Modelling methane emissions from remotely collected liveweight data and faecal near-infrared spectroscopy in beef cattle
L. A. González A C , E. Charmley B and B. K. Henry AA The University of Sydney, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
B CSIRO, Animal, Food and Health Sciences, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: Luciano.Gonzalez@sydney.edu.au
Animal Production Science 54(12) 1980-1987 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14615
Submitted: 2 June 2014 Accepted: 26 July 2014 Published: 30 September 2014
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to develop a model-data fusion approach using remotely collected liveweight (LW) data from individual animals (weighing station placed at the water trough) and evaluate the potential for these data from frequent weighing to increase the accuracy of estimates of methane emissions from beef cattle grazing tropical pastures. Remotely collected LW data were used to calculate daily LW change (LWC), i.e. growth rate on a daily basis, and then to predict feed intake throughout a 342-day grazing period. Feed intake and diet dry matter digestibility (DMD) from faecal near-infrared spectroscopy analysis were used to predict methane emissions using methods for both tropical and temperate cattle as used in the Australian national inventory (Commonwealth of Australia 2014). The remote weighing system captured both short- and long-term environmental (e.g. dry and wet season, and rainfall events) and management effects on LW changes, which were then reflected in estimated feed intake and methane emissions. Large variations in all variables, measured and predicted, were found both across animals and throughout the year. Methane predictions using the official national inventory model for tropical cattle resulted in 20% higher emissions than those for temperate cattle. Predicted methane emissions based on a simulation using only initial and final LW and assuming a linear change in LW between these two points were 7.5% and 5.8% lower than those using daily information on LW from the remote weighing stations for tropical and temperate cattle, respectively. Methane emissions and feed intake can be predicted from remotely collected LW data in near real-time on a daily basis to account for short- and long-term variations in forage quality and intake. This approach has the potential to provide accurate estimates of methane emissions at the individual animal level, making the approach suitable for grazing livestock enterprises wishing to participate in carbon markets and accounting schemes.
Additional keywords: feed intake, growth rate, livestock, tropical pastures.
References
Benchaar C, Rivest J, Pomar C, Chiquette J (1998) Prediction of methane production from dairy cows using existing mechanistic models and regression equations. Journal of Animal Science 76, 617–627.Blaxter KL, Clapperton JL (1965) Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. The British Journal of Nutrition 19, 511–522.
| Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF28XitFKktg%3D%3D&md5=cce47ad397fedf3bced4f69441c525dfCAS | 5852118PubMed |
Charmley E, Stephens ML, Kennedy PM (2008) Predicting livestock productivity and methane emissions in northern Australia: development of a bio-economic modelling approach. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 109–113.
| Predicting livestock productivity and methane emissions in northern Australia: development of a bio-economic modelling approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXovV2i&md5=2b5877cca68b4381554a90036b8a90cdCAS |
Brouwer E (1965) Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In ‘Energy metabolism’. EAAP Publication No. 11. pp. 441–443. (Academic Press: New York)
Coates DB (2004) Faecal NIRS–Technology for improving nutritional management of grazing cattle. Final report of Project NAP3.121. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney. Available at http://www.mla.com.au [Verified 29 August 2014]
Coates DB, Dixon RM (2011) Developing robust faecal near infrared spectroscopy calibrations to predict diet dry matter digestibility in cattle consuming tropical forages. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 19, 507–519.
| Developing robust faecal near infrared spectroscopy calibrations to predict diet dry matter digestibility in cattle consuming tropical forages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhvVKltrw%3D&md5=7440664c22c877fe626e30dda93fe86aCAS |
Commonwealth of Australia (2014) National inventory report 2012. Vol. 1. Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/6b894230-f15f-4a69-a50c-5577fecc8bc2/files/national-inventory-report-2012-vol1.pdf [Verified 17 May 2014]
CSIRO, Primary Industries Standing Committee (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Dixon RM, Coates DB (2010) Diet quality estimated with faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy and responses to N supplementation by cattle grazing buffel grass pastures. Animal Feed Science and Technology 158, 115–125.
| Diet quality estimated with faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy and responses to N supplementation by cattle grazing buffel grass pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXmvVSrsro%3D&md5=713cf7233e4f1985dc520348bd4155e9CAS |
Eilers PHC, Marx BD (1996) Flexible smoothing with B-Splines and penalties. Statistical Science 11, 89–121.
| Flexible smoothing with B-Splines and penalties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ellis JL, Kebreab E, Odongo NE, McBride BW, Okine EK, France J (2007) Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3456–3466.
| Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXntlCksLY%3D&md5=33ae06dfa51110ac12c0cbaac2378c1eCAS | 17582129PubMed |
Gaden B (2005) Final report, Project LIVE.120, Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney.
Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) ‘Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome)
González LA, Ramírez-Restrepo C, Coates D, Charmley E (2012) Predicting feed intake in growing beef cattle fed tropical forages. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Rangeland Society 17th biennial conference, 23–27 September 2012, Kununurra, WA’. Available at https://www.austrangesoc.com.au/userfiles/file/2012%20ARS%20Conference/Poster%204-2%20Luciano%20Gonzalezx.pdf
González LA, Bishop-Hurley G, Henry D, Charmley E (2014) Wireless sensor networks to study, monitor and manage cattle in grazing systems. Animal Production Science 54, 1687–1693.
| Wireless sensor networks to study, monitor and manage cattle in grazing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hristov AN, Oh J, Firkins JL, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Waghorn G, Makkar HPS, Adesogan AT, Yang W, Lee C, Gerber PJ, Henderson B, Tricarico JM (2013) Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science 91, 5045–5069.
| Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhslKktrrL&md5=4f67430a31a04d014f12be800c812ad3CAS | 24045497PubMed |
Hunter RA (2007) Methane production by cattle in the tropics. The British Journal of Nutrition 98, 657
| Methane production by cattle in the tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFKms7%2FO&md5=fd0f910ee583a68568a7619b7297ad7cCAS | 17896417PubMed |
IPCC (2006) ‘Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Vol. 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use.’ (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES): Hayama, Japan)
Kebreab E, Johnson KA, Archibeque SL, Pape D, Wirth T (2008) Model for estimating enteric methane emissions from United States dairy and feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2738–2748.
| Model for estimating enteric methane emissions from United States dairy and feedlot cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1ams7jF&md5=66b9a65973f3f6009753cf46a66e90f0CAS | 18539822PubMed |
Kennedy PM, Charmley E (2012) Methane yields from Brahman cattle fed tropical grasses and legumes. Animal Production Science 52, 225–239.
| Methane yields from Brahman cattle fed tropical grasses and legumes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XktFWgsL0%3D&md5=103a69cd99a37c57d64080ba67b0951fCAS |
Kurihara M, Magner T, Hunter RA, McCrabb GJ (1999) Methane production and energy partition of cattle in the tropics. The British Journal of Nutrition 81, 227–234.
Minson DJ, McDonald CK (1987) Estimating forage intake from the growth of beef cattle. Tropical Grasslands 21, 116–122.
NRC (2000) ‘National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ 7th revised edn. (National Academy Press: Washington, DC)
