General practice trainees face practice ownership with fear
Elizabeth Sturgiss A C , Emily Haesler A B and Katrina Anderson AA Academic Unit of General Practice, Building 4, The Canberra Hospital Campus, ANU Medical School, PO Box 11, Woden, ACT 2606, Australia. Email: k.anderson@anu.edu.au; emily.haesler@anu.edu.au
B Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Science Building 2, La Trobe University, Vic. 3086, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: Elizabeth.sturgiss@anu.edu.au
Australian Health Review 40(6) 661-666 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15153
Submitted: 14 August 2015 Accepted: 30 November 2015 Published: 25 January 2016
Abstract
Objectives The aim of the present secondary analysis of data collected in a grounded theory study was to explore the perceptions of Registrars and new Fellows to practice ownership and management.
Methods Focus groups and interviews with Registrars and recent Fellows were undertaken to explore the desire to become an owner, facilitators and barriers to practice ownership and delivery models for practice ownership education. A secondary thematic analysis was conducted to understand emerging concepts related to perceptions of general practice ownership.
Results A surprisingly strong theme of fear was evident across focus group and interview participants. Expressed fear was specifically related to financial concerns, lack of relevant knowledge and skills and concern over balancing different roles. Moderating factors included previous life and educational experiences, as well as role modelling.
Conclusions Graduation of a cohort of new general practitioners (GPs) who express fear towards practice ownership is concerning. Creating more positive learning environments and opportunity for open discussion regarding practice management and ownership is an important step in providing adequate support for new GPs to give serious consideration to career options.
What is known about the topic? The traditional model of general practice ownership has been for a doctor to own and/or manage the practice. Fewer new GPs are taking on the role of owning a general practice, and disinterest has been presumed to play a significant role in this trend. It has been reported that current curricula provide insufficient focus on providing learning opportunities for general practice trainees on ownership and management models; however, recent research has shown that general practice trainees have a strong interest in receiving this knowledge during their training.
What does this paper add? The present qualitative research evaluated the emotional response that general practice trainees (Registrars) expressed when they considered practice ownership. GP Registrars expressed fear when asked about the prospect of owning their own practice. This may be influenced by the role modelling they receive during their training.
What are the implications for practitioners? Supervisors involved in general practice training should ensure their trainees have the opportunity to learn about practice ownership during their training. Supervisors should also be aware that their own behaviour and attitudes towards practice ownership is observed by their trainees and it can colour the emotional response the trainee has when considering owning a practice.
Additional keywords: mentorship, post-vocational education.
References
[1] Medicare Financing and Analysis Branch Department of Health and Ageing. State of corporatisation: a report on the corporatisation of general practices in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government; 2012.[2] The General Practice Workforce in Australia. Supply and requirements to 2013. Sydney: Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee; 2005.
[3] Liedvogel M, Haesler E, Anderson K. Who will be running your practice in 10 years? Supporting GP Registrars’ awareness and knowledge of practice ownership. Aust Fam Physician 2013; 42 333–6.
| 23781537PubMed |
[4] Lipscombe MV. Practice management. Med J Aust 2003; 179 51
| 12831387PubMed |
[5] Poduval M, Poduval J. Medicine as a corporate enterprise: a welcome step? Mens Sana Monogr 2008; 6 157–74.
| Medicine as a corporate enterprise: a welcome step?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22013357PubMed |
[6] Mars S. Corporate practice of medicine: a call for action. J Law Med 1997; 7 241–300.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3pvFClsA%3D%3D&md5=48f86c2f2c4d373e3539fb0791a31f75CAS |
[7] Joyce C, McDonald H, Lawlor-Smith L. General practitioners’ perceptions of different practice models: a qualitative study. Aust J Primary Health 2015;
| General practitioners’ perceptions of different practice models: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP). Vocational training standards. Melbourne: RACGP; 2013.
[9] Sturgiss E, Anderson K, Liedvogel M, Haesler E. To own or not to own? How can we best educate general practice registrars about practice ownership Aust Fam Physician 2013; 42 503–6.
| 23826607PubMed |
[10] Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.
[11] Cooke GP, Doust JA, Steele MC. A survey of resilience, burnout, and tolerance of uncertainty in Australian general practice registrars. BMC Med Educ 2013; 13 2
| A survey of resilience, burnout, and tolerance of uncertainty in Australian general practice registrars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23294479PubMed |
[12] Manski-Nankervis J-A, Vergara E, Daniel D, Young D. Academic posts at The University of Melbourne: 28 years of history. Aust Fam Physician 2011; 40 1014–5.
| 22146335PubMed |
