Modes of transmission of rumen protozoa between mature sheep
Simon H. Bird A B , R. S. Hegarty A and R. Woodgate AA Beef Industry Centre, Industry and Investment NSW, Trevenna Road, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: simon.bird@industry.nsw.gov.au
Animal Production Science 50(6) 414-417 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09216
Submitted: 17 December 2009 Accepted: 28 April 2010 Published: 11 June 2010
Abstract
Three experiments were conducted to evaluate routes by which viable rumen ciliate-protozoa may be transferred between mature sheep. Feed, water and faecal material were tested as possible vectors for protozoal transfer in addition to direct animal to animal contact. In Experiment 1, protozoa-free sheep were either offered or orally dosed with protozoa-contaminated material or allowed contact with faunated animals. The treated sheep were then monitored over a 4-week period for the appearance of protozoa in the rumen. Protozoa were successfully transferred to protozoa-free animals via contaminated water but no transfer occurred via feed or faeces or by direct animal to animal contact. In Experiment 2, the drinking water of penned faunated sheep was found to become contaminated with protozoa within 4–6 h of being placed in the pen. In Experiment 3, nine protozoa-free sheep were grazed in a paddock with a flock of 75 faunated ewes for periods of 1–3 weeks, and protozoa became established in one protozoa-free sheep. The results of these studies suggest that the most likely mode of transfer of protozoal cells from one sheep to another is via water, rather than by rumen fluid contaminating feed, or from faeces of faunated sheep. Further tests are required to demonstrate protozoal transmission via water occur under a range of conditions and inoculum levels.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Department of Climate Change and by NSW Industry and Investment (formerly NSW Department of Primary Industries).
de la Fuente G,
Perez-Quintana M,
Ceebrian JA, Fondevila M
(2006) Preliminary study on the effect of exposure to low temperature on the viability of both mixed and monocultures of rumen protozoa. Acta Protozoologica 45, 225–230.
Eadie JM
(1962a) Inter-relationships between certain rumen ciliate protozoa. Journal of General Microbiology 29, 579–588.
Eadie JM
(1962b) The development of rumen microbial populations in lambs and calves under various conditions of management. Journal of General Microbiology 29, 563–578.
Eugène M,
Archimède H, Sauvant D
(2004) Quantitative meta-analysis on the effects of defaunation of the rumen on growth, intake and digestion in ruminants. Livestock Production Science 85, 81–97.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lloyd D,
Hillman K,
Yarlett N, Williams AG
(1989) Hydrogen production by rumen holotrich protozoa: effects of oxygen and implications for metabolic control by in situ conditions. The Journal of Protozoology 36, 205–213.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Strelkov A,
Poljansky G, Isaakowa-Keo M
(1933) Über die Infektionswege der im Pansen und in der Haube der Wiederkäuer befindlichen Infusorien. Archiv für Tierernährung und Tierzücht 9, 679–697.
