The economic benefit of localised, short-term, wildfire-potential information
Laine Christman A B and Kimberly Rollins AA Department of Economics, University of Nevada, Reno, Mail Stop 204, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
B Corresponding author. Email: christman@unr.edu
International Journal of Wildland Fire 24(7) 974-982 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF14003
Submitted: 30 August 2013 Accepted: 16 May 2015 Published: 9 July 2015
Abstract
Wildfire-potential information products are designed to support decisions for prefire staging of movable wildfire suppression resources across geographic locations. We quantify the economic value of these information products by defining their value as the difference between two cases of expected fire-suppression expenditures: one in which daily information about spatial variation in wildfire-potential is used to move fire suppression resources throughout the season, and the other case in which daily information is not used and fire-suppression resources are staged in their home locations all season. We demonstrate the method by constructing a hypothetical wildland management unit calibrated to represent a region typical in the US West. The method uses estimated suppression costs and probabilities of significant fire, as provided by an information service, to estimate expected suppression costs. We analyse differences in expected suppression costs for a range of risk scenarios. Economic savings occur for the majority of risk scenarios. This approach can be used to evaluate investments in wildfire-potential information services, and for assessing the value of investing in new resources.
Additional keywords: decision-support, expenditures, management, suppression, wildland.
References
Andrews PL, Bevins CD, Seli RC (2008) BehavePlus fire modeling system, version 4.0: user’s guide. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-106WWW. (Ogden, UT)Fried JS, Fried BD (1996) Simulating wildfire containment with realistic tactics. Forest Science 42, 267–281.
Gebert KM, Calkins DE, Yoder J (2007) Estimating suppression expenditures for individual large wildland fires. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 22, 188–196.
Haight RG (2007) Deploying wildland fire-suppression resources with a scenario‐based standard response model. INFOR 45, 31–39.
| Deploying wildland fire-suppression resources with a scenario‐based standard response model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hamlet AF, Huppert D, Lettenmaier DP (2002) Economic value of long-lead streamflow forecasts for Columbia River hydropower. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 128, 91–101.
| Economic value of long-lead streamflow forecasts for Columbia River hydropower.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lee KK, Lee JW (2007) The economic value of weather forecasts for decision‐making problems in the profit/loss situation. Meteorological Applications 14, 455–463.
| The economic value of weather forecasts for decision‐making problems in the profit/loss situation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marsha T (2008) Assessing daily fire-potential, step one – developing a ‘fuel dryness level’. Northwest Coordination Center Predictive Services. (Portland, OR) Available at http://www.nwccweb.us/content/products/fwx/publications/assessing_daily_fire_severity1.pdf [Verified 5 December 2014]
Williamson RA, Hertzfeld HR, Cordes J (2002) The socio-economic value of improved weather and climate information. Space Policy Institute, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.gwu.edu/~spi/assets/docs/Socio-EconomicBenefitsFinalREPORT2.pdf [Verified 6 June 2015]
NIFC (National Interagency Fire Center) (2004) Fireline Handbook, National Wildfire Coordinating Group Handbook 3, PMS 410–1 NFES 0065. (Boise, ID)
Nazzaro RM (2007) Wildland fire management improvements could enhance Federal agencies’ efforts to contain the costs of fighting fires. US General Accounting Office, Report no. GAO-07–922T. (Washington, DC)
Neill C, Carter D (2008) Cost accounting and reporting. In ‘Interagency incident business management handbook’. Ch. 80. RM/GBCG-2008–6. (National Wildfire Coordinating Group: Boise, ID)
Ntaimo L, Zeigler BP, Vasconcelos MJ, Khargharia B (2004) Forest fire spread and suppression in DEVS. Simulation 80, 479–500.
| Forest fire spread and suppression in DEVS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ntaimo L, Hu X, Sun Y (2008) DEVS-FIRE: towards an integrated simulation environment for surface spread and containment. Simulation 84, 137–155.
| DEVS-FIRE: towards an integrated simulation environment for surface spread and containment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rodréguez y Silva F, González-Cabán A (2010) ‘SINAMI’: a tool for the economic evaluation of forest fire management programs in Mediterranean ecosystems. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 927–936.
| ‘SINAMI’: a tool for the economic evaluation of forest fire management programs in Mediterranean ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rollins KS, Shaykewich J (2003) Using willingness‐to‐pay to assess the economic value of weather forecasts for multiple commercial sectors. Meteorological Applications 10, 31–38.
| Using willingness‐to‐pay to assess the economic value of weather forecasts for multiple commercial sectors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wesolowsky GO, Truscott WG (1975) The multiperiod location–allocation problem with relocation of facilities. Management Science 22, 57–65.
| The multiperiod location–allocation problem with relocation of facilities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
