Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Healthcare professional perspectives on quality and safety in New Zealand public hospitals: findings from a national survey

Robin Gauld A B and Simon Horsburgh A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.

B Corresponding author. Email: robin.gauld@otago.ac.nz

Australian Health Review 38(1) 109-114 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13116
Submitted: 5 June 2013  Accepted: 11 November 2013   Published: 19 December 2013

Abstract

Background Few studies have sought to measure health professional perceptions of quality and safety across an entire system of public hospitals. Therefore, three questions that gauge different aspects of quality and safety were included in a national New Zealand survey of clinical governance.

Methods Three previously used questions were adapted. A total of 41 040 registered health professionals employed in District Health Boards were invited to participate in an online survey. Analyses were performed using the R statistical environment. Proportional odds mixed models were used to quantify associations between demographic variables and responses on five-point scales. Relationships between other questions in the survey and the three quality and safety questions were quantified with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results A 25% response rate delivered 10 303 surveys. Fifty-seven percent of respondents (95% CI: 56–58%) agreed that health professionals in their District Health Board worked together as a team; 70% respondents (95% CI: 69–70%) agreed that health professionals involved patients and families in efforts to improve patient care; and 69% (95% CI: 68–70%) agreed that it was easy to speak up in their clinical area if they perceived a problem with patient care. Correlations showed links between perceptions of stronger clinical leadership and performances on the three questions, as well as with other survey items. The proportional mixed model also revealed response differences by respondent characteristics.

Conclusions The findings suggest positive commitment to quality and safety among New Zealand health professionals and their employers, albeit with variations by district, profession, gender and age, but also scope for improvement. The study also contributes to the literature indicating that clinical leadership is an important contributor to quality improvement.

What is known about the topic? Various studies have explored aspects of healthcare quality and safety, generally within a hospital or group of hospitals, using a lengthy tool such as the ‘safety climate survey’.

What does this paper add? We used a simple three-question survey approach (derived from existing measures) to measuring healthcare professionals’ perceptions of quality and safety in New Zealand’s public hospitals. In doing so, we also collected the first such information on this.

What are the implications for practitioners? New Zealand policy makers and health professionals can take some comfort in our findings, but also note that there is considerable scope for improvement. Our finding that more positive perceptions of quality and safety were related to perceptions of stronger clinical leadership adds to the international literature indicating the importance of this. Policy makers and hospital managers should support strong clinical leadership.


References

[1]  Clancy CM. New research highlights the role of patient safety culture and safer care. J Nurs Care Qual 2011; 26 193–6.
New research highlights the role of patient safety culture and safer care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21623179PubMed |

[2]  Gallego B, Westbrook M, Dunn A, Braithwaite J. Investigating patient safety culture across a health system: multilevel modelling of differences associated with service types and staff demographics. Int J Qual Health Care 2012; 24 311–20.
Investigating patient safety culture across a health system: multilevel modelling of differences associated with service types and staff demographics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22687703PubMed |

[3]  Hellings J, Schrooten W, Klazinga NS, Vleugels A. Challenging patient safety culture: survey results. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2007; 20 620–32.
Challenging patient safety culture: survey results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18030963PubMed |

[4]  Paine L, Rosenstein B, Sexton J, Kent P, Holzmueller C, Pronovost P. Assessing and improving the safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 547–54.
Assessing and improving the safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21127113PubMed |

[5]  Sexton J, Berenholtz S, Goeschel C, Watson S, Holzmueller C, Thompson D, et al Assessing and improving safety climate in a large cohort of intensive care units. Crit Care Med 2011; 39 934–9.
Assessing and improving safety climate in a large cohort of intensive care units.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21297460PubMed |

[6]  Sexton JB, Helmreich R, Neilands T, Rowan K, Vella K, Boyden J, et al The safety attitudes questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6 44
The safety attitudes questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16584553PubMed |

[7]  Speroff T, Nwosu S, Greevy R, Weinger M, Talbot T, Wall R, et al Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 592–6.
Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M%2FhslKmtA%3D%3D&md5=23651a8be35dd9bc023672216af69d5eCAS | 21127115PubMed |

[8]  Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Safety climate survey. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement.

[9]  Cohen AB, Restuccia JD, Shwartz M, Drake J, Kang R, Kralovec P, et al A survey of hospital quality improvement activities. Med Care Res Rev 2008; 65 571–95.
A survey of hospital quality improvement activities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18511811PubMed |

[10]  Groene O, Mora N, Thompson AGH, Saez M, Casas M, Sunol R. Is the maturity of hospitals’ quality improvement systems associated with measures of quality and patient safety? BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11 344
| 22185479PubMed |

[11]  Gauld R. New Zealand’s post-2008 health system reforms: toward re-centralization of organizational arrangements. Health Policy 2012; 106 110–3.
New Zealand’s post-2008 health system reforms: toward re-centralization of organizational arrangements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22502934PubMed |

[12]  Ryall T. Clinical leadership ‘in good hands’. Ministerial Press Release. 12 March. Wellington: Minister of Health; 2009.

[13]  Gauld R, Horsburgh S, Brown J. The Clinical Governance Development Index: results from a New Zealand study. Qual Saf Health Carey 2011; 20 947–52.
The Clinical Governance Development Index: results from a New Zealand study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Ministerial Task Group on Clinical Leadership. In good hands: transforming clinical governance in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministerial Task Group on Clinical Leadership; 2009.

[15]  Pathak S, Holzmueller CG, Haller KB, Pronovost PJ. A mile in their shoes: interdisciplinary education at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Am J Med Qual 2010; 25 462–7.
A mile in their shoes: interdisciplinary education at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20508148PubMed |

[16]  Thomas EJ. Improving teamwork in healthcare: current approaches and the path forward. Qual Saf Health Care 2011; 20 647–50.
Improving teamwork in healthcare: current approaches and the path forward.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Luxford K, Safran D, Delbanco T. Promoting patient-centered care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience. Int J Qual Health Care 2011; 23 510–5.
Promoting patient-centered care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21586433PubMed |

[18]  Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15 307–10.
Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17074863PubMed |

[19]  Lewis GH, Vaithianathan R, Hockey PM, Hirst G, Bagian JP. Conterheroism, common knowledge, and ergonomics: concepts from aviation that could improve patient safety. Milbank Q 2011; 89 4–38.
Conterheroism, common knowledge, and ergonomics: concepts from aviation that could improve patient safety.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21418311PubMed |

[20]  R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012.

[21]  Christensen R. Ordinal-regression models for Ordinal Data R package version 2012. Available at: http://www.cran.r-project.org/package-ordinal/ [verified 30 November 2013].

[22]  Tutz G, Hennevogl W. Random effects in ordinal regression models. Comput Stat Data Anal 1996; 22 537–57.
Random effects in ordinal regression models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Morton S, Bandara D, Robinson E, Atatoa Carr P. In the 21st century, what is an acceptable response rate? Aust N Z J Public Health 2012; 36 106–8.
In the 21st century, what is an acceptable response rate?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22487341PubMed |

[24]  Robb G, Seddon M. Measuring the safety culture in a hospital setting: a concept whose time has come? N Z Med J 2010; 123 66–76.

[25]  Lee W-C, Wung H-Y, Liao H-H, Lo C-M. Hospital safety culture in Taiwan: a nationwide survey using Chinese version safety attitude questionnaire. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10 234
| 20698965PubMed |

[26]  Bisognano M, Kenney C. Pursuing the triple aim: seven innovators show the way to better care, better health, and lower costs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2012.

[27]  Baker G. High performing healthcare systems: delivering quality by design. Toronto: Longwoods Publishing; 2008.

[28]  Shekelle P, Pronovost P, Wachter R, McDonald K, Schoelles K, Dy S, et al The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158 365–8.
The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23460091PubMed |

[29]  Hogg CNL. Patient and public involvement: what next for the NHS? Health Expect 2007; 10 129–38.
Patient and public involvement: what next for the NHS?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[30]  Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, et al Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ 2002; 325 1263–7.
Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12458240PubMed |

[31]  Florin D, Dixon J. Public involvement in health care. BMJ 2004; 328 159–61.
Public involvement in health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14726350PubMed |

[32]  Fudge N, Wolfe CDA, McKevitt C. Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study. BMJ 2008; 336 313–7.
Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18230646PubMed |

[33]  Gauld R. The New Health Policy. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2009.

[34]  Bisognano M. Patient-centered leadership: more than a score. Healthc Exec 2012; 27 70–4.
| 23173515PubMed |

[35]  Leape L, Berwick D, Clancy CM, Conway J, Gluck P, Guest J, et al Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18 424–8.
Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MfgsVGgug%3D%3D&md5=f99ce47ca1e2511f156efa49094f39e8CAS | 19955451PubMed |

[36]  Steyrer J, Schiffinger M, Huber C, Valentin A, Strunk G. Attitude is everything? The impact of workload, safety climate, and safety tools on medical errors: a study of intensive care units. Health Care Manage Rev 2012; 38 306–16.

[37]  Mathews S, Pronovost P. Establishing safety and quality as core values: a hospital road map. Am J Med Qual 2012; 27 348–9.
Establishing safety and quality as core values: a hospital road map.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22205770PubMed |

[38]  Shipton H, Armstrong C, West M, Dawson J. The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance. Int J Qual Health Care 2008; 20 439–45.
The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18786932PubMed |

[39]  Dorgan S, Layton D, Bloom N, Homkes R, Sadun R, Van Reenen J. Management in healthcare: why good practice really matters. London: McKinsey and Company/London School of Economics; 2010.

[40]  Bohmer RMJ. Fixing health care on the front lines. Harv Bus Rev 2010; 88 62–9.

[41]  Taitz J, Lee T, Sequist T. A framework for engaging physicians in quality and safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2012; 21 722–8.
A framework for engaging physicians in quality and safety.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[42]  Dixon-Woods M, McNichol S, Martin G. Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literature. Qual Saf Health Care 2012; 21 876–84.
Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[43]  James BC, Savitz LA. How Intermountain trimmed health care costs through robust quality improvement efforts. Health Aff 2011; 30 1185–91.
How Intermountain trimmed health care costs through robust quality improvement efforts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[44]  Morrow G, Burford B, Redfern N, Briel R, Illing J. Does specialty training prepare doctors for senior roles? A questionnaire study of new UK consultants. Postgrad Med J 2012; 88 558–65.
Does specialty training prepare doctors for senior roles? A questionnaire study of new UK consultants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22773821PubMed |

[45]  Scott T, Mannion R, Davies H, Marshall M. The quantitative measurement of organizational culture in health care: a review of the available instruments. Health Serv Res 2003; 38 923–45.
The quantitative measurement of organizational culture in health care: a review of the available instruments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12822919PubMed |