Numerical modelling of the aerial drop of firefighting agents by fixed-wing aircraft. Part II: model validation
J. H. AmorimCentre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. Email: amorim@ua.pt
International Journal of Wildland Fire 20(3) 394-406 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF09123
Submitted: 30 October 2009 Accepted: 27 July 2010 Published: 5 May 2011
Abstract
The validation of the Aerial Drop Model consisted of the comparison of computed ground patterns with experimental data from a set of real-scale drop tests using water and a wide range of fire retardant viscosities. Results were analysed in terms of pattern length and area. A total of 78% of the computed line lengths per coverage level were within a 10% error, with an average normalised mean squared error of 0.01 and a Pearson correlation coefficient above 0.9. In all cases, nearly 90% of the results were within a factor of 2 of observations. The accuracy of the simulations showed no strong relation with the viscosity, although better results were obtained in the range from 700 to 1100 cP. In general, the model produced a good representation of the spatial distribution of the agent for various coverage levels and its accuracy was, in fact, within the statistical uncertainty of the cup-and-grid sampling method. The good performance obtained demonstrates that this tool, for the tested range of drop conditions, fulfils the requirements for use in the optimisation of firefighting operations, as a complementary method to real-scale drop testing, and in firefighter training activities.
Additional keywords: drop effectiveness, drop testing, model evaluation.
References
Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1972) ‘Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables.’ Applied Mathematics Series 55. (National Bureau of Standards: Washington, DC)Amorim JH (2008) Numerical modelling of the aerial drop of products for forest firefighting. PhD thesis, University of Aveiro, Portugal.
Amorim JH (2011) Numerical modelling of the aerial drop of products for forest firefighting. Part I: model development. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 384–393.
| Numerical modelling of the aerial drop of products for forest firefighting. Part I: model development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andersen WH, Brown RE, Kato KG, Louie NA (1974a) Investigation of rheological properties of aerial-delivered fire retardant – Final report. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station Report 8990-04. (Ogden, UT)
Andersen WH, Brown RE, Louie NA, Blatz PJ, Burchfield JA (1974b) Investigation of rheological properties of aerial-delivered fire retardant extended study – Final report. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station Report 8990-05. (Ogden, UT)
Andersen WH, Brown RE, Louie NA, Kato KG, Burchfield JA, Dalby JD, Zernow L (1976) Correlation of rheological properties of liquid fire retardant with aerially delivered performance – Final report. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station Report 8990-08. (Ogden, UT)
ASTM International (2000) ‘Standard Guide for Statistical Evaluation of Atmospheric Dispersion Model Performance, D 6589-00.’ (ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA)
Blakely AD, George CW, Johnson GM (1982) Static testing to evaluate airtanker delivery performance. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-78. (Ogden, UT)
Chang JC, Hanna SR (2005) ‘Technical Descriptions and User’s Guide for the BOOT Statistical Model Evaluation Software Package, Version 2.0.’ (George Mason University and Harvard School of Public Health: Fairfax, VA)
Davis JB (1960) Air drop tests: Willows, Santa Ana, Ramona, 1955–59. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, California Air Attack Coordinating Committee Research Paper 17382 4-60 2M SPO. (Berkeley, CA)
George CW (1975) Fire retardant ground distribution patterns from the CL-215 air tanker. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-165. (Ogden, UT)
George CW, Blakely AD (1973) An evaluation of the drop characteristics and ground distribution patterns of forest fire retardants. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Research Paper INT-134. (Ogden, UT)
George CW, Johnson GM (1990) Developing air tanker performance guides. USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-268. (Ogden, UT)
George CW, Blakely AD, Johnson GM (1976) Forest fire retardant research – A status report. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-31. (Ogden, UT)
Giroud F, Picard C, Arvieu P, Oegema P (2002) An optimum use of retardant during the aerial firefighting. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Forest Fire Research’, 18–23 November 2002, Luso-Coimbra, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) (CD-ROM) (Millpress: Rotterdam)
Lovellette G (2004) How to conduct drop tests of aerial retardant delivery systems. USDA Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center, Technical Report 0457-2813-MTDC. (Missoula, MT)
Lovellette G (2005) How to conduct static tests of aerial retardant delivery systems. USDA For est Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center, Technical Report 0557-2812-MTDC. (Missoula, MT)
Newstead RG, Lieskovsky RJ (1985) Air tanker and fire retardant drop patterns. Canadian Forestry Service, Northern Forest Research Centre Information Report NOR-X-273. (Alberta, Canada)
Pickler R (1994) Aircraft and forest fire control in Canada. In ‘International Forest Fire News (IFFN)’, vol. 11, July 1994. (The Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC), Max Planck Institute for Chemistry: Freiburg, Germany)
Rawson R (1977) A study of the distribution of aerially applied fire retardant in softwood plantations. Department of Conservation and Environment, Forests Commission, Fire Research Branch report number 1. (Melbourne)
Robertson K, Fogarty L, Webb S (1997a) Firebombing effectiveness – where to from here? New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Fire Technology Transfer Note FTTN-11. (Christchurch, New Zealand)
Robertson K, Fogarty L, Webb S (1997b) Guidelines for determining aerial drop patterns in open areas. New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Fire Technology Transfer Note FTTN-12. (Christchurch, New Zealand)
Stechishen E (1976) Cascading Fire-Trol 931 fire retardant into a jack pine stand. Canadian Forestry Service, Forest Fire Research Institute Information Report FF-X-58. (Ottawa, Canada)
Suter A (2000) Drop testing airtankers: a discussion of the cup-and-grid method. USDA Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center Technical Report 0057-2868-MTDC. (Missoula, MT)
Van Meter WP (1983) Using rheology to estimate short-term retardant droplet sizes. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-327. (Ogden, UT)
Van Meter WP, George CW (1981) Correlating laboratory air drop data with retardant rheological properties. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-278. (Ogden, UT)
Vandersall HL (1994) Air attack: retardants, rheology and some new options. International Journal of Wildland Fire 4, 45–51.
| Air attack: retardants, rheology and some new options.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
