The importance of species-specific survey designs: prey camera trap surveys significantly underestimate the detectability of endangered spotted-tailed quolls
T. Henderson A * , B. A. Fancourt
A and G. Ballard A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Ecosystem Management, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Australian Mammalogy 44(3) 380-386 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM21039
Submitted: 4 November 2021 Accepted: 24 February 2022 Published: 17 May 2022
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Mammal Society.
Abstract
The spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus) is an endangered marsupial carnivore that is often surveyed using camera traps. Camera trap surveys targeting quolls typically use meat-based lures and specific camera setups tailored to increase the probability of quoll detection. However, where quolls occur, they can also be incidentally detected as non-target species in camera surveys targeting small to medium-sized herbivorous or omnivorous mammals (‘prey’ surveys). We investigated whether quoll detectability using traditional ‘prey’ camera surveys could sufficiently approximate quoll detectability using targeted ‘quoll’ surveys, potentially enabling quoll data from prey surveys to be used in lieu of undertaking additional quoll-specific surveys. We used 50 Reconyx HC600 cameras to quantify and compare quoll detectability between prey and quoll surveys at each of two different sites. The number of quoll detections, number of individual quolls detected and the probability of quoll detection at both sites were significantly higher in quoll surveys than in prey surveys. Our findings suggest that prey surveys substantially underestimate quoll detectability, resulting in incomplete datasets. We therefore caution against using quoll detection data from prey camera trap surveys for anything other than incidental presence observations, to avoid misleading survey and management outcomes.
Keywords: attractant, camera trap, carnivore, Dasyurus maculatus, lure, marsupial, mesopredator, quoll surveys, wildlife monitoring.
References
Austin, C., Tuft, K., Ramp, D., Cremona, T., and Webb, J. K. (2017). Bait preference for remote camera trap studies of the endangered northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus). Australian Mammalogy 39, 72–77.| Bait preference for remote camera trap studies of the endangered northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.
Belcher, C. A. (2003). Demographics of tiger quoll (Dasyurus maculatus maculatus) populations in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 51, 611–626.
Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). A practical information-theoretic approach. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference 2, 70–71.
Caravaggi, A., Banks, P. B., Burton, A. C., Finlay, C. M. V., Haswell, P. M., Hayward, M. W., Rowcliffe, M. J., and Wood, M. D. (2017). A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 3, 109–122.
| A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Claridge, A. W., Ballard, G., Körtner, G., Fleming, P. J. S., Forge, T., and Hine, A. (2021). Lethal control of eutherian predators via aerial baiting does not negatively affect female spotted-tailed quolls (Dasyurus maculatus maculatus) and their pouch young. Wildlife Research 48, 273–288.
| Lethal control of eutherian predators via aerial baiting does not negatively affect female spotted-tailed quolls (Dasyurus maculatus maculatus) and their pouch young.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Courtney Jones, S. K., and Mikac, K. M. (2019). Quantifying daily activity patterns of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus) using camera trap data from a stronghold population in south-eastern New South Wales. Australian Mammalogy 41, 283–286.
| Quantifying daily activity patterns of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus) using camera trap data from a stronghold population in south-eastern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Diete, R. L., Meek, P. D., Dixon, K. M., Dickman, C. R., and Leung, L. K.-P. (2015). Best bait for your buck: bait preference for camera trapping north Australian mammals. Australian Journal of Zoology 63, 376–382.
| Best bait for your buck: bait preference for camera trapping north Australian mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Driessen, M. M., Jarman, P. J., Troy, S., and Callander, S. (2017). Animal detections vary among commonly used camera trap models. Wildlife Research 44, 291–297.
| Animal detections vary among commonly used camera trap models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fancourt, B. A., Sweaney, M., and Fletcher, D. B. (2018). More haste, less speed: pilot study suggests camera trap detection zone could be more important than trigger speed to maximise species detections. Australian Mammalogy 40, 118–121.
| More haste, less speed: pilot study suggests camera trap detection zone could be more important than trigger speed to maximise species detections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ferreras, P., Díaz-Ruiz, F., and Monterroso, P. (2018). Improving mesocarnivore detectability with lures in camera-trapping studies. Wildlife Research 45, 505–517.
| Improving mesocarnivore detectability with lures in camera-trapping studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fiske, I., and Chandler, R. (2011). Unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software 43, 1–23.
| Unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Glen, A. S., and Dickman, C. R. (2006). Diet of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus) in eastern Australia: effects of season, sex and size. Journal of Zoology 269, 241–248.
| Diet of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus) in eastern Australia: effects of season, sex and size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harley, D., Holland, G., Hradsky, B., and Antrobus, J. (2014). The use of camera traps to detect arboreal mammals: lessons from targeted surveys for the cryptic Leadbeater’s possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri). In ‘Camera Trapping: Wildlife Management and Research’. (Eds P. Meek, P. Fleming, G. Ballard, P. Banks, A. Claridge, J. Sanderson, D. Swann) pp. 233–243. (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Victoria.)
Henderson, T., Fancourt, B. A., Rajaratnam, R., Vernes, K., and Ballard, G. (2021). Spatial and temporal interactions between endangered spotted-tailed quolls and introduced red foxes in a fragmented landscape. Journal of Zoology 315, 276–287.
| Spatial and temporal interactions between endangered spotted-tailed quolls and introduced red foxes in a fragmented landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holinda, D., Burgar, J. M., and Burton, A. C. (2020). Effects of scent lure on camera trap detections vary across mammalian predator and prey species. PLos One 15, e0229055.
| Effects of scent lure on camera trap detections vary across mammalian predator and prey species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32396558PubMed |
Jones, M. E., Rose, R. K., and Burnett, S. (2001). Dasyurus maculatus. Mammalian Species 676, 1–9.
| Dasyurus maculatus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kolowski, J. M., and Forrester, T. D. (2017). Camera trap placement and the potential for bias due to trails and other features. PloS One 12, e0186679.
| Camera trap placement and the potential for bias due to trails and other features.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29045478PubMed |
Körtner, G., Holznagel, N., Fleming, P. J. S., and Ballard, G. (2015). Home range and activity patterns measured with GPS collars in spotted-tailed quolls. Australian Journal of Zoology 63, 424–431.
| Home range and activity patterns measured with GPS collars in spotted-tailed quolls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Körtner, G., Claridge, A., and Ballard, G. (2019). Denning behaviour of female spotted-tailed quolls during the breeding season. Australian Journal of Zoology 67, 145–152.
| Denning behaviour of female spotted-tailed quolls during the breeding season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lunney, D., Sonawane, I., Shannon, I., Hope, B., and Crowther, M. S. (2021). Combining cameras and citizen science to define the distribution and behaviour of dingoes and foxes in New South Wales. Australian Zoologist 41, 608–642.
| Combining cameras and citizen science to define the distribution and behaviour of dingoes and foxes in New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Royle, J. A., and Langtimm, C. A. (2002). Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83, 2248–2255.
| Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McLean, C. M., Vårhammar, A., and Mikac, K. M. (2015). Use of motion-activated remote cameras to detect the endangered spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus): results from a pilot study. Australian Mammalogy 37, 113–115.
| Use of motion-activated remote cameras to detect the endangered spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus): results from a pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meek, P. D., Ballard, G., Claridge, A., Kays, R., Moseby, K., O’Brien, T., O’Connell, A., Sanderson, J., Swann, D. E., Tobler, M., and Townsend, S. (2014). Recommended guiding principles for reporting on camera trapping research. Biodiversity and Conservation 23, 2321–2343.
| Recommended guiding principles for reporting on camera trapping research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meek, P., Ballard, G., Fleming, P., and Falzon, G. (2016a). Are we getting the full picture? Animal responses to camera traps and implications for predator studies. Ecology and Evolution 6, 3216–3225.
| Are we getting the full picture? Animal responses to camera traps and implications for predator studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27096080PubMed |
Meek, P. D., Ballard, G. A., and Falzon, G. (2016b). The higher you go the less you will know: placing camera traps high to avoid theft will affect detection. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 2, 204–211.
| The higher you go the less you will know: placing camera traps high to avoid theft will affect detection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mills, D., Fattebert, J., Hunter, L., and Slotow, R. (2019). Maximising camera trap data: using attractants to improve detection of elusive species in multi-species surveys. PLos One 14, e0216447.
| Maximising camera trap data: using attractants to improve detection of elusive species in multi-species surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31141506PubMed |
Niedballa, J., Sollmann, R., Courtiol, A., and Wilting, A. (2016). camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7, 1457–1462.
| camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NPWS (2020). WildCount. Broadscale, long-term, monitoring of fauna in NSW National Parks 2012-2016. Available at https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/animals-and-plants/surveys-monitoring-and-records/native-animal-monitoring
Parsons, A. W., Forrester, T., McShea, W. J., Baker-Whatton, M. C., Millspaugh, J. J., and Kays, R. (2017). Do occupancy or detection rates from camera traps reflect deer density? Journal of Mammalogy 98, 1547–1557.
| Do occupancy or detection rates from camera traps reflect deer density?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Development Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.r-project.org/index.html
Rowland, J., Hoskin, C. J., and Burnett, S. (2020). Camera traps are an effective method for identifying individuals and determining the sex of spotted-tailed quolls (Dasyurus maculatus gracilis). Australian Mammalogy 42, 349–356.
| Camera traps are an effective method for identifying individuals and determining the sex of spotted-tailed quolls (Dasyurus maculatus gracilis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith, D. H. V., and Weston, K. A. (2017). Capturing the cryptic: a comparison of detection methods for stoats (Mustela erminea) in alpine habitats. Wildlife Research 44, 418-426.
| Capturing the cryptic: a comparison of detection methods for stoats (Mustela erminea) in alpine habitats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sollmann, R. (2018). A gentle introduction to camera-trap data analysis. African Journal of Ecology 56, 740–749.
| A gentle introduction to camera-trap data analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thorn, M., Scott, D. M., Green, M., Bateman, P. W., and Cameron, E. Z. (2009). Estimating brown hyaena occupancy using baited camera traps. African Journal of Wildlife Research 39, 1–10.
| Estimating brown hyaena occupancy using baited camera traps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tobler, M. W., Carrillo-Percastegui, S. E., Leite Pitman, R., Mares, R., and Powell, G. (2008). An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation 11, 169–178.
| An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Troy, S. N. (2014). Spatial ecology of the Tasmanian spotted-tailed quoll, University of Tasmania.
