Survey of research activity among multidisciplinary health professionals
Andrea P. Marshall A B C D G , Shelley Roberts B D , Mark J. Baker A C , Gerben Keijzers A E F , Jessica Young A , N. J. Chris Stapelberg A F and Julia Crilly A C DA Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Southport, Qld 4215, Australia. Email: mark.baker2@health.qld.gov.au; Gerben.Keijzers@health.qld.gov.au; jessica.young@health.qld.gov.au; chris.stapelberg@health.qld.gov.au; julia.crilly@health.qld.gov.au
B NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing Interventions for Hospitalised Patients, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia.
C School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia.
D Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia. Email: s.roberts@griffith.edu.au
E School of Medicine, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, Qld 4226, Australia.
F School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia.
G Corresponding author. Email: a.marshall@griffith.edu.au
Australian Health Review 40(6) 667-673 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15156
Submitted: 19 August 2015 Accepted: 2 December 2015 Published: 1 February 2016
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to describe the research activities being undertaken by health service employees within one Australian health service and explore their experiences with undertaking research.
Methods The present mixed-methods study was conducted across one health service in Queensland, Australia, and included a cross-sectional online survey and interviews with healthcare service employees. The anonymous survey was a self-administered online questionnaire, distributed to all 6121 employees at the health service via email, asking about research activity and engagement. Willing participants were also interviewed on their perceptions and experiences with research and capacity building.
Results In all, 151 participants responded to the survey and 22 participated in interviews. Three-quarters of respondents reported actively participating in research over the past 6 years and several research outputs, such as publications, conference presentations and competitive grant funding, were displayed. Four concepts emerged from interview findings, namely collaborative partnerships, skilled mentorship, embedding research and organisational support, which represented the overall theme ‘opportunities for a research-infused health service’.
Conclusion Employees of the health service recognised the importance of research and had a range of research skills, knowledge and experience. They also identified several opportunities for building research capacity in this service.
What is known about the topic? Building research capacity among healthcare professionals is important for enabling the conduct of high-quality research in healthcare institutions. However, building research capacity is complex and influenced by the uniqueness of organisational context. In order to successfully build research capacity among employees at any health service, current research activity, skills and experience, as well as staff perceptions around building research capacity in that setting, should first be explored.
What does this paper add? Healthcare services should incorporate teaching and research with clinical care to optimise outcomes for consumers. Support for research can be diminished in favour of clinical care and reduced emphasis on the importance of research can negatively influence research activity and expansion of clinician-led research. Highlighting the perceptions and experience of clinicians with enabling research and capacity building is a context-specific but necessary process to ensure that strategies, processes and resources are targeted to maintain support for research activity while overcoming barriers.
What are the implications for practitioners? Participants in this study identified several ways to build research capacity in their health service, many of which may be applicable to other settings and contexts. Building research collaborations and academic partnerships are important to enable and drive research. Structural processes, such as organisational support and opportunities for skilled mentorship, may be necessary to build health service employees’ research knowledge, skills and confidence. Finally, embedding research into everyday practice is important to foster a positive research culture within health services.
Additional keywords: research capacity building.
References
[1] Pickstone C, Nancarrow S, Cooke J, Vernon W, Mountain G, Boyce RA, Campbell J. Building research capacity in the allied health professions. Evid Policy: J Res Debate Pract 2008; 4 53–68.| Building research capacity in the allied health professions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Edwards N, Webber J, Mill J, Kahwa E, Roelofs S. Building capacity for nurse‐led research. Int Nurs Rev 2009; 56 88–94.
| Building capacity for nurse‐led research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M7mtl2itw%3D%3D&md5=1c2ed631479fbcd504b20370c79e29f6CAS | 19239521PubMed |
[3] Pager S, Holden L, Golenko X. Motivators, enablers, and barriers to building allied health research capacity. J Multidiscip Healthc 2012; 5 e9
[4] National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). NHMRC strategic plan 2013–2015. Canberra: NHMRC; 2012.
[5] Queensland Health. Health practitioner research. Queensland Government; 2013. Available at: http://www.health.qld.gov.au/hpresearch/ [verified 10 April 2015].
[6] Trostle J. Research capacity building in international health: definitions, evaluations and strategies for success. Soc Sci Med 1992; 35 1321–4.
| Research capacity building in international health: definitions, evaluations and strategies for success.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FpslWmsg%3D%3D&md5=4081f4a3823f082699d1b3fc2adce8cfCAS | 1462171PubMed |
[7] Cooke J. A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care. BMC Fam Pract 2005; 6 44
| A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16253133PubMed |
[8] Creswell J, Plano CV, Garrett A. Methodological issues in conducting mixed methods research designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2008.
[9] Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2011 Census QuickStats. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2013. Available at: http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/309?opendocument&navpos=220 [verified 14 June 2015].
[10] Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service. Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service annual report. Queensland Government; 2014. Available at: https://publications.qld.gov.au/storage/f/2014-10-24T01%3A47%3A06.406Z/ar-gchhs-1314.pdf [verified 14 June 2015].
[11] Gomm R, Davies C. Making sense of surveys. Using evidence in health and social care. London: Sage 2000.
[12] Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 2006; 27 237–46.
| A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Denzin N, Lincoln Y. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2011.
[14] Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: SAGE Publications; 1985.
[15] Shenton A. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf 2004; 22 63–75.
[16] Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service. Research annual report 2013–2014. Southport: Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service; 2014.
[17] Paget S, Lilischkis K, Morrow A, Caldwell P. Embedding research in clinical practice: differences in attitudes to research participation among clinicians in a tertiary teaching hospital. Intern Med J 2014; 44 86–9.
| Embedding research in clinical practice: differences in attitudes to research participation among clinicians in a tertiary teaching hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2czosFejtA%3D%3D&md5=af5396178dc62cd92948960164725163CAS | 24450523PubMed |
[18] Pighills AC, Plummer D, Harvey D, Pain T. Positioning occupational therapy as a discipline on the research continuum: results of a cross‐sectional survey of research experience. Aust Occup Ther J 2013; 60 241–51.
| Positioning occupational therapy as a discipline on the research continuum: results of a cross‐sectional survey of research experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23888974PubMed |
[19] Short A, Holdgate A, Ahern N, Morris J. Enhancing research interest and collaboration in the interdisciplinary context of emergency care. J Interprof Care 2009; 23 156–68.
| Enhancing research interest and collaboration in the interdisciplinary context of emergency care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19283546PubMed |
[20] Akerjordet K, Lode K, Severinsson E. Clinical nurses’ attitudes towards research, management and organisational resources in a university hospital: part 1. J Nurs Manag 2012; 20 814–23.
| Clinical nurses’ attitudes towards research, management and organisational resources in a university hospital: part 1.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22967299PubMed |
[21] Segrott J, McIvor M, Green B. Challenges and strategies in developing nursing research capacity: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 2006; 43 637–51.
| Challenges and strategies in developing nursing research capacity: a review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16157338PubMed |
[22] Wilkes L, Jackson D. Enabling research cultures in nursing: insights from a multidisciplinary group of experienced researchers. Nurse Res 2013; 20 28–34.
| Enabling research cultures in nursing: insights from a multidisciplinary group of experienced researchers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23520710PubMed |
[23] Johnson C, Lizama C, Harrison M, Bayly E, Bowyer J. Cancer health professionals need funding, time, research knowledge and skills to be involved in health services research. J Cancer Educ 2014; 29 389–94.
| Cancer health professionals need funding, time, research knowledge and skills to be involved in health services research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24510803PubMed |
[24] Howard A, Ferguson M, Wilkinson P, Campbell K. Involvement in research activities and factors influencing research capacity among dietitians. J Hum Nutr Diet 2013; 26 180–7.
| Involvement in research activities and factors influencing research capacity among dietitians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23577923PubMed |
[25] Green B, Segrott J, Priest H, Rout A, McIvor M, Douglas J, Flood Y, Morris S, Rushton C. Research capacity for everyone? A case study of two academic nursing schools’ capacity building strategies. J Res Nurs 2007; 12 247–65.
| Research capacity for everyone? A case study of two academic nursing schools’ capacity building strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Wallis M, Chaboyer W. Building the clinical bridge: an Australian success. Nurs Res Pract 2012; 2012
| Building the clinical bridge: an Australian success.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22577536PubMed |
[27] Dunn SV, Yates P. The roles of Australian chairs in clinical nursing. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31 165–71.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FpvVKjuw%3D%3D&md5=720320e98c89f66d15a36981ad87c062CAS | 10632805PubMed |
[28] Ragsdale JR, Vaughn LM, Klein M. Characterizing the adequacy, effectiveness, and barriers related to research mentorship among junior pediatric hospitalists and general pediatricians at a large academic institution. Hosp Pediatr 2014; 4 93–8.
| Characterizing the adequacy, effectiveness, and barriers related to research mentorship among junior pediatric hospitalists and general pediatricians at a large academic institution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24584979PubMed |
[29] Rockey SJ. Mentorship matters for the biomedical workforce. Nat Med 2014; 20 575
| Mentorship matters for the biomedical workforce.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXptlOjurw%3D&md5=ca623d98315e3d3187043423ed66a61dCAS | 24901558PubMed |
[30] Keyser DJ, Lakoski JM, Lara-Cinisomo S, Schultz DJ, Williams VL, Zellers DF, Pincus HA. Advancing institutional efforts to support research mentorship: a conceptual framework and self-assessment tool. Acad Med 2008; 83 217–25.
| Advancing institutional efforts to support research mentorship: a conceptual framework and self-assessment tool.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18316865PubMed |
[31] Pfund C, House SC, Asquith P, Fleming MF, Buhr KA, Burnham EL, Eichenberger Gilmore JM, Huskins WC, McGee R, Schurr K, Shapiro ED, Spencer KC, Sorkness CA. Training mentors of clinical and translational research scholars: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med 2014; 89 774–82.
| Training mentors of clinical and translational research scholars: a randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24667509PubMed |
[32] Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service. Research annual report 2014–2015. Southport: Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service; 2015.
[33] Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service. Strategic plan 2013–2017. Southport: Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service; 2015.
[34] Vogel I. Research capacity strengthening: learning from experience. London: UK Collaborative on Development Sciences; 2011.
