Improving the accuracy of digestibility estimates for cattle grazing tropical pastures when sampling with oesophageal fistulated cattle
D. B. CoatesCSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, ATSIP, PMB PO, Aitkenvale, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia. Email: david.coates@csiro.au
Animal Production Science 51(1) 44-52 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10131
Submitted: 26 July 2010 Accepted: 3 September 2010 Published: 15 December 2010
Abstract
The in vitro digestibility analysis of extrusa samples collected from oesophageal fistulated cattle is widely used to estimate the digestibility of diets selected by resident grazing cattle. In the present study, oesophageal fistulated steers were used to sample a range of grass–legume pastures continuously stocked with small herds of resident cattle at two sites in northern Queensland at different times of the year. Pepsin–cellulase in vitro analysis was used to measure in vitro dry matter loss (IVDML) during incubation. Additional laboratory analyses were used to demonstrate that unless appropriate corrections are applied, serious inaccuracies can occur in the estimates of in vivo digestibility as a result of (1) differences between IVDML of extrusa (feed plus saliva) and the IVDML of the feed consumed (feed without saliva), (2) differences in the botanical and chemical composition between the extrusa samples and the diets of the resident cattle, and (3) differences between grasses and legumes in the linear-regression relationships used to estimate in vivo digestibility from IVDML. Methodologies to minimise such errors are described and results illustrating the magnitude of potential errors are presented. In the dataset from the present study, it was clear that differences between extrusa and resident diets in grass–legume proportions consumed were the major cause of error but other causes of error were also important. Appropriate methodologies to improve accuracy are recommended.
Additional keywords: in vitro digestibility, in vivo digestibility, oesophageal fistulated cattle, tropical grass–legume pastures.
References
Alder FE (1969) The use of cattle with oesophageal fistulae in grassland experiments. Journal of the British Grassland Society 24, 6–12.| The use of cattle with oesophageal fistulae in grassland experiments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barth KM, Kazzal NT (1971) Separation of true selective grazing by cattle from effects of esophageal fistula. Journal of Animal Science 33, 1124–1128.
Clements RJ, Jones RM, Valdes LR, Bunch GA (1996) Selection of Chamaecrista rotundifolia by cattle. Tropical Grasslands 30, 389–394.
Coates DB (1995) The effect of phosphorus as fertiliser or supplement on the forage intake of heifers grazing stylo-based pastures. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 181–188.
| The effect of phosphorus as fertiliser or supplement on the forage intake of heifers grazing stylo-based pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXnsF2lsbg%3D&md5=fd95ccc0a7fa041fe6b4c0517d96b0a1CAS |
Coates DB (1998) Predicting diet digestibility and crude protein content from the faeces of grazing cattle. Final report of project CS.253 to the Meat Research Corporation, Sydney.
Coates DB (1999) The use of faecal δ13C values to improve the reliability of estimates of diet quality when sampling tropical pastures with oesophageal fistulated cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 1–7.
| The use of faecal δ13C values to improve the reliability of estimates of diet quality when sampling tropical pastures with oesophageal fistulated cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Coates DB, Mayer RJ (2009) Differences between the in vitro digestibility of extrusa collected from oesophageal fistulated steers and the forage consumed. Animal Production Science 49, 563–573.
| Differences between the in vitro digestibility of extrusa collected from oesophageal fistulated steers and the forage consumed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Coates DB, Schachenmann P, Jones RJ (1987) Reliability of extrusa samples collected from steers fistulated at the oesophagus to estimate the diet of resident animals in grazing experiments. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27, 739–745.
| Reliability of extrusa samples collected from steers fistulated at the oesophagus to estimate the diet of resident animals in grazing experiments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cohen RDH (1979) Factors influencing the estimation of the nutritive value of the diet selected by cattle fistulated at the oesophagus. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 607–618.
| Factors influencing the estimation of the nutritive value of the diet selected by cattle fistulated at the oesophagus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hendricksen RE, Ternouth JH, Punter LD (1994) Seasonal nutrient intake and phosphorus kinetics of grazing steers in northern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 1817–1829.
| Seasonal nutrient intake and phosphorus kinetics of grazing steers in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones RJ (1981) The use of natural carbon isotope ratios in studies with grazing animals. In ‘Forage evaluation: concepts and techniques’. (Eds JL Wheeler, RD Mochrie) pp. 277–286. (CSIRO Australia and the American Forage and Grassland Council: Melbourne)
Jones RJ, Lascano CE (1992) Oesophageal fistulated cattle can give unreliable estimates of the proportion of legume in the diets of resident animals grazing tropical pastures. Grass and Forage Science 47, 128–132.
| Oesophageal fistulated cattle can give unreliable estimates of the proportion of legume in the diets of resident animals grazing tropical pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Langlands JP (1966) Studies on the nutritive value of the diet selected by grazing sheep. I. Differences in composition between herbage consumed and material collected from oesophageal fistulae. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 9, 253–259.
Le Feuvre R, Jones RJ (1988) The static combustion of biological samples sealed in glass tubes as a preparation for δ13C determination. Analyst 113, 817–823.
| The static combustion of biological samples sealed in glass tubes as a preparation for δ13C determination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXitVWhurw%3D&md5=c7ebc63f10d2984f00ce32407f03f398CAS | 3414971PubMed |
Leite ER, Stuth JW (1995) Fecal NIRS equations to assess diet quality of free-ranging goats. Small Ruminant Research 15, 223–230.
| Fecal NIRS equations to assess diet quality of free-ranging goats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lyons RK, Stuth JW (1992) Fecal NIRS equations for predicting diet quality of free-ranging cattle. Journal of Range Management 45, 238–244.
| Fecal NIRS equations for predicting diet quality of free-ranging cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McLean RW, Ternouth JH (1994) The growth and phosphorus kinetics of steers grazing a subtropical pasture. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 1831–1845.
| The growth and phosphorus kinetics of steers grazing a subtropical pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McLeod MN, Minson DJ (1978) The accuracy of the pepsin–cellulase technique for estimating the dry matter digestibility in vivo of grasses and legumes. Animal Feed Science and Technology 3, 277–287.
| The accuracy of the pepsin–cellulase technique for estimating the dry matter digestibility in vivo of grasses and legumes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE1MXktVeqtb0%3D&md5=6cf0d34dd061f0b071a91eba5b317188CAS |
Saul GH, Flinn PC, Heard JF (1986) The nutritive value of roughages before and after mastication by oesophageally fistulated sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 16, 351–354.
Ternouth JH, McLean RW, MacDonald RN, Adamu A (1990) Field estimates of the phosphorus kinetics of grazing cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 18, 396–399.
Terry RA, Mundell DC, Osbourn DF (1978) Comparison of two in vitro procedures using rumen liquor–pepsin or pepsin–cellulase for prediction of forage digestibility. Journal of the British Grassland Society 33, 13–18.
| Comparison of two in vitro procedures using rumen liquor–pepsin or pepsin–cellulase for prediction of forage digestibility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE1cXksFyntrg%3D&md5=9c0c663e707a44f6be1941ab95e370ddCAS |
Tilley JMA, Terry RA (1963) A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.
| A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF3sXks1Cmurk%3D&md5=14ff6fc015ddd67bf73ef625640b2070CAS |
