What is learned from an Australian older person health assessment?
Sai Ram Ramisetty A , Angelo D’Amore
A B , Ruth Chantler A , Jane Greacen C , David Campbell D E and Eleanor Katherine Louise Mitchell A F
A School of Rural Health, Monash University, Bairnsdale, Vic. 3875, Australia. Email: srram5@student.monash.edu; angelo.damore@monash.edu; ruth.chantler@monash.edu
B Eastern Victoria GP Training, 50 Northways Road, Churchill, Vic. 3842, Australia. Email: angelo.damore@evgptraining.com.au
C Dr Jane’s Plane, Cunninghame Arm Medical Centre,188 Macleod Street, Bairnsdale, Vic. 3875, Australia. Email: bairnsdale@camc.com.au
D Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine, Level 4, 410 Queen Street, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.
E Cunninghame Arm Medical Centre, 8 Whiter Street, Lakes Entrance, Vic. 3909, Australia. Email: camc@camc.com.au
F Corresponding author. Email: eleanor.mitchell@monash.edu
Australian Health Review 45(4) 491-496 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH20064
Submitted: 15 April 2020 Accepted: 10 December 2020 Published: 2 March 2021
Abstract
Objective To examine what new health information is identified at a patient’s most recent 75+HA compared with their standard GP consultations in the prior 24 months.
Methods Parameters measured included newly identified chronic conditions, new management for previously diagnosed chronic conditions, medication management, referrals, vaccinations, and positive test results for the monitoring of previously diagnosed chronic conditions. A retrospective patient record study collecting data from two GP clinics in metropolitan and regional Victoria was undertaken. A total of 195 75+HA recipients were included.
Results No significant difference was found in the number of new chronic conditions recorded at patients’ most recent 75+HA compared with standard GP consultations in the prior 24 months. However, significant differences in the types of conditions were noted, with 75+HAs significantly more likely to record elevated lipids (P < 0.001), vitamin D deficiencies (P = 0.004), eye/vision-related (P = 0.011), diabetes (P = 0.019), and hearing conditions (P = 0.045) compared with standard GP consultations. Significantly more referrals (P < 0.001) and new management for previously diagnosed conditions (P = 0.009) occurred at 75+HA than at standard GP consultations. Patients who were receiving their first 75+HA were significantly more likely to receive vaccinations than those receiving a subsequent 75+HA (P = 0.022).
Conclusion 75+HAs fulfil a role in addressing chronic health problems otherwise overlooked during standard GP consultations.
What is known about the topic? Since their introduction in 1999, uptake of 75+HAs has been low. Two studies from 2001 to 2002 have suggested benefits of conducting 75+HAs to identify new health problems.
What does this paper add? When compared with standard GP consultations, 75+HAs identify different types of new health problems, including elevated lipids, vitamin D deficiencies, eye/vision-related conditions, diabetes, and hearing conditions. Furthermore, more referrals and new management of previously identified problems occur at 75+HA.
What are the implications for practitioners? 75+HAs fulfil a role in identifying and addressing chronic health problems in older patients that may otherwise have been overlooked at standard GP consultations. Suggestions of additions to the 75+HA template are made based on common chronic conditions detected in standard consultations but not included currently within the 75+HA.
References
[1] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian Burden of Disease Study: impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2011. Canberra: AIHW; 2016.[2] Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3105.0.65.001 – Australian Historical Population Statistics, 2016. Canberra: ABS; 2019.
[3] Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3222.0 – Population Projections, Australia, 2017 (base) – 2066. Canberra: ABS; 2018.
[4] Australian Government Department of Health. History of key MBS primary care initiatives 1999–2013. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2014 [updated 3 April 2014]. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/mbsprimarycare-History [verified 5 April 2019].
[5] Gray LC, Newbury JW. Health assessment of elderly patients. Aust Fam Physician 2004; 33 795–7.
| 15532153PubMed |
[6] Blakeman TM, Harris MF, Comino EJ, Zwar NA. Evaluating general practitioners’ views about the implementation of the Enhanced Primary Care Medicare items. Med J Aust 2001; 175 95–8.
| Evaluating general practitioners’ views about the implementation of the Enhanced Primary Care Medicare items.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11556428PubMed |
[7] Hamirudin AH, Ghosh A, Charlton K, Bonney A, Walton K. Trends in uptake of the 75+ health assessment in Australia: a decade of evaluation. Aust J Prim Health 2015; 21 423–8.
| Trends in uptake of the 75+ health assessment in Australia: a decade of evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25200596PubMed |
[8] Dolja-Gore X, Tavener M, Majeed T, Nair BR, Byles JE. Uptake, prevalence and predictors of first-time use for the 75+ Health Assessment Scheme. Aust J Prim Health 2017; 23 476–81.
| Uptake, prevalence and predictors of first-time use for the 75+ Health Assessment Scheme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28619125PubMed |
[9] Newbury JW, Marley JE, Beilby JJ. A randomised controlled trial of the outcome of health assessment of people aged 75 years and over. Med J Aust 2001; 175 104–7.
| A randomised controlled trial of the outcome of health assessment of people aged 75 years and over.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11556409PubMed |
[10] Blakeman TM, Comino EJ, Zwar NA, Harris MF. Evaluating the introduction of the enhanced primary care 75+ annual health assessments. Aust Fam Physician 2001; 30 1004–9.
| 11706594PubMed |
[11] Sturmberg JP. Health assessments of an ‘at risk’ population in general practice. Resource implications of identifying unmet health care needs–a case study. Aust Fam Physician 2002; 31 384–7.
| 12043137PubMed |
[12] Australian Government Department of Health. Modified Monash Model. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2019. Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/health-workforce/health-workforce-classifications/modified-monash-model#what-is-the-modified-monash-model [verified 23 October 2020].
[13] Australian Government Department of Health. Immunisation for seniors. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2019. Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/health-topics/immunisation/immunisation-throughout-life/immunisation-for-seniors [verified 1 September 2019].
[14] Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council. Summary of the 2009 Alcohol Guidelines. Canberra: Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council; 2019. Available at: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/health-advice/alcohol [verified 1 September 2019].
[15] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Overweight and obesity: an interactive insight. Canberra: AIHW; 2019.
[16] O’Halloran J, Ng A, Britt H, Charles J. EPC encounters in Australian general practice. Aust Fam Physician 2006; 35 8–10.
| 16489377PubMed |
[17] The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice, 9th edn. Melbourne: The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; 2016 pp. 90–2, 142–3.
[18] Arnold-Nott C, Abernethy G, Smyth W. The best tool to assess frailty in general practice and rural communities. 14th National Rural Health Conference; 2017 Apr 26. Cairns, Queensland, 2017. Canberra: National Rural Health Alliance; 2017. p. 7.
[19] Abernethy G, Smyth W, Arnold-Nott C, Aquilina C, Stewart R. Investigation on the use and acceptability of the Edmonton Frail Scale in a rural primary care setting. Aust J Rural Health 2018; 26 449–50.
| Investigation on the use and acceptability of the Edmonton Frail Scale in a rural primary care setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30444285PubMed |
[20] Grimmer K, Kennedy K, Milanese S, Price K, Kay D. The Australian 75+ Health Assessment: could it detect early functional decline better? Aust Health Rev 2016; 40 69–77.
| The Australian 75+ Health Assessment: could it detect early functional decline better?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26053613PubMed |
[21] Hills D, Hills S, Robinson T, Northam H, Hungerford C. General practice nurse–led screening for anxiety in later life in Australian primary care settings. Australas J Ageing 2019; 38 e121–6.
| General practice nurse–led screening for anxiety in later life in Australian primary care settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30828952PubMed |
