Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Creeping into a wild boar stomach to find traces of supplementary feeding

Ježek Miloš A , Holá Michaela A B , Kušta Tomáš A and Červený Jaroslav A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague, 165 21, Czech Republic.

B Corresponding author. Email: mhola@fld.czu.cz

Wildlife Research 43(7) 590-598 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16065
Submitted: 6 April 2016  Accepted: 23 September 2016   Published: 18 November 2016

Abstract

Context: Supplementary feeding and baiting of wild ungulates is a common management practice. Wild boar is among the most frequently fed species and its numbers are rapidly increasing throughout Europe. It has been suggested that supplementary feeding throughout the year can have intentional and unintentional impacts on the species as well as on European forests and agricultural landscapes, and biodiversity. It is, therefore, important to identify the dependence of wild boar on supplemental foods to determine and predict its feeding patterns under alternative population and land-use management scenarios.

Aims: We investigated the diet composition of wild boar from stomach contents to identify its dependence on food resources of human origin (i.e. agricultural crops and supplemental foods) throughout the year in the Czech Republic.

Methods: We collected 345 samples from four study sites during spring, summer and winter seasons, over a 3-year period, and from different wild boar ages and sex classes.

Key results: Foods of human origin (mainly cereals) were the dominant food category and constituted the bulk of wild boar diet throughout the year (>50% of total stomach-content biomass), especially in winter, and in all the study sites. Cereals found in the stomachs of wild boar in summer might come from both crop fields as well as supplementary feeding. However, cereals identified in the stomachs in winter and spring come predominantly from baiting and supplementary feeding conducted by hunters. Cereals were consumed in different proportions by different ages and sexes. Males fed on cereals more than did females, whereas juveniles depended on such food less than did subadults.

Conclusions: Our finding of a consistent dependence of wild boar on food of human origin throughout the year in all study sites confirmed that supplementary feeding is important in the diet, which is a potential reason for the rapid increase of wild boar numbers in the Czech Republic.

Implications: Wildlife management agencies need to target feeding practices and design restrictive measures for supplementary feeding and baiting of wild boar in the Czech Republic. This should include defining maximum amounts of food and precise periods for supplementary feeding, and reducing non-target species at feeding sites.

Additional keywords: anthropogenic food sources, stomach-content analysis, Sus scrofa, wildlife.


References

Amici, A., Serrani, F., Rossi, C. M., and Primi, R. (2012). Increase in crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): the ‘refuge effect’. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32, 683–692.
Increase in crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): the ‘refuge effect’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arentson, R. A., and Zimmerman, D. R. (1995). True digestibility of amino acids and protein in pigs with 13C as a label to determine endogenous amino acid excretion. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1077–1085.
True digestibility of amino acids and protein in pigs with 13C as a label to determine endogenous amino acid excretion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXkvV2gtLo%3D&md5=db6aa63d81e08c23ff627a48a5cfb2c7CAS |

Ballari, S. A., and Barrios-García, M. N. (2014). A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges. Mammal Review 44, 124–134.
A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barrios-García, M. N., and Ballari, S. A. (2012). Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biological Invasions 14, 2283–2300.
Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bartoń, K. (2013). ‘MuMIn: Multi-model Inference.’ R package version 1.9.13. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn [Accessed 23 September 2015]

Bartoš, L., Kotrba, R., and Pintíř, J. (2010). Ungulates and their management in the Czech Republic. In ‘European Ungulates and their Management in the 21st Century’. (Eds M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman) pp. 243–261. (Cambridge University Press: London.)

Břečka, J., Honzík, I., and Neubauer, K. (2001). ‘Stroje pro Sklizeň Pícnin a Obilnin.’ (Czech University of Life Sciences: Prague.)

Briedermann, L. (1970). Zum körper und organwaschstum des wildchweines in der Deutschen. Demokrtischen Republik. Archiv für Forstwesen 19, 401–420.

Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-theoretic Approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Carpio, A. J., Guerrero-Casado, J., Tortosa, F. S., and Vicente, J. (2014). Predation of simulated red-legged partridge nests in big game estates from south central Spain. European Journal of Wildlife Research 60, 391–394.
Predation of simulated red-legged partridge nests in big game estates from south central Spain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cellina, S. (2008). Effects of supplemental feeding on the body condition and reproductive state of wild boar Sus scrofa in Luxembourg. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Červený, J., Kamler, J., Kholová, H., Koubek, P., and Martínková, N. (2013). ‘Ottova Encyklopedie Myslivost.’ (Ottovo Nakladatelství: Prague.)

Chen, K., Baxter, T., Muir, W., Groenen, M., and Schook, L. (2007). Genetic resources, genome mapping and evolutionary genomics of the pig (Sus scrofa). International Journal of Biological Sciences 3, 153–165.
Genetic resources, genome mapping and evolutionary genomics of the pig (Sus scrofa).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chytrý, M. (2013). ‘Vegetation of the Czech Republic. Forest and Scrub Vegetation.’ (Academia: Prague.)

Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Albon, S. D. (1985). Competition and population regulation in social mammals. In ‘Behavioural Ecology’. (Eds R. M. Sibly and R. H. Smith.) pp. 557–576. (Blackwell Scientific: Oxford, UK.)

Crawley, M. J. (2007). ‘The R Book.’ (John Wiley & Sons, Sussex: Sussex, UK.)

Dardaillon, M. (1986). Seasonal variations in habitat selection and spatial distribution of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Camargue, southern France. Behavioural Processes 13, 251–268.
Seasonal variations in habitat selection and spatial distribution of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Camargue, southern France.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2cfit1yhsw%3D%3D&md5=944c2bbf1e4c63b504523f17a88c0cf0CAS |

de la Fuente, J., Naranjo, V., Ruiz-Fons, F., Vicente, J., Estrada-Peña, A., Almazán, C., Kocan, K. M., Martín, M. P., and Gortázar, C. (2004). Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in ixodid ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) collected from European wild boar (Sus scrofa) and Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) in central Spain. European Journal of Wildlife Research 50, 187–196.
Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in ixodid ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) collected from European wild boar (Sus scrofa) and Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) in central Spain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

EFSA AHAW Panel (2015). African swine fever. EFSA Journal 13, 4163.
African swine fever.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fernanda Cuevas, M., Ojeda, R. A., Dacar, M. A., and Jaksic, F. M. (2013). Seasonal variation in feeding habits and diet selection by wild boars in a semi-arid environment of Argentina. Acta Theriologica 58, 63–72.
Seasonal variation in feeding habits and diet selection by wild boars in a semi-arid environment of Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fournier-Chambrillon, C., Maillard, D., and Fournier, P. (1995). Diet of the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) inhabiting the Montpellier garrigue. Ibex Journal of Mountain Ecology 3, 174–179.

Genov, P. (1981). The distribution of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Eurasia and its adaptation to the feeding conditions. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 4, 221–231.

Giménez-Anaya, A., Herrero, J., Rosell, C., Couto, S., and García-Serrano, A. (2008). Food habits of wild boars (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean coastal wetland. Wetlands 28, 197–203.
Food habits of wild boars (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean coastal wetland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gortázar, C., Herrero, J., Villafuerte, R., and Marco, J. (2000). Historical examination of the status of large mammals in Aragon, Spain. Mammalia 64, 411–422.
Historical examination of the status of large mammals in Aragon, Spain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gortázar, C., Ferroglio, E., Höfle, U., Frölich, K., and Vicente, J. (2007). Diseases shared between wildlife and livestock: a European perspective. European Journal of Wildlife Research 53, 241–256.
Diseases shared between wildlife and livestock: a European perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Groot Bruinderink, G. W. T. A., and Hazebroek, E. (1996). Wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa L.) rooting and forest regeneration on podzolic soils in the Netherlands. Forest Ecology and Management 88, 71–80.
Wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa L.) rooting and forest regeneration on podzolic soils in the Netherlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Groot Bruinderink, G. W. T. A., Hazebroek, E., and van der Voot, H. (1994). Diet and condition of wild boar, Sus scrofa scrofa, without supplementary feeding. Journal of Zoology 233, 631–648.
Diet and condition of wild boar, Sus scrofa scrofa, without supplementary feeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hacker, J. B., and Minson, D. J. (1981). The digestibility of plant parts. Herbage Abstracts 51, 459–482.

Hafeez, S., Abbas, M., Khan, Z., and Rehman, E. (2011). Preliminary analysis of the diet of wild boar (Sus scrofa L., 1758) in Islamabad, Pakistan. Turkish Journal of Zoology 35, 115–118.
Preliminary analysis of the diet of wild boar (Sus scrofa L., 1758) in Islamabad, Pakistan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hahn, N., and Eisfeld, D. (1998). Diet and habitat use of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in SW-Germany. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15, 595–606.

Herrero, J., García-Serrano, A., Couto, S., Ortuňo, V., and García-Gonzáles, R. (2006). Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. European Journal of Wildlife Research 52, 245–250.
Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Herrero, J., García-Serrano, A., and García-Gonzáles, R. (2008). Reproductive and demographic parameters in two Iberian wild boar Sus scrofa populations. Acta Theriologica 53, 355–364.
Reproductive and demographic parameters in two Iberian wild boar Sus scrofa populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keuling, O., Stier, N., and Roth, M. (2009). Commuting, shifting or remaining? Different spatial usage patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in forest and field crops during summer. Mammal Biology 74, 145–152.

Kušta, T., Keken, Z., Ježek, M., and Kůta, Z. (2015). Effectiveness and costs of odor repellents in wildlife-vehicle collisions: a case study in central Bohemia, Czech Republic. Transportation Research Part D, Transport and Environment 38, 1–5.
Effectiveness and costs of odor repellents in wildlife-vehicle collisions: a case study in central Bohemia, Czech Republic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lagos, L., Picos, J., and Valero, E. (2012). Temporal pattern of wild ungulate-related traffic accidents in northwest Spain. European Journal of Wildlife Research 58, 661–668.
Temporal pattern of wild ungulate-related traffic accidents in northwest Spain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MACR (2015). ‘Hunting Statistics.’ (Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic: Prague.) Available at http://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/lesy/myslivost/statistika [Accessed 19 October 2015]

Massei, G., and Genov, P. V. (2004). The environmental impact of wild boar. Galemys 16, 135–145.

Massei, G., Kindberg, J., Licoppe, A., Gačić, D., Šprem, N., Kamler, J., Baubet, E., Hohmann, U., Monaco, A., Ozolinš, J., Podgórski, T., Nickolay, M., Boštjan, P., Rosell, C., and Náhlik, A. (2015). Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Management Science 71, 492–500.
Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXmt1Snsbo%3D&md5=cb338ef161ffaee18f29ed8059f7e777CAS |

Mysterud, A. (2010). Still walking on the wild side? Management actions as steps towards ‘semi-domestication’ of hunted ungulates. Journal of Applied Ecology 47, 920–925.
Still walking on the wild side? Management actions as steps towards ‘semi-domestication’ of hunted ungulates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pinheiro, J., and Bates, D. (2000). ‘Mixed-effects Models in S and S-PLUS.’ (Springer: New York.)

Schley, L., and Roper, T. J. (2003). Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Review 33, 43–56.
Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schley, L., Dufrêne, M., Krier, A., and Frantz, A. C. (2008). Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54, 589–599.
Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Škorpík, M., Andrejkovič, T., Jurmanová, E., Korecký, J., Krejčí, J., Lazárek, P., Padělková, L., Reška, M., Rothöckl, T., Růžička, M., Vančura, P., and Vítek, P. (1993). ‘Plán Péče o Národní Park Podyjí a Jeho Ochranné Pásmo.’ (Správa Národního Parku Podyjí: Znojmo, Czech Republic.) [In Czech].

Šumava, N. P. (2015). ‘Vegetation of the Šumava National Park.’ Available at http://www.npsumava.cz/en/3277/sekce/flora/ [Accessed 23 October 2015]

Vetter, S. G., Ruf, T., Bieber, C., and Arnold, W. (2015). What Is a mild winter? Regional differences in within-species responses to climate change. PLoS One 10, e0132178.
What Is a mild winter? Regional differences in within-species responses to climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vojta, J., and Kopecký, M. (2006). Vegetation of secondary forests and shrubs in Doupovské hory hills. Zprávy Čes. Bot. Společ., Praha 21, 209–225.

Wilcox, J. T., and Van Vuren, D. H. (2009). Wild pigs as predators in oak woodlands of California. Journal of Mammalogy 90, 114–118.
Wild pigs as predators in oak woodlands of California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zeman, J., Hrbek, J., Drimaj, J., Plhal, R., Kamler, J., Adamec, Z., and Heroldová, M. (2016). Wild boar impact to the natural regeneration of oak and acorn importance in its diet. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 64, 579–585.
Wild boar impact to the natural regeneration of oak and acorn importance in its diet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |