Outcomes of fire research: is science used?
Molly E. Hunter
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, 1064 East Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA. Email: mollyhunter@u.arizona.edu
International Journal of Wildland Fire 25(5) 495-504 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15202
Submitted: 24 November 2015 Accepted: 23 January 2016 Published: 30 March 2016
Abstract
An assessment of outcomes from research projects funded by the Joint Fire Science Program was conducted to determine whether or not science has been used to inform management and policy decisions and to explore factors that facilitate use of fire science. In a web survey and follow-up phone interviews, I asked boundary spanners and scientists about how findings from a random sample of 48 projects had been applied and factors that acted as barriers or facilitators to science application. In addition, I conducted an investigation of recent planning documents to determine whether products from the sampled projects were cited. All lines of evidence suggest that information from most (44 of 48) of these projects have been used by fire and fuels managers in some capacity. Science has mostly been used during planning efforts, to develop treatment prescriptions, and to evaluate current practices. Lack of manager awareness was commonly identified as a barrier to application of science. Conversely, activities and organisations that foster interaction between scientists and managers were identified as facilitating the application of science. The efforts of the Joint Fire Science Program to communicate science findings and engage managers has likely contributed to the application of fire science.
Additional keywords: communication, planning, policy.
References
Arno SF, Fiedler CE (2005) ‘Mimicking nature’s fire: restoring fire-prone forests in the West.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC)Barbour J (2007) Accelerating adoption of fire science and related research. Joint Fire Science Program Final Report 05-S-07. (Boise, ID)
Bell S, Shaw B, Boaz A (2011) Real-world approaches to assessing the impact of environmental research on policy. Research Evaluation 20, 227–237.
| Real-world approaches to assessing the impact of environmental research on policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bellamy JA, MacLeod ND (1998) Evaluation of science-based research and development: a review in the context of integrated catchment management. In ‘Farming action – catchment reaction’. (Eds J Williams, R Hook and H Gascoigne) pp. 71–80. (CSIRO: Melbourne, Vic.)
Boaz A, Fitzpatrick S, Shaw B (2009) Assessing the impact of research on policy: a literature review. Science & Public Policy 36, 255–270.
| Assessing the impact of research on policy: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bolson J, Martinez C, Breuer N, Srivastava P, Knox P (2013) Climate information use among south-east US water managers: beyond barriers and toward opportunities. Regional Environmental Change 13, 141–151.
| Climate information use among south-east US water managers: beyond barriers and toward opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 8086–8091.
| Knowledge systems for sustainable development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXlsFGnsrc%3D&md5=23ba9d39e873831691d0323f2eb721d5CAS | 12777623PubMed |
Cash DW, Borck JC, Patt AG (2006) Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision-making: comparative analysis of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems. Science, Technology & Human Values 31, 465–494.
| Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision-making: comparative analysis of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Charmaz K (2006) ‘Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis.’ (Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA)
Clark RN, Meidinger EE, Miller G, Rayner J, Layseca M, Monreal S, Fernandez J, Shannon MA (1998) Integrating science and policy in natural resources management: lessons and opportunities from North America. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-441. (Portland, OR)
Clark WC, Holliday L (2006) ‘Linking knowledge with action for sustainable development.’ (National Research Council of the National Academies: Washington, DC).
Conley A, Moote MA (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 16, 371–386.
| Evaluating collaborative natural resource management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) ‘Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory’. (Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA)
DellaSala DA, Martin A, Spivak R, Schulke T, Bird B, Criley M, van Daalen C, Kreilick J, Brown R, Aplet G (2003) A citizen’s call for ecological forest restoration: forest restoration principles and criteria. Ecological Research 21, 14–23.
| A citizen’s call for ecological forest restoration: forest restoration principles and criteria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dilling L, Lemos MC (2011) Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Global Environmental Change 21, 680–689.
| Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ford JD, Knight M, Pearce T (2013) Assessing the ‘usability’ of climate change research for decision-making: a case study of the Canadian International Polar Year. Global Environmental Change 23, 1317–1326.
| Assessing the ‘usability’ of climate change research for decision-making: a case study of the Canadian International Polar Year.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Guston DH (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Science, Technology & Human Values 26, 399–408.
| Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hart DD, Calhoun AJK (2010) Rethinking the role of ecological research in the sustainable management of freshwater ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 55, 258–269.
| Rethinking the role of ecological research in the sustainable management of freshwater ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ, Moritz MA (2004) Lessons from the October 2003 wildfires of southern California. Journal of Forestry 102, 26–31.
Kerns S, Wright V (2002) ‘Barriers to the use of science: USFS case study on fire, weeds, and recreation management in wilderness.’ (Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute: Missoula, MT)
Kirchhoff CJ, Lemos MC, Engle NL (2013a) What influences climate information use in water management? The role of boundary organizations and governance regimes in Brazil and the US. Environmental Science & Policy 26, 6–18.
| What influences climate information use in water management? The role of boundary organizations and governance regimes in Brazil and the US.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirchhoff CJ, Lemos MC, Dessai S. (2013b) Actionable knowledge for environmental decision-making: broadening the usability of climate science. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38, 393–414.
| Actionable knowledge for environmental decision-making: broadening the usability of climate science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kocher SD, Toman E, Trainor SF, Wright V, Briggs JS, Goebel CP, MontBlanc EM, Oxarart A, Pepin DL, Steelman TA, Thode A, Waldrop TA (2012) How can we span the boundaries between wildland fire science and management in the United States? Journal of Forestry 110, 421–428.
| How can we span the boundaries between wildland fire science and management in the United States?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Koontz TM, Thomas CW (2006) What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review 66, 111–121.
| What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mandarano LA (2008) Evaluating collaborative environmental planning outputs and outcomes: restoring and protecting habitat and the New York–New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program. Journal of Planning Education and Research 27, 456–468.
| Evaluating collaborative environmental planning outputs and outcomes: restoring and protecting habitat and the New York–New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Matso KE, Becker ML (2014) What can funders do to better link science with decisions? Case studies of coastal communities and climate change. Environmental Management 54, 1356–1371.
| What can funders do to better link science with decisions? Case studies of coastal communities and climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25091428PubMed |
Matso KE, Becker ML (2015) Funding science that links to decisions: case studies involving coastal land use planning projects. Estuaries and Coasts 38, 136–150.
| Funding science that links to decisions: case studies involving coastal land use planning projects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McKinley DC, Briggs RD, Bartuska AM (2012) When peer-reviewed publications are not enough! Delivering science for natural resource management. Forest Policy and Economics 21, 1–11.
| When peer-reviewed publications are not enough! Delivering science for natural resource management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environmental Science & Policy 10, 17–38.
| Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXot1Si&md5=1b1781812f6e8b0a5e36dca6ab6833bbCAS |
Miller JD, Safford HD, Crimmins M, Thode AE (2009) Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12, 16–32.
| Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade mountains, California and Nevada, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
National Research Council (2005) ‘Thinking strategically: the appropriate use of metrics for the climate change science program.’ (The National Academies Press: Washington, DC)
Rayner S, Lach D, Ingram H (2005) Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts. Climatic Change 69, 197–227.
| Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rogers E, Weber EP (2010) Thinking harder about outcomes for collaborative governance arrangements. American Review of Public Administration 40, 546–567.
| Thinking harder about outcomes for collaborative governance arrangements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rogers EM (2003) ‘Diffusion of innovations.’ (The Free Press: New York)
Sarewitz D, Pielke RA (2007) The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environmental Science & Policy 10, 5–16.
| The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sicafuse L, Malestsky L, Evans W, Singletary L (2015) Joint Fire Science Program Fire Science Exchange Network 2014 Evaluation Report. Annual report submitted to the Joint Fire Science Program for project no. 10-S-02–06, Joint Fire Science Program, Boise, ID.
Stephens SL (2005) Forest fire causes and extent on United States forest service lands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 213–222.
| Forest fire causes and extent on United States forest service lands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomas CW, Koontz TM (2011) Research designs for evaluating the impact of community-based management of natural resources. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 3, 97–111.
| Research designs for evaluating the impact of community-based management of natural resources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increases western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313, 940–943.
| Warming and earlier spring increases western US forest wildfire activity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XotFCitbo%3D&md5=63b22aab2b41b6316345dc06d421f040CAS | 16825536PubMed |
Wright V (2010) Influences to the success of fire science delivery: perspectives of potential fire/fuels science users. Joint Fire Science Program Final Report 04–4–2–01. (Boise, ID)
