The value of genetic fatness in Merino ewes differs with production system and environment
M. B. Ferguson A B G , J. M. Young C , G. A. Kearney D , G. E. Gardner A E , I. R. D. Robertson F and A. N. Thompson A BA CRC for Sheep Industry Innovation, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
B Sheep Industries Group, Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia.
C RMB 309, Kojonup, WA 6395, Australia.
D Paynes Road, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.
E Division of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
F ‘Yarrak’, RMB 311, Kojonup, WA 6395, Australia.
G Corresponding author. Email: mark.ferguson@agric.wa.gov.au
Animal Production Science 50(12) 1011-1016 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10130
Submitted: 25 July 2010 Accepted: 15 October 2010 Published: 23 November 2010
Abstract
Selection against fatness in the Australian sheep industry has been a priority, but defining the true value of fat requires an understanding of the effects it has on both the value of lamb carcasses and on sheep productivity. A Merino flock with 10 years of reproduction data was used to analyse the correlation between breeding values for fatness at yearling age (YFAT) and the number of lambs born per ewe mated (NLB). In 2 production years, NLB was related (P < 0.01) to YFAT resulting in an extra 14 or 24.5 lambs born per 100 ewes mated per mm of YFAT. Based on these relationships, bio-economic modelling was used to assess the whole-farm value of YFAT for different sheep production systems and for years representing a low, medium and high response of NLB to YFAT. The changes in whole-farm profitability for a 1-mm increase in YFAT varied from $1000 (2%) for a wool enterprise with a low response up to $44 000 (25%) for a lamb enterprise with a high response. Appropriate carcass value discounts for higher YFAT were investigated but were not evident because of the small change in GR fat depth associated with the range of YFAT investigated. In most years there is no impact of YFAT on NLB and therefore profitability, yet in years where Merino ewes with higher YFAT produce higher NLB, ewes with an extra 1 mm of YFAT will be up to 25% more profitable. Therefore, care is required in determining the appropriate selection pressure to be placed on YFAT in Merino selection.
References
Brown DJ, Huisman AE, Swan AA, Graser H-U, Woolaston RR, Ball AJ, Atkins KD, Banks RG (2007) Genetic evaluation for the Australian sheep industry. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 187–194.Edirisinghe A, Hill MJ, Donald GE, Hyder M, Warren B, Wheaton GA, Smith RCG (2000) Estimation of feed on offer and growth rate of pastures using remote sensing. In ‘10th Australian remote sensing and photogrammetry conference. Paper No. 112, Adelaide, Australia’. (CD-ROM)
Estany J, Villalba D, Tibau J, Soler J, Babot D, Noguera JL (2002a) Correlated response to selection for litter size in pigs: I. Growth, fat deposition, and feeding behaviour traits. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2556–2565.
Estany J, Villalba D, Tor M, Cubilo D, Noguera JL (2002b) Correlated response to selection for litter size in pigs: II. Carcass, meat, and fat quality traits. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2566–2573.
Ferguson MB, Adams NR, Robertson IRD (2007) Implications of selection for meat or wool traits on maternal performance in Merinos. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 195–198.
Fogarty NM (2009) Meat sheep breeding – where we are at and future challenges. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 18, 414–421.
Friggens NC (2003) Body lipid reserves and the reproductive cycle: towards a better understanding. Livestock Production Science 83, 219–236.
| Body lipid reserves and the reproductive cycle: towards a better understanding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gardner GE, Williams A, Siddell J, Ball AJ, Mortimer S, Jacob RH, Pearce KL, Rowe JB, Hocking Edwards J, Pethick DW (2010) Using Australian sheep breeding values to increase lean meat yield percentage. Animal Production Science 50, 1098–1106.
| Using Australian sheep breeding values to increase lean meat yield percentage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gernand E, Wassmuth R, Lenz H, von Borstel UU, Gauly M, König S (2008) Impact of energy supply of ewes on genetic parameters for fertility and carcass traits in Merino Long Wool sheep. Small Ruminant Research 75, 80–89.
Gunn RG, Doney JM, Russel AJF (1969) Fertility in Scottish Blackface ewes as influenced by nutrition and body condition at mating. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 289–294.
| Fertility in Scottish Blackface ewes as influenced by nutrition and body condition at mating.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hastings IM, Yang J, Hill WG (1991) Analysis of lines of mice selected on fat content. 4. Correlated responses in growth and reproduction. Genetical Research 58, 253–259.
| Analysis of lines of mice selected on fat content. 4. Correlated responses in growth and reproduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK383gtFKrtA%3D%3D&md5=fb3a6cb2e6e3d7d68b76aca504442a4dCAS | 1802807PubMed |
Hegarty RS, Shands C, Marchant R, Hopkins DL, Ball AJ, Harden S (2006) Effects of available nutrition and sire breeding values for growth and muscling on the development of crossbred lambs. 1: Growth and carcass characteristics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 593–603.
| Effects of available nutrition and sire breeding values for growth and muscling on the development of crossbred lambs. 1: Growth and carcass characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XlvFaqtL8%3D&md5=f9643e3a70f32d6ecce6d612a97f15ebCAS |
Hopkins DL, Stanley DF, Martin LC, Ponnampalam EN, van de Ven R (2007) Sire and growth path effects on sheep meat production. 1. Growth and carcass characteristics. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1208–1218.
| Sire and growth path effects on sheep meat production. 1. Growth and carcass characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kadim IT, Purchas RW, Rae AL, Barton RA (1989) Carcass characteristics of Southdown rams from high and low back fat selection lines. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 181–191.
McEwan JC, Morriss CA, Fennessy PF, Greer GJ, Bain WE, Hickey SM (2001) Selection for high or low backfat depth in Coopworth sheep: breeding-ewe traits. Animal Science 73, 241–252.
Pethick DW, Harper GS, Dunshea FR (2005) Fat metabolism and turnover. In ‘Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism’. 2nd edn. (Eds J Dijkstra, JM Forbes, J France) pp. 345–372. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Pethick DW, Warner RD, Banks RG (2006) Genetic improvement of lamb – industry issues and the need for integrated research. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 591–592.
| Genetic improvement of lamb – industry issues and the need for integrated research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pond CM (1992) An evolutionary and functional view of mammalian adipose tissue. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 51, 367–377.
| An evolutionary and functional view of mammalian adipose tissue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7is1equg%3D%3D&md5=ea5f2e3294f0efc1a4cfdcc6d193c514CAS | 1480631PubMed |
Russell BC, McAlister G, Ross IS, Pethick DW (2005) Lamb and sheep meat eating quality – industry and scientific issues and the need for integrated research. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 465–467.
| Lamb and sheep meat eating quality – industry and scientific issues and the need for integrated research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Safari E, Fogarty NM, Hopkins DL, Greeff JC, Brien FD, Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, Taylor PJ, van der Werf JHJ (2008) Genetic correlations between ewe reproduction and carcass and meat quality traits in Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125, 397–402.
| Genetic correlations between ewe reproduction and carcass and meat quality traits in Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FmtlOqsA%3D%3D&md5=472a25dceeae2836f6ad0319ee45d165CAS | 19134075PubMed |
Thompson AN, Young JM (2002) A comparison of the profitability of farming systems using wool and wool/meat sheep genotypes in south-west Victoria. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 615–619.
VSN International (2008) ‘Genstat release 11 reference manual. Part 3 procedure library PL19.’ (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
Warn LK, Geenty KG, McEachern S (2006) What is the optimum wool-meat enterprise type? In ‘Wool meets meat . Proceedings of the 2006 Australian Sheep Industry CRC Conference’. (Eds PB Cronje, D Maxwell) pp. 60–69. (Australian Sheep Industry Co-operative Research Centre: Armidale, NSW)
Young J, Bathgate A, Saul G, Clark S, Sanford P, Friend M (2004) MIDAS insights on profitably utilising perennial plants in Hamilton, Victoria. Report to the CRC for Plant-Based Solutions to Dryland Salinity. University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA.
Young JM, Thompson AN, Kennedy AJ (2010) Bioeconomic modelling to identify the relative importance of a range of critical control points for prime lamb production systems in south-west Victoria. Animal Production Science 50, 748–756.
| Bioeconomic modelling to identify the relative importance of a range of critical control points for prime lamb production systems in south-west Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
