Using a public hospital funding model to strengthen a case for improved nutritional care in a cancer setting
Anna G. Boltong A , Jenelle M. Loeliger B C and Belinda L. Steer BA Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, Vic. 8006, Australia. Email: anna.boltong@petermac.org
B Nutrition Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, Vic. 8006, Australia. Email: belinda.steer@petermac.org
C Corresponding author. Email: jenelle.loeliger@petermac.org
Australian Health Review 37(3) 286-290 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13010
Submitted: 8 July 2012 Accepted: 9 April 2013 Published: 4 June 2013
Abstract
Objective. This study aimed to measure the prevalence of malnutrition risk and assessed malnutrition in patients admitted to a cancer-specific public hospital, and to model the potential hospital funding opportunity associated with implementing routine malnutrition screening.
Methods. A point-prevalence audit of malnutrition risk and diagnosable malnutrition was conducted. A retrospective audit of hospital funding associated with documented cases of malnutrition was conducted. Audit results were used to estimate annual malnutrition prevalence, associated casemix-based reimbursement potential and the clinical support resources required to adequately identify and treat malnutrition.
Results. Sixty-four percent of inpatients were at risk of malnutrition. Of these, 90% were assessed as malnourished. Twelve percent of malnourished patients produced a positive change in the diagnosis-related group (DRG) and increased allocated financial reimbursement. Identifying and diagnosing all cases of malnutrition could contribute an additional AU$413 644 reimbursement funding annually.
Conclusions. Early identification of malnutrition may expedite appropriate nutritional management and improve patient outcomes in addition to contributing to casemix-based reimbursement funding for health services. A successful business case for additional clinical resources to improve nutritional care was aided by demonstrating the link between malnutrition screening, hospital reimbursements and improved nutritional care.
What is known about the topic? It is known that between 20 and 50% of hospital patients are malnourished and oncology patients are 1.7 times more likely to be malnourished than are other hospitalised patients. Despite the existence of practice guidelines for malnutrition screening of at-risk oncology patients, these are not routinely implemented. Identification of malnutrition in hospitalised patients is linked to casemix funding via DRG. Casemix reimbursement for malnutrition can be enhanced if: (1) malnutrition risk is identified; (2) malnutrition is diagnosed; (3) the word ‘malnutrition’ and an associated action plan is documented in the medical record; and (4) malnutrition is recognised and recorded by the clinical coder. Amendments to the ICD-10-AM in 2008 allowing malnutrition to be recognised as a complication for coding when it is documented by a dietitian in the medical history has hospital reimbursement implications for dietetic practice. Reimbursement potential for malnutrition has been calculated in public hospitals in Australia with varying results.
What does this paper add? This paper reports the components of a successful business case made to enhance resources for identification and treatment of malnutrition on the basis of improved treatment as well as enhanced reimbursement potential resulting from changes to the ICD-10-AM. The present study adds to the body of literature showing that malnutrition coding contributes to casemix funding in Australian public hospitals, as well as internationally, and highlights the previously unreported opportunity for a cancer-specific health service. This work demonstrated that reassignment of a DRG based on a diagnosis of malnutrition altered the overall casemix funding value for 12% of audited patients. This compares with the findings of other authors who demonstrated hypothetical DRG changes and financial reallocation.
What are the implications for practitioners? This paper highlights that practitioner-centred strategies are needed to enhance malnutrition identification, diagnosis, documentation and coding to maximise casemix reimbursement and better treat malnutrition in hospitals. Strategies include education of the dietetics, medical and health-information workforce. This manuscript provides a description of the conduct of quality-improvement activities that may support successful business cases for increased dietetic resources in future.
References
[1] Norman K, Pichard C, Lochs H, Pirlich M. Prognostic impact of disease-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr 2008; 27 5–15.| Prognostic impact of disease-related malnutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Agarwal E, Ferguson M, Banks M, Bauer J, Capra S, Isenring E. Nutritional status and dietary intake of acute care patients: results from the Nutrition Care Day Survey 2010. Clin Nutr 2012; 31 41–7.
| Nutritional status and dietary intake of acute care patients: results from the Nutrition Care Day Survey 2010.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Tong H, Isenring E, Yates P. The prevalence of nutrition impact symptoms and their relationship to quality of life and clinical outcomes in medical oncology patients. Support Care Cancer 2009; 17 83–90.
| The prevalence of nutrition impact symptoms and their relationship to quality of life and clinical outcomes in medical oncology patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Pressoir M, Desne S, Berchery D, Rossignol G, Poiree B, Meslier M, et al Prevalence, risk factors and clinical implications of malnutrition in French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. Br J Cancer 2010; 102 966–71.
| Prevalence, risk factors and clinical implications of malnutrition in French Comprehensive Cancer Centres.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Watterson C, Fraser A, Banks M, Isenring A, Miller M, Silvester C, et al Evidence based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of malnutrition in adult patients across the continuum of care. Nutr Diet 2009; 66 S1–34.
| Evidence based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of malnutrition in adult patients across the continuum of care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Gupta D, Vashi PG, Lammersfeld CA, Braun DP. Role of nutritional status in predicting the length of stay in cancer: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Ann Nutr Metab 2011; 59 96–106.
| Role of nutritional status in predicting the length of stay in cancer: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Nozoe T, Kimura Y, Ishida M, Saeki H, Korenaga D, Sugimachi K. Correlation of pre-operative nutritional condition with post-operative complications in surgical treatment for oesophageal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002; 28 396–400.
| Correlation of pre-operative nutritional condition with post-operative complications in surgical treatment for oesophageal carcinoma.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Gupta D, Lis CG, Granick J, Grutsch JF, Vashi PG, Lammersfeld CA. Malnutrition was associated with poor quality of life in colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59 704–9.
| Malnutrition was associated with poor quality of life in colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Isenring E, Hill J, Davidson W, Brown T, Baumgartner L, Kaegi K, et al Evidence based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of patients receiving radiation therapy. Nutrition & Dietetics 2008; 65 S1–S20.
| Evidence based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of patients receiving radiation therapy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Elia M, Zellipour L, Stratton RJ. To screen or not to screen for adult malnutrition? Clin Nutr 2005; 24 867–84.
| To screen or not to screen for adult malnutrition?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Bauer JD, Ash S, Davidson WL, Hill JM, Brown T, Isenring EA, et al Evidence based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of cancer cachexia. Nutrition & Dietetics 2006; 63 S3–32.
| Evidence based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of cancer cachexia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Findlay M, Bauer J, Brown T. Evidence based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of adult patients with head and neck cancer. Sydney: Clinical Oncological Society of Australia; 2011. Available at: http://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/COSA:Head_and_neck_cancer_nutrition_guidelines
[13] Leuenberger M, Kurmann S, Stanga Z. Nutritional screening tools in daily clinical practice: the focus on cancer. Support Care Cancer 2010; 18 S17–S27.
[14] Ferguson M, Banks M, Bauer J, Isenring E, Vivanti A, Capra S. Nutrition screening practices in Australian healthcare facilities: a decade later. Nutrition & Dietetics 2010; 67 213–8.
| Nutrition screening practices in Australian healthcare facilities: a decade later.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Porter J, Raja R, Cant R, Aroni R. Exploring issues influencing the use of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool by nurses in two Australian hospitals. J Hum Nutr Diet 2009; 22 203–9.
| Exploring issues influencing the use of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool by nurses in two Australian hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] ICD-10. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. 10th revised edn. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.
[17] Department of Health. Casemix funding in Victoria. Melbourne: Depatment of Health Victoria; 2012. Available at: http://www.health.vic.gov.au/abf/history.htm
[18] Ferguson M, Capra S, Bauer J, Banks M. Development of a valid and reliable malnutrition screening tool for adult acute hospital patients. Nutrition 1999; 15 458–64.
| Development of a valid and reliable malnutrition screening tool for adult acute hospital patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Ottery F. Patient-generated subjective global assessment. In McCallum P, Polisena C, editors. The clinical guide to oncology nutrition. Chicago: American Dietetic Association; 2000: pp. 11–23.
[20] Ferguson M, Capra S, Bauer J, Banks M. Coding for malnutrition enhances reimbursement under casemix-based funding. Aust J Nutr Diet 1997; 54 102–8.
[21] Gout BS, Barker LA, Crowe TC. Malnutrition identification, diagnosis and dietetic referrals: are we doing a good enough job? Nutrition & Dietetics 2009; 66 206–11.
| Malnutrition identification, diagnosis and dietetic referrals: are we doing a good enough job?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Ockenga J, Freudenreich M, Zakonsky R, Norman K, Pirlich M, Lochs H. Nutritional assessment and management in hospitalised patients: implication for DRG-based reimbursement and health care quality. Clin Nutr 2005; 24 913–9.
| Nutritional assessment and management in hospitalised patients: implication for DRG-based reimbursement and health care quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Barker L, Gout B, Crowe T. Hospital malnutrition: prevalence, identification and impact on patients and the healthcare system. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011; 8 514–27.
| Hospital malnutrition: prevalence, identification and impact on patients and the healthcare system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Rowell D, Jackson T. Additional costs of inpatient malnutrition, Victoria, Australia, 2003–2004. Eur J Health Econ 2011; 12 353–61.
| Additional costs of inpatient malnutrition, Victoria, Australia, 2003–2004.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Funk KL, Ayton CM. Improving malnutrition documentation enhances reimbursement. J Am Diet Assoc 1995; 95 468–75.
| Improving malnutrition documentation enhances reimbursement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Raja R, Lim AV, Lim YP, Lim G, Chan SP, Vu CKF. Malnutrition screening in hospitalised patients and its implication on reimbursement. Intern Med J 2004; 34 176–81.
| Malnutrition screening in hospitalised patients and its implication on reimbursement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
