Overcoming the distance barrier in relation to treatment for haematology patients: Queensland findings
Pam McGrathCentre for Community Science, Population & Social Health Program, Griffith Health Institute, PO Box 1307, Kenmore, Qld 4069, Australia. Email: pmcgrathgu@gmail.com
Australian Health Review 39(3) 344-350 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14147
Submitted: 28 August 2014 Accepted: 21 November 2014 Published: 15 January 2015
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to document the financial and psychosocial impact of relocation for specialist haematology treatment in Queensland.
Methods This study was a qualitative exploratory study comprising 45 in-depth interviews with haematology patients supported by the Leukaemia Foundation of Queensland.
Results The findings indicate that decentralisation of treatment is assisting haematology patients to overcome the profound difficulties associated with travelling to the metropolitan area for treatment.
Conclusion Fostering specialist outreach and building capacity in regional cancer centres are service delivery strategies that are greatly appreciated by regional, rural and remote haematology patients who are stressed by the many challenges associated with leaving home to travel distances for specialist treatment. It is the hope and expectation that these findings will make a contribution to informing future health policy and service delivery planning.
What is known about the topic? Internationally, there is evidence of the benefits of visiting specialists and the development of local specialist services for cancer patients in regional and rural areas, but there is limited research on the topic in Australia.
What does this paper add? The findings herein make a contribution to this area of research through an up-to-date, in-depth consumer perspective on non-metropolitan oncology hospital services for haematology patients in Queensland. The evidence indicates that the opportunity to avoid travel to the metropolitan treating hospitals for regional, rural and remote haematology patients is increasingly an option in Queensland and greatly appreciated by many of those who have this option.
What are the implications for practitioners? The findings applaud the work of the health professionals providing the opportunity for regional specialist care for haematology patients. With regard to service delivery and health policy decision making, it is important to note that for patients positive about access to local treatment, psychosocial concerns (e.g. remaining at home, connection with family, avoidance of financial hardship) predominate in their reasoning about benefit. Thus, it is important that regional, rural and remote patients are offered greater choice in treatment options and have more involvement in decision making about specialist care.
References
[1] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Cancer in Australia: an overview, 2012. Cancer series no. 74. Catalogue no. CAN 70. Canberra: AIHW and Australian Association of Cancer Registries; 2012.[2] George M, Ngo P, Prawira A. Rural oncology: overcoming the tyranny of distance for improved cancer care. J Oncol Pract 2014; 10 e146–9.
| Rural oncology: overcoming the tyranny of distance for improved cancer care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24667293PubMed |
[3] Grimison P, Phillips F, Butow P, White K, Yip D, Sardelic F, Underhill C, Tse R, Simes R, Turley K, Raymond C, Goldstein D. Are visiting oncologists enough? A qualitative study of the needs of Australian rural and regional cancer patients, carers and health professionals. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2013; 9 226–38.
| Are visiting oncologists enough? A qualitative study of the needs of Australian rural and regional cancer patients, carers and health professionals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22989350PubMed |
[4] Coory M, Ho T, Jordan S. Australia is continuing to make progress against cancer, but the regional and remote disadvantage remains. Med J Aust 2013; 199 605–8.
| Australia is continuing to make progress against cancer, but the regional and remote disadvantage remains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24182226PubMed |
[5] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Cancer in Australia 2010: an overview. Catalogue no. CAN 56; Cancer Series No. 60. Canberra: AIHW; 2010. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442472459 [verified August 2014].
[6] McConigley R, Platt V, Holloway K, Smith J. Developing a sustainable model of rural cancer care: the Western Australian Cancer Network project. Aust J Rural Health 2011; 19 324–8.
| Developing a sustainable model of rural cancer care: the Western Australian Cancer Network project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22098217PubMed |
[7] McGrath P, Holewa H, Etcheverry P. Surviving the crisis of relocation for specialist treatment in haematology: insights from New Zealand. Illn Crisis Loss 2011; 19 233–47.
| Surviving the crisis of relocation for specialist treatment in haematology: insights from New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] McGrath P. Exploring Aboriginal peoples’ experience of relocation for treatment during end-of-life care. Int J Palliat Nurs 2006; 12 75–82.
[9] McGrath P, Rogers T. Relocation for specialist treatment for paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Austral Asian J Can 2002; 2 1–9.
[10] McGrath P. ‘It’s horrendous: but really, what can you do?’: preliminary findings on the financial impact of relocation for specialist treatment. Aust Health Rev 2000; 23 94–103.
| ‘It’s horrendous: but really, what can you do?’: preliminary findings on the financial impact of relocation for specialist treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FmtlCjtw%3D%3D&md5=394010ccf78c1cdabfaf6dc346544b43CAS | 11186065PubMed |
[11] Mayan M. Essentials of qualitative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2009.
[12] Drew J, Cashman S, Savageau J, Stenger J. The visiting specialist model of rural health care delivery: a survey in Massachusetts. J Rural Health 2006; 22 294–9.
| The visiting specialist model of rural health care delivery: a survey in Massachusetts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17010025PubMed |
[13] Gruca T, Nam I, Tracy R. Trends in medical oncology outreach clinics in rural areas. J Oncol Pract 2014; 10 e313–20.
| 25052498PubMed |
[14] Heifetz L, Christensen S, Deverre-White R, Meyers F. A model for rural oncology. J Oncol Pract 2011; 7 168–71.
| A model for rural oncology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21886498PubMed |
[15] Lantagne R. Networking services to reach rural outpatients. J Healthc Resour Manag 1995; 13 16–9.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3pvF2jsg%3D%3D&md5=585d994ee839ead4c713e365bedbc749CAS | 10142830PubMed |
[16] Gilbar P. Preventing medication errors in cancer chemotherapy referred to rural and remote hospitals. Aust J Rural Health 2001; 9 47–51.
| Preventing medication errors in cancer chemotherapy referred to rural and remote hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnlt1WjtQ%3D%3D&md5=b593860b7ffdccc1bc05f11264f7397dCAS | 11703267PubMed |
[17] McCarthy A, Hegney D, Brown L, Gilbar P, Brodribb T, Swale J. Characteristics of chemotherapy practice in rural and remote area health facilities in Queensland. Aust J Rural Health 2003; 11 138–44.
| 12950397PubMed |
[18] McCarthy A, Hegney D. Rural and remote palliative care. In Aranda S, O’Connor M, editors. Pallitive care nursing: a guide to practice. Melbourne: Ausmed Publications; 1999.
[19] Underhill C, Bartel R, Goldstein D, Snodgrass H, Begbie S, Yates P, White K, Jong K, Grogan P. Mapping oncology services in regional and rural Australia. Aust J Rural Health 2009; 17 321–9.
| Mapping oncology services in regional and rural Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19930199PubMed |
[20] Payne S, Jarrett N, Jeffs D. The impact of travel on cancer patients’ experiences of treatment: a literature review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2000; 9 197–203.
| The impact of travel on cancer patients’ experiences of treatment: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FpvFelsw%3D%3D&md5=45ab7396c7dbdbcb210cbd4ef893dd96CAS |
[21] Mathews M, West R, Buebler S. How important are out-of-pocket costs to rural patients’ cancer care decisions? Can J Rural Med 2009; 14 54–60.
| 19379628PubMed |
[22] Dejardin O, Bouvier A, Faivre J, Boutreux S, De Pouvourville G, Launoy G. Access to care, socioeconomic deprivation and colon cancer survival. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27 940–9.
| Access to care, socioeconomic deprivation and colon cancer survival.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3lsFeqsw%3D%3D&md5=c29c1c606616f7a72bee148ec461882dCAS | 18315583PubMed |
