Putting rakali in the spotlight: innovative methods for detecting an elusive semi-aquatic mammal

Emmalie Sanders; Dale G. Nimmo; James M. Turner; Skye Wassens; Damian R. Michael

doi:10.1071/WR24002

RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Previous Next Contents Vol 51(6)

Putting rakali in the spotlight: innovative methods for detecting an elusive semi-aquatic mammal

Emmalie Sanders

^A ^B ^* , Dale G. Nimmo ^A ^B , James M. Turner

^C , Skye Wassens ^A ^B and Damian R. Michael

^B

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.

^B Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.

^C Institute of Biomedical and Environmental Health Research, School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, South Lanarkshire, G72 0LH UK.

^* Correspondence to: esanders@csu.edu.au

Handling Editor: Alexandra Carthey

Wildlife Research 51, WR24002 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR24002

Submitted: 15 January 2024 Accepted: 14 May 2024 Published: 31 May 2024

Abstract

Context

Freshwater ecosystems rank among the most threatened environments on Earth. Monitoring aquatic and semi-aquatic species is vital to informing conservation of freshwater ecosystems. However, many semi-aquatic mammals can be difficult to detect with conventional survey methods.

Aims

We aimed to identify the most effective survey method for detecting an Australian semi-aquatic mammal, the rakali (Hydromys chrysogaster).

Methods

We compared rakali detection rates among camera-trapping, live-trapping and visual surveys, and tested the influence of camera angle, trap proximity to water and time of survey, across the Yanco Creek system in southern New South Wales.

Key results

Nocturnal spotlight surveys were the most effective method for detecting rakali, with most observations occurring while individuals were foraging or swimming in the water. Camera traps facing a floating platform and cage traps mounted on floating platforms performed better than those deployed on land. Downward-facing camera traps detected rakali three times more often than did forward-facing cameras. Trapping rakali was unreliable, with the species detected at fewer than half of the sites where presence was confirmed via visual observation and camera traps. For species absence to be determined with 95% confidence, 2–4 weeks of nightly trapping is required, compared with six nights of visual surveys or 12 nights for a platform-facing camera. Morning visual surveys were largely ineffective because of predominantly nocturnal rakali activity and difficulty in detecting signs in creek environments.

Conclusions

The likelihood of detecting rakali can be maximised through the use of nightly spotlighting and deployment of baited camera traps focussed on platforms or natural resting areas within a water body.

Implications

Understanding the effectiveness of each method is essential for developing species-appropriate protocols for population monitoring. Our findings present suitable options to be further explored among the 100-plus small (<1 kg) semi-aquatic mammals worldwide that share similar behaviours and characteristics to the rakali, many of which are threatened or data deficient.

Keywords: Australia, camera trap, conservation, detection, Hydromys, monitoring, semi-aquatic, water, water rat.

References

Ahlers AA, Heske EJ, Schooley RL, Mitchell MA (2010) Home ranges and space use of muskrats Ondatra zibethicus in restricted linear habitats. Wildlife Biology 16(4), 400-408.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ahumada JA, Fegraus E, Birch T, Flores N, Kays R, O’Brien TG, Palmer J, Schuttler S, Zhao JY, Jetz W, Kinnaird M, Kulkarni S, Lyet A, Thau D, Duong M, Oliver R, Dancer A (2020) Wildlife insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and other passive sensor wildlife data for the planet. Environmental Conservation 47, 1-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Atlas of Living Australia (2023) Hydromys chrysogaster Geoffroy, 1804. (Atlas of Living Australia: Canberra) Available at https://www.ala.org.au/ [Accessed 10 October 2023]

Baker R, Scott DM, Keeling C, Dwight C (2018) Overwinter survival and post-release movements of translocated water voles: implications for current mitigation guidance. European Journal of Wildlife Research 64, 56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Brunt T, Cecil M, Griffiths J, Adams-Hosking C, Murray P (2021) Where are the platypuses (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) now? A snapshot in time of their distribution in the Greater Brisbane region. Australian Mammalogy 43, 368-372.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dawson TJ, Fanning FD (1981) Thermal and energetic problems of semiaquatic mammals: a study of the Australian water rat, including comparisons with the platypus. Physiological Zoology 54, 285-296.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Day CC, Westover MD, Hall LK, Larsen RT, McMillan BR (2016) Comparing direct and indirect methods to estimate detection rates and site use of a cryptic semi-aquatic carnivore. Ecological Indicators 66, 230-234.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

De Bondi N, White JG, Stevens M, Cooke R (2010) A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities. Wildlife Research 37, 456-465.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z-I, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard A-H, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 81, 163-182.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Findlay MA, Briers RA, White PJC (2020) Component processes of detection probability in camera-trap studies: understanding the occurrence of false-negatives. Mammal Research 65, 167-180.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fiske I, Chandler R (2011) unmarked: an r package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software 43, 1-23.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Garcia-Passos GO, Soeiro MS, Lira-da-Silva RM (2018) Use of tomahawk traps in freshwater Testudines capture. Herpetology Notes 11, 285-289.
| Google Scholar |

Garden JG, McAlpine CA, Possingham HP, Jones DN (2007) Using multiple survey methods to detect terrestrial reptiles and mammals: what are the most successful and cost-efficient combinations? Wildlife Research 34, 218-227.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gardner JL, Serena M (1995) Observations on activity patterns, population and den characteristics of the water rat Hydromys chrysogaster along Badger Creek, Victoria. Australian Mammalogy 18, 71-75.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gil-Sánchez JM, Antorán-Pilar E (2020) Camera-trapping for abundance estimation of otters in seasonal rivers: a field evaluation. European Journal of Wildlife Research 66, 72.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gourmas, M (2011) Competitive interactions between an alien invasive (Rattus rattus) and a native competitor (Hydromys chrysogaster). Honours thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Hanke W, Meyer S, Bleckmann H, Dehnhardt G (2020) Hydrodynamic reception in the Australian water rat, Hydromys chrysogaster. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 206, 517-526.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Harkins KM, Keinath D, Ben-David M (2019) It’s a trap: optimizing detection of rare small mammals. PLoS ONE 14, e0213201.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Harrington LA, Hays GC, Fasola L, Harrington AL, Righton D, Macdonald DW (2012) Dive performance in a small-bodied, semi-aquatic mammal in the wild. Journal of Mammalogy 93(1), 198-210.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Harris WF (1978) An ecological study of the Australian water-rat (Hydromys chrysogaster: Geoffroy) in southeast Queensland. MSc thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

Herrin RO (2010) The use of Scoutguard sg550 camera traps to monitor platypus activity. In ‘Tasmanian platypus management plan’. (Eds N Gust, J Griffiths) pp. 48–50. (Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment: Hobart, Tas., Australia)

Homan P (2022) Surveys of vertebrate fauna on the northern outskirts of metropolitan Melbourne, 2006-2022: (1) mammals. The Victorian Naturalist 139, 173-183.
| Google Scholar |

Hood GA (2020) ‘Semi-aquatic mammals: ecology and biology.’ (John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA)

Koprowski JL (2002) Handling tree squirrels with a safe and efficient restraint. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30, 101-103.
| Google Scholar |

Kutt AS, Waller NL, Colman NJ, Perry JJ, Starr CR (2023) Camera trapping ekes out some improvement for surveying sparse mammal populations in northern Queensland. Australian Mammalogy 45, 293-304.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kéry M (2002) Inferring the absence of a species: a case study of snakes. The Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 330-338.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lee AK (1995) ‘The action plan for Australian rodents.’ (Australian Nature Conservation Agency: Canberra, ACT, Australia)

Leigh CM, Breed WG (2020) A demographic study of the water-rat (Hydromys chrysogaster) on the River Torrens in Adelaide, South Australia. Australian Mammalogy 42, 277-282.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Leite MdS, Galliez M, Queiroz TL, Fernandez FAS (2016) Spatial ecology of the water opossum Chironectes minimus in Atlantic forest streams. Mammalian Biology 81(5), 480-487.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lerone L, Carpaneto GM, Loy A (2015) Why camera traps fail to detect a semi-aquatic mammal: activation devices as possible cause. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39, 193-196.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lima DO, Pinho GM, Fernandez FAS (2016) Spatial patterns of the semi-aquatic rodent Nectomys squamipes in Atlantic forest streams. Journal of Natural History 50(7–8), 497-511.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McIlduff C, Koeller K, Wilson B, Bleby K (2014) Use of remote cameras to survey and monitor mammal fauna occurrence at Loch McNess and Lake Yonderup, Yanchep National Park, Perth, Western Australia (2011–2013). Report for Department of Parks and Wildlife. Government of Western Australia Department of Parks and Wildlife. Perth, Western Australia. Available at https://library.dbca.wa.gov.au/#record/135247 [Accessed 15 November 2023]

Meek PD, Ballard G-A, Fleming PJS, Schaefer M, Williams W, Falzon G (2014) Camera traps can be heard and seen by animals. PLoS ONE 9, e110832.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Moeller AK, Waller SJ, DeCesare NJ, Chitwood MC, Lukacs PM (2023) Best practices to account for capture probability and viewable area in camera-based abundance estimation. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 9, 152-164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Molyneux J, Pavey CR, James AI, Carthew SM (2017) The efficacy of monitoring techniques for detecting small mammals and reptiles in arid environments. Wildlife Research 44, 534-545.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moore HA, Valentine LE, Dunlop JA, Nimmo DG (2020) The effect of camera orientation on the detectability of wildlife: a case study from north-western Australia. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 6, 546-556.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moore HA, Dunlop JA, Geyle HM, Greenwood L, Nimmo DG (2023) First you get the money, then you get the power: comparing the cost and power of monitoring programs to detect changes in occupancy of a threatened marsupial predator. Conservation Science and Practice 5, e12881.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mori E, Andreoni A, Cecere F, Magi M, Lazzeri L (2020) Patterns of activity rhythms of invasive coypus Myocastor coypus inferred through camera-trapping. Mammalian Biology 100, 591-599.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Nichols M, Glen AS, Garvey P, Ross J (2017) A comparison of horizontal versus vertical camera placement to detect feral cats and mustelids. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 41, 145-150.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

O’Connell AF, Jr, Talancy NW, Bailey LL, Sauer JR, Cook R, Gilbert AT (2006) Estimating site occupancy and detection probability parameters for meso- and large mammals in a coastal ecosystem. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 1625-1633.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Parrott ML, Doody JS, McHenry C, Clulow S (2020) Eat your heart out: choice and handling of novel toxic prey by predatory water rats. Australian Mammalogy 42, 235-229.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Peres PHdF, Grotta-Neto F, Luduvério DJ, Oliveira MLd, Duarte JMB (2021) Implications of unreliable species identification methods for neotropical deer conservation planning. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 19, 435-442.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

R Core Team (2022) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria)

Randler C, Kalb N (2018) Distance and size matters: a comparison of six wildlife camera traps and their usefulness for wild birds. Ecology and Evolution 8, 7151-7163.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Rendall AR, Sutherland DR, Cooke R, White J (2014) Camera trapping: a contemporary approach to monitoring invasive rodents in high conservation priority ecosystems. PLoS ONE 9, e86592.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Sales NG, McKenzie MB, Drake J, Harper LR, Browett SS, Coscia I, Wangensteen OS, Baillie C, Bryce E, Dawson DA, Ochu E, Hänfling B, Lawson Handley L, Mariani S, Lambin X, Sutherland C, McDevitt AD (2020) Fishing for mammals: landscape-level monitoring of terrestrial and semi-aquatic communities using eDNA from riverine systems. Journal of Applied Ecology 57, 707-716.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sanders E (2021) Effectiveness of camera traps in detecting a cryptic semi-aquatic mammal. Wildlife Insights. Available at http://n2t.net/ark:/63614/w12004053 [15 November 2023]

Sanders E, Wassens S, Michael DR, Nimmo DG, Turner JM (2024) Extinction risk of the world’s freshwater mammals. Conservation Biology 38, e14168.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Schooley RL, Branch LC (2005) Survey techniques for determining occupancy of isolated wetlands by round-tailed muskrats. Southeastern Naturalist 4, 745-756.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Scott A, Grant T (1997) Impacts of water management in the Murray–Darling basin on the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) and the water rat (Hydromys chrysogaster). Technical report 23/97. CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Seidlitz A, Bryant KA, Armstrong NJ, Wayne AF (2022) Animal detections increase by using a wide-angle camera trap model but not by periodically repositioning camera traps within study sites. Pacific Conservation Biology 28, 25-35.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Shields J, Austin LM (2018) Monitoring invasive and threatened aquatic amphibians, mammals, and birds. In ‘Using detection dogs to monitor aquatic ecosystem health and protect aquatic resources’. (Ed. NL Richards) pp. 71–117. (Springer International Publishing: MT, USA)

Smart C, Speldewinde P, Mills H (2011) Influence of habitat characteristics on the distribution of the water-rat (Hydromys chrysogaster) in the greater Perth region, Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 94, 533-539.
| Google Scholar |

State Government of NSW and Department of Planning and Environment (2022) NSW state vegetation type map. The Sharing and Enabling Environmental Data Portal. Available at https://datasets.seed.nsw.gov.au/dataset/95437fbd-2ef7-44df-8579-d7a64402d42d [Accessed 15 November 2023]

Suárez-Tangil BD, Rodríguez A (2021) Estimates of species richness and composition depend on detection method in assemblages of terrestrial mammals. Animals 11, 186.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Taylor BD, Goldingay RL, Lindsay JM (2014) Horizontal or vertical? Camera trap orientations and recording modes for detecting potoroos, bandicoots and pademelons. Australian Mammalogy 36, 60-66.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thomas ML, Baker L, Beattie JR, Baker AM (2020) Determining the efficacy of camera traps, live capture traps, and detection dogs for locating cryptic small mammal species. Ecology and Evolution 10, 1054-1068.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Thompson W (2004) ‘Sampling rare or elusive species: concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC, USA)

Torre I, Freixas L, Arrizabalaga A, Díaz M (2016) The efficiency of two widely used commercial live-traps to develop monitoring protocols for small mammal biodiversity. Ecological Indicators 66, 481-487.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Triggs B (2004) ‘Tracks, scats and other traces: a field guide to australian mammals.’ Revised edn. (Oxford University Press: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Trocini S, Barrett G, Howard K, Ramalho C (2015) Rakali community survey 2014-2015. Report prepared by WWF-Australia and the Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife. WWF-Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

Turner A, Sanders E, Talbot S, Moore E, Wassens S (2022) Yanco creek system community report. Commonwealth Environmental Water Office, Albury, NSW, Australia.

Watts CHS, Aslin HJ (1981) ‘Rodents of Australia.’ (Angus & Robertson: Sydney, NSW, Australia)

Wearn OR, Glover-Kapfer P (2019) Snap happy: camera traps are an effective sampling tool when compared with alternative methods. Royal Society Open Science 6, 181748.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Welbourne DJ, Claridge AW, Paull DJ, Lambert A, Rowcliffe M, Disney M (2016) How do passive infrared triggered camera traps operate and why does it matter? Breaking down common misconceptions. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 2, 77-83.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wickham H (2016) ‘Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis.’ (Springer: New York, NY, USA)

Williams G (2019) Distribution and status of the Australian water-rat/rakali (Hydromys chrysogaster) in the greater ACT region. Report to the Wettenhall Environment Trust. Australian Platypus Conservancy, Wiseleigh, Vic., Australia.

Williams G, Serena M (2018) Distribution of the Australian water-rat Hydromys chrysogaster in Victoria: findings from community-based sightings and live-trapping surveys. The Victorian Naturalist 135, 71-83.
| Google Scholar |

Woollard P, Vestjens WJM, Maclean L (1978) The ecology of the eastern water rat Hydromys chrysogaster at Griffith, N.S.W.: food and feeding habits. Wildlife Research 5, 59-73.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yonezawa S, Ushio M, Yamanaka H, Miya M, Takayanagi A, Isagi Y (2020) Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals the presence of a small, quick-moving, nocturnal water shrew in a forest stream. Conservation Genetics 21, 1079-1084.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |