Genomic selection for female reproduction in Australian tropically adapted beef cattle
Y. D. Zhang A B F , D. J. Johnston A B , S. Bolormaa A C , R. J. Hawken A D E and B. Tier A BA Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies.
B Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit,1 University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C Victorian Department of Primary Industries, Bundoora, Vic. 3083, Australia.
D CSIRO Livestock Industries, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, Brisbane, Qld 4067, Australia.
E Present address: Cobb-Vantress, Siloam Springs, Arkansas, 72762, USA.
F Corresponding author. Email: yzhang4@une.edu.au
Animal Production Science 54(1) 16-24 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13016
Submitted: 17 January 2013 Accepted: 7 May 2013 Published: 20 August 2013
Abstract
The usefulness of genomic selection was assessed for female reproduction in tropically adapted breeds in northern Australia. Records from experimental populations of Brahman (996) and Tropical Composite (1097) cattle that had had six calving opportunities were used to derive genomic predictions for several measures of female fertility. These measures included age at first corpus luteum (AGECL), at first calving and subsequent postpartum anoestrous interval and measures of early and lifetime numbers of calves born or weaned. In a second population, data on pregnancy and following status (anoestrous or pregnancy) were collected from 27 commercial herds from northern Australia to validate genomic predictions. Cows were genotyped with a variety of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels and, where necessary, genotypes imputed to the highest density (729 068 SNPs). Genetic parameters of subsets of the complete data were estimated. These subsets were used to validate genomic predictions using genomic best linear unbiased prediction using both univariate cross-validation and bivariate analyses. Estimated heritability ranged from 0.56 for AGECL to 0.03 for lifetime average calving rate in the experimental cows, and from 0.09 to 0.25 for early life reproduction traits in the commercial cows. Accuracies of predictions were generally low, reflecting the limited number of data in the experimental populations. For AGECL and postpartum anoestrous interval, the highest accuracy was 0.35 for experimental Brahman cows using five-fold univariate cross-validation. Greater genetic complexity in the Tropical Composite cows resulted in the corresponding accuracy of 0.23 for AGECL. Similar level of accuracies (from univariate and bivariate analyses) were found for some of the early measures of female reproduction in commercial cows, indicating that there is potential for genomic selection but it is limited by the number of animals with phenotypes.
References
Barwick SA, Wolcott ML, Johnston DJ, Burrow HM, Sullivan MT (2009) Genetics of steer daily and residual feed intake in two tropical beef genotypes, and relationships among intake, body composition, growth and other post-weaning measures. Animal Production Science 49, 351–366.| Genetics of steer daily and residual feed intake in two tropical beef genotypes, and relationships among intake, body composition, growth and other post-weaning measures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXotFOgtrc%3D&md5=d8bc7838d05e31202598bec42ed148d7CAS |
Bolormaa S, Pryce JE, Kemper K, Savin K, Hayes BJ, Barendse W, Zhang Y, Reich C, Mason B, Bunch RJ, Harrison BE, Reverter A, Herd RM, Tier B, Goddard ME (2013) Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake, carcass traits and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus and composite beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3088–3104.
| Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake, carcass traits and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus and composite beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23658330PubMed |
Browning SR, Browning BL (2007) Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing data inference for whole genome association studies using localized haplotype clustering. American Journal of Human Genetics 81, 1084–1097.
| Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing data inference for whole genome association studies using localized haplotype clustering.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXht1KmsL3M&md5=27d443efa1beae518ffdcd981232d323CAS | 17924348PubMed |
Browning BL, Browning SR (2009) A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. American Journal of Human Genetics 84, 210–223.
| A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXisFCrtL8%3D&md5=e29e171b504de9b30094d4e5c8ef783aCAS | 19200528PubMed |
Burrow HM, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Holroyd RG, Barendse W, Thompson JM, Griffith GR, Sullivan M (2003) Relationships between carcass and beef quality and components of herd profitability in northern Australia. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 359–362.
de Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman R, Goddard ME (2008) Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics 179, 1503–1512.
| Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cvmsFeltw%3D%3D&md5=bc29bac9895b8b4f04452ea96b2fa09cCAS |
Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, Reich M, Mason BA, Goddard ME (2012) Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 4114–4129.
| Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XoslGqt74%3D&md5=2c20e3f7aefd51731ca7780e049baccbCAS | 22720968PubMed |
Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ‘ASReml user guide release 3.0.’ (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
Goddard M (2009) Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136, 245–257.
| Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18704696PubMed |
Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM (2007) The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177, 2389–2397.
Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried FR, Lichtner P, Thaller G (2010) The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 42, 5–16.
| The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20170500PubMed |
Hawken RJ, Zhang YD, Fortes MRS, Collis E, Barris WC, Corbet NJ, Williams PJ, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Walkley JRW, Barendse W, Johnston DJ, Prayaga KC, Tier B, Reverter A, Lehnert SA (2012) Genome-wide association studies of female reproduction in tropically adapted beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1398–1410.
| Genome-wide association studies of female reproduction in tropically adapted beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xns1eis7w%3D&md5=26fe31d2cf3508e453939dacb1436dd2CAS | 22100599PubMed |
Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AC, Verbyla K, Goddard ME (2009a) Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 41, 51–59.
| Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19930712PubMed |
Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AC, Goddard ME (2009b) Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 433–443.
| Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXit1Kju7s%3D&md5=b2f90cdddbfb0818c5b7ed37a5b336f3CAS | 19164653PubMed |
Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Corbet NJ, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Williams PJ, Burrow HM (2009) Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer- and steer-production traits. Animal Production Science 49, 399–412.
| Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer- and steer-production traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG (2010) Understanding the genetics of lactation anoestrus in Brahman beef cattle to enhance genetic evaluation of female reproductive traits. In ‘9th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production’. (CD-ROM) Article no. 0923.
Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Williams PJ, Corbet NJ (2014) Genetics of early and lifetime annual reproductive performance in cows of two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia. Animal Production Science 54, 1–15.
| Genetics of early and lifetime annual reproductive performance in cows of two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meyer K (2007) WOMBAT – A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by REML. Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B. 8, 815–821.
| WOMBAT – A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by REML.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17973343PubMed |
Moser G, Tier B, Crump RE, Khatkar MS, Raadsma HW (2009) A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 41, 56–81.
| A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20043835PubMed |
Pryce JE, Arias J, Bowman PJ, Davis SR, Macdonald KA, Waghorn GC, Wales WJ, Williams YJ, Spelman RJ, Hayes BJ (2012) Accuracy of genomic predictions of residual feed intake and 250 day bodyweight in growing heifers using 625,000 SNP markers. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 2108–2119.
| Accuracy of genomic predictions of residual feed intake and 250 day bodyweight in growing heifers using 625,000 SNP markers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XkslejtLg%3D&md5=2dd0a6d745b1ac544d77eb1d5d41b36cCAS | 22459856PubMed |
Taylor WJ, Rudder TH (1986) New ways to maximise returns from Queensland beef. Proceedings of Australian Society of Animal Production 16, 379–382.
VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS (2009) Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 16–24.
| Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXlsVOrsw%3D%3D&md5=cd99aa80d881c0faef510dc53c1ad49aCAS | 19109259PubMed |
Verbyla KL, Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME (2009) Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Genetical Research 91, 307–311.
| Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weber KL, Thallman RM, Keele JW, Snelling WM, Bennett GL, Smith TP, McDaneld TG, Allan MF, Van Eenennaam AL, Kuehn LA (2012) Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes. Journal of Animal Science 90, 4177–4190.
| Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXns1Snug%3D%3D&md5=a123ac5e785e0fc7434a00d14cb7ee13CAS | 22767091PubMed |
Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy NP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, Madden PA, Heath AC, Martin NG, Montgomery GW, Goddard ME, Visscher PM (2010) Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nature Genetics 42, 565–569.
| Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXns1GisL8%3D&md5=5126214cdad5fa515ace5770a35cae37CAS | 20562875PubMed |
Zhang YD, Tier B, Hawken H (2011) Genetic parameters of post-partum reproductive status in beef cattle from Northern Australia. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 19, 67–70.
