A diagnostic method for gander selection in Zi geese (Anser cygnoides L.) and Rhin geese (Anser anser L.) using massage reaction and semen quality
S. J. Liu A C , J. L. Li C and H. Li A B DA Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang province, Harbin 150030, People’s Republic of China.
B College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, People’s Republic of China.
C College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqin 163319, People’s Republic of China.
D Corresponding author. Email: lihui@neau.edu.cn
Animal Production Science 54(5) 569-573 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12387
Submitted: 6 November 2012 Accepted: 19 March 2013 Published: 15 May 2013
Abstract
The objective of this study was to score reactions to artificial semen collection procedures and to develop an efficient method for gander selection in two original geese breeds. One-hundred and three Zi geese and 110 Rhin geese were used. Gander reaction scores to massage and semen quality parameters were investigated in 10 Zi and 10 Rhin ganders during a complete reproductive season. The relationships between average gander massage reaction score and semen quality were evaluated. After natural mating, egg fertility comparison between Zi ganders selected by massage reaction scores and those not subjected to selection were investigated. Ganders exhibited large variations in artificial semen collection and semen characteristics between breeds. Only 30.1% (31/103) of Zi geese and 46.3% (51/110) of Rhin geese had stable positive massage reactions with semen ejaculation (P < 0.05). Average massage reaction score, ejaculate volume, spermatozoa concentration, sperm motility and semen quality factor for single ejaculate were significantly higher in Zi than in Rhin geese. There was a high correlation between average massage reaction score and semen volume, being 0.87 for Zi geese (P < 0.05) and 0.82 for Rhin (P < 0.05), and this correlation enabled pre-selection of ganders at the beginning of the breeding season. Reproductive efficiency could be improved with massage-selected ganders in natural breeding flocks. Examination of gander massage reaction scores combined with laboratory assessment of semen quality early in the breeding season is a feasible method for predicting fertilising capability of ganders.
References
Bakst MR, Cecil HC (1997) Sperm motility and metabolism. In ‘Techniques for semen evaluation, semen storage, and fertility determination’. (Ed. AN Mester) pp. 46–47. (Poultry Science Association, Inc.: Savoy, IL)Bilcik B, Estevez I (2005) Impact of male–male competition and morphological traits on mating strategies and reproductive success in broiler breeders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, 307–323.
Burke WH, Mauldin JM (1985) Reproductive characteristics of broiler breeder males from flocks with low fertility. Poultry Science 64, 73
Burrows WH, Quinn JP (1937) The collection of the spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poultry Science 16, 19–24.
| The collection of the spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chelmonska B, Łukaszewicz E (1995) Current state and future of artificial insemination in waterfowl. In ‘Proceedings of the 10th European symposium on waterfowl’. (Ed. H Lardinois) pp. 225–240. (World’s Poultry Association: Halle, Germany)
Chelmonska B (1972) Seasonal changes in ganders’ reproductive organs in artificial insemination aspect. Part II Polskie Archiwum Weterynaryjne 15, 575–611.
Cheng FP, Guo TJ, Wu JT, Lin TE, Ursem PJ, Colenbrander B, Fung HP (2002) Annual variation in semen characteristics of pigeons. Poultry Science 81, 1050–1056.
Donoghue AM (1999) Prospective approaches to avoid flock fertility problem: predictive assessment of sperm function traits in poultry. Poultry Science 78, 437–443.
FAOSTAT (2010) Faostat. Available at http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx [Verified 14 April 2013]
Grunder AA, Pawluczuk B (1991) Comparison of procedures for collecting semen from gander and inseminating geese. Poultry Science 70, 1975–1980.
| Comparison of procedures for collecting semen from gander and inseminating geese.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK387ktFSksQ%3D%3D&md5=451335904331081a071d648475ec720eCAS | 1780267PubMed |
Jones M, Mench JA (1991) Behavioral correlates of male mating success in a multisire hock as determined by DNA fingerprinting. Poultry Science 70, 1493–1498.
| Behavioral correlates of male mating success in a multisire hock as determined by DNA fingerprinting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3MzmtVCrtg%3D%3D&md5=d8c77674eeec054cf7d19b9c8dfc33feCAS | 1886859PubMed |
Lee YP, Lee SL, Ho YJ, Chen TL (1999) Behavioural responses of cockerels to semen collection and their influence on semen characteristics. British Poultry Science 403, 317–322.
Liu WX, Wang JW, Huang P, Wang L, Zeng FT (2002) Study on the histological features of the testes and the testosterone level in blood plasma of the male geese with abnormal penis. Chinese Journal of Animal Science 19, 11–13.
Liu SJ, Yang HM, Zhou RJ (2005) Performance observation and crossbreeding for Zi goose. In ‘The 3rd world waterfowl conference’. (Ed. XQ Zhang) pp. 239–241. (World Poultry Science Association China Branch of WPSA: Guangzhou, China)
Liu SJ, Zhen JX, Yang N (2008) Semen quality factor as an indicator of fertilizing ability for geese. Poultry Science 87, 155–159.
| Semen quality factor as an indicator of fertilizing ability for geese.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVClurk%3D&md5=b750a6c118b63d9773b3994c1172b089CAS | 18079465PubMed |
Łukaszewicz E (2010) Artificial insemination in geese. World’s Poultry Science Journal 66, 647–658.
| Artificial insemination in geese.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Łukaszewicz E, Kruszynski W (2003) Evaluation of fresh and frozen-thawed semen of individual ganders by assessment of spermatozoa motility and morphology. Theriogenology 59, 1627–1640.
| Evaluation of fresh and frozen-thawed semen of individual ganders by assessment of spermatozoa motility and morphology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12559467PubMed |
Mellor S (2001) Selecting males by sperm quality. World Poultry 17, 32–34.
Møller AP, Ninni P (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 6, 345–358.
Parker HM, McDaniel CD (2002) Selection of young broiler breeders for semen quality improves hatchability in an industry field trial. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 11, 250–259.
Pawluczuk B, Grunder AA (1989) Comparison of three methods of collecting semen from ganders. Poultry Science 68, 1714–1717.
| Comparison of three methods of collecting semen from ganders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Perek M (1966) Fertility in the male in relation to natural and artificial insemination. In ‘Physiology of the domestic fowl’. (Eds C Horton-Smith, EC Amoroso) pp. 44–51. (Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh)
Svetlik IS, Weis J (2004) Gander ejaculates monitoring during reproductive season. Zootehnie si Biotehnologii 67, 259–261.
Wezyk S (2005) World advances in research and production of waterfowl. In ‘The 3rd world waterfowl conference’. (Ed. XQ Zhang) pp. 30–38. (World Poultry Science Association China Branch of WPSA: Guangzhou, China)
Wilson HR, Piesco NP, Miller ER, Nesbeth WG (1979) Prediction of the fertility potential of broiler breeder males. World’s Poultry Science Journal 35, 95–118.
| Prediction of the fertility potential of broiler breeder males.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wishart GJ, Staines HJ, Steele MG (1992) A method for predicting infertility in naturally-mated chickens and demonstration of gross variation in sperm transfer efficiency. In ‘Proceedings of the 19th world poultry congress’. (Ed. MG Steele) pp. 631–634. (World’s Poultry Science Association: Amersterdam)
Zheng SY, Guo GW, Zhang SJ, Jiang YD, Lin QL (1986) Effect of different gander selection methods on reproductive efficiency and economic benefit in Taihu geese. China Poultry 1, 39–41.
