Effects of seasonality and ambient temperature on genetic parameters for production and reproductive traits in pigs
Craig R. G. Lewis A B and Kim L. Bunter AA Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit*, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: clewis21@une.edu.au
Animal Production Science 51(7) 615-626 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10265
Submitted: 7 December 2010 Accepted: 5 May 2011 Published: 27 June 2011
Abstract
This study examined the effects of season on genetic parameters for production and reproductive traits and quantified within contemporary group effects of temperature on these traits using linear and plateau-linear regression models. From 2003 onwards, data were available on ~60 000 gilts for the routinely recorded production traits (BF: back fat; LADG: lifetime average daily gain) and ~45 000 litters for the sow reproductive traits (TB: total born; NBA: number born alive; BWT: average piglet birthweight). A subset of gilts were also recorded for test period daily gain (TADG), daily feed intake (ADI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) and, later, as sows (n ~2000) for average daily lactation feed intake (LADI). Least-squares means for some production and reproductive traits significantly differed between seasons: summer and winter means were 2.28 ± 0.017 vs 2.54 ± 0.011 kg/day for ADI, 2.80 ± 0.022 vs 3.21 ± 0.011 kg/kg for FCR, and 1.61 ± 0.02 vs 1.54 ± 0.02 kg for BWT. However, some statistically significant differences (due to large n) were biologically insignificant. Trait variation also differed between seasons, but heritability estimates did not significantly differ from each other. Heritabilities were (summer vs winter): BF: 0.43 ± 0.03 vs 0.41 ± 0.02; LADG: 0.18 ± 0.02 vs 0.16 ± 0.02; TADG: 0.12 ± 0.10 vs 0.08 ± 0.06; ADI: 0.37 ± 0.15 vs 0.22 ± 0.07; FCR: 0.14 ± 0.11 vs 0.17 ± 0.06; TB: 0.09 ± 0.01 vs 0.10 ± 0.01; NBA: 0.06 ± 0.01 vs 0.07 ± 0.01 and BWT: 0.37 ± 0.03 vs 0.32 ± 0.04. Genetic correlations between the same trait recorded in different seasons were generally very high (>0.70), with the exception of TB, where the genetic correlation between spring and autumn was 0.65 ± 0.09, suggesting a genetic component to the effect of seasonal infertility on litter size. Regression models demonstrated that two selection lines had different responses to increasing temperature, despite concurrent selection in the same environment. Plateau-linear models were generally better than linear models for describing changes to production traits with temperature. Based on maximum temperature at the end of performance testing, the estimated temperature thresholds above which lifetime growth performance was compromised were 25.5 and 32.5°C in the two lines. There were only small linear relationships between reproductive traits and temperature. Overall, the ongoing acclimatisation to the thermal environment and the partial confounding of contemporary group with temperature variables (season explained 62% of variation in average daily temperature) are potentially contributing factors to the lack of major differences in heritability estimates between seasons, and the relatively small regression coefficients for the effects of temperature on performance. Nevertheless, temperature can be demonstrated to affect phenotypic outcomes within contemporary groups using commercial data.
Additional keywords: heat stress, reproduction.
References
Bergsma R, Kanis E, Verstegen MWA, Knol EF (2008) Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1067–1080.| Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXltlWrtLk%3D&md5=2d2feba3dc489c060d791b9da80c2331CAS | 18192550PubMed |
Black JL, Mullan BP, Lorschy ML, Giles LR (1993) Lactation in the sow during heat-stress. Livestock Production Science 35, 153–170.
| Lactation in the sow during heat-stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bloemhof S, van der Waaij EH, Merks JWM, Knol EF (2008) Sow line differences in heat stress tolerance expressed in reproductive performance traits. Journal of Animal Science 86, 3330–3337.
| Sow line differences in heat stress tolerance expressed in reproductive performance traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsV2jsbzN&md5=cd1d6f329ec798df991970b99d687e50CAS | 18708608PubMed |
Christon R (1988) The effect of tropical ambient-temperature on growth and metabolism in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 66, 3112–3123.
Clutter AC, Brascamp EW (1998) Genetics of performance traits. In ‘The genetics of the pig’. (Eds MF Rothschild, A Ruvinsky) pp. 427–462. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Dourmad JY, Etienne M, Prunier A, Noblet J (1994) The effect of energy and protein-intake of sows on their longevity – a review. Livestock Production Science 40, 87–97.
| The effect of energy and protein-intake of sows on their longevity – a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dragovich D (1978) Influence of high temperatures on milk production of Friesian dairy cows grazed on farms in a pasture-based feed system. International Journal of Biometeorology 22, 279–284.
| Influence of high temperatures on milk production of Friesian dairy cows grazed on farms in a pasture-based feed system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE1M7nt1aqtw%3D%3D&md5=2a14175aced7c6f8b2da794d2ec57934CAS | 750508PubMed |
Einarsson S, Brandt Y, Lundeheim N, Madej A (2008) Stress and its influence on reproduction in pigs: a review. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 50, 48–55.
| Stress and its influence on reproduction in pigs: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19077201PubMed |
Fitas da Cruz V, Le Dividich J (2002) Modeling feed intake in growing-finishing pigs. Effects of animal density, diet energy density, environmental temperature and sex. In ‘Proceedings of the 15th International Commission of Agricultural Engineering (CIGR) World Congress’, Chicago, IL; #024047. Available at http://asae.frymulti.com/azdez.asp?JID=5&AID=10572&CID=cil2002&T=2 [Verified 15 June 2011]
Fitas da Cruz V, Lucas EM, Baptista FJ (2001) Effect of pre-weaning housing system on growth performances and carcass composition of pigs. In ‘Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium of Livestock Environment’, Louisville, KY; ASAE Publication number 701P0201. (Eds RR Stowell, R Bucklin, RW Bottcher) pp. 80–86. Available at http://asae.frymulti.com/azdez.asp?JID=1&AID=7063&CID=iles2001&T=2 [Verified 15 June 2011]
Fitzgerald RF, Stalder KJ, Matthews JO, Kaster CMS, Johnson AK (2009) Factors associated with fatigued, injured, and dead pig frequency during transport and lairage at a commercial abattoir. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1156–1166.
| Factors associated with fatigued, injured, and dead pig frequency during transport and lairage at a commercial abattoir.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXislaqs78%3D&md5=f3709ba6a4e34a033c65891f385262d2CAS | 19028860PubMed |
Flowers WL (2008) Applying reproductive technologies in practice. In ‘Proceedings of the London Swine Conference – Facing the New Reality’. (Eds JM Murphy and CFM de Lange) pp. 185–194. (London Swine Conference: London, Ontario)
Gentry JG, McGlone JJ, Miller MF, Blanton JR (2002) Diverse birth and rearing environment effects on pig growth and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1707–1715.
Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R (2005) ‘ASREML reference manual.’ (NSW Agriculture: Orange)
Hawton JD (1990) Factors affecting feed-intake. Agri-Practice 11, 13–16.
Hermesch S (2007) Genetic analysis of feed intake in lactating sows. Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 61–64.
Hermesch S, Jones RM (2007) Association between lactation feed intake and lifetime reproductive performance of sows. Manipulating Pig Production XI, 196
Huynh TTT, Aarnink AJA, Verstegen MWA, Gerrits WJJ, Heetkamp MJW, Kemp B, Canh TT (2005) Effects of increasing temperatures on physiological changes in pigs at different relative humidities. Journal of Animal Science 83, 1385–1396.
Imboonta N, Rydhmer L, Tumwasorn S (2007) Genetic parameters for reproduction and production traits of Landrace sows in Thailand. Journal of Animal Science 85, 53–59.
| Genetic parameters for reproduction and production traits of Landrace sows in Thailand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsFakuw%3D%3D&md5=f755e3f01c350c021f9d93a8b148120cCAS | 17179539PubMed |
Ingram DL (1977) Adaptions to ambient temperature in growing pigs. Pflugers Archiv European Journal of Physiology 367, 257–264.
| Adaptions to ambient temperature in growing pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE2s7gtF2juw%3D%3D&md5=c97dad9f2018545c3de28c6cb46be5dcCAS | 556847PubMed |
Kunavongkrit A, Suriyasomboon A, Lundeheim N, Heard TW, Einarsson S (2005) Management and sperm production of boars under differing environmental conditions. Theriogenology 63, 657–667.
| Management and sperm production of boars under differing environmental conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15626423PubMed |
Lewis CRG, Bunter KL (2011) Body development in sows, feed intake and maternal capacity. Part 1: Performance, pre-breeding and lactation feed intake traits of primiparous sows. Animal (in press)
Lewis CRG, Hermesch S, Bunter KL (2010) A random regression analysis of sow lactation feed intake and the effect of temperature on intake. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production’, ID670. (Ed. G Erhardt) (German Society of Animal Science: Leipzig, Germany)
Lucas EM, Randall JM, Meneses JF (2000) Potential for evaporative cooling during heat stress periods in pig production in Portugal (Alentejo). Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 76, 363–371.
| Potential for evaporative cooling during heat stress periods in pig production in Portugal (Alentejo).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGlone JJ, Pond WG (2003) ‘Pig production – biological principles and applications.’ (Delmar Learning: Clifton Park, NY)
Misztal I, Aguilar I, Tsuruta S, Sanchez JP, Zumbach B (2010) Studies on heat stress in dairy cattle and pigs. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production’, ID625. (Ed. G Erhardt) (German Society of Animal Science: Leipzig, Germany)
Morrison SR, Heitman H, Bond TE, Finn-Kelcey P (1966) The influence of humidity on growth rate and feed utilization of swine. International Journal of Biometeorology 10, 163–168.
| The influence of humidity on growth rate and feed utilization of swine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF2s3ksVygsA%3D%3D&md5=8e9502c847b973e11ea1803e91277677CAS | 6009553PubMed |
Morrow-Tesch JL, McGlone JJ, Salakjohnson JL (1994) Heat and social stress effects on pig immune measures. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2599–2609.
Nardone A, Ronchi B, Lacetera N, Bernabucci U (2006) Climatic effects on productive traits in livestock. Veterinary Research Communications 30, 75–81.
| Climatic effects on productive traits in livestock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nienaber JA, Hahn GL, McDonald TP, Korthals RL (1996) Feeding patterns and swine performance in hot environments. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 39, 195–202.
Patience JF, Umboh JF, Chaplin RK, Nyachoti CM (2005) Nutritional and physiological responses of growing pigs exposed to a diurnal pattern of heat stress. Livestock Production Science 96, 205–214.
| Nutritional and physiological responses of growing pigs exposed to a diurnal pattern of heat stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pollott GE, Greeff JC (2004) Genotype × environment interactions and genetic parameters for fecal egg count and production traits of Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2840–2851.
Ravagnolo O, Misztal I (2000) Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, parameter estimation. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 2126–2130.
| Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, parameter estimation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmvFKitLo%3D&md5=a23b491a71ed00d46fd4cc0aebe4efd5CAS | 11003247PubMed |
Renaudeau D, Huc E, Kerdoncuff M, Gourdine JL (2006) Acclimation to high ambient temperature in growing pigs: effects of breed and temperature level. In ‘Symposium COA/INRA Scientific Cooperation in Agriculture’, 7–10 November 2006, Tainan, Taiwan. pp. 177–182. Available at http://www.angrin.tlri.gov.tw/INRA/p19.pdf [Verified 15 June 2011]
Schinckel AP, Schwab CR, Duttlinger VM, Einstein ME (2010) Analyses of feed and energy intakes during lactation for three breeds of sows. The Professional Animal Scientist 26, 35–50.
St-Pierre NR, Cobanov B, Schnitkey G (2003) Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. Journal of Dairy Science 86, E52–E77.
| Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Suriyasomboon A, Lundeheim N, Kunavongkrit A, Einarsson S (2006) Effect of temperature and humidity on reproductive performance of crossbred sows in Thailand. Theriogenology 65, 606–628.
| Effect of temperature and humidity on reproductive performance of crossbred sows in Thailand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16009413PubMed |
Tholen E, Bunter KL, Hermesch S, Graser HU (1996a) The genetic foundation of fitness and reproduction traits in Australian pig populations. 1. Genetic parameters for weaning to conception interval, farrowing interval, and stayability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 1261–1274.
| The genetic foundation of fitness and reproduction traits in Australian pig populations. 1. Genetic parameters for weaning to conception interval, farrowing interval, and stayability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tholen E, Bunter KL, Hermesch S, Graser HU (1996b) The genetic foundation of fitness and reproduction traits in Australian pig populations. 2. Relationships between weaning to conception interval, farrowing interval, stayability, and other common reproduction and production traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 1275–1290.
| The genetic foundation of fitness and reproduction traits in Australian pig populations. 2. Relationships between weaning to conception interval, farrowing interval, stayability, and other common reproduction and production traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Trezona M, Mullan BP, D’Antuono M, Wilson RH, Williams IH (2004) The causes of seasonal variation in backfat thickness of pigs in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 273–277.
| The causes of seasonal variation in backfat thickness of pigs in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tummaruk P, Lundeheim N, Einarsson S, Dalin AM (2001) Effect of birth litter size, birth parity number, growth rate, backfat thickness and age at first mating of gilts on their reproductive performance as sows. Animal Reproduction Science 66, 225–237.
| Effect of birth litter size, birth parity number, growth rate, backfat thickness and age at first mating of gilts on their reproductive performance as sows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzntFCltQ%3D%3D&md5=9a87ea3f93e2f175a310fe89780654d2CAS | 11348784PubMed |
Williams AM (2009) Effects of heat stress on reproduction and productivity of primiparous sows and their piglets’ performance. MS thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia.
Zumbach B, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Sanchez JP, Azain M, Herring W, Holl J, Long T, Culbertson M (2008) Genetic components of heat stress in finishing pigs: parameter estimation. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2076–2081.
| Genetic components of heat stress in finishing pigs: parameter estimation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFansLbE&md5=de5a5d5811862437b0cf2e7b1f0fa6c5CAS | 18469056PubMed |
