Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The influence of diet type (dairy versus intensive fattening) on the effectiveness of garlic oil and cinnamaldehyde to manipulate in vitro ruminal fermentation and methane production

I. Mateos A , M. J. Ranilla A B , M. L. Tejido B , C. Saro A , C. Kamel A C and M. D. Carro A B D E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain.

B Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-ULE), Finca Marzanas s/n 24346 Grulleros, León, Spain.

C Deceased.

D Present address: Departamento de Producción Animal, ETSI Agrónomos, Ciudad Universitaria, s/n Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

E Corresponding author. Email: mariadolores.carro@upm.es

Animal Production Science 53(4) 299-307 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12167
Submitted: 16 May 2012  Accepted: 27 September 2012   Published: 23 January 2013

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of increasing doses [0 (control: CON), 20, 60, 180 and 540 mg/L incubation medium] of garlic oil (GO) and cinnamaldehyde (CIN) on in vitro ruminal fermentation of two diets. Batch cultures of mixed ruminal microorganisms were inoculated with ruminal fluid from four sheep fed a medium-concentrate diet (MC; 50 : 50 alfalfa hay : concentrate) or four sheep fed a high-concentrate diet (HC; 15 : 85 barley straw : concentrate). Diets MC and HC were representative of those fed to dairy and fattening ruminants, respectively. Samples of each diet were used as incubation substrates for the corresponding inoculum, and the incubation was repeated on 4 different days (four replicates per experimental treatment). There were GO × diet-type and CIN × diet-type interactions (P < 0.001–0.05) for many of the parameters determined, indicating different effects of both oils depending on the diet type. In general, effects of GO were more pronounced for MC compared with HC diet. Supplementation of GO did not affect (P > 0.05) total volatile fatty acid (VFA) production at any dose. For MC diet, GO at 60, 180 and 540 mg/L decreased (P < 0.05) molar proportion of acetate (608, 569 and 547 mmol/mol total VFA, respectively), and increased (P < 0.05) propionate proportion (233, 256 and 268 mmol/mol total VFA, respectively), compared with CON values (629 and 215 mmol/mol total VFA for acetate and propionate, respectively). A minimum dose of 180 mg of GO/L was required to produce similar modifications in acetate and propionate proportions with HC diet, but no effects (P > 0.05) on butyrate proportion were detected. Methane/VFA ratio was reduced (P < 0.05) by GO at 60, 180 and 540 mg/L for MC diet (0.23, 0.16 and 0.10 mol/mol, respectively), and by GO at 20, 60, 180 and 540 mg/L for HC diet (0.19, 0.19, 0.16 and 0.08 mol/mol, respectively), compared with CON (0.26 and 0.21 mol/mol for MC and HC diets, respectively). No effects (P = 0.16–0.85) of GO on final pH and concentrations of NH3-N and lactate were detected. For both diet types, the highest CIN dose decreased (P < 0.05) production of total VFA, gas and methane, which would indicate an inhibition of fermentation. Compared with CON, CIN at 180 mg/L increased (P < 0.05) acetate proportion for the MC (629 and 644 mmol/mol total VFA for CON and CIN, respectively) and HC (525 and 540 mmol/mol total VFA, respectively) diets, without affecting the proportions of any other VFA or total VFA production. Whereas for MC diet CIN at 60 and 180 mg/L decreased (P < 0.05) NH3-N concentrations compared with CON, only a trend (P < 0.10) was observed for CIN at 180 mg/L with the HC diet. Supplementation of CIN up to 180 mg/L did not affect (P = 0.18–0.99) lactate concentrations and production of gas and methane for any diet. The results show that effectiveness of GO and CIN to modify ruminal fermentation may depend on diet type, which would have practical implications if they are confirmed in vivo.


References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1999) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ 16th edn. 5th revision. (AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD)

Benchaar C, Chaves AV, Fraser GR, Wang Y, Beauchemin KA, McAllister TA (2007) Effects of essential oils and their components on in vitro rumen microbial fermentation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 87, 413–419.
Effects of essential oils and their components on in vitro rumen microbial fermentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVSrsbnJ&md5=55fabf158692891d69dd7e56519f7068CAS |

Busquet M, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Kamel C (2005a) Effects of cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil on rumen microbial fermentation in a dual flow continuous culture. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2508–2516.
Effects of cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil on rumen microbial fermentation in a dual flow continuous culture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXlsFCmsbo%3D&md5=811187084ae4d4f532cc55b56b7a8524CAS |

Busquet M, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Carro MD, Kamel C (2005b) Effect of garlic oil and four of its compounds on rumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 4393–4404.
Effect of garlic oil and four of its compounds on rumen microbial fermentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtlSqtr3O&md5=0fb914801bdb1a8f9b6783799ec4c867CAS |

Busquet M, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Kamel C (2006) Plant extracts affect in vitro rumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 761–771.
Plant extracts affect in vitro rumen microbial fermentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtlWrtLk%3D&md5=dad39aedbbea38c7bb648bf904875495CAS |

Calsamiglia S, Busquet M, Cardozo PW, Castillejos L, Ferret A (2007) Invited review: essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 2580–2595.
Invited review: essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXlvFOisLg%3D&md5=f78da0183612a03ce198de0ae460f88aCAS |

Cardozo PW, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Kamel C (2004) Effects of natural plant extracts on protein degradation and fermentation profiles in continuous culture. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3230–3236.

Cardozo PW, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Kamel C (2005) Screening for the effects of natural plant extracts at different pH on in vitro rumen microbial fermentation of a high-concentrate diet for beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 83, 2572–2579.

Carro MD, Valdés C, Ranilla MJ, González JS (2000) Effect of forage to concentrate ratio in the diet on ruminal fermentation and digesta flor kinetics in sheep. Animal Science (Penicuik, Scotland) 70, 127–134.

Chaves AV, Stanford K, Dugan ME, Gibson LL, McAllister TA, Van Herk F, Benchaar C (2008) Effect of cinnamaldehyde, garlic and juniper berry oils on performance, blood metabolites, and carcass characteristics of growing lambs. Livestock Science 117, 215–224.
Effect of cinnamaldehyde, garlic and juniper berry oils on performance, blood metabolites, and carcass characteristics of growing lambs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Demeyer DI (1991) Quantitative aspects of microbial metabolism in the rumen and hindgut. In ‘Rumen microbial metabolism and ruminant digestion’. (Ed. JP Jouany) pp. 217–237. (INRA Editions: Paris)

Demeyer DI, Van Nevel CJ (1975) Methanogenesis, an integrated part of carbohydrate fermentation, and its control. In ‘Digestion and metabolism in the ruminant’. (Eds IW McDonald, ACI Warner) pp. 73–97. (University of New England Publishing Unit: Armidale)

García-Martínez R, Ranilla MJ, Tejido ML, Carro MD (2005) Effects of disodium fumarate on in vitro rumen microbial growth, methane production and fermentation of diets differing in their forage:concentrate ratio. The British Journal of Nutrition 94, 71–77.
Effects of disodium fumarate on in vitro rumen microbial growth, methane production and fermentation of diets differing in their forage:concentrate ratio.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goering MK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). In ‘Agricultural handbook, No. 379’. (Agricultural Research Services, USDA: Washington, DC)

Gómez JA, Tejido ML, Carro MD (2005) Mixed rumen microorganisms growth and rumen fermentation of two diets in RUSITEC fermenters: influence of disodium malate supplementation. The British Journal of Nutrition 93, 479–484.

Kamel C, Greathead HMR, Ranilla MJ, Tejido ML, Carro MD (2008) Effects of allicin and diallyl disulfide on in vitro fermentation of a mixed diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 145, 351–363.
Effects of allicin and diallyl disulfide on in vitro fermentation of a mixed diet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXpsVKrtrY%3D&md5=a7a0e3c59bf93d579708a349f3cb5b0eCAS |

Klevenhusen F, Duval S, Zeitz JO, Kreuzer M, Soliva CR (2011a) Diallyl disulphide and lovastatin: effects on energy and protein utilisation in, as well as methane emission from sheep. Archives of Animal Nutrition 65, 255–266.
Diallyl disulphide and lovastatin: effects on energy and protein utilisation in, as well as methane emission from sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXptFKnu74%3D&md5=279747f6d7767b7d5ec2bfa678073d33CAS |

Klevenhusen F, Zeitz JO, Duval S, Kreuzer M, Soliva CR (2011b) Garlic oil and its principal component diallyl disulfide fail to mitigate methane, but improve digestibility in sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 356–363.
Garlic oil and its principal component diallyl disulfide fail to mitigate methane, but improve digestibility in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kongmun P, Wanapat M, Navanukraw C (2010) Effect of coconut oil and garlic powder on in vitro fermentation using gas production technique. Livestock Science 134, 38–44.

Kongmun P, Wanapat M, Pakdee P, Navanukraw C, Yu Z (2011) Manipulation of rumen fermentation and ecology of swamp buffalo by coconut oil and garlic powder supplementation. Livestock Science 135, 84–92.
Manipulation of rumen fermentation and ecology of swamp buffalo by coconut oil and garlic powder supplementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Macheboeuf D, Lassalas B, Ranilla MJ, Carro MD, Morgavi D (2006) Dose–response effect of diallyl disulfide on ruminal fermentation and methane production in vitro. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 46, S103

Macheboeuf D, Morgavi DP, Papon Y, Mousset JL, Arturo-Schaan M (2008) Dose-response effects of essential oils on in vitro fermentation activity of the rumen microbial population. Animal Feed Science and Technology 145, 335–350.
Dose-response effects of essential oils on in vitro fermentation activity of the rumen microbial population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXpsVKrtrs%3D&md5=0e8bad80e092f1b52ff60ca642ecd3dfCAS |

Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M (2010) Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4, 351–365.
Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhslWgs7k%3D&md5=000a71f62163a6c0712fbd90fbdeec69CAS |

Martínez ME, Ranilla MJ, Tejido ML, Ramos S, Carro MD (2010) The effect of the diet fed to donor sheep on in vitro methane production and ruminal fermentation of diets of variable composition. Animal Feed Science and Technology 158, 126–135.
The effect of the diet fed to donor sheep on in vitro methane production and ruminal fermentation of diets of variable composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Patra AK, Kamra DN, Agarwal N (2010) Effects of extracts of spices on rumen methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feeds in vitro. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90, 511–520.

Patra AK, Kamra DN, Bhar R, Kumar R, Agarwal N (2011) Effect of Terminalia chebula and Allium sativum on in vivo methane emission by sheep. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 95, 187–191.
Effect of Terminalia chebula and Allium sativum on in vivo methane emission by sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXltleqtb0%3D&md5=3770a4ceec3a58c0273cb23eb7de4668CAS |

Ramos S, Tejido ML, Martínez ME, Ranilla MJ, Carro MD (2009) Microbial protein synthesis, ruminal digestion, microbial populations, and N balance in sheep fed diets varying in forage to concentrate ratio and type of forage. Journal of Animal Science 87, 2924–2934.
Microbial protein synthesis, ruminal digestion, microbial populations, and N balance in sheep fed diets varying in forage to concentrate ratio and type of forage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtFSqu7fO&md5=63c420d6b98ea97f2b90b8cf8a7bbc39CAS |

Ranilla MJ, López S, Giráldez FJ, Valdés C, Carro MD (1998) Comparative digestibility and digesta flow kinetics in two breeds of sheep. Animal Science (Penicuik, Scotland) 66, 389–396.
Comparative digestibility and digesta flow kinetics in two breeds of sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

SAS (Statistical Analysis Systems) (2004) ‘SAS procedures guide. Release 9.1.’ (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC)

Soliva CR, Amelchanka SL, Duval SM, Kreuzer M (2011) Ruminal methane inhibition potential of various pure compounds in comparison with garlic oil as determined with a rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). The British Journal of Nutrition 106, 114–122.
Ruminal methane inhibition potential of various pure compounds in comparison with garlic oil as determined with a rumen simulation technique (Rusitec).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXosVOmu7k%3D&md5=a7173da321bf6c17f0ed7dd3ce89efd8CAS |

Staerfl SM, Kreuzer M, Soliva CR (2010) In vitro screening of unconventional feeds and various natural supplements for their ruminal methane mitigation potential when included in a maize-silage based diet. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 19, 651–654.

Staerfl SM, Zeitz JO, Kreuzer M, Soliva CR (2012) Methane conversion rate of bulls fattened on grass or maize silage as compared with the IPCC default values, and the long-term methane mitigation efficiency of adding acacia tannin, garlic, maca and lupine. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 148, 111–120.
Methane conversion rate of bulls fattened on grass or maize silage as compared with the IPCC default values, and the long-term methane mitigation efficiency of adding acacia tannin, garlic, maca and lupine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xht12ju7o%3D&md5=564ce325e34eef2266ebbc87d62d884fCAS |

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FnvVCltA%3D%3D&md5=83605a987aed1cab5024d20cbdabf9b5CAS |

Weimer PJ, Waghorn GC, Odt CL, Mertens DR (1999) Effect of diet on populations of three species of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in lacting dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 122–134.
Effect of diet on populations of three species of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in lacting dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXpsVOktQ%3D%3D&md5=193dbb3b97e6aa1069526a9c0a38ff22CAS |

Yang WZ, Ametaj BN, Benchaar C, Beauchemin KA (2010) Dose response to cinnamaldehyde supplementation in beef growing heifers: ruminal and intestinal digestion. Journal of Animal Science 88, 680–688.
Dose response to cinnamaldehyde supplementation in beef growing heifers: ruminal and intestinal digestion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXktVOqtLo%3D&md5=804f429ba9968dcc6784c4b58fa52180CAS |

van Zijderveld SM, Fonken B, Dijkstra J, Gerrits WJ, Perdok HB, Fokkink W, Newbold JR (2011) Effects of a combination of feed additives on methane production, diet digestibility, and animal performance in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 1445–1454.
Effects of a combination of feed additives on methane production, diet digestibility, and animal performance in lactating dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXmvFeitrs%3D&md5=c293e5eb2f94e0e99ccbce1398223002CAS |