Large airtanker use and outcomes in suppressing wildland fires in the United States
David E. Calkin A C , Crystal S. Stonesifer A , Matthew P. Thompson A and Charles W. McHugh B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 200 E. Broadway, Missoula, MT 59807, USA.
B USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, 5575 W. US Highway 10, Missoula, MT 59808, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: decalkin@fs.fed.us
International Journal of Wildland Fire 23(2) 259-271 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13031
Submitted: 28 February 2013 Accepted: 29 August 2013 Published: 3 February 2014
Abstract
Wildfire activity in the United States incurs substantial costs and losses, and presents challenges to federal, state, tribal and local agencies that have responsibility for wildfire management. Beyond the potential socioeconomic and ecological losses, and the monetary costs to taxpayers due to suppression, wildfire management is a dangerous occupation. Aviation resources, in particular large airtankers, currently play a critical role in wildfire management, and account for a relatively large share of both suppression expenditure and firefighting fatalities. A recent airtanker modernisation strategy released by the US Department of Agriculture Forest Service and the US Department of Interior highlighted cost effectiveness as the fundamental tenet of both the replacement strategy and the use of aerial firefighting resources. However, determining the cost effectiveness of alternative airtanker fleets is challenging due to limited data and substantial uncertainty regarding aerial firefighting effectiveness. In this paper, we significantly expand on current airtanker usage and effectiveness knowledge, by incorporating spatially explicit drop location data linked to firefighting resource orders to better identify the period in the fire history when drops occurred, and through characterisation of the resulting outcomes of fires that received drops during initial attack. Our results confirm earlier work suggesting extensive use of large airtankers on extended attack, despite policy suggesting priority use in initial attack. Further, results suggest that containment rates for fires receiving large airtanker use during initial attack are quite low. We explore possible causes for these results, address potential limitations with our methods and data, and offer recommendations for improvements in data collection and aviation management.
Additional keywords: cost effectiveness, fire and aviation management.
References
Blue Ribbon Panel (2002) Federal aerial firefighting: assessing safety and effectiveness. Blue Ribbon Panel Report to the Chief, USDA Forest Service and Director, (USDI Bureau of Land Management) Available at http://www.wildlandfire.com/docs/2003_n_before/BRP_Final12052002-1.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]Calkin DE, Gebert KM, Jones JG, Neilson RP (2005) Forest Service large fire area burned and suppression expenditure trends, 1970–2002. Journal of Forestry 103, 179–183.
Chaney R (2011) Neptune’s jet-powered tanker could ‘revolutionize’ aerial firefighting. Missoulian 28 September 2011. Available at http://missoulian.com/news/local/neptune-s-jet-powered-tanker-could-revolutionize-aerial-firefighting/article_4cc0276e-ea4a-11e0-a4c5-001cc4c03286.html [Verified 22 January 2013]
Chaney R (2012) Neptune’s 2nd jet-powered retardant bomber cleared to fly amid dispute. Missoulian 1 September 2012. Available at http://missoulian.com/news/local/neptune-s-nd-jet-powered-retardant-bomber-cleared-to-fly/article_370039be-f3e0-11e1-a1f1-0019bb2963f4.html [Verified 22 January 2013]
FAA (2012) Emergency airworthiness directive. (Federal Aviation Administration, Aviation Safety) Available at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAD.nsf/0/6559a291129f39358625799c0064393c/$FILE/2012-03-51_Emergency.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
Finney MA, Grenfell IC, McHugh CW (2009) Modeling containment of large wildfires using generalized linear mixed-model analysis. Forest Science 55, 249–255.
Finney MA, Grenfell IC, McHugh CW, Seli RC, Trethewey D, Stratton RD, Brittain S (2011) A method for ensemble wildland fire simulation. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 16, 153–167.
| A method for ensemble wildland fire simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fire Program Solutions (2005) Wildland Fire Management Aerial Application Study. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/publications/aviation/nats3_wfmaas_report_final.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
Fried JS, Fried BD (1996) Simulating wildfire containment with realistic tactics. Forest Science 42, 267–281.
Fried JS, Gilles JK, Spero J (2006) Analysing initial attack on wildland fires using stochastic simulation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 137–146.
| Analysing initial attack on wildland fires using stochastic simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gabbert B (2010) Tanker 44 back in the air. Wildfire Today. Available at http://wildfiretoday.com/2010/12/07/tanker-44-back-in-the-air/ [Verified 22 January 2013]
Gabbert B (2011) 8 of the 19 heavy air tankers grounded. Wildfire Today. Available at http://wildfiretoday.com/2011/04/15/8-of-the-19-heavy-air-tankers-grounded/ [Verified 22 January 2013]
Gabbert B (2012) Two air tanker incidents, one crash and one wheels-up landing. Wildfire Today. Available at http://wildfiretoday.com/2012/06/03/two-air-tanker-incidents-one-crash-and-one-wheels-up-landing/ [Verified 22 January 2013]
Ganewatta G, Handmer J (2009) The cost-effectiveness of aerial firefighting in Australia. Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre, Technical report A.09.01. (Melbourne)
GAO (2007) Wildland fire management: lack of clear goals or a strategy hinders Federal Agencies’ efforts to contain the costs of fighting fires. US Government Accountability Office, Report number GAO-07–655. Available at http://www.gao.gov/assets/270/261640.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
Hamilton L (2003) Testimony before Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee at the Oversight Hearing concerning the Blue Ribbon Panel Report and aerial firefighting safety. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/congress/108/senate/oversight/hamilton/032603.html [Verified 22 January 2013]
Holmes TP, Calkin DE (2013) Econometric analysis of fire suppression production functions for large wildland fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 246–255.
| Econometric analysis of fire suppression production functions for large wildland fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Published online early 18 September 2012]
Keating EG, Morral AR, Price CC, Woods D, Norton D, Panis C, Saltzman E, Sanchez R (2012) Air attack against wildfires: understanding US Forest Service requirements for large aircraft. (RAND Corporation) Available at http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2012/RAND_MG1234.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
Mees R, Strauss D (1992) Allocating resources to large wildland fires: a model with stochastic production rates. Forest Science 38, 842–853.
NIFC (2004) Limited number of large airtankers recalled to service. National Interagency Fire Center, NIFC News press release. Available at http://wildfirelessons.net/documents/airtankers_070204_NIFC_72DPI.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
NIFC (2005) Statement from the National Multi Agency Coordination Group regarding airtanker management and dispatch procedures. (National Interagency Fire Center) Available at http://www.nifc.gov/nicc/administrative/nmac/correspond/AT_mgmt_dsp.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
NWCG (2007) NWCG Data standard unique fire identifier discussion paper. Available at http://www.nwcg.gov/pmu/pmo-archive/products/stds/unique_fire_id/discussion.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
NWCG (2011) Safety Gram: fatalities, entrapments, and serious accident summary for 2011. (National Wildfire Coordinating Group Risk Management Committee) Available at http://www.nwcg.gov/branches/pre/rmc/safety-grams/sg_2011_f.pdf [Verified 14 January 2013]
NWCG (2012a) Safety Gram: fatalities, entrapments, and serious accident summary for 2012. (National Wildfire Coordinating Group Risk Management Committee) Available at http://www.nwcg.gov/branches/pre/rmc/safety-grams/sg_2012_d.pdf [Verified 14 January 2013]
NWCG (2012b) Glossary of wildland fire terminology. (National Wildfire Coordinating Group) Available at http://www.nwcg.gov/pms/pubs/glossary/index.htm [Verified 22 January 2013]
OIG (2009) Audit report: Forest Service’s replacement plan for firefighting aerial resources. US Office of Inspector General, Report number 08601–53-SF. Available at http://www.usda.gov/oig/webdocs/08601-53-SF.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
Plucinski M, Gould J, McCarthy G, Hollis J (2007) The effectiveness and efficiency of aerial firefighting in Australia, Part 1. Bushfire CRC, Technical report A0701. (Melbourne)
Podur JJ, Martell DL (2007) A simulation model of the growth and suppression of large forest fires in Ontario. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 285–294.
| A simulation model of the growth and suppression of large forest fires in Ontario.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rey M, Scarlett L (2004) Statement before Senate Commerce Committee concerning firefighting aircraft safety. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/congress/108/senate/oversight/rey/060204.html [Verified 22 January 2013]
Thompson MP, Calkin DE, Finney MA, Gebert KM, Hand MS (2013a) A risk-based approach to wildland fire budgetary planning. Forest Science 59, 63–77.
| A risk-based approach to wildland fire budgetary planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson MP, Calkin DE, Herynk J, McHugh CW, Short KC (2013b) Airtankers and wildfire management in the US Forest Service: examining data availability and exploring usage and cost trends. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 223–233.
| Airtankers and wildfire management in the US Forest Service: examining data availability and exploring usage and cost trends.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Published online early 10 August 2012]
USAF (2012) United States Air Force Aircraft Accident Investigation Board Report regarding 1 July 2012 C-130H3 accident. Available at http://usaf.aib.law.af.mil/ExecSum2012/C-130H3_Edgemont_SD_1%20Jul%2012.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
USDA Forest Service (2002) FY 2002 aviation safety summary. National Aviation Safety Center (Boise, ID) Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/av_safety/assurance/fy_safety_reports/fy02avsumm.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
USDA Forest Service (2005) Fire and aviation management briefing paper regarding agency airtanker program and recent Orion P-3 accident. Available at http://wildfirelessons.net/BrowseResults.aspx?All=61&New=0&Level=2&Value=280&Cat=61&Sub=0&Topic=0&Page=9 [Verified 22 January 2013]
USDA Forest Service (2008) FY 2008 aviation safety summary. National Aviation Safety Center. (Boise, ID) Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/av_safety/assurance/fy_safety_reports/FY2008_Summary.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
USDA Forest Service (2009) FY 2009 aviation safety summary. National Aviation Safety Center. (Boise, ID) Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/av_safety/assurance/fy_safety_reports/FY2009_Summary.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
USDA Forest Service (2010) FY 2010 aviation safety summary. National Aviation Safety Center. (Boise, ID) Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/av_safety/assurance/fy_safety_reports/fy2010_summary.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
USDA Forest Service (2011a) National exclusive use airtanker service contract, Section C-1A. Available at www.fs.fed.us/fire/contracting/airtankers/airtanker_contract.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
USDA Forest Service (2011b) US Forest Service cancels airtanker contract with Aero Union. News Release number 1127. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/news/2011/releases/07/airtanker.shtml [Verified 22 January 2013]
USDA Forest Service (2012). Large airtanker modernization strategy. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/aviation/airtanker_modernization_strategy.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
USDI, USDA (2004a) Communication plan: termination of large airtanker contract. Available at http://wildfirelessons.net/documents/airtankers_comm_plan_051004.pdf [Verified January 2013]
USDI, USDA (2004b) Federal firefighting agencies will return two additional large airtankers to service, will monitor plane stress in fire environment. News Release number 0333.04. Available at http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentid=2004/08/0333.xml&navid=NEWS_RELEASE&navtype=RT&parentnav=LATEST_RELEASES&edeployment_action=retrievecontent [Verified 22 January 2013]
USDI, USDA (2005) Transcript of tele-news conference with Under Secretary for Natural Resources and the Environment, Mark Rey. USDA Release number 0191.05. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/news/2005/releases/05/air-tanker-transcript.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
USDI, USDA (2010) Wildland firefighter safety, calendar year 2010 report. Report to Congress.
Venn TJ, Calkin DE (2011) Accommodating non-market values in evaluation of wildfire management in the United States: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 327–339.
| Accommodating non-market values in evaluation of wildfire management in the United States: challenges and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Western Forestry Leadership Coalition (2009) The true cost of wildfire in the western US. Available at http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/roseburg/plans/collab_forestry/files/TrueCostOfWilfire.pdf [Verified 22 January 2013]
Wibbenmeyer MJ, Hand MS, Calkin DE, Venn TJ, Thompson MP (2013) Risk preferences in strategic wildfire decision making: a choice experiment with US wildfire managers. Risk Analysis 33, 1021–1037.
| Risk preferences in strategic wildfire decision making: a choice experiment with US wildfire managers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23078036PubMed |
