Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Operationalising homeowner wildfire risk mitigation in fire-prone areas

Hugh Walpole https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5224-7601 A C , Sarah McCaffrey B , Claire Rapp https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1579-5208 A and Robyn Wilson A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The Ohio State University, School of Environment and Natural Resources, 210 Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.

B USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 West Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO, 80526, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: walpole.23@osu.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 30(3) 161-169 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF19095
Submitted: 21 June 2019  Accepted: 16 October 2020   Published: 12 November 2020

Journal Compilation © IAWF 2021 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

A significant amount of research has examined what motivates people living in fire-prone areas to mitigate their wildfire risk (i.e. engage in activities that reduce vulnerability and the effects of a wildfire on an individual’s property). However, drawing overarching conclusions from this research is difficult because of the myriad of ways researchers have measured and analysed wildfire risk mitigation. Although recommendations exist for measuring risk-mitigation activities, no research to date has based these recommendations on an examination of how different operationalisations influence subsequent interpretations of homeowner preparedness. We addressed this gap by examining how the effects of demographics and contextual factors on preparedness differ across different ways of counting the amount of vegetation management completed. We also examined how different statistical approaches influence the results. We found that measuring vegetation management as the sum of activities completed is problematic and can obfuscate important relationships. For example, age is positively related to the proportion of applicable activities completed, but not the total number. We recommend assessing which items are applicable to respondents and constructing proportional measures rather than sums. We also recommend that, given the need for maintenance of vegetation, researchers use non-binary measures that allow respondents to indicate how much work they have undertaken towards each activity.

Keywords: natural hazards, vegetation management, wildfire preparedness, wildland urban interface.


References

Absher JD, Vaske JJ (2007) Examining the sources of public support for wildland fire policies. Fire Management Today 67, 35–39.

Allison PD (2009). ‘Fixed effects regression models, Vol. 160.’ SAGE publications.

Anton CE, Lawrence C (2016) Does place attachment predict wildfire mitigation and preparedness? A comparison of wildland–urban interface and rural communities. Environmental Management 57, 148–162.
Does place attachment predict wildfire mitigation and preparedness? A comparison of wildland–urban interface and rural communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26280311PubMed |

Brenkert-Smith H (2011) Homeowners’ perspectives on the parcel approach to wildland fire mitigation: the role of community context in two Colorado communities. Journal of Forestry 109, 193–200.
Homeowners’ perspectives on the parcel approach to wildland fire mitigation: the role of community context in two Colorado communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brenkert-Smith H, Champ PA, Flores N (2012) Trying not to get burned: understanding homeowners’ wildfire risk-mitigation behaviors. Environmental Management 50, 1139–1151.
Trying not to get burned: understanding homeowners’ wildfire risk-mitigation behaviors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23001246PubMed |

Bright AD, Burtz RT (2006) Creating defensible space in the wildland-urban interface: the influence of values on perceptions and behavior. Environmental Management 37, 170–185.
Creating defensible space in the wildland-urban interface: the influence of values on perceptions and behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16391968PubMed |

Cohen JD (2000) Preventing disaster: home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Forestry 98, 15–21.

Cohen, JD (2010). The wildland-urban interface fire problem. Forest History Today (Fall 2008). pp. 20–26. Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_other/rmrs_2008_cohen_j002.pdf [verified 20 October 2020]

Collins TW (2005) Households, forests, and fire hazard vulnerability in the American West: a case study of a California community. Environmental Hazards 6, 23–37.
Households, forests, and fire hazard vulnerability in the American West: a case study of a California community.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Collins T (2008) What influences hazard mitigation? Household decision making about wildfire risks in Arizona’s White Mountains. The Professional Geographer 60, 508–526.
What influences hazard mitigation? Household decision making about wildfire risks in Arizona’s White Mountains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Collins TW (2012) Spatial scale and hazard perception: an exploratory analysis. Society & Natural Resources 25, 1134–1151.
Spatial scale and hazard perception: an exploratory analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dickinson K, Brenkert-Smith H, Champ PA, Flores N (2015) Catching fire? Social interactions, beliefs, and wildfire risk mitigation behaviors. Society & Natural Resources 28, 807–824.
Catching fire? Social interactions, beliefs, and wildfire risk mitigation behaviors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dunlop PD, Mcneill IM, Boylan JL, Morrison DL, Skinner TC (2014) Preparing ... for what? Developing multi-dimensional measures of community wildfire preparedness for researchers, practitioners and households. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 887–896.
Preparing ... for what? Developing multi-dimensional measures of community wildfire preparedness for researchers, practitioners and households.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fischer AP (2011) Reducing hazardous fuels on nonindustrial private forests: factors influencing landowner decisions. Journal of Forestry 109, 260–266.

Ghasemi B, Kyle GT, Absher JD (2020) An examination of the social-psychological drivers of homeowner wildfire mitigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 70, 101442
An examination of the social-psychological drivers of homeowner wildfire mitigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hall TE, Slothower M (2009) Cognitive factors affecting homeowners’ reactions to defensible space in the Oregon Coast Range. Society & Natural Resources 22, 95–110.
Cognitive factors affecting homeowners’ reactions to defensible space in the Oregon Coast Range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jarrett A, Gan J, Johnson C, Munn IA (2009) Landowner awareness and adoption of wildfire programs in the southern United States. Journal of Forestry 107, 113–118.

Koksal K, McLennan J, Every D, Bearman C (2019) Australian wildland-urban interface householders’ wildfire safety preparations: ‘Everyday life’ project priorities and perceptions of wildfire risk. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 33, 142–154.
Australian wildland-urban interface householders’ wildfire safety preparations: ‘Everyday life’ project priorities and perceptions of wildfire risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kyle GT, Theodori GL, Absher JD, Jun J (2010) The influence of home and community attachment on firewise behavior. Society & Natural Resources 23, 1075–1092.
The influence of home and community attachment on firewise behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martin IM, Bender H, Raish C (2007) What motivates individuals to protect themselves from risks: the case of wildland fires. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 27, 887–900.
What motivates individuals to protect themselves from risks: the case of wildland fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martin WE, Martin IM, Kent B (2009) The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: the case of wildfire in high risk communities. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 489–498.
The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: the case of wildfire in high risk communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19819614PubMed |

McCaffrey S, Olsen CS (2012) Research perspectives on the public and fire management: a synthesis of current social science on eight essential questions. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-GTR-104. (Newtown Square, PA, USA).

McCaffrey S, Winter G (2011) Understanding homeowner preparation and intended actions when threatened by a wildfire. In ‘Proceedings of the Second Conference on the Human Dimensions of Wildland Fire.’ USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-P-84. pp. 88–95. (Newtown Square, PA, USA)

McCaffrey SM, Stidham M, Toman E, Shindler B (2011) Outreach programs, peer pressure, and common sense: what motivates homeowners to mitigate wildfire risk? Environmental Management 48, 475–488.
Outreach programs, peer pressure, and common sense: what motivates homeowners to mitigate wildfire risk?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21706380PubMed |

McFarlane BL, McGee TK, Faulkner H (2011) Complexity of homeowner wildfire risk mitigation: an integration of hazard theories. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 921–931.
Complexity of homeowner wildfire risk mitigation: an integration of hazard theories.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McNeill IM, Dunlop PD (2016) Development and preliminary validation of the constructive and unconstructive worry questionnaire: a measure of individual differences in constructive versus unconstructive worry. Psychological Assessment 28, 1368–1378.
Development and preliminary validation of the constructive and unconstructive worry questionnaire: a measure of individual differences in constructive versus unconstructive worry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26691505PubMed |

McNeill IM, Ronan KR (2017) Children in disasters: the role of household preparedness. Natural Hazards 89, 1239–1254.
Children in disasters: the role of household preparedness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McNeill IM, Dunlop PD, Heath JB, Skinner TC, Morrison DL (2013) Expecting the unexpected: predicting physiological and psychological wildfire preparedness from perceived risk, responsibility, and obstacles. Risk Analysis 33, 1829–1843.
Expecting the unexpected: predicting physiological and psychological wildfire preparedness from perceived risk, responsibility, and obstacles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23551072PubMed |

Nelson KC, Monroe MC, Johnson JF, Bowers A (2004) Living with fire: homeowner assessment of landscape values and defensible space in Minnesota and Florida, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 13, 413–425.
Living with fire: homeowner assessment of landscape values and defensible space in Minnesota and Florida, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olsen CS, Kline JD, Ager AA, Olsen KA, Short KC (2017) Examining the influence of biophysical conditions on wildland-urban interface homeowners’ wildfire risk mitigation activities in fire-prone landscapes. Ecology and Society 22, 21
Examining the influence of biophysical conditions on wildland-urban interface homeowners’ wildfire risk mitigation activities in fire-prone landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Penman TD, Eriksen C, Blanchi R, Chladil M, Gill AM, Haynes K, Leonard J, McLennan J, Bradstock RA (2013) Defining adequate means of wildfire preparation for property protection. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 6, 67–77.
Defining adequate means of wildfire preparation for property protection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Price LJ, Mcfarlane B, Lantz V (2016) Wildfire risk mitigation and recreational property owners in Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park-Alberta. Forestry Chronicle 92, 66–76.
Wildfire risk mitigation and recreational property owners in Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park-Alberta.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ryan RL (2010) Local residents’ preferences and attitudes toward creating defensible space against wildfire in the Northeast Pine Barrens. Landscape Journal 29, 199–214.
Local residents’ preferences and attitudes toward creating defensible space against wildfire in the Northeast Pine Barrens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schulte S, Miller KA (2010) Wildfire risk and climate change: the influence on homeowner mitigation behavior in the wildland-urban interface. Society & Natural Resources 23, 417–435.
Wildfire risk and climate change: the influence on homeowner mitigation behavior in the wildland-urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Toman E, Stidham M, McCaffrey S, Shindler B (2013) Social science at the wildland-urban interface: a compendium of research results to create fire-adapted communities. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS 111.(Newtown Square, PA, USA)

Warziniack T, Champ P, Meldrum J, Brenkert-Smith H, Barth CM, Falk LC (2019) Responding to risky neighbors: testing for spatial spillover effects for defensible space in a fire-prone WUI community. Environmental and Resource Economics 73, 1023–1047.
Responding to risky neighbors: testing for spatial spillover effects for defensible space in a fire-prone WUI community.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |