Translational research in Australian mental health policy: a scoping review
Caroline Robertson A B # * , Justin J. Chapman A B C # , Vicky Stewart A , Calista Castles A , Victoria J. Palmer B D , Harry Lovelock B , Kerry Hawkins B E , Michelle Banfield B F G , The ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation Investigator Group B , The ALIVE National Centre Intersectoral Policy and Practice Committee B and Amanda J. Wheeler A B HA
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
# These authors contributed equally to this paper
Abstract
The role of translational research in improving mental health care has been highlighted in federal policy; however, an examination of how and to what extent it has been articulated at this level has not been undertaken. The aim of this scoping review was to characterise translational research concepts in federal mental health policy.
Australian Government websites were searched for federal policy documents that made recommendations for mental health services in primary care and/or community settings. Thirty eligible documents were identified, corresponding with 25 policies. Data extraction was informed by a conceptual model of translational research involving: (1) barriers and enablers and (2) recommendations and priorities codes; each had evidence generation and evidence translation subcodes. Coded text excerpts were further categorised into topics based on content.
In total, 1951 references were coded, about three-quarters of which were ‘recommendations and priorities’. More were related to evidence generation (total = 1163, 59.6%) than evidence translation (total = 788, 40.3%). Most were generic without specific recommendations for how translational research should be supported. Specific recommendations for evidence generation included the use of routine databases, lived experience involvement (e.g. co-design) and strategic responsibilities (e.g. funding, policy). Specific recommendations for evidence translation mostly referred to lived experience, quality improvement and strategic responsibilities.
While the value of translational research is broadly acknowledged, recommendations and priorities in federal policy should emphasise evidence translation with greater specificity about how translational research should be supported. This may further influence state policy and drive improvements in practice to improve mental health care.
Keywords: mental health policy, research translation, system change.
References
3 Rosenberg S, Hickie I. Managing madness: mental health and complexity in public policy. Evid Base [3] 2013; 1-19.
| Google Scholar |
4 Australian Medical Association. Health system continues to fail people with poor mental health: AMA; 2023. Available at https://www.ama.com.au/media/health-system-continues-fail-people-poor-mental-health
5 Productivity Commission. Mental Health, Report no. 95. Canberra; 2020. Available at https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/mental-health/report
8 Seyhan AA. Lost in translation: the valley of death across preclinical and clinical divide – identification of problems and overcoming obstacles. Transl Med Commun 2019; 4(1): 18.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
9 Klepac B, Krahe M, Spaaij R, Calder R, Craike M. Increasing research evidence translation and utilisation to improve population health outcomes. Mitchell Institute, Victoria University. Melbourne: Victoria University; 2022. 10.26196/0bck-q209
10 Drolet BC, Lorenzi NM. Translational research: understanding the continuum from bench to bedside. Transl Res 2011; 157(1): 1-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Woolf SH. The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters. JAMA 2008; 299(2): 211-3.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 Wallace J. Lost in translation: transferring knowledge from research to clinical practice. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2013; 19(4): 250-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
13 Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med 2011; 104(12): 510-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Sargeant J, Hurley KF, Duffy J, Sketris I, Sinclair D, Ducharme J. Lost in translation or just lost? Ann Emerg Med 2008; 52(5): 575-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
15 Kansagra SM, Farley TA. Public Health Research: Lost in Translation or Speaking the Wrong Language? Am J Public Health 2011; 101(12): 2203-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Glasziou P, Haynes B. The paths from research to improved health outcomes. BMJ Evid Based Med 2005; 10(1): 4.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
17 Campos PA, Reich MR. Political analysis for health policy implementation. Health Syst Reform 2019; 5(3): 224-35.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
18 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169(7): 467-73.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
20 Oliver K, Boaz A. Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations. Palgrave Commun 2019; 5(1): 60.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
21 Pagliaro C, Mundie A, Whiteford H, Diminic S. Analysis of data items and gaps in Australia’s national mental health services activity and capacity data collections for integrated regional service planning. Health Inf Manag J 2024; 53(3): 206-16.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
22 Australian Health Ministers. National mental health and suicide prevention agreement. 2022. Available at https://federalfinancialrelations.gov.au/sites/federalfinancialrelations.gov.au/files/2022-03/nmh_suicide_prevention_agreement.pdf
23 Jones B, Vaux E, Olsson-Brown A. How to get started in quality improvement. BMJ 2019; 364: k5408.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
24 Willmington C, Belardi P, Murante AM, Vainieri M. The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22(1): 139.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
25 Kringos DS, Sunol R, Wagner C, Mannion R, Michel P, Klazinga NS, et al. The influence of context on the effectiveness of hospital quality improvement strategies: a review of systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 1-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
26 National Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum. Consumer and Carer Engagement. 2021 Available at https://nmhccf.org.au/our-work/advocacy-briefs/consumer-and-carer-engagement
27 Palmer VJ, Bibb J, Lewis M, Densley K, Kritharidis R, Dettmann E, et al. A co-design living labs philosophy of practice for end-to-end research design to translation with people with lived-experience of mental ill-health and carer/family and kinship groups. Front Public Health 2023; 11: 1206620.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Sunkel C, Sartor C. Perspectives: involving persons with lived experience of mental health conditions in service delivery, development and leadership. BJPsych Bull 2022; 46(3): 160-4.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
29 Singh KK. Evidence-based public health: barriers and facilitators to the transfer of knowledge into practice. Indian J Public Health 2015; 59(2): 131-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
30 Campbell DM, Redman S, Rychentnik L, Cooke M, Zwi AB, Jorm L. Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers. Aust N Z Health Policy 2009; 6(1): 21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
31 Murphy JK, Chau LW, Nguyen VC, Minas H, Anh DV, O’Neil J. An integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach to advancing community-based depression care in Vietnam: lessons from an ongoing research-policy collaboration. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24(1): 142.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
32 Yehia F, El Jardali F. Applying knowledge translation tools to inform policy: the case of mental health in Lebanon. Health Res Policy Syst 2015; 13(1): 29.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |