Genetic analysis of feet and leg traits of Australian Angus cattle using linear and threshold models
Gilbert Jeyaruban A B , Bruce Tier A , David Johnston A and Hans Graser AA Animal Genetic and Breeding Unit (a joint venture of NSW Department of Primary Industries and University of New England), University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: gjeyarub@une.edu.au
Animal Production Science 52(1) 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11153
Submitted: 27 July 2011 Accepted: 25 November 2011 Published: 9 January 2012
Abstract
The advantages of using a univariate threshold animal model (TAM) over the conventional linear animal model (AM) in the development of a genetic evaluation system for feet and leg traits of Angus cattle were explored. The traits were scored on a scale of 1–9 with scores 5 and 6 being the most desirable. The genetic parameters and estimated breeding values for front feet angle (FA), rear feet angle (RA), front feet claw set (FC), rear feet claw set (RC), rear leg hind view (RH) and rear leg side view (RS) were compared from AM and TAM. In order to predict breeding values to identify the animals with intermediate optimum, the scores were categorised to form three groups to differentiate the desirable group (5–6) from the other two groups with less desirable feet and leg appearances (1–4 and 7–9). The AM and TAM were used to estimate genetic parameters for the grouped data as well as the original score data. A TAM using the group data was used to predict the probability and breeding value for the desirable intermediate group. For the original score data, estimated heritabilities on the underlying scale, using TAM, were 0.50, 0.46, 0.35, 0.44, 0.32 and 0.22 for FA, FC, RA, RC, RH and RS, respectively, and were 0.01–0.18 higher than the heritabilities estimated using AM. Genetic correlation between the six traits using a bivariate TAM with all scores ranged from 0.02 to 0.50 with front and rear angles had the highest genetic correlation at 0.50. For all six traits, proportion in the intermediate desirable group was higher than the other two groups combined. The low annual genetic change observed for all six traits over the 10 years of data recording reflected the lack of directional selection to improve the traits in Angus cattle. For genetic evaluation of feet and leg traits with an intermediate optimum, TAM is a preferred method for estimating genetic parameters and predicting breeding values for the desirable category. The TAM has now been implemented for regular estimated breeding value analysis of feet and leg traits of Angus cattle.
References
Abdel-Azim GA, Berger PJ (1999) Properties of threshold model prediction. Journal of Animal Science 77, 582–590.Altarriba J, Varona L, Garcia-Cortes LA, Moreno C (1998) Bayesian inference of variance components for litter size in Rasa Aragonesa sheep. Journal of Animal Science 76, 23–28.
Angus Australia (2003) Structural scoring – bull buyer’s guide. Angus Commercial Bulletin. January 2003. Available at http://www.angusaustralia.com.au/Articles [Verified 10 September 2010]
Boelling D, Pollott GE (1998) Locomotion, lameness, hoof and leg traits in cattle: II. Genetic relationships and breeding value. Livestock Production Science 54, 205–215.
| Locomotion, lameness, hoof and leg traits in cattle: II. Genetic relationships and breeding value.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Boettcher PJ, Dekker JCM, Warnick LD, Wells SJ (1998) Genetic analysis of clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1148–1156.
| Genetic analysis of clinical lameness in dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXivFOmsL0%3D&md5=bbb9df2b06c64b9274200cdaee72374cCAS |
Enting H, Kooij D, Dijkhuizen AA, Huirne RBM, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN (1997) Economic losses due to clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 49, 259–267.
| Economic losses due to clinical lameness in dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fernando RL, Billingsley RD, Gianola D (1983) Effects of methods of scaling on heritability estimates and sire evaluations for frame size at weaning in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 56, 1047–1056.
Gelfand AE, Smith AFM (1990) Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 398–409.
| Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic relation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6, 721–741.
| Stochastic relation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gianola D (1982) Theory and analysis of threshold characters. Journal of Animal Science 54, 1079–1096.
Gianola D, Foulley JL (1983) Sire evaluation for ordered categorical data with a threshold model. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 15, 201–223.
| Sire evaluation for ordered categorical data with a threshold model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Graser H-U, Tier B, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA (2005) Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 913–921.
| Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gutierrez JP, Goyache F (2002) Estimation of genetic parameters of type traits in Asturiana de los valles beef cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 119, 93–100.
| Estimation of genetic parameters of type traits in Asturiana de los valles beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harville DA, Mee RW (1984) A mixed-model procedure for analysing ordered categorical data. Biometrics 40, 393–408.
| A mixed-model procedure for analysing ordered categorical data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hoeschele I, Tier B, Graser H-U (1995) Multiple-trait genetic evaluation for one polychotomous trait and several continuous traits with missing data and unequal models. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1609–1627.
Jamrozik J, Schaeffer LR, Burnside EB, Sullivan BP (1991) Threshold models applied to Holstein conformation traits. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3196–3201.
| Threshold models applied to Holstein conformation traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK387jvVyntg%3D%3D&md5=888c8522025f84b8e74fed6ee229e7a7CAS |
Kass RE, Carlin BP, Gelmen A, Neal RM (1998) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. A roundtable. The American Statistician 52, 93–100.
| Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. A roundtable.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirschten DP, Kress DD, Tess MW, Davis KC (2001) Estimating genetic parameters of a linear type scoring method in beef cattle. Proceeding Western Section. American Society of Animal Science 52, 1–4. Available at http://www.asas.org/westernsection/proceedings01.asp [Verified 12 October 2010]
McDaniel BT (1997) Breeding programs to reduce foot and leg problems. Proceedings of the International workshop on genetic improvement of functional traits in cattle; health. Uppsala, Sweden. Interbull Bulletin 15, 115–122.
Meyer K (2006) ‘WOMBAT – a program for mixed model analyses by restricted maximum likelihood. User notes.’ (Animal Genetic and Breeding Unit, University of New England: Armidale)
Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Strabel T, Auvray B, Druet T, Lee DH (2002) BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). Proceedings of the 7th World Congress for the Genetics of Applied Livestock Production, Montpellier, France. CD-ROM communication no. 28–07.
Pérez-Cabal MA, García C, González-Recio O, Alenda R (2006) Genetic and phenotypic relationships among locomotion type traits, profit, production, longevity, and fertility in Spanish dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1776–1783.
| Genetic and phenotypic relationships among locomotion type traits, profit, production, longevity, and fertility in Spanish dairy Cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Snell EJ (1964) A scaling procedure for ordered categorical data. Biometrics 20, 592–607.
| A scaling procedure for ordered categorical data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tanner MA (1993) ‘Tools for statistical inference.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York)
Thompson R (1979) Sire evaluation. Biometrics 35, 339–353.
| Sire evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Dorp TE, Boettcher P, Schaeffer LR (2004) Genetics of locomotion. Livestock Production Science 90, 247–253.
| Genetics of locomotion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
