Animal welfare and the use of procedural documents: limitations and refinement
Jordan O. Hampton A B C , Timothy H. Hyndman A , Michael Laurence A , Andrew L. Perry B , Peter Adams A and Teresa Collins A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Murdoch University, 90 South St, Murdoch WA 6150, Australia.
B Ecotone Wildlife Veterinary Services, PO Box 76, Inverloch Vic 3996, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: j.hampton@ecotonewildlife.com
Wildlife Research 43(7) 599-603 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16153
Submitted: 15 August 2016 Accepted: 22 October 2016 Published: 18 November 2016
Abstract
Increased scrutiny of animal welfare in wildlife management has seen a recent proliferation in the use of procedural documents (standard operating procedures, codes of practice etc.). Some procedural documents are presumed to represent ‘best practice’ methods, whereby adherence to prescribed inputs is explicitly purported to generate humane outcomes. However, the relationship between what is done to animals (inputs) and what they experience (outputs), as assessed by animal-based measures, has received little attention. Procedural documents are commonly developed in the absence of empirical animal-based measures, creating uncertainty in animal welfare outcomes. Prescribed procedures are valuable as guidelines for standardising methodology, but the development of ‘welfare standards’ that focus on desired thresholds for animal-based measures offers many advantages for improving animal welfare. Refinement of the use of procedural documents in wildlife management is required to ensure they generate desirable outcomes for animals, and do not preclude the development of improved methods.
Additional keywords: human dimensions, outcome assessment, policy development, stress, wildlife management.
References
Alpigiani, I., Bacci, C., Keeling, L., Salman, M., Brindani, F., Pongolini, S., Hitchens, P., and Bonardi, S. (2016). The associations between animal-based welfare measures and the presence of indicators of food safety in finishing pigs. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 25, 355–363.| The associations between animal-based welfare measures and the presence of indicators of food safety in finishing pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arnemo, J. M., Ahlqvist, P., Andersen, R., Berntsen, F., Ericsson, G., Odden, J., Brunberg, S., Segerström, P., and Swenson, J. E. (2006). Risk of capture-related mortality in large free-ranging mammals: experiences from Scandinavia. Wildlife Biology 12, 109–113.
| Risk of capture-related mortality in large free-ranging mammals: experiences from Scandinavia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Australian Capital Territory Parks and Conservation Service (2013). Animal welfare and compliance assessment of the 2013 Australian Capital Territory kangaroo conservation cull. Australian Capital Territory Parks and Conservation Service, Canberra.
Baker, S. E., Sharp, T. M., and Macdonald, D. W. (2016). Assessing animal welfare impacts in the management of European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), European moles (Talpa europaea) and carrion crows (Corvus corone). PLoS One 11, e0146298.
| Assessing animal welfare impacts in the management of European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), European moles (Talpa europaea) and carrion crows (Corvus corone).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bhandari, M., Zlowodzki, M., and Cole, P. A. (2004). From eminence-based practice to evidence-based practice: a paradigm shift. Minnesota Medicine 87, 51–54.
Buchanan, K. L., and Goldsmith, A. R. (2004). Noninvasive endocrine data for behavioural studies: the importance of validation. Animal Behaviour 67, 183–185.
| Noninvasive endocrine data for behavioural studies: the importance of validation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carter, A., Barr, S., Bond, C., Paske, G., Peters, D., and van Dam, R. (2016). Controlling sympatric pest mammal populations in New Zealand with self-resetting, toxicant-free traps: a promising tool for invasive species management. Biological Invasions 18, 1723–1736.
| Controlling sympatric pest mammal populations in New Zealand with self-resetting, toxicant-free traps: a promising tool for invasive species management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapple, R. (2005). The politics of feral horse management in Guy Fawkes River National Park, NSW. Australian Zoologist 33, 233–246.
| The politics of feral horse management in Guy Fawkes River National Park, NSW.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Commonwealth of Australia (2008). National code of practice for the humane shooting of kangaroos and wallabies for commercial purposes. Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra.
Daoust, P.-Y., and Cattet, M. (2004). Consideration of use of the 22 caliber rimfire Winchester magnum cartridge for instant killing of young harp seals (Pagophilus groenlandicus). Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Ottawa.
Daoust, P.-Y., Caraguel, C., Fenton, H., Hammill, M. O., Roy, L. D., and Spears, J. (2013). Assessment of current and alternative methods for killing young grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) during commercial harvest. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Ottawa.
Department of Environment and Primary Industries (2014). Standard operating procedure: aerial shooting of feral goats in Victoria. Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Melbourne.
Department of Parks and Wildlife (2013). Temporary marking of mammals, reptiles and birds. Department of Parks and Wildlife, Perth.
Department of Sustainability and Environment (2004). Victoria’s koala management strategy. Biodiversity and Natural Resources Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.
Fisher, P., Brown, S., and Arrow, J. (2016). Welfare impacts of pindone poisoning in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Animals (Basel) 6, 19.
| Welfare impacts of pindone poisoning in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fleming, P. A., Clarke, T., Wickham, S. L., Stockman, C. A., Barnes, A. L., Collins, T., and Miller, D. W. (2016). The contribution of qualitative behavioural assessment to appraisal of livestock welfare. Animal Production Science 56, 1569–1578.
Grandin, T. (2010). Auditing animal welfare at slaughter plants. Meat Science 86, 56–65.
| Auditing animal welfare at slaughter plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greene, E., Heleski, C., Ralston, S., and Stull, C. (2011). Academic assessment of equine welfare during the gather process of the Bureau of Land Management’s wild horse and burro program. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 31, 352–353.
| Academic assessment of equine welfare during the gather process of the Bureau of Land Management’s wild horse and burro program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Griffith University (2013). Animal ethics manual standard operating procedure W-5: euthanasia of amphibians. Griffith University, Nathan.
Hampton, J. O., Mawson, P., Coughran, D., and Vitali, S. (2014a). Validation of the use of firearms for euthanising stranded cetaceans. The Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 14, 117–123.
Hampton, J. O., Cowled, B. D., Perry, A. L., Miller, C. J., Jones, B., and Hart, Q. (2014b). Quantitative analysis of animal-welfare outcomes in helicopter shooting: a case study with feral dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius). Wildlife Research 41, 127–135.
| Quantitative analysis of animal-welfare outcomes in helicopter shooting: a case study with feral dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hampton, J. O., Forsyth, D. M., Mackenzie, D., and Stuart, I. (2015). A simple quantitative method for assessing animal welfare outcomes in terrestrial wildlife shooting: the European rabbit as a case study. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 24, 307–317.
| A simple quantitative method for assessing animal welfare outcomes in terrestrial wildlife shooting: the European rabbit as a case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hampton, J. O., Jones, B., Perry, A. L., Miller, C. J., and Hart, Q. (2016a). Integrating animal welfare into wild herbivore management: lessons from the Australian Feral Camel Management Project. The Rangeland Journal 38, 163–171.
| Integrating animal welfare into wild herbivore management: lessons from the Australian Feral Camel Management Project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hampton, J. O., Robertson, H., Adams, P., Hyndman, T. H., and Collins, T. (2016b). An animal welfare assessment framework for helicopter darting: a case study with a newly developed method for feral horses. Wildlife Research 43, 429–437.
| An animal welfare assessment framework for helicopter darting: a case study with a newly developed method for feral horses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
International Organisation for Standardisation (1999). Animal (mammal) traps – part 4: methods for testing killing-trap systems used on land or underwater. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva.
Jacques, C. N., Jenks, J. A., Deperno, C. S., Sievers, J. D., Grovenburg, T. W., Brinkman, T. J., Swanson, C. C., and Stillings, B. A. (2009). Evaluating ungulate mortality associated with helicopter net‐gun captures in the northern Great Plains. The Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 1282–1291.
| Evaluating ungulate mortality associated with helicopter net‐gun captures in the northern Great Plains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jansen, P. (2011). The Goodnature™ self-resetting rat and stoat kill trap evaluation of humaneness: 2011. Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington.
Langkilde, T., and Shine, R. (2006). How much stress do researchers inflict on their study animals? A case study using a scincid lizard, Eulamprus heatwolei. The Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 1035–1043.
| How much stress do researchers inflict on their study animals? A case study using a scincid lizard, Eulamprus heatwolei.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Levin, A. (1998). Evidence-based medicine gaining supporters. Annals of Internal Medicine 128, 334–336.
| Evidence-based medicine gaining supporters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7jsFGitw%3D%3D&md5=a9fbe4462285542648894aac4d277648CAS |
Main, D., Webster, A., and Green, L. (2001). Animal welfare assessment in farm assurance schemes. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 51, 108–113.
| Animal welfare assessment in farm assurance schemes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mawson, P. R., Hampton, J. O., and Dooley, B. (2016). Subsidized commercial harvesting for cost-effective wildlife management in urban areas: a case study with kangaroo sharpshooting. Wildlife Society Bulletin 40, 251–260.
| Subsidized commercial harvesting for cost-effective wildlife management in urban areas: a case study with kangaroo sharpshooting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGregor, H., Hampton, J. O., Lisle, D., and Legge, S. (2016). Live-capture of feral cats using tracking dogs and darting. Wildlife Research 43, 313–322.
| Live-capture of feral cats using tracking dogs and darting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McMahon, C. R., Burton, H. R., Van Den Hoff, J., Woods, R., and Bradshaw, C. J. (2006). Assessing hot-iron and cryo-branding for permanently marking southern elephant seals. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 1484–1489.
| Assessing hot-iron and cryo-branding for permanently marking southern elephant seals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McMahon, C. R., Hindell, M. A., and Harcourt, R. G. (2012). Publish or perish: why it’s important to publicise how, and if, research activities affect animals. Wildlife Research 39, 375–377.
| Publish or perish: why it’s important to publicise how, and if, research activities affect animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McMahon, C. R., Wiggins, N., French, V., McCallum, H., and Bowman, D. (2013). A report of capture myopathy in the Tasmanian pademelon (Thylogale billardierii). Animal Welfare 22, 1–4.
| A report of capture myopathy in the Tasmanian pademelon (Thylogale billardierii).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhslGjtb4%3D&md5=b83323d879ce894a500dcf1d012f5dd0CAS |
Mellor, D. J., and Littin, K. (2004). Using science to support ethical decisions promoting humane livestock slaughter and vertebrate pest control. Animal Welfare 13, 127–132.
Mellor, D. J., and Stafford, K. (2001). Integrating practical, regulatory and ethical strategies for enhancing farm animal welfare. Australian Veterinary Journal 79, 762–768.
| Integrating practical, regulatory and ethical strategies for enhancing farm animal welfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FmsVSlug%3D%3D&md5=6bfdaa3da03d0681a08b890ac8fc838cCAS |
Mellor, D. J., Campbell, A., and Bayvel, D. (2008). New Zealand’s inclusive science-based system for setting animal welfare standards. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 113, 313–329.
| New Zealand’s inclusive science-based system for setting animal welfare standards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mörner, T., Malmsten, J., Bernodt, K., and Lunneryd, S.-G. (2013). A study on the effect of different rifle calibres in euthanisation of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) in seal traps in the Baltic Sea. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 55, 79.
| A study on the effect of different rifle calibres in euthanisation of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) in seal traps in the Baltic Sea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Morriss, G. A., and Warburton, B. (2014). Modifying the Victor® Easy Set® rat trap to improve the animal welfare of stoats and ship rats trapped in New Zealand. PLoS One 9, e86760.
| Modifying the Victor® Easy Set® rat trap to improve the animal welfare of stoats and ship rats trapped in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nevarez, J. G., Strain, G. M., da Cunha, A. F., and Beaufrère, H. (2014). Evaluation of four methods for inducing death during slaughter of American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis). American Journal of Veterinary Research 75, 536–543.
| Evaluation of four methods for inducing death during slaughter of American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Petit, S., and Waudby, H. P. (2013). Standard Operating Procedures for aluminium box, wire cage, and pitfall trapping, handling, and temporary housing of small wild rodents and marsupials. Australian Journal of Zoology 60, 392–401.
| Standard Operating Procedures for aluminium box, wire cage, and pitfall trapping, handling, and temporary housing of small wild rodents and marsupials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reynolds, J. (2004). Trade-offs between welfare, conservation, utility and economics in wildlife management – a review of conflicts, compromises and regulation. Animal Welfare 13, 133–138.
Rouco, C., Richardson, K. S., and Tompkins, D. M. (2015). Improving animal welfare standards while reducing disease exposure risk during euthanasia of trapped brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 24, 235–239.
| Improving animal welfare standards while reducing disease exposure risk during euthanasia of trapped brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
RSPCA Australia (2002). Kangaroo shooting code compliance: a survey of the extent of compliance with the requirements of the Code of Practice for the Humane Shooting of Kangaroos. RSPCA Australia, Canberra.
Sharp, T. (2011). Standard operating procedure HOR002: aerial shooting of feral horses. Invasive Animals CRC, Canberra.
Sharp, T. (2012). Standard operating procedure CAT003: trapping of feral cats using padded-jaw traps. Invasive Animals CRC, Canberra.
Sharp, T., and Saunders, G. (2004). Development of a model code of practice and standard operating procedures for the humane capture, handling or destruction of feral animals in Australia. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW.
Sharp, T., and Saunders, G. (2012). Standard operating procedure RAB004: ground baiting of rabbits with pindone. Invasive Animals CRC, Canberra.
Sharp, T. M., McLeod, S. R., Leggett, K. E. A., and Gibson, T. J. (2015). Evaluation of a spring-powered captive bolt gun for killing kangaroo pouch young. Wildlife Research 41, 623–632.
| Evaluation of a spring-powered captive bolt gun for killing kangaroo pouch young.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shine, R., Amiel, J., Munn, A. J., Stewart, M., Vyssotski, A. L., and Lesku, J. A. (2015). Is “cooling then freezing” a humane way to kill amphibians and reptiles? Biology Open 00, 1–4.
South-East Trawl Fishing Industry Association (2007). Industry code of practice to minimise interactions with seals. South-East Trawl Fishing Industry Association: Shearwater, Tas.
Tidemann, C. R., and King, D. H. (2009). Practicality and humaneness of euthanasia of pest birds with compressed carbon dioxide (CO2) and carbon monoxide (CO) from petrol engine exhaust. Wildlife Research 36, 522–527.
| Practicality and humaneness of euthanasia of pest birds with compressed carbon dioxide (CO2) and carbon monoxide (CO) from petrol engine exhaust.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtFyqtrvF&md5=45bf7231509217df22d5dccc239419f9CAS |
Touma, C., and Palme, R. (2005). Measuring fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in mammals and birds: the importance of validation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1046, 54–74.
| Measuring fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in mammals and birds: the importance of validation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVWjtL%2FE&md5=83e2bdca206ab773e6fb0c56d077b240CAS |
Veltheim, I., Chavez-Ramirez, F., Hill, R., and Cook, S. (2015). Assessing capture and tagging methods for brolgas, Antigone rubicunda (Gruidae). Wildlife Research 42, 373–381.
| Assessing capture and tagging methods for brolgas, Antigone rubicunda (Gruidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Warburton, B., and Hall, J. (1995). Impact momentum and clamping force thresholds for developing standards for possum kill traps. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 22, 39–44.
| Impact momentum and clamping force thresholds for developing standards for possum kill traps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Warburton, B., and Norton, B. (2009). Towards a knowledge‐based ethic for lethal control of nuisance wildlife. The Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 158–164.
| Towards a knowledge‐based ethic for lethal control of nuisance wildlife.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Warburton, B., Gregory, N. G., and Morriss, G. (2000). Effect of jaw shape in kill-traps on time to loss of palpebral reflexes in brushtail possums. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 36, 92–96.
| Effect of jaw shape in kill-traps on time to loss of palpebral reflexes in brushtail possums.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ksV2mtg%3D%3D&md5=c1140a0f8d0d942275f554c07f5491eeCAS |
Whisson, D. A., Holland, G. J., and Carlyon, K. (2012). Translocation of overabundant species: implications for translocated individuals. The Journal of Wildlife Management 76, 1661–1669.
| Translocation of overabundant species: implications for translocated individuals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whitham, J. C., and Wielebnowski, N. (2009). Animal‐based welfare monitoring: using keeper ratings as an assessment tool. Zoo Biology 28, 545–560.
Work, T. M., and Balazs, G. H. (2013). A simple humane method to euthanize a sea turtle. Marine Turtle Newsletter 136, 5–6.
