Returning to physiotherapy practice: the perspective of returners, potential returners and clinical supervisors
Lorraine Sheppard A B C , Michael Crowe A , Anne Jones A and Robyn Adams AA Department of Physiotherapy, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4814, Australia.
B School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: lorraine.sheppard@jcu.edu.au
Australian Health Review 34(3) 304-311 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH08681
Submitted: 25 August 2008 Accepted: 14 October 2009 Published: 25 August 2010
Abstract
The experience of returning to physiotherapy practice needs to be understood from the perspective of those who have returned to practice, those thinking of returning, and clinical supervisors who have worked with people that have returned to practice. A qualitative methodology using an interpretivist theoretical framework was utilised. Participants were selected using a combination of purposive and snowballing sampling techniques. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to determine the opinions of participants on returning to physiotherapy. Maternity and child-care were the main reason returners and potential returners took a break from physiotherapy. The main reason for returning to physiotherapy was because the returner wanted to rather than external factors such as financial hardship. Overall, the experience of returning to physiotherapy has been rewarding for returners and clinical supervisors. Returners and potential returners were highly motivated, keen to learn, and are willing to undertake a period of training to help them return to practice. However, there is only one programme available for returners to re-register as a physiotherapist and no refresher programmes are available. Returners, potential returners, and clinical supervisors thought that a structured re-registration or re-entry programme would need to be flexible to allow for returners’ current needs, commitments, and career directions.
What is known about the topic? In nursing, reasons for returning to the profession are change in family circumstance, financial necessity or wishing to use their skills again. Little is known of the circumstances for other health professionals.
What does this paper add? Return to physiotherapy was driven by personal motivation rather than financial hardship. Returners are highly motivated, keen to learn, and are willing to undertake a period of training to help them return to practice.
What are the implications for practitioners? Flexible methods to enable return to practice are needed. Time away from practice needs to be managed to enable seamless returns, facilitating workforce strategies.
Additional keywords: re-entry, re-registration, refresher, retraining, workforce.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the Steering Committee members: Kathy Grudzinskas, Meaghan Poulton, Ilsa Nielson, and Helen Finneran.
[1]
[2] Langan JC, Tadych RA, Kao C-C. Exploring incentives for RNs to return to practice: a partial solution to the nursing shortage. J Prof Nurs 2007; 23(1): 13–20.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified 9 September 2007].
[11] Wilson M. Coming back after career interruptions. PT: Magazine of Physical Therapy 2002; 10(2): 52–5.
[verified 9 September 2007].
[13]
[14] Hall C, Andre CA. Nurses re-entering the workforce: a special needs group. Contemp Nurse 1999; 8(1): 238–44.
| PubMed |
[15] Morrison RS, Stone GL, Wilson M. RN refresher courses: hospital-based versus university-based. J Nurses Staff Dev 2005; 21(4): 177–83.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[16] Blankenship JS, Winslow SA, Smith AU. Refresher course for inactive RNs facilitates workforce reentry. J Nurses Staff Dev 2003; 19(6): 288–91.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[17] Bouwman K, Kruithof JB. Teaching old dogs new tricks: RN ‘returnship’ program. J Nurses Staff Dev 2004; 20(4): 164–9.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[18] Cundall R, Emert B, Gowens D, Hedrick C, Phillips M, Schulze B, Sredi D. Designing a nurse refresher course curriculum. J Contin Educ Nurs 2004; 35(4): 164–75.
| PubMed |
[19] Davidhizar RE, Bartlett D. Re-entry into the registered nursing work force: we did it! J Contin Educ Nurs 2006; 37(4): 185–90.
| PubMed |
[20] McLean T, Anema M. Reduce the nursing shortage: help inactive nurses return to work. J Contin Educ Nurs 2004; 35(5): 211–5.
| PubMed |
[21] White A, Roberts VW, Brannan J. Returning nurses to the workforce: developing an online refresher course. J Contin Educ Nurs 2003; 34(2): 59–63.
| PubMed |
[22] Griffiths MJ, Czekanski K. Meeting the needs of the health system: a refresher course for registered nurses. J Contin Educ Nurs 2003; 34(4): 162–71.
| PubMed |
[23] Bullen M. Overcoming the undersupply: supporting midwives’ return to practice. Australian Midwifery 2003; 16(4): 14–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Edwards J, MacDonald J, Merriman H. Returners as learners: a different species? A qualitative study. Education for Primary Care 2007; 18(3): 354–63.
[25] Hastie A, Clark R. The GP returner scheme: the London Deanery experience of the first 50 applicants. Work Based Learning in Primary Care 2005; 3(1): 23–30.
[26] Hutchins A, Hastie A, Starkey C, Clark R. The general practice returner scheme in London. Education for Primary Care 2006; 17(1): 32–9.
[27] Asselin M, Osterman P, Cullen HA. In their own words: the experience of returning to acute care practice. J Nurses Staff Dev 2006; 22(3): 104–11.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[28] Boonyawiroj EB. Physiotherapy re-entry: a case study. Physiotherapy 1996; 82(8): 447–55.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29]
[30] Gottlieb JAK. Designing and implementing an RN refresher course for the acute care hospital: development of the nurses’ critical thinking skills. J Nurses Staff Dev 2002; 18(2): 86–91.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[31]
[32] Anaf S, Drummond C, Sheppard L. Combining case study research and systems theory as a heuristic model. Qual Health Res 2007; 17(10): 1309–15.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[33] Veenstra G. Different wor(l)ds: three approaches to health research. Can J Public Health 1999; 90(Suppl. 1): S18–21.
| PubMed |
A AECOP is for physiotherapists who are trained outside Australia and New Zealand, and wish to become registered in Australia. The participant was trained and previously registered in Australia.
