Differences in land ownership, fire management objectives and source data matter: a reply to Hanson and Odion (2014)
Hugh D. Safford A B F , Jay D. Miller C and Brandon M. Collins D EA USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Vallejo, CA 94592, USA.
B Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
C USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Fire and Aviation Management, McClellan, CA 95652, USA.
D USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Davis, CA 95618, USA.
E Center for Fire Research and Outreach, College of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
F Corresponding author. Email: hughsafford@fs.fed.us
International Journal of Wildland Fire 24(2) 286-293 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF14013
Submitted: 14 November 2013 Accepted: 21 August 2014 Published: 10 March 2015
Abstract
We respond to Hanson and Odion (2014), who claim in this journal (vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–8) that their reanalysis of fire severity patterns in and around the Sierra Nevada refutes earlier work showing increases in fire severity in certain forest types over the last 3 decades. Hanson and Odion base their reanalysis on a highly inaccurate, very coarse-scale, and geographically misregistered vegetation map. Also, in contrast to the previous work, which was restricted to wildfires on Forest Service lands in forest types differentiated by their fire regimes, Hanson and Odion combine all types of fires on lands of all jurisdictions and stratify by very broad, unorthodox vegetation types that conjoin very different fire regimes. As such, their work does not constitute a test of the previous work. We present analyses that demonstrate sources of error associated with Hanson and Odion’s data and the analyses they perform, and explore how that error might confound their results. Fundamental and compounded problems in Hanson and Odion (2014) cast strong doubt on their conclusions.
References
Altman DG (1980) Statistics and ethics in medical research. V – Analyzing data. British Medical Journal 281, 1473–1475.| Statistics and ethics in medical research. V – Analyzing data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL3M%2Fmtl2iuw%3D%3D&md5=9d49520f0c2283a2b123da4a32a67b5eCAS | 7437841PubMed |
Barbour M, Kelley E, Maloney P, Rizzo D, Royce E, Fites-Kaufmann J (2002) Present and past old-growth forests of the Lake Tahoe Basin, Sierra Nevada, US. Journal of Vegetation Science 13, 461–472.
| Present and past old-growth forests of the Lake Tahoe Basin, Sierra Nevada, US.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barbour MG, Keeler-Wolf T, Schoenherr AA (2007) (Eds) ‘Terrestrial Vegetation of California’, 3rd edn. (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA)
CWWR (1996) Status of the Sierra Nevada. Summary of the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project report. (Center for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California: Davis, CA)
Dickson WZ, Wiedemeier TH, Haas PE, Barden MJ (2005) Designing monitoring programs to effectively evaluate the performance of natural attenuation. In ‘Practical Handbook of Environmental Site Characterization and Ground-Water Monitoring’. (Ed. DM Nielsen) Ch. 9, pp. 573–638. (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL)
Eidenshink J, Schwind B, Brewer K, Zhu Z-L, Quayle B, Howard S (2007) A project for monitoring trends in burn severity. Fire Ecology 3, 3–21.
| A project for monitoring trends in burn severity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Goodchild MF (1993) Data models and data quality: problems and prospects. In ‘Environmental Modeling with GIS’. (Eds MF Goodchild, BO Parks and LT Steyaert) pp. 94–104. (Oxford University Press: New York)
Goodchild MF, Davis FW, Painho M, Storns DM (1991) ‘The Use of Vegetation Maps and Geographic Systems for Assessing Conifer Lands in California.’ (National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, UC Santa Barbara, 91–23:Santa Barbara, CA)
Hanson CT, Odion DC (2014) Is fire severity increasing in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA? International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 1–8.
| Is fire severity increasing in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hanson CT, Odion DC, Dellasala DA, Baker WL (2009) Overestimation of fire risk in the Northern Spotted Owl Recovery Plan. Conservation Biology 23, 1314–1319.
| Overestimation of fire risk in the Northern Spotted Owl Recovery Plan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19549218PubMed |
Hanson CT, Odion DC, Dellasala DA, Baker WL (2010) More-comprehensive recovery actions for northern spotted owls in dry forests: reply to Spies et al. Conservation Biology 24, 334–337.
| More-comprehensive recovery actions for northern spotted owls in dry forests: reply to Spies et al.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (2002) ‘Statistical Methods in Water Resources: Techniques of Water Resources Investigations’ (US Geological Survey) Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/twri/twri4a3/ [Verified 3 October 2014]
Keeler-Wolf T (2007) The history of vegetation classification and mapping in California. In ‘Terrestrial Vegetation of California’. (Eds MG Barbour, T Keller-Wolf and AA Schoenherr) pp. 1–42. (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA)
Key CH, Benson NC (2006) Landscape assessment: ground measure of severity, the Composite Burn Index. In ‘FIREMON: Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System’. (Ed. DC Lutes) pp. LA8–LA15. (USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO)
Kilgore BM (1971) The role of fire in managing red fir forests. In ‘Transactions North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 7–10 March 1971, Portland, OR. (Ed. JB Trefethen) Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 405–416.
Mallek C, Safford HD, Viers JH, Miller JD (2013) Modern departures in fire severity and area vary by forest type, Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade Range, California, USA. Ecosphere 4, art153
| Modern departures in fire severity and area vary by forest type, Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade Range, California, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Matyas WJ, Parker I (1980) ‘CALVEG mosaic of existing vegetation in California.’ (Regional Ecology Group, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region: San Francisco, CA).
Miller JD, Safford HD (2012) Trends in wildfire severity 1984–2010 in the Sierra Nevada, Modoc Plateau, and southern Cascades, California, USA. Fire Ecology 8, 41–57.
| Trends in wildfire severity 1984–2010 in the Sierra Nevada, Modoc Plateau, and southern Cascades, California, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller JD, Thode AE (2007) Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR). Remote Sensing of Environment 109, 66–80.
| Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller JD, Safford HD, Crimmins MA, Thode AE (2009a) Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12, 16–32.
| Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller JD, Knapp EE, Key CH, Skinner CN, Isbell CJ, Creasy RM, Sherlock JW (2009b) Calibration and validation of the relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR) to three measures of fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mountains, California, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment 113, 645–656.
| Calibration and validation of the relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR) to three measures of fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mountains, California, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller JD, Collins BM, Lutz JA, Stephens SL, van Wagtendonk JW, Yasuda DA (2012) Differences in wildfires among ecoregions and land management agencies in the Sierra Nevada region, California, USA. Ecosphere 3, Article 80
| Differences in wildfires among ecoregions and land management agencies in the Sierra Nevada region, California, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rollins MG (2009) LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 235–249.
| LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Safford HD, Van de Water K (2013) Using Fire Return Interval Departure (FRID) analysis to map spatial and temporal changes in fire frequency on National Forest lands in California. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, PSW-RP-266. (Albany, CA) Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_rp266/ [Verified 3 October 2014]
Schmidt KM, Menakis JP, Hardy CC, Hann WJ, Bunnell DL (2002) Development of coarse-scale spatial data for wildland fire and fuel management. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, RMRS-GTR-87. (Fort Collins, CO) Available at http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fsbdev3_061488.pdf [Verified 3 October 2014]
Smith JH, Wickham JD, Stehman SV, Yang LM (2002) Impacts of patch size and land-cover heterogeneity on thematic image classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68, 65–70.
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) ‘Biometry.’ (WH Freeman and Company: New York)
Sugihara NG, van Wagtendonk JW, Shaffer KE, Fites-Kaufman J, Thode AE (2006) (Eds) ‘Fire in California’s Ecosystems.’ (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA)
Van de Water K, Safford HD (2011) A summary of fire frequency estimates for California vegetation before Euro-American settlement. Fire Ecology 7, 26–58.
| A summary of fire frequency estimates for California vegetation before Euro-American settlement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Wagtendonk JW (2007) The history and evolution of Wildland Fire Use. Fire Ecology 3, 3–17.
| The history and evolution of Wildland Fire Use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yue S, Pilon P, Cavadias G (2002) Power of the Mann–Kendall and Spearman’s rho tests for detecting monotonic trends in hydrological series. Journal of Hydrology 259, 254–271.
| Power of the Mann–Kendall and Spearman’s rho tests for detecting monotonic trends in hydrological series.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang J, Webster J, Powers RF, Mills J (2008) Reforestation after the fountain fire in northern California: an untold success story. Journal of Forestry 106, 425–430.