The golden-tailed gecko: a disturbance-tolerant species in a fragmenting environment
Chris R. Pavey
A B E , Eric Vanderduys C and S. Raghu D
A CSIRO Land and Water, PMB 44 Winnellie, NT 0822, Australia.
B Workgroup for Endangered Species, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute of Zoology, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
C CSIRO Land and Water, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.
D CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: chris.pavey@csiro.au
Wildlife Research 48(7) 643-653 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR20115
Submitted: 7 July 2020 Accepted: 15 April 2021 Published: 21 May 2021
Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2021 Open Access CC BY-NC
Abstract
Context: In central Queensland, Australia, the development of a coal-seam gas (CSG) industry is creating additional fragmentation of landscapes consisting of woodland and open forest that are already highly fragmented.
Aims: To assess the response to fragmentation of Strophurus taenicauda (golden-tailed gecko). The species is ‘near threatened’ in Queensland.
Methods: Occurrence and abundance were examined across three categories of patch size – small (≤10 ha), medium (10–100 ha) and large (≥100 ha) – across three geographic areas of the species’ range. Minimal impact (i.e. sighting only) active searches for geckos were conducted at night. A minimum of three replicate sites of each patch size category was surveyed in each of the three geographic areas. Eleven additional patches (each <4 ha and located in the southern geographic area) were surveyed to investigate how size and spatial isolation of small patches affected occurrence and abundance of S. taenicauda. At all sites a standardised set of 22 habitat variables was collected, and the presence of other species of arboreal gecko was recorded.
Key results: The species was located across patches of all sizes, including those as small as 1.11 ha. It was also located opportunistically in the matrix among patches and occurred in isolated trees within an urban area. The abundance of another commonly occurring arboreal gecko, Gehyra dubia (dubious dtella), was negatively correlated with S. taenicauda abundance in small patches. The most important habitat variable for S. taenicauda was average basal area of trees. As this increased, especially above 5.7 m2 ha−1, it was more likely to be present. When considering only the small patches, the main factors influencing presence and abundance of S. taenicauda were the average basal area of Callitris glaucophylla (white cypress) and grazing (negligible or absent).
Conclusions: Strophurus taenicauda is a species that is tolerant of disturbance and can persist in fragmented habitat, provided the fragments have adequate cover of white cypress.
Implications: The species appears to be resilient to the current level of CSG development within its geographic range.
Keywords: brigalow, matrix, patch size, remnant, white cypress.
References
Accad, A., Neldner, V. J., Wilson, B. A., and Niehus, R. E. (2006). Remnant vegetation in Queensland. Analysis of remnant vegetation 1997–1999–2000–2001–2003, including regional ecosystem information. Queensland Herbarium, Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.APLNG Project EIS (2010). Chapter 8: Terrestrial ecology. In ‘Australia Pacific LNG Project Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 2: Gas Fields’. Available at https://www.aplng.com.au/about-us/compliance/eis.html [verified May 2021].
Baker, M. A., Mazumder, S., Sharma, H., Philpot, J. A., Scott, M. A., and Wittemeier, R. (2012). Well design and well spacing optimisation in unconventional plays. In ‘SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, October 2012’. Paper number SPE-159325-MS. (Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
Brittingham, M. C., Maloney, K. O., Farag, A. M., Harper, D. D., and Bowen, Z. H. (2014). Ecological risks of shale oil and gas developments to wildlife, aquatic resources and their habitats. Environmental Science & Technology 48, 11034–11047.
| Ecological risks of shale oil and gas developments to wildlife, aquatic resources and their habitats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown, D., Worthington Wilmer, J., and McDonald, S. (2012). A revision of Strophurus taenicauda (Squamata; Diplodactylidae) with the description of two new subspecies from central Queensland and a southerly range extension. Zootaxa 3243, 1–28.
| A revision of Strophurus taenicauda (Squamata; Diplodactylidae) with the description of two new subspecies from central Queensland and a southerly range extension.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
De’ath, G., and Fabricius, K. E. (2000). Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81, 3178–3192.
| Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N. J. B., and Collen, B. (2014). Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Nature 345, 401–406.
eco logical Australia (2012). Assessing the cumulative impact of mining scenarios on bioregional assets in the Namoi Catchment. Development and trial of a GIS tool – NCRAT Version 1. Final Report Version 1. Prepared for Namoi Catchment Management Authority, Gunnedah, NSW, Australia.
Evans, M. J., Banks, S. C., Driscoll, D. A., Hicks, A. J., Melbourne, B. A., and Davies, K. F. (2017). Short- and long-terms effects of habitat fragmentation differ but are predicted by response to the matrix. Ecology 98, 807–819.
| Short- and long-terms effects of habitat fragmentation differ but are predicted by response to the matrix.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27987325PubMed |
Eyre, T. J., Ferguson, D. J., Kennedy, M., Rowland, J., and Manon, M. (2015). Long term thinning and logging in Australian cypress pine forest: changes in habitat attributes and response of fauna. Biological Conservation 186, 83–96.
| Long term thinning and logging in Australian cypress pine forest: changes in habitat attributes and response of fauna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34, 487–515.
| Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fahrig, L. (2017). Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 48, 1–23.
| Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fahrig, L., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Bennett, J. R., Boucher-Lalonde, V., Cazetta, E., Currie, D. J., Eigenbrod, F., Ford, A. T., Harrison, S. P., Jaeger, J. A. G., Koper, N., Martin, A. E., Martin, J.-L., Metzger, J. P., Morrison, P., Rhodes, J. R., Saunders, D. A., Simberloff, D., Smith, A. C., Tischendorf, L., Vellend, M., and Watling, J. I. (2019). Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity? Biological Conservation 230, 179–186.
| Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gonsalves, L., Law, B., Brassil, T., Waters, C., Toole, I., and Tap, P. (2018). Ecological outcomes for multiple taxa from silvicultural trimming of regrowth forest. Forest Ecology and Management 425, 177–188.
| Ecological outcomes for multiple taxa from silvicultural trimming of regrowth forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hobday, A. J., and McDonald, J. (2014). Environmental issues in Australia. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39, 1–28.
| Environmental issues in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keinath, D. A., Doak, D. F., Hodges, K. E., Prugh, L. R., Fagan, W., Sekercioglu, C. H., Buchart, S. H. M., and Kaufmann, M. (2017). A global analysis of traits predicting sensitivity to habitat fragmentation. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26, 115–127.
| A global analysis of traits predicting sensitivity to habitat fragmentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Neldner, V. J., Wilson, B. A., Thompson, E. J., and Dillewaard, H. A. (2012). Methodology for survey and mapping of regional ecosystems and vegetation communities in Queensland. Version 3.2. Queensland Herbarium, Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Ngugi, M. R., Botkin, D. B., Doley, D., Cant, M., and Kelley, J. (2013). Restoration and management of Callitris forest ecosystems in Eastern Australia: simulation of attributes of growth dynamics, growth increment and biomass accumulation. Ecological Modelling 263, 152–161.
| Restoration and management of Callitris forest ecosystems in Eastern Australia: simulation of attributes of growth dynamics, growth increment and biomass accumulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pavey, C. R., Vanderduys, E., and Raghu, S. (2016). Habitat selection by two focal species; golden-tailed gecko and glossy black-cockatoo. A report to the Gas Industry Social and Environmental Research Alliance (GISERA). CSIRO, Alice Springs, NT, Australia. Available at https://gisera.csiro.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Bio-3-Final-Report.pdf.
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., and Schapire, R. E. (2006). Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190, 231–259.
| Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Queensland Government (2014). Queensland borehole series data set online. Available at https://data.qld.gov.au/dataset/queensland-borehole-series [verified 17 June 2014].
Queensland Herbarium (2014). Regional ecosystem description database online. Available at https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/plants/ecosystems/download [verified 23 February 2015].
R Core Team (2016). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.) Available at https://www.R-project.org/.
Read, J. L. (1999). Longevity, reproductive effort and movements of three sympatric Australian arid-zone geckos. Australian Journal of Zoology 47, 307–316.
| Longevity, reproductive effort and movements of three sympatric Australian arid-zone geckos.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Souther, S., Tingley, M. W., Popescu, V. D., Hayman, D. T. S., Ryan, M. E., Graves, T. A., Hartl, B., and Terrell, K. (2014). Biotic impacts of energy development from shale: research priorities and knowledge gaps. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12, 330–338.
| Biotic impacts of energy development from shale: research priorities and knowledge gaps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson, W. A., and Eldridge, D. J. (2005). White cypress pine (Callitris glaucophylla): a review of its role in landscape and ecological processes in eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 53, 555–570.
| White cypress pine (Callitris glaucophylla): a review of its role in landscape and ecological processes in eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilson, S. K. (2015). ‘A Field Guide to Reptiles of Queensland.’ (New Holland: Sydney, NSW, Australia.)
Wilson, S. K., and Knowles, D. G. (1988). ‘Australia’s Reptiles: a Photographic Reference to the Terrestrial Reptiles of Australia.’ (Collins Publishers: Sydney, NSW, Australia.)
Wilson, B. A., Neldner, V. J., and Accad, A. (2002). The extent and status of remnant vegetation in Queensland and its implications for statewide vegetation management and legislation. The Rangeland Journal 24, 6–35.
| The extent and status of remnant vegetation in Queensland and its implications for statewide vegetation management and legislation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yeager, L. A., Keller, D. A., Burns, T. R., Pool, A. S., and Fodrie, F. J. (2016). Threshold effects of habitat fragmentation on fish diversity at landscape scales. Ecology 97, 2157–2166.
| Threshold effects of habitat fragmentation on fish diversity at landscape scales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27859191PubMed |
Young, P. A. R., Wilson, B. A., McCosker, J. C., Fensham, R. J., Morgan, G., and Taylor, P. M. (1999). Brigalow Belt. In ‘The Conservation Status of Queensland Bioregional Ecosystems’. (Eds P. S. Sattler and R. D. Williams.) pp. 11/1–11/81. (Environmental Protection Agency: Brisbane, Qld, Australia.)
