Register      Login
Australian Mammalogy Australian Mammalogy Society
Journal of the Australian Mammal Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A permanent security post for camera trapping

Paul D. Meek A B C E , Guy-Anthony Ballard D and Peter J. S. Fleming C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, PO Box 4019, Coffs Harbour Jetty, NSW 2450, Australia.

B Ecosystem Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

C Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Locked Bag 6001, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

D Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, PO Box U86, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: paul.meek@invasiveanimals.com

Australian Mammalogy 35(1) 123-127 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM12014
Submitted: 29 February 2012  Accepted: 15 June 2012   Published: 26 October 2012

Abstract

As the use of camera traps in wildlife management in Australia rapidly increases, government agencies, private enterprises, universities and individuals are investing considerable amounts of money in camera trap technology for research, monitoring and recreation. Often camera traps need to be placed along vehicle tracks or in obvious locations to detect animal activity. Consequently, units are frequently highly visible and therefore easily located by would-be thieves. We describe a field-tested security post design that increases security for both camera traps and data, whilst also offering a means of standardising placement.

Additional keywords: carnivores, tracks.


References

Allen, L., Engeman, R., and Krupa, H. (1996). Evaluation of three relative abundance indices for assessing dingo populations. Wildlife Research 23, 197–205.
Evaluation of three relative abundance indices for assessing dingo populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bancroft, P. (2010). Property surveillance and security. In ‘Deer Cameras: The Science of Scouting’. Thomas L. Jr. (Ed.) pp. 222–231. (Quality Deer Management Association: Bogart.)

Bridges, A. S., and Noss, A. J. (2011). Behaviour and activity patterns. In ‘Camera Traps in Animal Ecology Methods and Analyses’. (Eds A. F. O’Connell, J. D. Nichols, K. U. Karanth.) pp. 57–69. (Springer: New York.)

Catling, P. C., and Burt, R. J. (1997). Studies of the ground-dwelling mammals of eucalypt forests in north-eastern New South Wales: the species, their abundance and distribution. Wildlife Research 24, 1–19.
Studies of the ground-dwelling mammals of eucalypt forests in north-eastern New South Wales: the species, their abundance and distribution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Claridge, A. W., Mifsud, G., Dawson, J., and Saxon, M. J. (2004). Use of infrared digital cameras to investigate the behaviour of cryptic species. Wildlife Research 31, 645–650.
Use of infrared digital cameras to investigate the behaviour of cryptic species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Claridge, A. W., Paull, D. J., and Barry, S. C. (2010). Detection of medium-sized ground-dwelling mammals using infrared digital cameras: an alternative way forward? Australian Mammalogy 32, 165–171.
Detection of medium-sized ground-dwelling mammals using infrared digital cameras: an alternative way forward?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cutler, T. L., and Swann, D. E. (1999). Using remote photography in wildlife ecology: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 571–581.

De Bondi, N., White, J. G., Stevens, M., and Cooke, R. (2010). A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities. Wildlife Research 37, 456–465.
A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Engeman, R. M. (2005). Indexing principles and a widely applicable paradigm for indexing animal populations. Wildlife Research 32, 203–210.
Indexing principles and a widely applicable paradigm for indexing animal populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fiehler, C. M., Cypher, B. L., Bremner-Harrison, S., and Pounds, D. (2007). A theft-resistant adjustable security box for digital cameras. Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 2077–2080.
A theft-resistant adjustable security box for digital cameras.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fleming, P., Thompson, J., and Nicol, H. (1996). Indices for measuring the efficacy of aerial baiting for wild dog control in north-eastern New South Wales. Wildlife Research 23, 665–674.
Indices for measuring the efficacy of aerial baiting for wild dog control in north-eastern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kays, R. W., and Slauson, K. M. (2008). Remote Cameras. In ‘Noninvasive Survey Methods for Carnivores: Methods and Analyses’. (Eds R. A. Long, P. MacKay, W. J. Zielinski, and J. C. Ray.) pp. 110–140. (Island Press: Washington.)

Meek, P. D. (2010). Remote camera monitoring of the Hastings River mouse (Pseudomys oralis): trial of a novel technique for monitoring populations. Unpublished report for Gondwana Rainforests of Australia.

Meek, P. D., Zewe, F., and Falzon, G. (2012). Temporal activity patterns of the swamp rat (Rattus lutreolus) and other rodents in mainland northern New South Wales, Australia. Australian Mammalogy , .
Temporal activity patterns of the swamp rat (Rattus lutreolus) and other rodents in mainland northern New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

NSW NPWS (2001). Threat abatement plan for predation by the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). NSW NPWS, Hurstville, Sydney.

O’Connell, A. F., Nichols, J. D., and Karanth, K. U. (2011). ‘Camera Traps in Animal Ecology Methods and Analyses.’ (Springer: New York.)

Swann, D. E., Kawanishi, K., and Palmer, J. (2011). Evaluating types and features of camera traps in ecological studies: guide for researchers. In ‘Camera Traps in Animal Ecology Methods and Analyses’. (Eds A. F. O’Connell, J. D. Nichols, K. U. Karanth.) pp. 27–44. (Springer: New York.)

Tobler, M. W., Carrillo-Percastegui, S. E., Leite Pitman, R., Mares, R., and Powell, G. (2008). An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation 11, 169–178.
An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |