Invasive wild pig carcass availability does not affect coyote abundance in South Carolina, USA
Heather E. Gaya
A * , Gino J. D’Angelo A , Mark Vukovich B D , Jordan L. Youngmann A , Stacey L. Lance C and John C. Kilgo B
A
B
C
D Present address:
Abstract
Control of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) is a growing management concern throughout their invaded range. In the United States, control programs often leave wild pig carcasses on the landscape where they are freely available for consumption by scavengers such as coyotes (Canis latrans). Coyotes consume wild pigs, but no studies have investigated the importance of pig carcasses for maintaining coyote abundance.
We tested the hypothesis that coyote populations may be bolstered by wild pig carcasses created by control programs.
From July 2014 to July 2017, we surveyed road transects for scat to monitor coyote abundance in response to changing levels of pig carcass availability. From June 2015 to July 2017, wild pigs were removed from the eastern half of the study area and placed at one of four carcass dump sites on the western side. We analysed the scat data using an open population spatially-explicit capture–mark recapture model to estimate seasonal abundance and movement of coyotes in response to the carcass treatment.
Coyote density across the entire study area declined from 95 coyotes/100 km2 in July 2014 to 65 coyotes/100 km2 by July 2016, but declines were unrelated to the carcass availability treatment. Additional analysis on non-genotyped scat data showed no apparent effect of carcass availability on coyote density. Coyote activity centers moved fewer than 100 m towards the nearest carcass dump site in response to the carcass treatment.
Wild pig carcass availability is not likely to be a primary driver of coyote abundance or territory selection at the study location.
We conclude that the availability of wild pig carcasses has little effect on coyote abundance and thus wild pig carcass removal will not be an effective coyote management strategy.
Keywords: abundance, Canis latrans, coyote, feral hog, invasive wild pig, Savannah River Site, supplemental forage, Sus scrofa.
References
Andelt WF, Andelt SH (1984) Diet bias in scat deposition-rate surveys of coyote density. Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973-2006) 12, 74-77.
| Google Scholar |
Barrios-Garcia MN, Ballari SA (2012) Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biological Invasions 14, 2283-2300.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Berger KM, Gese EM (2007) Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes? Journal of Animal Ecology 76, 1075-1085.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bevins SN, Pedersen K, Lutman MW, Gidlewski T, Deliberto TJ (2014) Consequences associated with the recent range expansion of nonnative feral swine. BioScience 64, 291-299.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Borchers DL, Efford MG (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture–recapture studies. Biometrics 64, 377-385.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Chandler RB, Royle JA (2013) Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populations. The Annals of Applied Statistics 7, 936-954.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Chitwood MC, Lashley MA, Kilgo JC, Moorman CE, Deperno CS (2015) White-tailed deer population dynamics and adult female survival in the presence of a novel predator. The Journal of Wildlife Management 79, 211-219.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Conner LM, Morris G (2015) Impacts of mesopredator control on conservation of mesopredators and their prey. PLoS ONE 10, e0137169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Davis AJ, Keiter DA, Kierepka EM, Slootmaker C, Piaggio AJ, Beasley JC, Pepin KM (2020) A comparison of cost and quality of three methods for estimating density for wild pig (Sus scrofa). Scientific Reports 10, 2047.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
de Valpine P, Turek D, Paciorek CJ, Anderson-Bergman C, Lang DT, Bodik R (2017) Programming with models: writing statistical algorithms for general model structures with NIMBLE. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 26, 403-413.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dyck MA, Wyza E, Popescu VD (2022) When carnivores collide: a review of studies exploring the competitive interactions between bobcats Lynx rufus and coyotes Canis latrans. Mammal Review 52, 52-66.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Efford MG, Dawson DK, Jhala YV, Qureshi Q (2016) Density-dependent home-range size revealed by spatially explicit capture–recapture. Ecography 39, 676-688.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Francisco LV, Langston AA, Mellersh CS, Neal CL, Ostrander EA (1996) A class of highly polymorphic tetranucleotide repeats for canine genetic mapping. Mamm Genome 7(5), 359-–362.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Garabedian JE, Kilgo JC (2024) Rapid recovery of invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations following density reduction. Biological Invasions 26, 1075-1089.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gardner B, Royle JA, Wegan MT (2009) Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark–recapture studies. Ecology 90, 1106-1115.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Gardner B, Reppucci J, Lucherini M, Royle JA (2010) Spatially explicit inference for open populations: estimating demographic parameters from camera-trap studies. Ecology 91, 3376-3383.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Gaskamp JA, Gee KL, Campbell TA, Silvy NJ, Webb SL (2021) Effectiveness and efficiency of corral traps, drop nets and suspended traps for capturing wild pigs (Sus scrofa). Animals 11, 1565.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 7, 457-472.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gese EM, Ruff RL, Crabtree RL (1996) Social and nutritional factors influencing the dispersal of resident coyotes. Animal Behaviour 52, 1025-1043.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Harrison DJ (1992) Dispersal characteristics of juvenile coyotes in maine. The Journal of Wildlife Management 56, 128-138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hellmann AP, Rohleder U, Eichmann C, Pfeiffer I, Parson W, Schleenbecker U (2006) A proposal for standardization in forensic canine DNA typing: allele nomenclature of six canine-specific STR loci. Journal of Forensic Sciences 51, 274-281.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hinton JW, Chamberlain MJ, van Manen FT (2012) Long-distance movements of transient coyotes in eastern north carolina. The American Midland Naturalist 168, 281-288.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hinton JW, van Manen FT, Chamberlain MJ (2015) Space use and habitat selection by resident and transient coyotes (Canis latrans). PLoS ONE 10, e0132203.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Hody JW, Kays R (2018) Mapping the expansion of coyotes (Canis latrans) across north and central america. ZooKeys 759, 81-97.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jensen AJ, Marneweck CJ, Kilgo JC, Jachowski DS (2022) Coyote diet in North America: geographic and ecological patterns during range expansion. Mammal Review 52, 480-496.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jensen AJ, Saldo EA, Chapman ZG, Butfiloski JW, Jachowski DS (2023) Risk from a top predator and forest structure influence scavenging by smaller carnivores. Ecosphere 14, e4596.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kilgo JC, Ray HS, Ruth C, Miller KV (2010) Can coyotes affect deer populations in southeastern North America? The Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 929-933.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kilgo JC, Ray HS, Vukovich M, Goode MJ, Ruth C (2012) Predation by coyotes on white-tailed deer neonates in South Carolina. The Journal of Wildlife Management 76, 1420-1430.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kilgo JC, Shaw CE, Vukovich M, Conroy MJ, Ruth C (2017) Reproductive characteristics of a coyote population before and during exploitation. The Journal of Wildlife Management 81, 1386-1393.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kilgo JC, Cherry MJ, Ditchkoff SS, Gulsby WD, Miller KV (2019) Coyotes and white-tailed deer populations in the east: a comment on Bragina et al. (2019). The Journal of Wildlife Management 83, 1636-1640.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kilgo JC, Garabedian JE, Vukovich M, Schlichting PE, Byrne ME, Beasley JC (2021) Food resources affect territoriality of invasive wild pig sounders with implications for control. Scientific Reports 11, 18821.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Kilgo JC, Vukovich M, Cox KJ, Larsen M, Mims TT, Garabedian JE (2023) Assessing whole-sounder removal versus traditional control for reducing invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations. Pest Management Science 79, 3033-3042.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Knowlton FF, Gese EM, Jaeger MM (1999) Coyote depredation control: an interface between biology and management. Journal of Range Management 52, 398-412.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Letnic M, Dickman CR (2010) Resource pulses and mammalian dynamics: conceptual models for hummock grasslands and other Australian desert habitats. Biological Reviews 85, 501-521.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lewis JS, Corn JL, Mayer JJ, Jordan TR, Farnsworth ML, Burdett CL, VerCauteren KC, Sweeney SJ, Miller RS (2019) Historical, current, and potential population size estimates of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States. Biological Invasions 21, 2373-2384.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Margenau LLS, Cherry MJ, Miller KV, Garrison EP, Chandler RB (2022) Monitoring partially marked populations using camera and telemetry data. Ecological Applications 32, e2553.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Mastro LL (2011) Life history and ecology of coyotes in the mid-atlantic states: a summary of the scientific literature. Southeastern Naturalist 10, 721-730.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mayer JJ, Smyser TJ, Piaggio AJ, Zervanos SM (2020) Wild pig taxonomy, morphology, genetics, and physiology. In ‘Invasive wild pigs in North America: ecology, impacts, and management’. (Eds KC VerCauteren, JC Beasley, SS Ditchkoff, JJ Mayer, GJ Roloff, BK Strickland) pp. 7–32. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)
McKelvey KS, Schwartz MK (2005) dropout: a program to identify problem loci and samples for noninvasive genetic samples in a capture-mark-recapture framework. Molecular Ecology Notes 5, 716-718.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Miller CR, Joyce P, Waits LP (2002) Assessing allelic dropout and genotype reliability using maximum likelihood. Genetics 160, 357-249.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Miller RS, Sweeney SJ, Slootmaker C, Grear DA, Di Salvo PA, Kiser D, Shwiff SA (2017) Cross-species transmission potential between wild pigs, livestock, poultry, wildlife, and humans: implications for disease risk management in North America. Scientific Reports 7, 7821.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Mills LS, Knowlton FF (1991) Coyote space use in relation to prey abundance. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69, 1516-1521.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Morin DJ, Kelly MJ (2017) The dynamic nature of territoriality, transience and biding in an exploited coyote population. Wildlife Biology 2017, 1-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Morin DJ, Kelly MJ, Waits LP (2016) Monitoring coyote population dynamics with fecal DNA and spatial capture–recapture. The Journal of Wildlife Management 80, 824-836.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Newsome TM, Dellinger JA, Pavey CR, Ripple WJ, Shores CR, Wirsing AJ, Dickman CR (2015) The ecological effects of providing resource subsidies to predators. Global Ecology and Biogeography 24, 1-11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
NIMBLE Development Team (2023) NIMBLE: MCMC, particle filtering, and programmable hierarchical modeling. Available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1211190, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8047617
O’Bryan CJ, Holden MH, Watson JEM (2019) The mesoscavenger release hypothesis and implications for ecosystem and human well-being. Ecology Letters 22, 1340-1348.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Parsons MA, Young JK (2024) Coyotes display minimal response to Cougar scent at experimental carcass sites. Journal of Mammalogy 105, 729-739.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pepin KM, Brown VR, Yang A, Beasley JC, Boughton R, VerCauteren KC, Miller RS, Bevins SN (2022) Optimising response to an introduction of African swine fever in wild pigs. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 69, e3111-e3127.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Poessel SA, Gese EM, Young JK (2017) Environmental factors influencing the occurrence of coyotes and conflicts in urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 157, 259-269.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Prugh LR (2005) Coyote prey selection and community stability during a decline in food supply. Oikos 110, 253-264.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
R Core Team (2022) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at https://www.R-project.org/
Risch DR, Ringma J, Price MR (2021) The global impact of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) on terrestrial biodiversity. Scientific Reports 11, 13256.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Royle JA, Dorazio RM, Link WA (2007) Analysis of multinomial models with unknown index using data augmentation. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 16, 67-85.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Royle JA, Chandler RB, Sollmann R, Gardner B (2013) ‘Spatial capture–recapture.’ (Academic Press: Waltham, MA, USA). Available at http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70048654
Ruprecht J, Eriksson CE, Forrester TD, Spitz DB, Clark DA, Wisdom MJ, Bianco M, Rowland MM, Smith JB, Johnson BK, Levi T (2021) Variable strategies to solve risk–reward tradeoffs in carnivore communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2101614118.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schrecengost JD, Kilgo JC, Mallard D, Ray HS, Miller KV (2008) Seasonal food habits of the coyote in the South Carolina coastal plain. Southeastern Naturalist 7, 135-144.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schrecengost JD, Kilgo JC, Ray HS, Miller KV (2009) Home range, habitat use and survival of coyotes in western South Carolina. The American Midland Naturalist 162, 346-355.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sells SN, Mitchell MS (2020) The economics of territory selection. Ecological Modelling 438, 109329.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sillero-Zubiri C, Hoffmann M, Macdonald DW (Eds) (2004) Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs : status survey and conservation action plan. Available at https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1376674/canids/1990939/ [accessed 11 January 2024]
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (2022) South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. Available at https://www.dnr.sc.gov/
Spencer EE, Dickman CR, Greenville A, Crowther MS, Kutt A, Newsome TM (2021) Carcasses attract invasive species and increase artificial nest predation in a desert environment. Global Ecology and Conservation 27, e01588.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stewart-Oaten A, Murdoch WW, Parker KR (1986) Environmental impact assessment: ‘pseudoreplication’ in time? Ecology 67, 929-940.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Turner KL, Abernethy EF, Conner LM, Rhodes OE, Jr., Beasley JC (2017) Abiotic and biotic factors modulate carrion fate and vertebrate scavenging communities. Ecology 98, 2413-2424.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-Checker: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4, 535-538.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
VerCauteren KC, Beasley JC, Ditchkoff SS, Mayer JJ, Roloff GJ, Strickland BK (Eds) (2020) ‘Invasive wild pigs in North America: ecology, impacts, and management’, 1st edn. (CRC Press) 10.1201/b22014
Ward JN, Hinton JW, Johannsen KL, Karlin ML, Miller KV, Chamberlain MJ (2018) Home range size, vegetation density, and season influences prey use by coyotes (Canis latrans). PLoS ONE 13, e0203703.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Watine LN, Giuliano WM (2017) Factors determining coyote (Canis latrans) diets. Open Journal of Ecology 7, 650-666.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Way JG (2011) Record pack-density of eastern coyotes/coywolves (Canis latrans × lycaon). The American Midland Naturalist 165, 201-203.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Webster SC, Beasley JC, Hinton JW, Chamberlain MJ (2022) Resident and transient coyotes exhibit differential patterns of movement behavior across heterogeneous landscapes in the southeastern United States. Ecology and Evolution 12, e8725.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Windberg LA, Ebbert SM, Kelly BT (1997) Population characteristics of coyotes (Canis latrans) in the northern Chihuahuan Desert of New Mexico. The American Midland Naturalist 138, 197-207.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Young JK, Glasscock SN, Shivik JA (2008) Does spatial structure persist despite resource and population changes? Effects of experimental manipulations on coyotes. Journal of Mammalogy 89, 1094-1104.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Youngmann JL, Hinton JW, Bakner NW, Chamberlain MJ, D’Angelo GJ (2022) Recursive use of home ranges and seasonal shifts in foraging behavior by a generalist carnivore. Ecology and Evolution 12, e9540.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
