Increasing home-grown forage consumption and profit in non-irrigated dairy systems. 3. Intake, milk production and composition, bodyweight and body condition score
J. Hill A , D. F. Chapman B C , J. Tharmaraj C , J. L. Jacobs D and B. R. Cullen C E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Ternes Agricultural Consulting, Upwey, Vic. 3158, Australia.
B DairyNZ, PO Box 160, Lincoln University, 7647, New Zealand.
C Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, Melbourne School of Land and Environment, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
D Department of Primary Industries, 78 Henna Street, Warrnambool, Vic. 3280, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: bcullen@unimelb.edu.au
Animal Production Science 54(3) 247-255 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12298
Submitted: 22 August 2012 Accepted: 26 April 2013 Published: 16 January 2014
Abstract
This paper reports the performance [intake, milk production, bodyweight and body condition score (BCS)] of cows managed under two feeding systems over 4 years (June 2005–May 2009) in south-west Victoria, Australia. The feeding systems were ‘Ryegrass Max’ (RM) a well managed perennial ryegrass pasture-based system stocked at 2.2 cows/ha, and a ‘Complementary Forage’ (CF) system based on perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and a double crop of winter-sown cereal and summer-sown brassica crops stocked at 2.82 cows/ha. There were no significant differences in milk production per lactation between feeding systems, with an average of 543 and 553 kg milk solids per cow (1246 and 1642 kg milk solids per ha) produced in the RM and CF systems, respectively. These production levels were 20.9 and 10.8% above pre-experimental model targets, respectively. The bodyweight and BCS of multiparous cows were not significantly different between the two feeding systems; however, bodyweight of heifers in early lactation declined more rapidly in the CF compared with RM feeding system. Over the 4-year study in the RM system pasture comprised 60% of total DM consumed (grazed + conserved), with 26% of the ration being concentrate and the balance being purchased hay supplements. In the CF system, home-grown forage contributed 57.9% of total DM consumed of which 46.6% was pasture (grazed + conserved) and 11.3% was from the double cropping system. These levels of home-grown forage consumption were lower than those predicted by the pre-experimental modelling, leading to higher than predicted levels of purchased concentrates and conserved forages being fed. The lower than expected levels of consumption of the forages produced in the double cropping system reflected both the low intake potential and moderate nutritive value of cereal silage, and the failure of establishment and subsequent low DM yields from the summer brassica crop. Further work is required to determine the risk of implementing CF in rain-fed dairy systems reflecting uncertainties in forage management planning and nutrient delivery to support high levels of milk production.
References
AFRC (1993) ‘Energy and protein requirements of ruminants.’ (Agricultural and Food Research Council, CAB International: Wallingford, UK)AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists International) (2000) ‘Official methods of analysis of AOAC International.’ (AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD)
Chapman DF, Kenny SN, Beca D, Johnson IR (2008a) Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 1. Physical production and economic performance. Agricultural Systems 97, 108–125.
| Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 1. Physical production and economic performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman DF, Kenny SN, Beca D, Johnson IR (2008b) Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 2. Inter-annual variation in forage supply, and business risk. Agricultural Systems 97, 126–138.
| Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 2. Inter-annual variation in forage supply, and business risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman DF, Cullen BR, Johnson IR, Beca D (2009) Interannual variation in pasture growth rate in Australian and New Zealand dairy regions and its consequences for systems management. Animal Production Science 49, 1071–1079.
| Interannual variation in pasture growth rate in Australian and New Zealand dairy regions and its consequences for systems management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman DF, Hill J, Tharmaraj J, Beca D, Kenny SN, Jacobs JL (2014) Increasing home-grown forage consumption and profit in non-irrigated dairy systems. 1. Rationale, systems design and management. Animal Production Science 54, 221–233.
| Increasing home-grown forage consumption and profit in non-irrigated dairy systems. 1. Rationale, systems design and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clarke T, Flinn PC, McGowan AA (1982) Low-cost pepsin-cellulase assays for prediction of digestibility of herbage. Grass and Forage Science 37, 147–150.
| Low-cost pepsin-cellulase assays for prediction of digestibility of herbage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Doyle PT, Stockdale CR, Lawson AR, Cohen DC (2000) ‘Pastures for dairy production in Victoria.’ (Department of Natural Resources and Environment: Kyabram)
Earle D (1976) A guide to scoring dairy cow condition. Journal of Agriculture Victoria 74, 228–231.
Enevoldsen C, Kristensen T (1997) Estimation of body weight from body size measurements and body condition scores in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1988–1995.
| Estimation of body weight from body size measurements and body condition scores in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2svlvVeiuw%3D%3D&md5=94c8f0f7151142fcf0e20e6600d30524CAS | 9313139PubMed |
García SC, Fulkerson WJ (2005) Opportunities for future Australian dairy systems: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1041–1055.
| Opportunities for future Australian dairy systems: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Genstat (2007) ‘Genstat.’ 10th edn. (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
Hill J (2007) Integration of complementary forages into pasture-based systems: animal response. In ‘Meeting the challenges for pasture-based dairying. Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian dairy science symposium’. (Eds DF Chapman, DA Clark, KL MacMillan, DP Nation) pp. 275–292. (National Dairy Alliance: Melbourne)
Horan B, Dillon P, Berry DP, O’Connor P, Rath M (2005a) The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian, feeding system and parity on lactation curves characteristics of spring-calving dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 95, 231–241.
| The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian, feeding system and parity on lactation curves characteristics of spring-calving dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Horan B, Dillon P, Faverdin P, Delaby L, Buckley F, Rath M (2005b) The interaction of strain of Holstein-Friesian cows and pasture-based feed systems on milk yield, bodyweight and body condition score. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1231–1243.
| The interaction of strain of Holstein-Friesian cows and pasture-based feed systems on milk yield, bodyweight and body condition score.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXitFygurg%3D&md5=c0a08cb8872d0d1c4313d09550ca3a1aCAS | 15738257PubMed |
Jacobs JL, Ward GN, McDowell AM, Kearney GA (2001) A survey on the effect of establishment techniques, crop management, moisture availability and soil type on turnip dry matter yields and nutritive characteristics in western Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 743–751.
| A survey on the effect of establishment techniques, crop management, moisture availability and soil type on turnip dry matter yields and nutritive characteristics in western Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jacobs JL, Hill J, Jenkin T (2009a) Effect of stage of growth and silage additives on whole crop cereal silage nutritive value and fermentation characteristics. Animal Production Science 49, 595–607.
| Effect of stage of growth and silage additives on whole crop cereal silage nutritive value and fermentation characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXntVGktbw%3D&md5=af5cdd3c530858681ea2f50555d10e0dCAS |
Jacobs JL, Hill J, Jenkin T (2009b) Effect of different grazing strategies on dry matter yields and nutritive characteristics of whole crop cereals. Animal Production Science 49, 608–618.
| Effect of different grazing strategies on dry matter yields and nutritive characteristics of whole crop cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kay JK, Phyn CVC, Roche JR, Kolver ES (2009) Extending lactation in pasture-based dairy cows. II: Effect of genetic strain and diet on plasma hormone and metabolite concentrations. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 3704–3713.
| Extending lactation in pasture-based dairy cows. II: Effect of genetic strain and diet on plasma hormone and metabolite concentrations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXptVWkurw%3D&md5=c008b5b2a3f7e3cc38208583cf0d6b46CAS | 19620652PubMed |
Kennedy J, Dillon P, Delaby L, Faverdin P, Stakelum G, Rath M (2003) Effect of genetic merit and concentrate supplementation on grass intake and milk production with Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 610–621.
| Effect of genetic merit and concentrate supplementation on grass intake and milk production with Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhslClt74%3D&md5=5e869de3781f05182f8c44ef24af4206CAS | 12647967PubMed |
McCarthy S, Berry DP, Dillon P, Rath M, Horan B (2007) Influence of Holstein-Friesian strain and feed system on body weight and body condition score lactation profiles. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1859–1869.
| Influence of Holstein-Friesian strain and feed system on body weight and body condition score lactation profiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjs1ahs7c%3D&md5=6cb4a6126030fcd9ee9c8ce36fe2c157CAS | 17369227PubMed |
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food (1990) ‘UK tables of nutritive value and chemical composition of feeding stuffs.’ (Eds DI Givens, JR Hopkins, CA Morgan, MH Shanks, JH Topps, J Wiseman) (Rowett Research Services Ltd: Aberdeen, UK)
Nie ZN, Chapman DF, Tharmaraj J, Clements R (2004a) Effects of pasture species mixture, management and environment on the productivity and persistence of dairy pastures in south west Victoria. 1. Herbage accumulation and seasonal growth pattern. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 625–636.
| Effects of pasture species mixture, management and environment on the productivity and persistence of dairy pastures in south west Victoria. 1. Herbage accumulation and seasonal growth pattern.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nie ZN, Chapman DF, Tharmaraj J, Clements R (2004b) Effects of pasture species mixture, management and environment on the productivity and persistence of dairy pastures in south west Victoria. 2. Plant population density and persistence. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 637–643.
| Effects of pasture species mixture, management and environment on the productivity and persistence of dairy pastures in south west Victoria. 2. Plant population density and persistence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pethick DW, Harper GS, Dunshea FR (2005) Fat metabolism and turnover. In ‘Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism’. 2nd edn. (Eds J Dijkstra, JM Forbes, J France) pp. 345–372. (CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK)
PISC (Primary Industries Standing Committee) (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Roche JR (2007) Milk production responses to pre- and postcalving dry matter intake in grazing dairy cows. Livestock Science 110, 12–24.
| Milk production responses to pre- and postcalving dry matter intake in grazing dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stockdale CR, King KR (1983) A comparison of two techniques used to estimate the herbage intake of lactating cows in a grazing experiment. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 100, 227–230.
| A comparison of two techniques used to estimate the herbage intake of lactating cows in a grazing experiment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tharmaraj J, Chapman DF, Hill J, Jacobs JL, Cullen BR (2014) Increasing home-grown forage consumption and profit in non-irrigated dairy systems. 2. Forage harvested. Animal Production Science 54, 234–246.
| Increasing home-grown forage consumption and profit in non-irrigated dairy systems. 2. Forage harvested.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thorrold B, Doyle P (2007) Nature or nurture – forces shaping the current and future state of dairy farming in New Zealand and Australia. In ‘Proceedings of Meeting the Challenges for Pasture-Based Dairying’. (Eds DF Chapman, DA Clark, KL MacMillan, DP Nation) pp. 450–460. (National Dairy Alliance: Melbourne)
Tyrrell HF, Reid JT (1965) Prediction of energy value of cow’s milk. Journal of Dairy Science 48, 1215–1223.
| Prediction of energy value of cow’s milk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF28%2FktVOjtA%3D%3D&md5=1ed2c5d3144d550b2f27fd90ea9f45d1CAS | 5843077PubMed |
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
| Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FnvVCltA%3D%3D&md5=1b837d0361716b7c813fff797a7701e0CAS | 1660498PubMed |
