Policy barriers and opportunities for prescribed fire application in the western United States
Courtney A. Schultz
A D , Sarah M. McCaffrey B and Heidi R. Huber-Stearns C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1472, USA.
B Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.
C Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email: courtney.schultz@colostate.edu
International Journal of Wildland Fire 28(11) 874-884 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF19040
Submitted: 25 March 2019 Accepted: 29 July 2019 Published: 3 September 2019
Abstract
Prescribed fire is an important management tool on US federal lands that is not being applied at the necessary or desired levels. We investigated the role of policy barriers and opportunities for prescribed fire application on US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management lands in the western United States. We conducted 54 semi-structured interviews with federal and state land managers and air quality regulators, and with several non-federal partners. We found that lack of adequate capacity and funding were the most commonly cited barriers to increasing application of prescribed fire. Interviewees also emphasised that owing to a lack of incentives and the prevalence of risk aversion at multiple agency levels, active prescribed fire programs depend on the leadership and commitment of individual decision-makers and fire managers. Successful approaches also rely on collaborative forums and positions that allow communication, problem-solving and resource sharing among federal and state partners, and that facilitate dialogue between air-quality and land managers. We did not find that air quality regulation was consistently cited as a major barrier, except in specific locations. Our findings highlight the importance of contextualised investigation into policy barriers and the role of collaborative and multilevel governance approaches for addressing complex land management challenges.
Additional keywords: collaborative governance, federal land management, fire management, forest policy, policy implementation.
References
Abrams J, Huber-Stearns HR, Bone C, Grummon CA, Moseley C (2017) Adaptation to a landscape-scale mountain pine beetle epidemic in the era of networked governance: the enduring importance of bureaucratic institutions. Ecology and Society 22, 22| Adaptation to a landscape-scale mountain pine beetle epidemic in the era of networked governance: the enduring importance of bureaucratic institutions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Armitage D (2005) Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management 35, 703–715.
| Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15940398PubMed |
Biesbroek R, Dupuis J, Wellstead A (2017) Explaining through causal mechanisms: resilience and governance of social–ecological systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 28, 64–70.
| Explaining through causal mechanisms: resilience and governance of social–ecological systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burrows N, McCaw L (2013) Prescribed burning in south-western Australian forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11, e25–e34.
| Prescribed burning in south-western Australian forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cash D, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 11, 8
| Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cleaves DA, Martinez J, Haines TK (2000) Influences on prescribed burning activity and costs in the national forest system. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-37. (Athens, GA, USA)
Crona B, Parker J (2012) Learning in support of governance: theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society 17, 32–50.
| Learning in support of governance: theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S (2012) An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory 22, 1–29.
| An integrative framework for collaborative governance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Engel KH (2013) Perverse incentives: the case of wildfire smoke regulation. Ecology Law Quarterly 40, 623–672.
Fernandes PM, Davies GM, Ascoli D, Fernández C, Moreira F, Rigolot E, Stoff CR, Veja JÁ, Molina D (2013) Prescribed burning in southern Europe: developing fire management in a dynamic landscape. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11, e4–e14.
| Prescribed burning in southern Europe: developing fire management in a dynamic landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fernandez S, Rainey HG (2006) Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review 66, 168–176.
| Managing successful organizational change in the public sector.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Howlett M (2009) Governance modes, policy regimes, and operational plans: a multilevel nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences 42, 73–89.
| Governance modes, policy regimes, and operational plans: a multilevel nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kalies EL, Kent LL (2016) Tamm Review: are fuel treatments effective at achieving ecological and social objectives? A systematic review. Forest Ecology and Management 375, 84–95.
| Tamm Review: are fuel treatments effective at achieving ecological and social objectives? A systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kamensky JM (2018) Becoming collaborative. In ‘Government for the future: reflection and vision for tomorrow’s leaders’. (Eds MA Abramson, DJ Chenok, JM Kamensky) pp. 111–137. (IBM Center for the Business of Government: Washington, DC, USA)
Kettl DF (2000) The transformation of governance: globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review 60, 488–497.
| The transformation of governance: globalization, devolution, and the role of government.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kobziar LN, Godwin D, Taylor L, Watts AC (2015) Perspectives on trends, effectiveness, and impediments to prescribed burning in the southern US. Forests 6, 561–580.
| Perspectives on trends, effectiveness, and impediments to prescribed burning in the southern US.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kolden CA (2019) We’re not doing enough prescribed fire in the western United States to mitigate wildfire risk. Fire 2, 30
| We’re not doing enough prescribed fire in the western United States to mitigate wildfire risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Melvin MA (2018) 2018 National prescribed fire use survey report. Coalition of Prescribed Fires, Inc., Technical Report 03–18. Available at https://www.stateforesters.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2018-Prescribed-Fire-Use-Survey-Report-1.pdf [Verified 9 August 2019]
Moritz MA, Batllori E, Bradstock RA, Gill AM, Handmer J, Hessburg PF, Leonard J, McCaffrey S, Odion DC, Schoennagel T, Syphard AD (2014) Learning to coexist with wildfire. Nature 515, 58–66.
| Learning to coexist with wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25373675PubMed |
Moseley C, Charnley S (2014) Understanding microprocesses of institutionalization: stewardship contracting and national forest management. Policy Sciences 47, 69–98.
| Understanding microprocesses of institutionalization: stewardship contracting and national forest management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
North M, Collins BM, Stephens S (2012) Using fire to increase the scale, benefits, and future maintenance of fuels treatment. Journal of Forestry 110, 392–401.
| Using fire to increase the scale, benefits, and future maintenance of fuels treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
North MP, Stephens SL, Collins BM, Agee JK, Aplet G, Franklin JF, Fulé PZ (2015) Reform forest fire management. Science 349, 1280–1281.
| Reform forest fire management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26383934PubMed |
Parker UL (2018) Reducing impediments to prescribed burning opportunities: the importance of collaborative relationships between land managers and air quality regulators. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, California State University, Chico, CA, USA. Available at http://csuchico-dspace.calstate.edu/handle/10211.3/205899 [Verified 9 August 2019]
Quinn-Davidson LN, Varner JM (2012) Impediments to prescribed fire across agency, landscape and manager: an example from northern California. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21, 210–218.
| Impediments to prescribed fire across agency, landscape and manager: an example from northern California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Quirke D (2018) Legal appendix: an overview of the Clean Air Act and state-level air quality regulation. Ecosystem Workforce Program Working Paper 86. (Eugene, OR, USA). Available at https://ewp.uoregon.edu/publications/working [Verified 9 August 2019]
Rutherford TK, Schultz CA (2019) Adapting wildland fire governance to climate change in Alaska. Ecology and Society 24, 27
| Adapting wildland fire governance to climate change in Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ryan KC, Knapp EE, Varner JM (2013) Prescribed fire in North American forests and woodlands: history, current practice, and challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11, e15–e24.
| Prescribed fire in North American forests and woodlands: history, current practice, and challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Saldaña J (2015) ‘The coding manual for qualitative researchers.’ (Sage Publications: London, UK)
Schoennagel T, Balch JK, Brenkert-Smith H, Dennison PE, Harvey BJ, Krawchuk MA, Mietkiewicz N, Morgan P, Moritz MA, Rasker R, Turner MG (2017) Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 4582–4590.
| Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28416662PubMed |
Schultz CA, Jedd T, Beam RD (2012) The Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program: a history and overview of the first projects. Journal of Forestry 110, 381–391.
| The Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program: a history and overview of the first projects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schultz CA, Huber-Stearns H, McCaffrey S, Quirke D, Ricco G, Moseley C (2018a) Policy barriers to prescribed fire: a diversity of challenges and opportunities across the west. Ecosystem Workforce Program Working Paper 86. (Eugene, OR, USA) Available at https://ewp.uoregon.edu/publications/working [Verified 9 August 2019]
Schultz CA, Mclntyre K, Cyphers L, Kooistra C, Ellison A, Moseley C (2018b) Policy design to support forest restoration: the value of focused investment and collaboration. Forests 9, 512–532.
| Policy design to support forest restoration: the value of focused investment and collaboration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schultz CA, Timberlake TJ, Wurtzebach Z, McIntyre KB, Moseley C, Huber-Stearns HR (2019) Policy tools to address scale mismatches: insights from US forest governance. Ecology and Society 24, 21
| Policy tools to address scale mismatches: insights from US forest governance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Steelman T, Nowell B (2019) Evidence of effectiveness in the Cohesive Strategy: measuring and improving wildfire response. International Journal of Wildland Fire 28, 267–274.
| Evidence of effectiveness in the Cohesive Strategy: measuring and improving wildfire response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Steelman TA (2010) ‘Implementing innovation: fostering enduring change in environmental and natural resource governance.’ (Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, USA)
USDA and USDI (1995) Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy and Program review. (Washington, DC, USA). Available at https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/documents/strategy/foundational/1995_fed_wildland_fire_policy_program_report.pdf [Verified 9 August 2019]
USDA and USDI (2014) 2014 Quadrennial fire review: final report. (Washington, DC, USA). Available at https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/documents/qfr/2014QFRFinalReport.pdf [Verified 9 August 2019]
USFS (2015) The rising cost of wildfire operations: effects on the Forest Service’s non-fire work. (Washington, DC, USA). Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/sites/default/files/2015-Fire-Budget-Report.pdf [Verified 9 August 2019]
WFEC (2014a) A National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. (Washington, DC, USA). Available at https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/documents/strategy/reports/1_CohesiveStrategy03172011.pdf [Verified 9 August 2019]
WFEC (2014b) The National Strategy Summary: the final phase in the development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. (Washington, DC, USA). Available at https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/documents/strategy/strategy/communications/NationalStrategySummary.pdf [Verified 9 August 2019]
Wurtzebach Z, Schultz C (2016) Measuring ecological integrity: history, practical applications, and research opportunities. Bioscience 66, 446–457.
| Measuring ecological integrity: history, practical applications, and research opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
