Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > AN10038
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 50(8)

Effect of breeding for milk yield, diet and management on enteric methane emissions from dairy cows

M. J. Bell A C , E. Wall A , G. Russell B , C. Morgan A and G. Simm A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A SAC Sustainable Livestock Systems Group, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK.

B School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN, UK.

C Corresponding author. Email: matthew.bell@sac.ac.uk

Animal Production Science 50(8) 817-826 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10038
Submitted: 17 March 2010  Accepted: 7 June 2010   Published: 31 August 2010

Abstract

Enteric methane production from livestock is an important source of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. The aim of the present study was to (1) assess the effect of long-term breeding for kilograms of milk fat plus protein production and (2) investigate the influence of parity, genetic line and diet on predicted enteric methane emissions of Holstein Friesian dairy cows. Analyses were based on 17 years of experimental data for lactating and dry cows, housed and at pasture. Restricted maximum likelihood (REML) was used to assess the effects of parity, genetic line and diet on the predicted enteric methane output of lactating and dry cows. A non-linear equation based on metabolisable energy intake (MEI) was used to predict daily enteric methane output. The present study found that selection for kilograms of milk fat plus protein production, zero-grazing low-forage diets and maintaining persistently high-yielding older cows can reduce a cow’s enteric methane emissions per kilogram milk by up to 12%, on average. Comparing the first 5 years to the most recent 5 years of the study period showed that large savings of 19% and 23% in enteric methane per kilogram milk were made in cows selected for milk fat plus protein or selected to remain close to the average genetic merit for milk fat plus protein production for all animals evaluated in the UK, respectively. Additionally, management to minimise the length of the drying-off period can help reduce enteric methane emissions during a cow’s lactation period.

Additional keywords: dry, grazing, housed, lactating, methane prediction.


Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the farm staff at the University of Edinburgh and at the SAC Dairy Research Centre for recording the data used in this study and to Ross McGinn (database manager) for maintaining such a thorough database. Advice from Tianhai Yan, Andre Bannink, Jan Dijkstra and Ian Nevison is very much appreciated. This work is sponsored by The Scottish Government Rural and Environmental Research and Analysis Directorate (RERAD) and SAC. Matt Bell is grateful to RERAD for a postgraduate scholarship.


References


AFRC (1993) ‘Energy protein requirements of ruminants.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, Oxon, UK)

Bauman DE, McCutcheon SN, Steinhour WD, Eppard PJ, Sechen SJ (1985) Sources of variation and prospects for improvement of productive efficiency in the dairy cow: a review. Journal of Animal Science 60, 583–592.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Bell MJ , Wall E , Russell G , Simm G (2009) Modelling methane output from lactating and dry dairy cows. In ‘Aspects of applied biology 93. Integrated agricultural systems: methodologies, modeling and measuring’. (Eds M MacLeod, S Mayne, N McRoberts, J Oldham, A Renwick, M Rivington, G Russell, L Toma, K Topp, E Wall, A Wreford) pp. 47–53. (Association of Applied Biologists: Wellesbourne, UK)

Capper JL, Cady RA, Bauman DE (2009) The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. Journal of Animal Science 87, 2160–2167.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Chagunda MGG, Römer DAM, Roberts DJ (2009) Effect of genotype and feeding regime on enteric methane, non-milk nitrogen and performance of dairy cows during the winter feeding period. Livestock Science 122, 323–332.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Coffey MP, Emmans GC, Brotherstone S (2001) Genetic evaluation of dairy bulls for energy balance traits using random regression. Animal Science 73, 29–40. open url image1

Eastridge ML (2006) Major advances in applied dairy cattle nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1311–1323.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Ellis JL, Kebreab E, Odongo NE, McBride BW, Okine EK, France J (2007) Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3456–3467.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2010) ‘Greenhouse gas emissions from the dairy sector – A life cycle assessment.’ (Food and Agriculture Organisation: Rome)

Halachmi I, Edan Y, Moallem U, Maltz E (2004) Predicting feed intake of the individual dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 2254–2267.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Hegarty RS (2004) Genotype differences and their impact on digestive tract function of ruminants: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 459–467.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Holter JB, Young AJ (1992) Methane prediction in dry and lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 2165–2175.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Johnson KA, Johnson DE (1995) Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2483–2492.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Kebreab E , France J , McBride BW , Odongo N , Bannink A , Mills JAN , Dijkstra J (2006) Evaluation of models to predict methane emissions from enteric fermentation in North American dairy cattle. In ‘Nutrient digestion and utilization in farm animals: modelling approaches’. (Eds E Kebreab, J Dijkstra, WJJ Gerrits, A Bannick, J France) pp. 299–313. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Kennedy J, Dillon P, Delaby L, Faverdin P, Stakelum G, Rath M (2003) Effect of genetic merit and concentrate supplementation on grass intake and milk production with Holstein Friesian dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 610–621.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Lawes Agricultural Trust (2009) ‘Genstat 11, version 11.1 reference manual.’ (Clarendon Press: London)

Lovett DK, Shalloo L, Dillon P, O’Mara FP (2006) A systems approach to quantify greenhouse gas fluxes from pastoral dairy production as affected by management regime. Agricultural Systems 88, 156–179.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

MAFF (1975) Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical bulletin 33. (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: London)

Mills JAN, Kebreab E, Yates CM, Crompton LA, Cammell SB, Dhanoa MS, Agnew RE, France J (2003) Alternative approaches to predicting methane emissions from dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 81, 3141–3150.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Moss AR, Jouany J-P, Newbold J (2000) Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Annales de Zootechnie 49, 231–253.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

NRC (2001) ‘Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle.’ 7th edn. (National Academy Press: Washington, DC)

Palliser CC , Woodward SL (2002) Using models to predict methane reduction in pasturefed dairy cows. In ‘Proceedings integrating management and decision support’. Part 1, 482. (Coordinated by Susan M Cuddy) pp. 162–167. (CSIRO: Canberra)

Patton J, Kenny DA, Mee JF, O’Mara FP, Wathes DC, Cook M, Murphy JJ (2006) Effect of milking frequency and diet on milk production, energy balance, and reproduction in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1478–1487.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Pinares-Patiño CS, Baumont R, Martin DR (2004) Methane emissions by Charolais cows grazing a monospecific pasture of timothy at four stages of maturity. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78, 769–777. open url image1

Pollott GE, Coffey MP (2008) The effect of genetic merit and production system on dairy cow fertility, measured using progesterone profiles and on-farm recording. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3649–3660.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Pryce JE, Nielsen BL, Veerkamp RF, Simm G (1999) Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 57, 193–201.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Roseler DK, Fox DG, Pell AN, Chase LE (1997) Evaluation of alternative equations for prediction of intake for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 864–877.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Steinfeld H , Gerber P , Wassenaar T , Castel V , Rosales M , de Haan C (2006) ‘Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options.’ (Food and Agriculture Organisation: Rome)

Tamminga S , Bannink A , Dijkstra J , Zom R (2007) Feeding strategies to reduce methane loss in cattle. Animal Science Group report, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Ulyatt MJ, Lassey KR (2001) Methane emissions from pastoral systems: the situation in New Zealand. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producciόn Animal 9, 118–126. open url image1

Ulyatt MJ, Lassey KR, Shelton ID, Walker CF (2002) Seasonal variation in methane emission from dairy cows and breeding ewes grazing ryegrass/white clover pasture in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 217–226.
|  CAS | Crossref |
open url image1

Veen WAG (2000) Veevoedermaatregelen ter vermindering van methaanproductie door herkauwers. Schothorst Feed Research proefverslag, Lelystad, The Netherlands.

Veerkamp RF, Simm G, Oldham JD (1994) Effects of interactions between genotype and feeding system on milk production, feed intake, efficiency and body tissue mobilization in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 39, 229–241.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wilkerson VA, Casper DP, Mertens DR (1995) The prediction of methane production of Holstein cows by several equations. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 2402–2414.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Yan T , Mayne CS (2007) Mitigation strategies to reduce methane emission from dairy cows. In ‘High value grassland: providing biodiversity, a clean environment and premium products’. (Eds JJ Hopkins, AJ Duncan, DI McCracken, S Peel, JRB Tallowin) pp. 345–348. (University of Keele: Staffordshire, UK)

Yan T, Agnew RE, Murphy JJ, Ferris CP, Gordon FJ (2003) Evaluation of different energy feeding systems with production data from lactating dairy cows offered grass silage-based diets. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 1415–1428.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1