Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Repeatability and frequency of in-paddock sheep walk-over weights: implications for flock-based management

D. J. Brown A B C D , D. B. Savage C and G. N. Hinch C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Cooperative Research Centre for Sheep Industry Innovation, Australia.

B Holmes Sackett, 34–36 Fitzmaurice Street, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.

C School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: davidb@holmessackett.com.au

Animal Production Science 54(5) 582-586 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12402
Submitted: 19 November 2012  Accepted: 28 May 2013   Published: 17 July 2013

Abstract

The ability to monitor average liveweight of a sheep flock provides livestock managers the opportunity to nutritionally manage their flock for higher productivity. Mob-based walk-over weighing (MBWOW) is a remote weighing concept for sheep flocks whereby liveweights are collected as the animals pass freely over a strategically placed weighing platform. We tested the hypothesis that the repeatability and frequency of MBWOW data are sufficient to generate sheep flock average liveweight estimates with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of <2 kg over a 5-day time period. These criteria were considered reasonable, in terms of accuracy and timeliness, for application in a commercial context. Radio frequency-identified WOW data were obtained from four sheep flocks in south-eastern New South Wales, representing a mix of age and breeds, as sheep traversed a remote weighing platform to and from some form of incentive. The repeatability and frequency of three forms of radio frequency-identified WOW data, being raw (unfiltered), course-filtered (filtered to remove all sheep weights outside the flock weight range) and fine-filtered (filtered to remove all sheep weights outside a 25% range of a recent flock average reference weight), were used in a simulation to test the 95% CI of 1- and 5-day MBWOW liveweight capture periods (samples). All data-filtering approaches over a 5-day sample generated flock average liveweight estimates with 95% CI of <2 kg, thus meeting the hypothesis criteria. One-day samples generated flock average liveweight estimates with 95% CI of >2 kg and data filtering, although reducing the 95% CI, did not bring it below the hypothesis criteria. Thus, when the appropriate data handling technique is used, MBWOW may provide information suitable for sheep management decision-making in a commercial context.

Additional keywords: confidence intervals, MBWOW, mob-based walk-over weighing, weighing systems.


References

Brown DJ, Savage DB, Hinch GN, Semple SJ (2012) Mob-based walk-over weights: similar to the average of individual static weights? Animal Production Science 52, 613–618.
Mob-based walk-over weights: similar to the average of individual static weights?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown DJ, Savage DB, Hinch GN (2013) The repeatability and frequency of in-paddock sheep walk-over weights: implications for individual animal management. Animal Production Science
The repeatability and frequency of in-paddock sheep walk-over weights: implications for individual animal management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | in press.

Lee GL, Sladek MA, Atkins KD, Semple SJ (2008) Variance components of liveweights of pregnant ewes measured by manual or remote methods, with and without processing by data screening. In ‘Proceedings from the conference of the Australian Society of Animal Production’. (Eds DG Barber, AR Cowan, AR Anstis) p. 22. (University of Queensland: Brisbane)

Morris JE, Cronin GM, Bush RD (2012) Improving sheep production and welfare in extensive systems through precision sheep management. Animal Production Science 52, 665–670.

Richards JS, Atkins KD, Thompson T, Murray WK (2006). Data from walk-over weighing – where are we at? In ‘Proceedings from the Australian Society of Animal Production 26th biennial conference’. (Eds NR Adams, KP Croker, DR Lindsay, C Anderson, L Webb) Short Communication 32. (University of Western Australia: Crawley)

Statgraphics (2009). ‘STATGRAPHICS centurion (version XVI) [software].’ (StatPoint Technologies: Warrenton, VA)

Trompf JP, Thompson AN, Gordon DJ, Dunstan M, Kildey L (2009) ‘Lifetime ewe management: a program for producers.’ (Rural Skills Training, Department of Primary Industries: Hamilton, Vic.)