Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WF > WF09063
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 19(6)

Building bridges to fight fire: the role of informal social interactions in six Colorado wildland–urban interface communities

Hannah Brenkert-Smith
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A National Center for Atmospheric Research, PO Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000, USA.

B Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 483 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0483, USA. Email: hannahb@ucar.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(6) 689-697 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF09063
Submitted: 12 June 2009  Accepted: 13 January 2010   Published: 17 September 2010

Abstract

Property owners in fire-prone communities have been identified as key stakeholders in the wildfire dilemma. Although past research has examined stakeholder characteristics and their behaviours, less is known about how small-scale social processes among stakeholders might shape mitigation decision-making and related actions. This manuscript highlights the role informal social interactions play in building bridges among full-time and part-time residents that facilitate the spread of wildfire information and galvanise small-scale cooperative efforts to reduce wildfire risk. Data from in-depth interviews conducted with residents in six fire-prone Colorado communities indicate that these interactions create bridging capital that links those who are not likely to be the direct recipients of wildfire outreach efforts to those who are.


Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency STAR (Science To Achieve Results) Fellowship Program, US Forest Service (FS-NC-4902, Study no. 05–01) and the Institute of Behavioural Science at the University of Colorado. The National Center for Atmospheric Research is supported by the National Science Foundation.


References


Agrawal S , Monroe MC (2006) Using and improving social capital to increase community preparedness for wildfire. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-1. (Ed. S McCaffrey) pp. 163–167. (Newtown Square, PA)

Auerbach CF , Silverstein LB (2003) ‘Qualitative Data: an Introduction to Coding and Analysis.’ (New York University Press: New York)

Berg B (2004) ‘Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences.’ 5th edn. (Allyn and Bacon: Boston)

Brenkert-Smith H (2008) Placing wildfire in context: environmental and social dimensions of mitigation decision-making. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado.

Bright AD , Burtz RT (2006) Firewise activities of full-time versus seasonal residents in the wildland–urban interface. Journal of Forestry  104(6), 307–315.
Burns S , Sperry C , Hodgson R (2003) People and fire in western Colorado: methods of engaging stakeholders. In ‘Fire, fuel treatments, and ecological restoration’, 16–18 April 2002, Fort Collins, CO, USA. (Technical Eds PN Omi, LA Joyce) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-29, pp. 213–223. (Fort Collins, CO)

Fishbein M , Ajzen I (1975) ‘Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research.’ (Addison: Reading, MA)

Frentz IC, Burns S , Sperry CW (2000) Forest service–community relationship building: recommendations. Society & Natural Resources  13, 549–566.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Gray G , Enzer JM , Kusel J (2001) ‘Understanding Community-based Forest Ecosystem Management.’ (Haworth Press Inc.: Binghamton, NY)

Jakes PJ , Nelson K , Lang E , Monroe M , Agrawal S , Kruger S , Sturtevant V (2002) A model for improving community preparedness for wildfire. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NC-231 (Ed. P Jakes) pp. 4–9. (Newtown Square, PA)

Kruger LE , Agrawal S , Monroe M , Lang E , Nelson K , Jakes P , Sturtevant V , McCaffrey S , Everett Y (2003) Keys to community preparedness for wildfire. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NC-231 (Ed. P Jakes) pp. 10–17. (Newtown Square, PA)

Kunreuther H , Heal G (2003) Interdependent security. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty  26, 231–249.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Lang EA , Nelson KC , Jakes P (2006) Working with community leadership to promote wildfire preparedness. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-1. (Ed. S McCaffrey) pp. 137–149. (Newtown Square, PA)

Lindell MK (Ed.) (1997) Special issue: adoption and implementation of hazard adjustments. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 15, 327–453.

Lindell MK , Whitney DJ (2000) Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption. Risk Analysis  20, 13–26.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Lofland J , Lofland L (1995) ‘Analyzing Social Settings: a Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis.’ 3rd edn. (Wadsworth Publishing: Belmont, CA)

Martin IM, Bender H , Raish C (2007) What motivates individuals to protect themselves from risks: the case of wildland fires. Risk Analysis  27, 887–900.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | McCaffrey S (2008) Understanding public perspectives of wildfire risk. In ‘Wildfire Risk, Human Perceptions and Management Implications’. (Eds WE Martin, C Raish, B Kent) pp. 11–22. (Resources for the Future: Washington, DC)

Monroe MC , Nelson KC , Payton M (2006) Communicating with homeowners in the interface about defensible space. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station General Technical Report NRS-1. (Ed. S McCaffrey) pp. 99–109. (Newtown Square, PA)

Patton MP (1990) ‘Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.’ 2nd edn. (Sage Publications: London)

Putnam R (2000) ‘Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community.’ (Simon and Schuster: New York)

Rey M , Cason J (2008) Preparedness for the 2008 wildfire season. United States Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources, Senate Hearing, S. Hrg 110-540. (Washington, DC) Available at http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/senate08ch110.html [Verified 27 July 2010]

Rogers EM (2003) ‘Diffusion of Innovations.’ 5th edn. (Free Press: New York)

Scherer C , Cho H (2003) A social network contagion theory of risk perception. Risk Analysis: An International Journal  23, 261–267.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Senate Hearing (2007) Costs of wildfire suppression.. United States Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources, Senate Hearing, S. Hrg 110–11. (Washington, DC) Available at http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/senate08ch110.html [Verified 27 July 2010]

Shiralipour HJ , Monroe MC , Nelson KC , Payson M (2006) Working with neighborhood organizations to promote wildfire preparedness. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-1. (Ed. S McCaffrey) pp. 151–162. (Newtown Square, PA)

Short JF (1984) The social fabric at risk: toward the social transformation of risk analysis. American Sociological Review  49, 711–725.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Steelman TA (2008) Addressing the mitigation paradox at the community level. In ‘Wildfire Risk: Human Perceptions and Management Implications’. (Eds WE Martin, C Raish, B Kent) pp. 64–80. (Resources for the Future: Washington, DC)

Strauss A , Corbin J (1998) ‘Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory.’ 2nd edn. (Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA)

Sturtevant V , McCaffrey S (2006) Encouraging wildland fire preparedness: lessons learned from three wildfire education programs. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-1. (Ed. S McCaffrey) pp. 125–136. (Newtown Square, PA)

Tierney KJ (1993) ‘Socio-economic Aspects of Hazard Mitigation.’ (Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware: Newark, DE)

Tierney KJ , Lindell MK , Perry RW (2001) ‘Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States.’ (Joseph Henry Press: Washington, DC)

Turner R , Nigg J , Heller-Paz D , Young B (1981) ‘Community Response to the Earthquake Threat in Southern California.’ (University of California, Institute for Social Science Research: Los Angeles, CA)

United States Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources (2009) ‘Flame Act Press Release.’ (USSCENR) Available at http://energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&PressRelease_Id=050733aa-6d3a-4166-896b-6dae85972d78 [Verified 14 April 2009]




A As household mitigation decisions are not typically made by one sole decision-maker, interviews were conducted with more than one member of the household whenever possible. In 11 of the 62 households represented in this study, two household decision-makers were interviewed.

B Several residents held more than one parcel.