What predicts consumer experience in residential aged care? An analysis of consumer experience report data
Kane Norman Solly
A B and Yvonne Wells A
A Lincoln Centre for Research on Ageing, La Trobe University, Plenty Road and Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia. Email: Y.Wells@latrobe.edu.au
B Corresponding author. Email: K.solly@latrobe.edu.au
Australian Health Review 45(4) 485-490 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH20270
Submitted: 24 September 2020 Accepted: 8 December 2020 Published: 30 March 2021
Abstract
Objectives This study explored whether consumer experience report (CER) data from residential aged care services (RACSs) could be combined into a general factor and determined whether poor experience in RACSs could be predicted by known resident or home characteristics or sampling procedures.
Methods CER data collected by structured interviews in 2018 and early 2019 were analysed using structural equation modelling and linear regression analysis.
Results Data were available from 17 194 interviews undertaken at 1159 RACSs. The 10 CER items loaded onto two independent factors. Bifactorial modelling indicated that items could be combined into a general factor. Controlling for state or territory, consumer experience was best predicted by home size: those in large facilities reported poorer experience than those in smaller facilities. Other significant negative predictors with small effect sizes included not being independently mobile, being male and not being randomly selected. Dementia did not predict total CER score.
Conclusions The results of this study support the inclusion of people with dementia and exclusion of volunteer participants from published CERs. Further research is needed to explore why a relatively poor consumer experience is reported by people in larger homes, men and those with mobility issues.
What is known about the topic? Poor experience in aged care is a persistent concern for government, individuals and aged care services. The recent Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety has identified systemic failure. Although many organisational features and processes have previously been identified as important in determining the quality of care, few studies have explored the characteristics that predict the consumer experience of residents in aged care.
What does this paper add? This paper provides empirical evidence that several variables influence consumer experience in aged care, including facility size and resident sex and mobility. There is evidence that smaller facilities provide care that is perceived better by residents, and that men and people with mobility issues have worse experiences in aged care. There is a lack of clarity as to what other influences, such as facility ethos, facility location and staffing levels, may contribute to resident experience. Such clarity is important, because Australian aged care is currently facing comprehensive scrutiny, and governments are looking to ensure the safety and quality of aged care services.
What are the implications for practitioners? Identifying and addressing inequities in aged care services and mitigating risks must be a priority in Australia to ensure aged care services provide safe and high-quality care. The results of this study challenge current funding structures that encourage the development of larger aged care homes, and instead suggest that better funding for smaller-sized facilities may be able to improve the experience of residents in aged care. The results also suggest that facilities and governments should attend to the experiences of specific groups, such as men and people with mobility issues.
References
[1] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Services and places in aged care. Canberra, Australia: AIHW; 2019.[2] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Aged care snapshot. Canberra, Australia: AIHW; 2019.
[3] Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. Interim report: Neglect. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia; 2019.
[4] Ibrahim JE. COVID-19 and residential aged care in Australia. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 2020; 37 1–3.
| COVID-19 and residential aged care in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Carnell K, Paterson R. Review of national aged care quality regulatory processes. Canberra, Australia; 2017.
[6] Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission. Factsheet: Aged care quality standards. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: https://www.agedcarequality.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/Aged%20Care%20Quality%20Standards.pdf
[7] Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission. Annual Report 2018–19. Australia: Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: https://www.agedcarequality.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/ACQSC_AR_2018-19_Full_Final.pdf
[8] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. What is Patient Experience? In Department of Health and Human Services, editor. Rockville, MD; 2017.
[9] Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Storey L, Thomas H. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 2002; 6 1–244.
| The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12925269PubMed |
[10] Chou S-C, Boldy DP, Lee AH. Factors influencing residents’ satisfaction in residential aged care. Gerontologist 2003; 43 459
| Factors influencing residents’ satisfaction in residential aged care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12937325PubMed |
[11] Sion KYJ, Verbeek H, Zwakhalen SMG, Odekerken-Schröder G, Schols JMGA, Hamers JPH. Themes Related to Experienced Quality of Care in Nursing Homes From the Resident’s Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review and Thematic Synthesis. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2020; 6 2333721420931964
| 32637461PubMed |
[12] Towers A-M, Palmer S, Smith N, Collins G, Allan S. A cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between regulator quality ratings and care home residents’ quality of life in England. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17 22
| A cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between regulator quality ratings and care home residents’ quality of life in England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30704482PubMed |
[13] Wells Y, Solly K. Analysis of consumer experience report data: Final report to the Australian Aged Care Quality Agency. AACQA; 2018 December; 2018.
[14] Petriwskyj A, Parker D, Brown Wilson C, Gibson A. What health and aged care culture change models mean for residents and their families: A systematic review. Gerontologist 2016; 56 e12–20.
| What health and aged care culture change models mean for residents and their families: A systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26603184PubMed |
[15] Wells Y, Fetherstonhaugh D, Solly KN. Development of a consumer experience reporting questionnaire for residential aged care homes in Australia. Australas J Ageing 2019; 38 267–73.
| Development of a consumer experience reporting questionnaire for residential aged care homes in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31016865PubMed |
[16] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. GEN fact sheet 2017–2018: People leaving aged care. In Welfare AIoHa, editor. Canberra, Australia; 2019.
[17] Adams K, Anderson JB, Archuleta M, Smith Kudin J. Defining skilled nursing facility residents’ dining style preferences. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr 2013; 32 213–32.
| Defining skilled nursing facility residents’ dining style preferences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23924255PubMed |
[18] Ball MM, Whittington FJ, Perkins MM, Patterson VL, Hollingsworth C, King SV, Combs BL. Quality of life in assisted living facilities: Viewpoints of residents. J Appl Gerontol 2000; 19 304–25.
| Quality of life in assisted living facilities: Viewpoints of residents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Productivity Commission. Trends in aged care services: Some implications. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2008.
[20] Baldwin R, Chenoweth L, Dela Rama M. Residential aged care policy in Australia – Are we learning from evidence? Aust J Public Admin 2015; 74 128–41.
| Residential aged care policy in Australia – Are we learning from evidence?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Ross L, Harrington C. California nursing home chains by ownership type: facility and resident characteristics, staffing, and quality outcomes in 2015. San Francisco: University of California; 2016. Available at: https://theconsumervoice.org/uploads/files/general/CA-Chains-Report_20AUG2016.pdf
[22] Akinci F, Krolikowski D. Nurse staffing levels and quality of care in Northeastern Pennsylvania nursing homes. J Appl Nurs Res 2005; 18 130–7.
| Nurse staffing levels and quality of care in Northeastern Pennsylvania nursing homes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Pradhan R, Weech-Maldonado R, Harman JS, Hyer K. Private equity ownership of nursing homes: Implications for quality. J Health Care Finance 2014; 42 1–14.
[24] Harrington C, Hauser C, Olney B, Rosenau PV. Ownership, financing, and management strategies of the ten largest for-profit nursing home chains in the United States. Int J Health Serv 2011; 41 725–46.
| Ownership, financing, and management strategies of the ten largest for-profit nursing home chains in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22053531PubMed |
[25] Baldwin R, Chenoweth L, DeLa Rama M, Liu Z. Quality failures in residential aged care in Australia: The relationship between structural factors and regulation imposed sanctions. Australas J Ageing 2015; 34 E7–12.
| Quality failures in residential aged care in Australia: The relationship between structural factors and regulation imposed sanctions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24854338PubMed |
[26] Henderson J, Blackman I, Willis E, Gibson T, Price K, Toffoli L, Bonner R, Hurley J, Currie T. The impact of facility ownership on nurses’ and care workers’ perceptions of missed care in Australian residential aged care. Aust J Soc Issues 2018; 53 355–71.
| The impact of facility ownership on nurses’ and care workers’ perceptions of missed care in Australian residential aged care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Rahman A, Straker JK, Manning L. Staff assignment practices in nursing homes: Review of the literature. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2009; 10 4–10.
| Staff assignment practices in nursing homes: Review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19111847PubMed |
[28] Shier V, Khodyakov D, Cohen LW, Zimmerman S, Saliba D. What does the evidence really say about culture change in nursing homes? Gerontologist 2014; 54 S6–16.
| What does the evidence really say about culture change in nursing homes?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24443607PubMed |
[29] Jeon YH, Tudball J, Nelson K. How do residents of aged care homes perceive physical activity and functional independence? A qualitative research. Health Soc Care Community 2019; 27 1321–32.
| 31149767PubMed |
[30] Men’s Health and Information Resource Centre. Older men and HACC services: Barriers to access and effective models of care. University of Western Sydney; 2009.
[31] MacDonald JJ, Brown AJ, Buchanan J. Keeping the balance: older men and healthy ageing. NSW Committee on Ageing: Sydney; 2001.
[32] Naleppa MJ. Families and the institutionalized elderly: A review. J Gerontol Soc Work 1997; 27 87–111.
| Families and the institutionalized elderly: A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Grant Thornton. Growing with age: Dealtracker for the aged care sector. Grant Thornton: Australia; 2015. Available at: https://www.grantthornton.com.au/globalassets/1.-member-firms/australian-website/industry/hac/pdfs/gtal_2015_growing-with-age_-aged-care-dealtracker.pdf
[34] Angelelli J. Promising models for transforming long-term care. Gerontologist 2006; 46 428–30.
| Promising models for transforming long-term care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16920995PubMed |
[35] Eager K, McNamee J, Gordon R, Snoek M, Duncan C, Samsa P, Loggie C. The Australian National Aged Care Classification (AN-ACC). The Resource Utilisation and Classification Study: Report 1. Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong; 2019.
