A ‘protein bank’ of Lotus uliginosus cv. Maku as an alternative to conventional protein supplements for weaned lambs grazing on natural pastures during summer and autumn
L. Piaggio A , M. de J. Marichal B C and A. Pastorín BA Secretariado Uruguayo de la Lana. Área de Investigación y Desarrollo, Rbla. B. Brum 3764, 11800 Montevideo, Uruguay.
B Departamento de Producción Animal y Pasturas, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Garzón 780, 12900 Montevideo, Uruguay.
C Corresponding author. Email: mariadejesus.marichal@gmail.com
Animal Production Science 55(1) 27-30 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13324
Submitted: 20 September 2013 Accepted: 23 October 2013 Published: 13 January 2014
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of restricted grazing of an improved natural pasture as an alternative to conventional protein supplements for weaned lambs grazing natural pastures during summer–autumn. Two natural pastures that differed in dry matter allowances were used as basal diets. Sixty Corriedale lambs, 3 months old, were divided into 10 homogeneous groups. For each natural pasture, one group of lambs was randomly assigned to one of the following treatments (at 10 lambs/ha): continuous grazing (control); control + protein block (150 g/lamb. day); control + soybean meal (100 g/lamb. day); control + supplemental protein obtained from grazing for 3 h/day a natural pasture improved with Lotus uliginosus cv. Maku; or same as previous, except that grazing was allowed 1 in 3 days. Performance results (final bodyweight, average daily gain, and difference between initial and final body scores) were analysed as a completely randomised block design with subsampling. Lambs grazing 3 h/day or 1 in 3 days on improved pasture or supplemented with soybean meal showed better (P < 0.05) performance than non-supplemented lambs. Lambs consuming the protein block performed similarly (P > 0.05) to control lambs. The experiment demonstrated that feeding strategies using controlled grazing of natural pastures improved with lotus Maku or soybean meal supplementation are effective to achieve target growth rates of weaned lambs grazing natural pastures in summer–autumn.
Additional keywords: Lotus uliginosus cv. Maku, performance, protein block, protein supplementation, soybean meal.
References
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2007) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ 18th edn. (AOAC International: Washington, DC)Azzarini M (1991) El efecto de la alimentación durante la recría sobre el desempeño productivo posterior de hembras Corriedale. Producción Ovina 4, 39–54.
Borucki Castro SI, Phillip LE, Lapierre H, Jardon PW, Berthiaume R (2007) Ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of protein and amino acids in treated soybean meal products. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 810–822.
| Ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of protein and amino acids in treated soybean meal products.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s%2FjsFSrsw%3D%3D&md5=f7d0211ca965738ae3cff51a7c79a280CAS | 17235158PubMed |
Espinoza F, Araque C, León L, Quintana H, Perdomo E (2001) Effect of protein bank on utilization of grazing stargrass (Cynodon nlemfuensis) in lambs. Zootecnia Tropical 19, 307–318.
Fredericks F, Dixon RM, Holmes JHG, Egan AR (1986) Effects of daily or infrequent supplementation of weaner sheep.on liveweight change and wool growth. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 16, 207–210.
Formoso D, Oficialdegui R, Norbis R (2001) Producción y valor nutritivo del campo natural y mejoramientos extensivos In ‘Utilización y Manejo de mejoramientos extensivos con ovinos’. pp. 7–24 (Secretariado Uruguayo de la Lana: Montevideo)
Getu K, Mesfin D, Aemiro K, Getnet A (2012) Comparative evaluation of tree lucerne (Chamaecytisus palmensis) over conventional protein supplements in supporting growth of yearling Horro lambs [Online]. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 24, Article #8. Available at http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/1/getu24008.htm [verified 8 January 2014]
Jarrige R, Ruckebush Y, Demarquilly C, Farce M-H, Journet M (Eds) (1995) ‘Ruminant nutrition. Recommended allowances and feed tables.’ (INRA: Paris)
Jefferies BC (1961) Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32, 19–32.
National Research Council (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of small ruminants. Sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids.’ (National Academies Press: Washington, DC)
Piaggio L, del Pino L, Deschenaux H, Marichal M de J (2012) Soybean meal supplementation of lambs grazing native pastures in the summer-fall season. Journal of Animal Science 90, 138
Poli CHEC, Carvalho PCF, Monteiro ALG, Jochims F, David DB, Fernandes SR, Fischer V (2010) Sheep pasture management and feeding systems in the southern region of Brazil. In ‘An overview of research on pastoral-based systems in the southern part of South America’. (Eds CF Machado, M Wade, SC Silva, M Agnusdei, Carvalho PCF, S Morris, W Beskow) pp. 119–137. (Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires: Tandil, Argentina)
Quirama L, Echeverry Zuluaga JJ, Parra Suescún E (2011) Effect of the Lotus uliginosus cv. Maku regrowth age on the post-ruminal digestibility of the protein that can not be degraded in rumen. Revista Lasallista de Investigación 8, 42–49.
San Buenaventura A, Acasio RN, Manaig PM, Tolosa HS (2001) Performance of sheep with tree fodder supplementation. In ‘Forage Development in Southeast Asia: Strategies and Impacts. 7th Meeting of the Regional Working Group on Grazing and Feed Resources.’ (FAO: Rome) Available at http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/agpc/doc/Proceedings/manado/contents.htm [verified 2 December 2013]
SAS (2000) ‘SAS/STAT user’s guide.Version 8.2.’ (SAS Institute: Cary, NC)
Undersander D, Mertens DR, Thiex N (1993) ‘Forage analysis procedures.’ (National Forage Testing Association: Omaha, NE, USA) Available at http://www.foragetesting.org/files/LaboratoryProcedures.pdf [verified 2 December 2013]
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
| Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FnvVCltA%3D%3D&md5=1b837d0361716b7c813fff797a7701e0CAS | 1660498PubMed |