What are we missing? How the delay-period setting on camera traps affects mesopredator detection
Jessica Sparkes A F , Peter J. S. Fleming B C D , Adam McSorley E and Bruce Mitchell EA Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Pine Gully Road, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.
B Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
C Ecosystem Management, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
D Institute for Agriculture and the Environment, Centre for Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
E Pests and Weeds Unit, New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, 43 Bridge Street, Hurstville, NSW 2220, Australia.
F Corresponding author. Email: jessica.todd@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Australian Mammalogy 43(2) 243-247 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM19068
Submitted: 11 December 2019 Accepted: 26 March 2020 Published: 29 April 2020
Abstract
Trigger-delays are often set on camera traps to save labour costs involved with servicing camera traps and reviewing images. However, the effects that delays of various length could have on data quantity and quality are unmeasured. Here, we aimed to assess how varying trigger-delays (5, 10, 30 and 60 min) or using an ‘independent event’ classification (i.e. a series of images taken less than 5 min apart on the same camera trap) affects detection rates and the number of individuals per trigger for feral cats and European red foxes. Using real camera trap images, we simulated trigger-delays of between 5 min and 60 min and compared with the independent events. Trigger-delays caused inaccuracies in detection frequencies of 3.6–22.0% for feral cats and 3.1–24.0% for foxes. Further, 68% of independent events in which two individual foxes were present were reduced to a single fox trigger when implementing a 5-min trigger-delay (n = 65). Using trigger-delays likely reduces accuracy and reliability of data generated for wildlife monitoring programs and could affect the types of observations and analyses able to be made from imagery so obtained.
Additional keywords: conservation, Felis catus, Oolambeyan National Park, Reconyx, trigger-delays, Vulpes vulpes.
References
Allen, B. L., Behrendorff, L., Willsher, L., Kaluza, J., and Oakey, J. (2017). Recent invasion of European red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) on to Fraser Island (K’gari) and South Stradbroke Island. Austral Ecology 42, 752–758.| Recent invasion of European red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) on to Fraser Island (K’gari) and South Stradbroke Island.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson, D. R. (2001). The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 1294–1297.
Apps, P. J., and McNutt, J. W. (2018). How camera traps work and how to work them. African Journal of Ecology 56, 702–709.
| How camera traps work and how to work them.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burton, A. C., Neilson, E., Moreira, D., Ladle, A., Steenweg, R., Fisher, J. T., Bayne, E., and Boutin, S. (2015). Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 675–685.
| Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Caughley, G. (1980). ‘Analysis of Vertebrate Populations.’ (John Wiley and Sons: London.)
ISO Central Secretariat (1987). International Standards Organisation – about us. Available at: www.iso.org/home.html [accessed 18 January 2020].
Claridge, A. W., and Paull, D. J. (2014). How long is a piece of string? Camera trapping methodology is question dependent. In ‘Camera Trapping: Wildlife Management and Research’. (Eds P. Meek, and P. Fleming.) pp. 205–214. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Falzon, G., Lawson, C., Cheung, K.-W., Vernes, K., Ballard, G.-A., Fleming, P. J. S., Glen, A. S., Milne, H., Mather-Zardain, A., and Meek, P. D. (2019). ClassifyMe: a field-scouting software for the identification of wildlife in camera trap images. Animals (Basel) 10, .
| ClassifyMe: a field-scouting software for the identification of wildlife in camera trap images.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31892236PubMed |
Fancourt, B. A., Cremasco, P., Wilson, C., and Gentle, M. N. (2019). Do introduced apex predators suppress introduced mesopredators? A multiscale spatiotemporal study of dingoes and feral cats in Australia suggests not. Journal of Applied Ecology 56, 2584–2595.
| Do introduced apex predators suppress introduced mesopredators? A multiscale spatiotemporal study of dingoes and feral cats in Australia suggests not.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harvey, P. (2015). ExifTool 9.99. Available at: www.exifpro.com/index.html [accessed 30 October 2019].
Jedrzejewski, W., Puerto, M. F., Goldberg, J. F., Hebblewhite, M., Abarca, M., Gamarra, G., Calderon, L. E., Romero, J. F., Viloria, A. L., Carreno, R., Robinson, H. S., Lampo, M., Boede, E. O., Biganzoli, A., Stachowicz, I., Velasquez, G., and Schmidt, K. (2017). Density and population structure of the jaguar (Panthera onca) in a protected area of Los Llanos, Venezuela, from 1 year of camera trap monitoring. Mammal Research 62, 9–19.
| Density and population structure of the jaguar (Panthera onca) in a protected area of Los Llanos, Venezuela, from 1 year of camera trap monitoring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kearney, S. G., Cawardine, J., Reside, A. E., Fisher, D. O., Maron, M., Doherty, T. S., Legge, S., Silcock, J., Woinarski, J. C. Z., Garnett, S. T., Wintle, B. A., and Watson, J. E. M. (2018). The threats to Australia’s imperilled species and implications for a national conservation response. Pacific Conservation Biology 25, 231–244.
| The threats to Australia’s imperilled species and implications for a national conservation response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Koivuniemi, M., Auttila, M., Niemi, M., Levanen, R., and Kunnasranta, M. (2016). Photo-ID as a tool for studying and monitoring the endangered Saimaa ringed seal. Endangered Species Research 30, 29–36.
| Photo-ID as a tool for studying and monitoring the endangered Saimaa ringed seal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kowalski, M., and Kowalski, M. (2013). ExifPro 2.1. Available at: www.exifpro.com/index.html [accessed 30 October 2019].
Lazenby, B. T., Mooney, N. J., and Dickman, C. R. (2014). Effects of low-level culling of feral cats in open populations: a case study from the forests of southern Tasmania. Wildlife Research 41, 407–420.
| Effects of low-level culling of feral cats in open populations: a case study from the forests of southern Tasmania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Legge, S., Murphy, B. P., McGregor, H., Woinarski, J. C. Z., Augusteyn, J., Ballard, G., Baseler, M., Buckmaster, T., Dickman, C. R., Doherty, T., Edwards, G., Eyre, T., Fancourt, B. A., Ferguson, D., Forsyth, D. M., Geary, W. L., Gentle, M., Gillespie, G., Greenwood, L., Hohnen, R., Hume, S., Johnson, C. N., Maxwell, M., McDonald, P. J., Morris, K., Moseby, K., Newsome, T., Nimmo, D., Paltridge, R., Ramsey, D., Read, J., Rendall, A., Rich, M., Ritchie, E., Rowland, J., Short, J., Stokeld, D., Sutherland, D. R., Wayne, A. F., Woodford, L., and Zewe, F. (2017). Enumerating a continental-scale threat: how many feral cats are in Australia? Biological Conservation 206, 293–303.
| Enumerating a continental-scale threat: how many feral cats are in Australia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lepard, C. C., Moll, R. J., Cepek, J. D., Lorch, P. D., Dennis, P. M., Robison, T., and Montgomery, R. A. (2019). The influence of the delay-period setting on camera-trap data storage, wildlife detections and occupancy models. Wildlife Research 46, 37–53.
| The influence of the delay-period setting on camera-trap data storage, wildlife detections and occupancy models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L., and Hines, J. E. (2017). ‘Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence.’ (Academic Press/Elsevier: London.)
McGregor, H. W., Legge, S., Potts, J., Jones, M. E., and Johnson, C. N. (2015). Density and home range of feral cats in north-western Australia. Wildlife Research 42, 223–231.
| Density and home range of feral cats in north-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meek, P. D., Ballard, G. A., and Fleming, P. J. S. (2015a). The pitfalls of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37, 13–22.
| The pitfalls of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meek, P. D., Ballard, G. A., Vernes, K., and Fleming, P. J. S. (2015b). The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37, 1–12.
| The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Monterroso, P., Rich, L. N., Serronha, A., Ferreras, P., and Alves, P. C. (2014). Efficiency of hair snares and camera traps to survey mesocarnivore populations. European Journal of Wildlife Research 60, 279–289.
| Efficiency of hair snares and camera traps to survey mesocarnivore populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (2014). Oolambeyan National Park plan of management. State of NSW, and the Office of Environment & Heritage, Sydney.
Olsen, P. (1998). ‘Australia’s Pest Animals: New Solutions to Old Problems.’ (Bureau of Resource Sciences and Kangaroo Press Pty Ltd: Canberra and Sydney.)
Tate, J., and Panteghini, M. (2007). Standardisation – the theory and the practice. The Clinical Biochemist. Reviews / Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists 28, 127–130.
Tracey, J. P., Fleming, P. J. S., and Melville, G. J. (2008). Accuracy of some aerial survey estimators: contrasts with known numbers. Wildlife Research 35, 377–384.
| Accuracy of some aerial survey estimators: contrasts with known numbers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vine, S. J., Crowther, M. S., Lapidge, S. J., Dickman, C. R., Mooney, N., Piggott, M. P., and English, A. W. (2009). Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Wildlife Research 36, 436–446.
| Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
West, P. (2008). Assessing invasive animals in Australia 2008. National Land & Water Resources Audit and Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra.
West, P. (2018). ‘Guide to Introduced Pest Animals of Australia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
