Predicting black spruce fuel characteristics with Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS)
H. A. Cameron A C , D. Schroeder B and J. L. Beverly A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada.
B Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Wildfire Management Branch, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5, Canada.
C Corresponding author. Email: hilary2@ualberta.ca
International Journal of Wildland Fire 31(2) 124-135 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF21004
Submitted: 7 January 2021 Accepted: 2 November 2021 Published: 14 December 2021
Journal Compilation © IAWF 2022 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Wildfire decision support systems combine fuel maps with other fire environment variables to predict fire behaviour and guide management actions. Until recently, financial and technological constraints have limited provincial fuel maps to relatively coarse spatial resolutions. Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS), a remote sensing technology that uses LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), is becoming an increasingly affordable and pragmatic tool for mapping fuels across localised and broad areas. Few studies have used ALS in boreal forest regions to describe structural attributes such as fuel load at a fine resolution (i.e. <100 m2 cell resolution). We used ALS to predict five forest attributes relevant to fire behaviour in black spruce (Picea mariana) stands in Alberta, Canada: canopy bulk density, canopy fuel load, stem density, canopy height and canopy base height. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) regression models indicated statistically significant relationships between ALS data and the forest metrics of interest (R2 ≥0.81 for all metrics except canopy base height which had a R2 value of 0.63). Performance of the regression models was acceptable and consistent with prior studies when applied to test datasets; however, regression models presented in this study mapped stand attributes at a much finer resolution (40 m2).
Keywords: remote sensing, fire behaviour, boreal ecosystems, fuel, planning, fuel maps, LiDAR, airborne laser scanning.
References
Alexander ME (1982) Calculating and interpreting forest fire intensities. Canadian Journal of Botany 60, 349–357.| Calculating and interpreting forest fire intensities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Alexander ME, Cruz MG (2014) Tables for estimating canopy fuel characteristics from stand variables in four interior west confier forest types. Forest Science 60, 784–794.
| Tables for estimating canopy fuel characteristics from stand variables in four interior west confier forest types.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Alexander ME, Stefner CN, Mason JA, Stocks BJ, Hartley GR, Maffey ME, Wotton BM, Taylor SW, Lavoie N, Dalrymple GN (2004) Characterizing the jack pine–black spruce fuel complex of the International Crown Fire Modelling Experiment (ICFME). Canadian Forest Service Information Report NOR-X-393. (Edmonton, AB)
Andersen H, McGaughey RJ, Reutebuch SE (2005) Estimating forest canopy fuel parameters using LIDAR data. Remote Sensing of Environment 94, 441–449.
| Estimating forest canopy fuel parameters using LIDAR data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson HE (1970) Forest fuel ignitibility. Fire Technology 6, 312–319.
| Forest fuel ignitibility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Babyak MA (2004) What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosomatic Medicine 66, 411–421.
| What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15184705PubMed |
Botequim B, Fernandes PM, Borges JG, González-Ferreiro E, Guerra-Hernández J (2019) Improving silvicultural practices for mediterranean forests through fire behaviour modelling using LiDAR-derived canopy fuel characteristics. International Journal of Wildland Fire 28, 823–839.
| Improving silvicultural practices for mediterranean forests through fire behaviour modelling using LiDAR-derived canopy fuel characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bright BC, Hudak AT, Meddens AJH, Hawbaker TJ, Briggs JS, Kennedy RE (2017) Prediction of forest canopy and surface fuels from lidar and satellite time series data in a bark beetle-affected forest. Forests 8, 322
| Prediction of forest canopy and surface fuels from lidar and satellite time series data in a bark beetle-affected forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Canadian Forest Service Fire Danger Group (2021). An overview of the next generation of the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (Information Report GLC-X-26). National Resources Canada, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie. (Ontario, Canada).
Chuvieco E, Riaño D, Van Wagtendok J, Morsdof F (2003) Fuel loads and fuel type mapping. In ‘Wildland fire danger estimation and mapping: The role of remote sensing data’. (Ed. E Chuvieco) pp. 119–142. (World Scientific)
Countryman CM (1972) The fire environment concept. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Range and Experiment Station. (Berkeley, CA)
Cruz MG, Alexander ME, Wakimoto RH (2003) Assessing canopy fuel stratum characteristics in crown fire prone fuel types of western north america. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 39–50.
| Assessing canopy fuel stratum characteristics in crown fire prone fuel types of western north america.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Engelstad PS, Falkowski M, Wolter P, Poznanovic A, Johnson P (2019) Estimating canopy fuel attributes from low-density LiDAR. Fire (Basel, Switzerland) 2, 38
| Estimating canopy fuel attributes from low-density LiDAR.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Erdody TL, Moskal LM (2010) Fusion of LiDAR and imagery for estimating forest canopy fuels. Remote Sensing of Environment 114, 725–737.
| Fusion of LiDAR and imagery for estimating forest canopy fuels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-Model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT)
Forestry Fire Danger Group Canada (1992). Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction System (Information Report ST-X-3). Forestry Canada, Headquarters, Fire Danger Group and Science and Sustainable Development Directorate. (Ottawa, Canada)
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2010) Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. Journal of Statistical Software 33, 1–22.
| Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20808728PubMed |
González-Olabarria J, Rodríguez F, Fernández-Landa A, Mola-Yudego B (2012) Mapping fire risk in the model forest of urbión (spain) based on airborne LiDAR measurements. Forest Ecology and Management 282, 149–156.
| Mapping fire risk in the model forest of urbión (spain) based on airborne LiDAR measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hermosilla T, Ruiz LA, Kazakova AN, Coops NC, Moskal LM (2014) Estimation of forest structure and canopy fuel parameters from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 224–233.
| Estimation of forest structure and canopy fuel parameters from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hirsch KG, Corey PN, Martell DL (1998) Using expert judgment to model initial attack fire crew effectiveness. Forest Science 44, 539–549.
| Using expert judgment to model initial attack fire crew effectiveness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jean SA, Pinno BD, Nielsen SE (2020) Early Regeneration Dynamics of Pure Black Spruce and Aspen Forests after Wildfire in Boreal Alberta, Canada. Forests 11, 333
| Early Regeneration Dynamics of Pure Black Spruce and Aspen Forests after Wildfire in Boreal Alberta, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnson AF, Woodard PM, Titus SJ (1990) Lodgepole pine and white spruce crown fuel weights predicted from diameter at breast height. Forestry Chronicle 66, 596–599.
| Lodgepole pine and white spruce crown fuel weights predicted from diameter at breast height.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnston DC, Turetsky MR, Benscoter BW, Wotton BM (2015) Fuel load, structure, and potential fire behaviour in black spruce bogs. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 45, 888–899.
| Fuel load, structure, and potential fire behaviour in black spruce bogs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kandare K, Ørka HO, Chan JCW, Dalponte M (2016) Effects of forest structure and airborne laser scanning point cloud density on 3D delineation of individual tree crowns. European Journal of Remote Sensing 49, 337–359.
| Effects of forest structure and airborne laser scanning point cloud density on 3D delineation of individual tree crowns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keane RE (Ed.) (2015) ‘Wildland fuel fundamentals and application’. (Springer: New York)
Keane RE, Burgan R, van Wagtendonk J (2001) Mapping wildland fuels for fire management across multiple scales: integrating remote sensing, GIS, and biophysical modeling. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10, 301–319.
| Mapping wildland fuels for fire management across multiple scales: integrating remote sensing, GIS, and biophysical modeling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Harding DJ, Parker GG, Acker SA, Gower ST (2002) Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11, 393–399.
| Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Luther JE, Skinner R, Fournier RA, Ovan Lier OR, Bowers WW, Coté J, Hopkinson C, Moulton T (2014) Predicting wood quantity and quality attributes of balsam fir and black spruce using airborne laser scanner data. Forestry 87, 313–326.
| Predicting wood quantity and quality attributes of balsam fir and black spruce using airborne laser scanner data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGaughey RJ (2018a) FUSION/LDV (Computer Software) Available at: http://forsys.cfr.washington.edu/fusion/fusionlatest.html
McGaughey RJ (2018b) FUSION/LDV: Software for LIDAR data analysis and visualization. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. (Seattle, WA)
National Forest Inventory (2013) Canada’s National Forest Inventory, revised 2006 baseline. Natural Resources Canada. Victoria, B.C. Available at: https://nfi.nfis.org/en/standardreports [accessed September 2021].
Popescu SC, Zhao K (2008) A voxel-based lidar method for estimating crown base height for deciduous and pine trees. Remote Sensing of Environment 112, 767–781.
| A voxel-based lidar method for estimating crown base height for deciduous and pine trees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.
Rebain SA, Reinhardt ED, Crookston NL, Beukema SJ, Kurz WA, Greenough JA, Robinson DCE, Lutes DC (2010) The fire and fuels extension to the forest vegetation simulator: Updated model documentation. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Management Service Center. (Fort Collins, CO)
Reinhardt E, Crookston NL (Tech. Eds) (2003) The Fire and Fuels Extension to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-116. (Ogden, UT)
Scott JH, Reinhardt ED (2005) Stereo photo guide for estimating canopy fuel characteristics in conifer stands. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-145. (Fort Collins, CO)
Skowronski NS, Clark KL, Duveneck M, Hom J (2011) Three-dimensional canopy fuel loading predicted using upward and downward sensing LiDAR systems. Remote Sensing of Environment 115, 703–714.
| Three-dimensional canopy fuel loading predicted using upward and downward sensing LiDAR systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stefanidou A, Gitas IZ, Korhonen L, Georgopoulos N, Stavrakoudis D (2020) Multispectral lidar-based estimation of surface fuel load in a dense coniferous forest. Remote Sensing 12, 3333
| Multispectral lidar-based estimation of surface fuel load in a dense coniferous forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stocks BJ, Alexander ME, Wotton BM, Stefner CN, Flannigan MD, Taylor SW, Lavoie N, Mason JA, Hartley GR, Maffey ME, Dalrymple GN, Blake TW, Cruz MG, Lanoville RA (2004) Crown fire behaviour in a northern jack pine black spruce forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34, 1548–1560.
| Crown fire behaviour in a northern jack pine black spruce forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological 58, 267–288.
| Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Treitz P, Lim K, Woods M, Pitt D, Nesbitt D, Etheridge D (2012) LiDAR sampling density for forest resource inventories in ontario, canada. Remote Sensing 4, 830–848.
| LiDAR sampling density for forest resource inventories in ontario, canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Wagner CV (1977) Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 7, 23–34.
| Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Varner JM, Kane JM, Kreye JK, Engber E (2015) The flammability of forest and woodland litter: a synthesis. Current Forestry Reports 1, 91–99.
| The flammability of forest and woodland litter: a synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vastaranta M, Kankare V, Holopainen M, Yu X, Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H (2012) Combination of individual tree detection and area-based approach in imputation of forest variables using airborne laser data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 67, 73–79.
| Combination of individual tree detection and area-based approach in imputation of forest variables using airborne laser data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vauhkonen J, Ene L, Gupta S, Heinzel J, Holmgren J, Pitkänen J, Solberg S, Wang Y, Weinacker H, Hauglin KM, Lien V, Packalén P, Gobakken T, Koch B, Næsset E, Tokola T, Maltamo M (2012) Comparative testing of single-tree detection algorithms under different types of forest. Forestry 85, 27–40.
| Comparative testing of single-tree detection algorithms under different types of forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White JC, Wulder MA, Varhola A, Vastaranta M, Coops NC, Cook BD, Pitt D, Woods M (2013) A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach. Forestry Chronicle 89, 722–723.
| A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White JC, Coops NC, Wulder MA, Vastaranta M, Hilker T, Tompalski P (2016) Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories: A review. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 42, 619–641.
| Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories: A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White J, Tompalski P, Vastaranta M, Wulder MA, Saarinen N, Stepper C, Coops NC (2017) A model development and application guide for generating an enhanced forest inventory using airborne laser scanning data and an area-based approach. Natural Resources Canada, Pacific Forestry Center, CWFC Information Report FI-X-018. Available at: https://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications?id=38945
Wu B, Yu B, Wu Q, Huang Y, Chen Z, Wu J (2016) Individual tree crown delineation using localized contour tree method and airborne LiDAR data in coniferous forests. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 52, 82–94.
| Individual tree crown delineation using localized contour tree method and airborne LiDAR data in coniferous forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
