Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of birthweight and birth rank on the survival of single and twin lambs born to ewe lambs

N. M. Schreurs A C , P. R. Kenyon B , F. J. Mulvaney B , P. C. H. Morel A , D. M. West B and S. T. Morris B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

B Sheep Research Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

C Corresponding author. Email: n.m.schreurs@massey.ac.nz

Animal Production Science 50(6) 460-464 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09184
Submitted: 7 December 2009  Accepted: 20 April 2010   Published: 11 June 2010

Abstract

Benefits of ewe lamb mating include improved lifetime production, increased rates of genetic gain and higher net profits. These benefits are only achieved if the ewe lamb successfully rears its offspring to weaning. A meta-analytic approach was used to assess the effects of birthweight and the interacting effect of birth rank on the survival to weaning of lambs born to ewe lambs. The data were from eight studies where birthweight and weight at weaning had been recorded for lambs born from ewe lambs. Data were for single- (n = 1392) or twin-born lambs (n = 456). The twin lambs were further classified as the ‘heavier’ or ‘lighter’ of the pair to give three birth rank categories. To compare the probability of dying before weaning between birth ranks, but with lambs compared at a similar birthweight, lambs were categorised by their birthweight as heavy (>3.8 kg) or light (<3.8 kg) and also categorised within their birth rank on their placement around the mean birthweight (birthweight deviation). A mid-range birthweight deviation fell between one standard deviation above or below the mean for each birth rank, whereas a low- and high-range birthweight fell below and above the mid-range, respectively. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of birth rank (single, heavier twin and lighter twin) and birthweight on lamb mortality up to weaning. To compare the probability of surviving up to weaning between the different birth ranks, relative risk ratios were calculated. Birth ranks were compared for lambs within the same birthweight group (heavy or light) and same birthweight deviation (low-, mid-, high-range). Decreasing birthweight increased mortality before weaning in twins and the change in mortality was greater for the lighter twin. Birthweight did not alter mortality before weaning in singles. Comparison of the birth ranks showed that there were differences (P < 0.05) in the probability of dying for lambs of different birth ranks but similar birthweight. The results suggest that management options for ewe lambs that increase the birthweight of the lighter twin could increase the weaning percentage.


Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge the providers of funding for the experiments: Meat and Wool New Zealand, C Alma Baker Trust and Massey University.


References


Dalton DC, Knight TW, Johnson DL (1980) Lamb survival in sheep breeds on New Zealand hill country. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 167–173. [Verified 10 May 2009]

Morel PCH, Kenyon PR (2006) Sensitivity analysis of weaner lamb production in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 66, 377–381. open url image1

Morel PCH, Morris ST, Kenyon PR (2008) Effects of birth weight on mortality in triplets born lambs. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 984–987.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Morel PCH, Morris ST, Kenyon PR (2009) Effects of birth weight on survival in twin born lambs. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 69, 75–79. open url image1

Morris ST, Kenyon PR, West DM (2005) Effect of hogget nutrition in pregnancy on lamb birthweight and survival to weaning. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 165–175. open url image1

Mulvaney FJ, Kenyon PR, Morris ST, West DM (2008) Ewe lamb nutrition during pregnancy affects pregnancy outcome. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1085–1089.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Rattray PV (1986) Feed requirements for maintenance, gain and production. In ‘Sheep production. Vol. II. Feeding, growth and health’. (Eds SN McCutcheon, MF McDonald, GA Wickham) pp. 75–109. (Ray Richards Publishers: Wellington, New Zealand)

Schreurs NM, Kenyon PR, Mulvaney FJ, Morel PCH, West DM, Morris ST (2010) Response of additional ewe lamb liveweight during gestation on birth and weaning weight of offspring and liveweight of the ewe lamb at weaning. Animal Production Science 50, 528–532.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

St-Pierre NR (2001) Invited review: integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 741–755.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Thompson BC, Muir PD, Smith NB (2004) Litter size, lamb survival, birth and twelve week weight in lambs born to cross-bred ewes. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 66, 233–237. open url image1

Yapi CV, Boylan WJ, Robinson RA (1990) Factors associated with causes of preweaning lamb mortality. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 10, 145–152.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1