Whole-farm profit and the optimum maternal liveweight profile of Merino ewe flocks lambing in winter and spring are influenced by the effects of ewe nutrition on the progeny’s survival and lifetime wool production
J. M. Young A , A. N. Thompson B D E F , M. Curnow C and C. M. Oldham CA Farming Systems Analysis Service, RMB 309, Kojonup, WA 6395, Australia.
B Department of Primary Industries Victoria, Private Bag 105, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.
C Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 444 Albany Highway, Albany, WA 6330, Australia.
D Present address: Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia.
E Present address: School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
F Corresponding author. Email: andrew.thompson@agric.wa.gov.au
Animal Production Science 51(9) 821-833 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10078
Submitted: 19 May 2010 Accepted: 12 July 2011 Published: 14 September 2011
Journal Compilation © CSIRO Publishing 2011 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Profitability of sheep production systems in southern Australia is optimised at a stocking rate that provides adequate nutrition for breeding ewes and enables efficient utilisation of grown pasture and supplements. In this paper we used bio-economic modelling to develop optimum liveweight1 profiles for spring-lambing Merino ewes in different environments. The modelling included the impacts of the ewe liveweight profile on the production of the ewe and the survival and lifetime wool production of her progeny. Fifteen ewe liveweight profiles were analysed for each region to determine the profitability of varying ewe liveweight at joining, varying rate of loss of liveweight after joining and the rate of gain in liveweight from the minimum to lambing. The analyses support the hypotheses that whole-farm profitability is sensitive to the liveweight profile of Merino ewe flocks and that there is a liveweight profile that maximises whole-farm profit. The variation between the most and least profitable ewe liveweight profile was $69 0002 per farm ($14.30/ewe) for south-west Victoria, $51 000 per farm ($8.70/ewe) for Great Southern Western Australia and $33 300 per farm ($9.70/ewe) for southern New South Wales. The changes in profit were due to differences in costs of feeding to achieve the ewe liveweight profile and its influence on the production of both the ewes and their progeny. Failure to include the impacts of liveweight profile on progeny survival and lifetime wool production incorrectly identifies the optimum ewe liveweight profile and provided inaccurate estimates of profitability. The optimum liveweight profiles for ewes lambing in spring were similar for all three regions and insensitive to changing commodity prices, pasture productivity and management. The optimum profile was to join ewes at ~90% of the standard reference weight of the genotype, lose a small amount of weight after joining and regain weight in late pregnancy to return to the joining weight by lambing. Regaining the liveweight lost in early pregnancy by lambing is the most important target to achieve. The cost per farm of missing this liveweight target by 1 kg was $13 000 ($2.60/ewe) for south-west Victoria, $8900 ($1.45/ewe) for Great Southern Western Australia and $5500 ($1.65/ewe) for southern New South Wales. By contrast, the cost per farm of missing the joining target by 1 kg was $5500 for south-west Victoria and less than $2000 across the other two regions. Whole-farm profit increased with increasing stocking rate up to an optimum and regardless of stocking rate there is an additional opportunity to increase whole-farm profit by up to 15% by managing ewes to achieve the optimum liveweight profile. This indicates that the optimum liveweight profile should be achieved by increasing the level of grain feeding and altering the timing of utilising the farm feed resources rather than manipulating stocking rate.
References
Behrendt R, van Burgel AJ, Bailey A, Barber P, Curnow M, Gordon DJ, Hocking Edwards JE, Oldham CM, Thompson AN (2011) On-farm paddock-scale comparisons across southern Australia confirm that increasing the nutrition of Merino ewes improves their production and the lifetime performance of their progeny. Animal Production Science 51, 805–812.| On-farm paddock-scale comparisons across southern Australia confirm that increasing the nutrition of Merino ewes improves their production and the lifetime performance of their progeny.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Curnow M, Oldham CM, Behrendt R, Gordon DJ, Hyder MW, Rose IJ, Whale JW, Young JM, Thompson AN (2011) Successful adoption of new guidelines for the nutritional management of ewes is dependent on the development of appropriate tools and information. Animal Production Science 51, 851–856.
| Successful adoption of new guidelines for the nutritional management of ewes is dependent on the development of appropriate tools and information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ferguson MB, Thompson AN, Gordon DJ, Hyder MW, Kearney GA, Oldham CM, Paganoni BL (2011) The wool production and reproduction of Merino ewes can be predicted from changes in liveweight during pregnancy and lactation. Animal Production Science 51, 763–775.
| The wool production and reproduction of Merino ewes can be predicted from changes in liveweight during pregnancy and lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kelly RW (1992) Lamb mortality and growth to weaning in commercial Merino flocks in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 1399–1416.
| Lamb mortality and growth to weaning in commercial Merino flocks in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kelly RW, MacLeod I, Hynd P, Greeff J (1996) Nutrition during fetal life alters annual wool production and quality in young Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36, 259–267.
| Nutrition during fetal life alters annual wool production and quality in young Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kelly RW, Greeff JC, Macleod I (2006) Lifetime changes in wool production of Merino sheep following differential feeding in fetal and early life. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 867–876.
| Lifetime changes in wool production of Merino sheep following differential feeding in fetal and early life.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kingwell RS, Pannell DJ (Eds) (1987) ‘MIDAS: a bioeconomic model of a dryland farming system.’ (Pudoc: Wageningen)
Kleemann DO, Walker SK (2006) Fertility in South Australian commercial merino flocks: relationships between reproductive traits and environmental cues. Theriogenology 63, 2416–2433.
Lean G (2008) Productivity and profitability of Western Victoria farms over the last 8 years. In ‘Proceedings of the Sheep Veterinary Conference’. (September 2008). (Eds C Trengrove, R Suter) (Australian Veterinary Association: Eight Mile Plains, Qld)
Lindsay DR, Knight TW, Smith JF, Oldham CM (1975) Studies in ovine fertility in agricultural regions of Western Australia: ovulation rate, fertility and lambing performance. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 189–198.
| Studies in ovine fertility in agricultural regions of Western Australia: ovulation rate, fertility and lambing performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Oldham CM, Thompson AN, Ferguson MB, Gordon DJ, Kearney GA, Paganoni BL (2011) The birthweight and survival of Merino lambs can be predicted from the profile of liveweight change of their mothers during pregnancy. Animal Production Science 51, 776–783.
| The birthweight and survival of Merino lambs can be predicted from the profile of liveweight change of their mothers during pregnancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pannell DJ (1996) ‘Introduction to practical linear programming.’ (John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York) 332 pp.
Purser DB, Southey IN (1984) Fluctuations in nutrient supply in the south west of Western Australia. In ‘Wool production in Western Australia’. (Eds SK Baker, DG Masters, IH Williams) pp. 99–111. (Australian Society of Animal Production, Western Australian Branch: Perth).
Rossiter RC (1966) Ecology of Mediterranean annual-type pasture. Advances in Agronomy 18, 1–56.
| Ecology of Mediterranean annual-type pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Standing Committee on Agriculture (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock. Ruminants.’ (Standing Committee on Agriculture Ruminants Subcommittee and CSIRO: East Melbourne)
Thompson AN, Young JM (2002) Potential economic benefits from improving ewe nutrition to optimise lifetime wool production and quality. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 503–509.
Thompson AN, Doyle PT, Grimm M (1994) Effects of differential grazing of annual pastures in spring on sheep and wool production. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 367–389.
| Effects of differential grazing of annual pastures in spring on sheep and wool production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson AN, Ferguson MB, Gordon DJ, Kearney GA, Oldham CM, Paganoni BL (2011a) Improving the nutrition of Merino ewes during pregnancy increases the fleece weight and reduces the fibre diameter of their progeny’s wool during their lifetime and these effects can be predicted from the ewe’s liveweight profile. Animal Production Science 51, 794–804.
| Improving the nutrition of Merino ewes during pregnancy increases the fleece weight and reduces the fibre diameter of their progeny’s wool during their lifetime and these effects can be predicted from the ewe’s liveweight profile.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson AN, Ferguson MB, Campbell AJD, Gordon DJ, Kearney GA, Oldham CM, Paganoni BL (2011b) Improving the nutrition of Merino ewes during pregnancy and lactation increases weaning weight and survival of progeny but does not affect their mature size. Animal Production Science 51, 784–793.
| Improving the nutrition of Merino ewes during pregnancy and lactation increases weaning weight and survival of progeny but does not affect their mature size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Burgel AJ, Oldham CM, Behrendt R, Curnow M, Gordon DJ, Thompson AN (2011) The merit of condition score and fat score as alternatives to liveweight for managing the nutrition of ewes. Animal Production Science 51, 834–841.
| The merit of condition score and fat score as alternatives to liveweight for managing the nutrition of ewes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Warn LK, Geenty KG, McEachern S (2006) What is the optimum wool-meat enterprise type? International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 54, 40–49.
White DH, Nagorcka BN, Birrell HA (1979) Predicting wool growth of sheep under field conditions. In ‘Physiological and environmental limitations to wool growth: proceedings of a national workshop, Leura, New South Wales, Australia, April 1978’. (Eds JL Black, PJ Reis) pp. 139–161. (University of New England Publishing Unit: Armidale)
Young JM (1995) ‘MIDAS, Model of an Integrated Dryland Agricultural System. Manual and documentation for the Great Southern model.’ (CLIMA, University of WA: Perth)
Young JM, Thompson AN, Kennedy AJ (2011) Bioeconomic modelling to identify the critical control points for prime lamb production systems in southwest Victoria. Animal Production Science 50, 748–756.
| Bioeconomic modelling to identify the critical control points for prime lamb production systems in southwest Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
