Nutritional management of group-housed gestating sows – key challenges in the transition from stall-housing systems
R. J. van BarneveldBarneveld Nutrition Pty Ltd, PO Box 4477, Loganholme DC, Qld 4129, Australia. Email: rob@barneveld.com.au
Animal Production Science 53(11) 1149-1155 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13277
Submitted: 16 July 2013 Accepted: 30 August 2013 Published: 18 September 2013
Abstract
Transition from gestation stalls to group-housing systems is a source of trepidation for many pork producers, given the capital cost of conversion and the challenges associated with managing sows in groups. Despite this, market imperatives in Australia have led to rapid transition in many enterprises. The cost of conversion of a 4100-sow unit from stalls to groups using low-cost retrofitting of existing breeder space (AU$150.00/sow) at relatively high densities (1.8 m2/sow) in small static groups (15–20 sows) based on floor or trough feeding with or without head bales and shoulder partitions equates to an additional cost of $3.00/piglet weaned if the level of productivity is maintained. If the number of piglets born per litter is increased by 1.04 piglets per litter, overall earnings of the herd are equal to levels achieved before the transition. This capital cost appears manageable if appropriate nutritional regimens are implemented to address individual nutritional needs of sows housed in groups and to manage aggression. Management of sow body condition during the reproductive cycle focussed on standardised gilt introduction to the breeding herd and optimisation of sow and gilt feed intake in lactation is pivotal, as it reduces the need for remedial feeding of individual sows post-weaning and during gestation. Nutritional management can also be used to reduce aggression between sows by removing impediments to feed access and by induction of satiety. Commercial implementation of these strategies confirms their relevance and demonstrates that sows can be cost-effectively managed in group-housing systems.
Additional keywords: aggression, gilt, lactation, productivity, pig, satiety.
References
Athorn RZ, Stott P, Bouwman EG, Edwards AC, Blackberry MA, Martin GB, Langendijk P (2013) Feeding level and dietary energy source have no effect on embryo survival in gilts, despite changes in systemic progesterone levels. Animal Production Science 53, 30–37.| Feeding level and dietary energy source have no effect on embryo survival in gilts, despite changes in systemic progesterone levels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhvVSkur%2FF&md5=891fc73beac58d6a45973a9ba0dfaf8fCAS |
Australian Pork Ltd (2012a) ‘Group housing case studies.’ (Australian Pork Ltd: Canberra, ACT)
Australian Pork Ltd (2012b) ‘Australian pig annual 2011–12.’ (Australian Pork Ltd: Canberra, ACT)
Australian Pork Ltd (2013a) ‘Shaping our future.’ (Australian Pork Ltd: Canberra, ACT)
Australian Pork Ltd (2013b) ‘Feeding pregnant sows in group-housing systems – an update.’ (Australian Pork Ltd: Canberra, ACT)
Ball RO, Samuel RS, Moehn S (2008) Nutrient requirements of prolific sows. Advances in Pork Production 19, 223–236.
Chapinai N, Ruiz-De-La-Torre JL, Cerisuelo A, Gasa J, Baucelis MD, Manteca X (2010) Behavior in two different group-housing systems for pregnant sows. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 13, 1–11.
Close WH, Cole DJA (2000) ‘Nutrition of sows and boars.’ (Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UK)
Cook PW (2004) ‘Concepts of data based management systems.’ (PrimePulse, Queensland Department of Primary Industries: Brisbane, Qld)
DeRouchey J, Tokach M (2013) ‘Group-housing systems: nutritional considerations.’ Pork Check Off #03647-3/13. (National Pork Board: Des Moines, IA)
Edwards SA, Taylor AG, Fowler VR (1991) Effects of high inclusion levels of sugar-beet pulp in diets for dry sows. Animal Production 52, 598
Hoving LL, Soede NM, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Graat EAM, Feitsma H, Kemp B (2011) An increased feed intake during early pregnancy improves sow body weight recovery and increases litter size in young sows. Journal of Animal Science 89, 3542–3550.
| An increased feed intake during early pregnancy improves sow body weight recovery and increases litter size in young sows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhsVSqsr3E&md5=305d04ea3e2319f8aacf0f002da52cecCAS | 21705632PubMed |
Kim SW, Hurley WL, Wu G, Ji F (2009) Ideal amino acid balance for sows during gestation and lactation. Journal of Animal Science 87, E123–E132.
| Ideal amino acid balance for sows during gestation and lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3mtVamtQ%3D%3D&md5=8aa389a4f6323aea34dd9b1fb6e00025CAS | 19098235PubMed |
Langendijk P, Chen TY (2013) Fibre in late gestation gilt diets, glucose tolerance, and feed intake and bodyweight loss during subsequent lactation. Animal Production Science 53, 18–22.
| Fibre in late gestation gilt diets, glucose tolerance, and feed intake and bodyweight loss during subsequent lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhvVSkur%2FE&md5=c0957344a9df28d45a74442741f8f7c0CAS |
Primary Industries Standing Committee (2008) ‘Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals – Pigs.’ 3rd edn. PISC Report No. 92. (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Vic.)
Revell DK, Williams IH, Mullan BP, Ranford JL, Smits RJ (1998) Body composition at farrowing and nutrition during lactation affect the performance of primiparous sows: 1. Voluntary feed intake, weight loss, and plasma metabolites. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1729–1737.
Salak-Johnson JL, Niekamp SR, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Ellis M, Curtis SE (2007) Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: Body condition, skin lesions, and performance. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1758–1769.
| Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: Body condition, skin lesions, and performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXntV2msb8%3D&md5=7d6ae41c33ddf65a5e122941fb04d3a7CAS | 17371790PubMed |
Seguin MJ, Barney D, Widowski TM (2006) Assessment of a group-housing system for gestating sows: Effects of space allowance and pen size on the incidence of superficial skin lesions, changes in body condition, and farrowing performance. Journal of Swine Health and Production 14, 89–96.
Smits RJ, Luxford BG, Mitchell M, Nottle MB (2013) Embryo survivial, but not first parity litter size, is increased when gilts are fed diets supplemented with omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil. Animal Production Science 53, 57–66.
| Embryo survivial, but not first parity litter size, is increased when gilts are fed diets supplemented with omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhvVSkur%2FK&md5=9888ec2e46cbd4e49fcaf23aef134fccCAS |
Sugiyama T, Kusuhara S, Chung TK, Yonekura H, Azem E, Hayakawa T (2013) Effects of 25-hydroxy-cholecalciferol on the development of osteochondrosis in swine. Animal Science Journal 84, 341–349.
| Effects of 25-hydroxy-cholecalciferol on the development of osteochondrosis in swine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtVWms7zN&md5=e5ae8772aefbe69819624fa6e447b745CAS | 23590509PubMed |
van Barneveld RJ, Brooke G, Vandepeer ME (2007) Management of fibre consumption to optimize performance of growing pigs and sows. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 16, 11–19.
van Wettere WHEJ, Smits RJ, Hughes PE (2013) Methyl donor supplementation of gestating sow diets improves pregnancy outcomes and litter size. Animal Production Science 53, 1–7.
| Methyl donor supplementation of gestating sow diets improves pregnancy outcomes and litter size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhvVSkurzP&md5=e7d3c853a52beaafbffafeca7569af12CAS |
Willis SA (2007) Group Demonstration Award – Providing chilled drinking water to lactating sows using a modified milk vat. Australian Pork Ltd Research Database. Australian Pork Ltd, Canberra. Available at http://www.australianpork.com.au/pages/researchdb_details.asp?id=265 [Verified 2 September 2013]
Young MG, Tokach MD, Aherne FX, Main RG, Dritz SS, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL (2004) Comparison of three methods of feeding sows in gestation and the subsequent effects on lactation performance. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3058–3070.
