Group characteristics influence growth rate and backfat of commercially raised grower pigs
Robert M. Jones A B , Ron E. Crump A and Susanne Hermesch A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit1,University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: rjones20@une.edu.au
Animal Production Science 51(3) 191-197 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10175
Submitted: 14 September 2010 Accepted: 14 January 2011 Published: 7 March 2011
Abstract
Records from 9429 pigs raised in 353 grower groups in a commercial Australian piggery were analysed to determine whether grower-group characteristics affected daily gain and backfat of individual pigs. Individual and group effects as well as their interactions were tested for significance (P < 0.05) in a mixed model, with sire fitted as a random effect. Group characteristics affected average daily gain (ADG) more than backfat (BF). The proportion of males in a group influenced both traits significantly, as did the average number of full siblings. Groups with 10–30% of the opposite sex had the highest BF and a 21–30 g/day reduction in ADG compared with the highest-performing groups with less than 10% of males. Each additional full sibling per group increased ADG by 5.5 ± 1.60 g/day and BF by 0.12 ± 0.05 mm. Additionally, ADG increased by 9.8 ± 2.64 g/day per second of group mean flight time and by 4.5 g/day per 10% increase in the proportion of Duroc pigs per group. Group size affected ADG (linear and quadratic) and BF (linear); however, the effect on ADG was considerably larger during the warmer grower season. In commercial piggeries, it may be possible to optimise individual daily gain through the manipulation of grower-group characteristics. Advantages for growth rate arose from including a portion of a calmer line of pigs within groups, optimising the stocking density in warmer months and maximising the proportion of quieter, less fearful pigs in grower groups.
Additional keywords: breed, daily gain, flight time, full sibs, sex, social effects.
References
Andersson HK, Schaub A, Andersson K, Lundström K, Thomke S, Hansson I (1997) The effects of feeding system, lysine level and gilt contact on performance, skatole levels and economics of entire male pigs. Livestock Production Science 51, 131–140.| The effects of feeding system, lysine level and gilt contact on performance, skatole levels and economics of entire male pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andersson HK, Andersson K, Zamaratskaia G, Rydhmer L, Chen G, Lundström K (2005) Effect of single-sex or mixed rearing and live weight on performance, technological meat quality and sexual maturity in entire male and female pigs fed raw potato starch. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 55, 80–90.
| Effect of single-sex or mixed rearing and live weight on performance, technological meat quality and sexual maturity in entire male and female pigs fed raw potato starch.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barber RS, Braude RG, Mitchell KG, Joanne T (1980) A note on the housing of intact male and female pigs together in the same pen during the growing period to bacon weight. Animal Production 31, 321–322.
| A note on the housing of intact male and female pigs together in the same pen during the growing period to bacon weight.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Black JL, Giles LR, Wynn PC, Knowles AG, Kerr CA, Jones MR, Strom AD, Gallager NL, Eamens GJ (2001) A review – factors limiting the performance of growing pigs in commercial environments. In ‘Manipulating pig production VIII’. (Ed. P Cranwell) pp. 9–36. (Australasian Pig Science Association: Werribee, Vic.)
Bunter KL, Bennett C, Luxford BG (2008) Sire breed comparisons for meat and eating quality traits in Australian pig populations. Animal 2, 1168–1177.
| Sire breed comparisons for meat and eating quality traits in Australian pig populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Busse CS, Shea-Moore MM (1999) Behavioural and physiological responses to transportation stress. Journal of Animal Science 77, 147–151.
Cassady JP (2007) Evidence of phenotypic relationships among behavioural characteristics of individual pigs and performance. Journal of Animal Science 85, 218–224.
| Evidence of phenotypic relationships among behavioural characteristics of individual pigs and performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsFaquw%3D%3D&md5=8c436a64d3b02240aeb5532b85e7dc17CAS | 17179559PubMed |
Chapple RP (1993) Effect of stocking arrangement on pig performance. In ‘Manipulating pig production IV’. (Ed. ES Batterham) pp. 87–97. (Australasian Pig Science Association: Attwood, Vic.)
Coutellier L, Arnould C, Boissy A, Orgeur P, Prunier A, Veissier I, Meunier-Salaün M-C (2007) Pig’s responses to repeated social regrouping and relocation during the growing–finishing period. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 105, 102–114.
| Pig’s responses to repeated social regrouping and relocation during the growing–finishing period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cronin GM, Dunshea FR, Butler KL, McCauley I, Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH (2003) The effects of immuno- and surgical-castration on the behaviour and consequently growth of group-housed, male finisher pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 111–126.
| The effects of immuno- and surgical-castration on the behaviour and consequently growth of group-housed, male finisher pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crump RE (2004) Genetics of temperament: flight time and the movement meter. AGBU Pig Genetics Workshop Notes, 107–115. Available at http://agbu.une.edu.au/pig_genetics/pdf/2004/Paper_13_RC_flitim_2004.pdf [Verified 14 December 2010]
de Haer LCM, de Vries AG (1993) Effects of genotype and sex on the feed intake pattern of group housed growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 36, 223–232.
| Effects of genotype and sex on the feed intake pattern of group housed growing pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Désautés C, Sarrieau A, Caritez JC, Mormède P (1999) Behavior and pituitary-adrenal function in Large White and Meishan pigs. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 16, 193–205.
| Behavior and pituitary-adrenal function in Large White and Meishan pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10370859PubMed |
English PR, Fowler JR, Baxter S, Smith B (1988) The growing–finishing pig: the basis of efficient systems. In ‘The growing and finishing pig: improving efficiency’. (Ed. PR English) pp. 323–335. (Farming Press: Ipswich, UK)
Foury A, Geverink NA, Gil M, Gispert M, Hortós M, Font i Furnols M, Carrion D, Blott SC, Plastow GS, Mormède P (2007) Stress neuroendocrine profiles in five pig breeding lines and the relationship with carcass composition. Animal 1, 973–982.
| Stress neuroendocrine profiles in five pig breeding lines and the relationship with carcass composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFGqtL%2FF&md5=e7007a4dd17f294a1abf62ecdf5c0e97CAS |
Geverink NA, Heetkamp MJW, Schouten WGP, Wiegant VM, Schrama JW (2004) Backtest type and housing condition of pigs influence energy metabolism. Journal of Animal Science 82, 1227–1233.
Grandin T (1992) Effect of genetics on handling and CO2 stunning of pigs. Meat Focus International 1, 124–126.
Hansson AC, Crump RE, Graser H-U, Sokolinski R (2005) Relationships among temperament and production traits of pigs. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 16, 141 [Verified 14 December 2010]http://www.aaabg.org/livestocklibrary/2005/141hansson.pdf
Hessing MJC, Hagelsø AM, van Beek JAM, Wiepkema PR, Schouten WGP, Krukow R (1993) Individual behavioural characteristics in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37, 285–295.
| Individual behavioural characteristics in pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hessing MJC, Schouten WGP, Wiepkema PR, Tielen MJM (1994) Implications of individual behavioural characteristics on performance in pigs. Livestock Production Science 40, 187–196.
| Implications of individual behavioural characteristics on performance in pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones RM, Hermesch S, Crump RE (2009) Evaluation of flight time, average daily gain and backfat using random effect models including growing group. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 18, 199–202. [Verified 14 December 2010]http://www.aaabg.org/proceedings18/files/jones199.pdf
Maruyama K, Sato S, Ohira T, Maeda K, Noda H, Kubota Y, Nishimura S, Kitamura A, Kiyama M, Okada T, Imano H, Nakamura M, Ishikawa Y, Kurokawa M, Sasaki S, Iso H (2008) The joint impact on being overweight of self reported behaviours of eating quickly and eating until full: cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal 1, 337–344.
McConnell JC, Eargle JC, Waldorf RC (1987) Effects of weaning weight, co-mingling, group size and room temperature on pig performance. Journal of Animal Science 65, 1201–1206.
Morrow-Tesch JL, McGlone JJ, Salak-Johnson JL (1994) Heat and social stress effects on pig immune measures. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2599–2609.
Patterson RLS, Lightfoot AL (1984) Effect of sex grouping during growth on 5u-androstenone development in boars at three commercial slaughter weights. Meat Science 10, 253–263.
| Effect of sex grouping during growth on 5u-androstenone development in boars at three commercial slaughter weights.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXktlentrs%3D&md5=2e500b0d0383e2b5f077b7bcc855682aCAS |
Payne HG, Brumm MC, Antuono MD, Pluske JR, Williams IH, Moore KL, Mullan BP (2006) Review of group size effects on the performance of growing pigs. Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science. Nutrition and Natural Resources 12, 1–22.
Petherick JC, Blackshaw JK (1987) A review of the factors influencing the aggressive and agonistic behavior of the domestic pig. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27, 605–611.
| A review of the factors influencing the aggressive and agonistic behavior of the domestic pig.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Petherick JC, Holroyd RG, Doogan VJ, Venus BK (2002) Productivity carcass and meat quality of lot-fed Bos indicus cross steers grouped according to temperament. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 389–398.
| Productivity carcass and meat quality of lot-fed Bos indicus cross steers grouped according to temperament.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rydhmer L, Zamaratskaia G, Andersson HK, Algers B, Guillemet R, Lundström K (2006) Aggressive and sexual behaviour of growing and finishing pigs reared in groups, without castration. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 56, 109–119.
| Aggressive and sexual behaviour of growing and finishing pigs reared in groups, without castration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shea-Moore MM (1998) The effect of genotype on behaviour in segregates early weaned pigs tested in an open field. Journal of Animal Science 77, 100–106.
Sherritt GW, Graves HB, Gobble JL, Hazlett VE (1974) Effects of mixing pigs during the growing–finishing period. Journal of Animal Science 39, 834–837.
Smith WC, Pearson G, Holmes RJ (1984) A note on the effect of mixed or segregated penning of boars and gilts over the live weight range 20 to 80 kg on performance, carcass characteristics and behaviour. Animal Production 38, 503–506.
| A note on the effect of mixed or segregated penning of boars and gilts over the live weight range 20 to 80 kg on performance, carcass characteristics and behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Trezona M, Mullan BP, D’Antuono MD, Wilson RH, Williams IH (2004) The causes of seasonal variation in backfat thickness of pigs in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 273–277.
| The causes of seasonal variation in backfat thickness of pigs in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turner SP, Allcroft DJ, Edwards SA (2003) Housing pigs in large social groups: a review of implications for performance and other economic traits. Livestock Production Science 82, 39–51.
| Housing pigs in large social groups: a review of implications for performance and other economic traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Erp-van der Kooij E, Kuijpers AH, Schrama JW, Ekkel ED, Tielen MJM (2000) Individual behavioural characteristics in pigs and their impact on production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66, 171–185.
| Individual behavioural characteristics in pigs and their impact on production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Williams NH (1998) Impact of immune system activation on pig growth and amino acid needs. In ‘Progress in pig science’. (Eds J Wiseman, MA Varley, JP Chadwick) pp. 583–592. (Nottingham University Press: Nottingham)
