Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Fibre in late gestation gilt diets, glucose tolerance, and feed intake and bodyweight loss during subsequent lactation

P. Langendijk A B and T.-Y. Chen A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A South Australian Research and Development Institute, Roseworthy Campus, SA 5371, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: pieter.langendijk@sa.gov.au

Animal Production Science 53(1) 18-22 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11368
Submitted: 23 December 2011  Accepted: 13 June 2012   Published: 25 September 2012

Abstract

Forty-nine crossbred gilts were fed one of three diets during the last month of their gestation: 2.5 kg of a standard diet (2.5C, n = 15), 3.5 kg of the same standard diet (3.5C, n = 17), or 3.5 kg of a high fibre diet, with 10.6% fibre compared with 4.4% fibre in the standard diet (3.5F, n = 17). The 3.5F and 3.5C gilts were fed at isocaloric and isonitrogenous levels. During the subsequent lactation, all gilts were fed the same lactation diet. Nineteen gilts (6 or 7 per treatment) were subjected to an oral glucose tolerance test around Day 110 of gestation. The high feed level (3.5C and 3.5F) resulted in a higher weight gain during gestation (P < 0.05). Gilts fed the high fibre diet tended to have (P < 0.10) piglets with a greater birthweight at farrowing (1535 g) than gilts fed the standard diet at 2.5 kg (1484 g). The 3.5C gilts (n.s.) and the 3.5F gilts (P < 0.05) had a lower feed intake and more bodyweight loss during lactation than gilts fed the 2.5-kg standard diet during gestation. Insulin profiles after the glucose tolerance test were higher for gilts fed the high fibre diet. Gilts fed the 2.5- or 3.5-kg standard diet had a similar insulin profile. Glucose profiles and insulin sensitivity were similar across treatments. Leptin around Day 110 was negatively correlated with feed intake during the third week of lactation (r = –0.28; P < 0.05). This study shows that a high feed level during late gestation reduces feed intake during lactation and that a high fibre diet during gestation does not negate this effect. The results suggest that feed level during gestation and the resulting body fat mass, rather than glucose tolerance, impacts on feed intake during lactation.


References

Close WH, Noblet J, Heavens RP (1984) The partition of body weight gain in the pregnant sow. Livestock Production Science 11, 517–527.
The partition of body weight gain in the pregnant sow.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Eissen JJ, Kanis E, Kemp B (2000) Sow factors affecting voluntary feed intake during lactation. Livestock Production Science 64, 147–165.
Sow factors affecting voluntary feed intake during lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Etienne M, Pere MC, Dourmad JY (1997) Adaptations du metabolisme glucidique chez la truie multipare. Journees Recherche Porcine en France 29, 73–80.

Farmer C, Robert S, Matte JJ (1996) Lactation performance of sows fed a bulky diet during gestation and receiving growth hormone releasing factor during lactation. Journal of Animal Science 74, 1298–1306.

Farmer C, Meunier-Salaün MC, Bergeron R, Robert S (2002) Hormonal response of pregnant gilts fed a high-fiber or a concentrate diet once or twice daily. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 82, 159–164.
Hormonal response of pregnant gilts fed a high-fiber or a concentrate diet once or twice daily.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XlsFWju7g%3D&md5=56b98786b3dba832a425c2e16c3b2f37CAS |

Katz A, Nambi SS, Mather K, Baron AD, Follmann DA, Sullivan G, Quon MJ (2000) Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 85, 2402–2410.
Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXlt1Wntrg%3D&md5=11a796df40fe9e77600e8259e1c1e02dCAS |

King RH (1986) The partition of energy and protein in sows. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 11, 153–156.

King RH, Eason PJ, Smits RJ, Morley WC, Henman DJ (2006) The response of sows to increased nutrient intake during mid to late gestation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 33–39.
The response of sows to increased nutrient intake during mid to late gestation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA (1999) Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care 22, 1462–1470.
Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgvVertQ%3D%3D&md5=9a99d1dc4c6c4bf251994f16ecad01c7CAS |

Matte JJ, Robert S, Girard CL, Farmer C, Martinead GP (1994) Effect of bulky diets based on wheat bran or oat hulls on reproductive performance of sows during their first two parities. Journal of Animal Science 72, 1754–1760.

Pere MC, Etienne M, Dourmad JY (2000) Adaptations of glucose metabolism in multiparous sows: effects of pregnancy and feeding level. Journal of Animal Science 78, 2933–2941.

Quesnel H, Meunier-Salaun M-C, Hamard A, Guillemet R, Etienne M, Farmer C, Dourmad J-Y, Pere M-C (2009) Dietary fiber for pregnant sows: influence on sow physiology and performance during lactation. Animal Science (Penicuik, Scotland) 87, 532–543.

Renteria-Flores JA, Johnston LJ, Shurson GC, Gallaher DD (2008) Effect of soluble and insoluble fiber on energy digestibility, nitrogen retention, and fiber digestibility of diets fed to gestating sows. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2568–2575.
Effect of soluble and insoluble fiber on energy digestibility, nitrogen retention, and fiber digestibility of diets fed to gestating sows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1ams7vO&md5=702b3d103be7ded95fc525e9e33b47f9CAS |

SAS/STAT (1990) ‘User’s guide.’ (SAS Institute: Cary, NC)

Weldon WC, Lewis AJ, Louis GF, Kovar JL, Giesemann MA, Miller PM (1994a) Postpartum hypophagia in primiparous sows: I. Effects of gestation feeding level on feed intake, feeding behaviour, and plasma metabolite concentration during lactation. Journal of Animal Science 72, 387–394.

Weldon WC, Lewis AJ, Louis GF, Kovar JL, Miller PM (1994b) Postpartum hypophagia in primiparous sows: II. Effects of feeding level during gestation and exogenous insulin on lactation feed intake, glucose tolerance, and epinephrine-stimulated release of nonesterified fatty acids and glucose. Journal of Animal Science 72, 394–403.

Xue JL, Koketsu Y, Dial GD, Pettigrew J, Sower A (1997) Glucose tolerance, luteinizing hormone release, and reproductive performance of first-litter sows fed at two levels of energy during gestation. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1845–1852.