Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Simple models for predicting dead fuel moisture in eucalyptus forests

Stuart Matthews A B C E , Jim Gould A C and Lachie McCaw C D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Climate Adaptation Flagship – CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Bellenden St, Crace, ACT 2911, Australia.

B Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources, Woolley Building A20, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

C Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre, 340 Albert St, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia.

D Western Australia Department of Environment and Conservation, Brain St, Manjimup, WA 6258, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: stuart.matthews@csiro.au

International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(4) 459-467 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF09005
Submitted: 16 January 2009  Accepted: 21 October 2009   Published: 24 June 2010

Abstract

Fire behaviour prediction requires models of dead fuel moisture that are both accurate and suitable for use for operational applications. The paper investigates two methods of developing a simple operational fine fuel moisture model from a more complex process-based model. The first simple model is a table of fuel moisture predictions for values of air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and solar radiation. The second model reduces the original model to a single differential equation, which may be used on low-powered computers. The simple models are tested against the output of the original model and against observations from two case studies in dry eucalyptus forest in south-western Australia. The single differential equation model was capable of reproducing the prediction of the process-based model at all times of the day, with mean error (ME) in predictions of –0.1% and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.6%. The table model performed less well, with ME = –0.7% and MAE = 1.1% at 1500 hours, and ME = –1.2% and MAE = 3.0% at other times of the day.

Additional keywords: Eucalyptus marginata, litter layer, Western Australia.


Acknowledgements

Review comments by Sadanandan Nambiar, Miguel Cruz and Auro Almeida of CSIRO and by Jon Marsden-Smedley and an anonymous reviewer helped to improve our original manuscript.


References


Bird RE, Hulstrom RL (1981) A simplified clear sky model for direct and diffuse insolation on horizontal surfaces. US Department of Energy, Solar Research Institute, Technical Report SERI/TR-642–761. (Golden, CO)

Byram GM , Jemison GM (1943) Solar radiation and forest fuel moisture. Journal of Agricultural Research  67, 149–176.
Catchpole WR (2001) Fire properties and burn patterns in heterogeneous landscapes. In ‘Flammable Australia: the Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent’. (Eds RA Bradstock, JE Williams, AM Gill) pp. 49–75. (Cambridge University Press: UK)

Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator – model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT)

Fosberg MA (1975) Heat and water vapour flux in conifer forest litter and duff: a theoretical model. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper RM-152. (Fort Collins, CO)

Fosberg MA, Deeming JE (1971) Derivation of the 1- and 10-hour timelag fuel moisture calculations for fire danger rating. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RM-207. (Fort Collins, CO)

Gould JS, McCaw WL, Cheney NP, Ellis PF, Matthews S (2007a) ‘Field guide – Fuel Assessment and Fire Behaviour Prediction in Dry Eucalypt Forest.’ (Ensis–CSIRO: Canberra, and Department of Environment and Conservation: Perth)

Gould JS, McCaw WL, Cheney NP, Ellis PF, Knight IK, Sullivan AL (2007b) ‘Project Vesta – Fire in Dry Eucalypt Forest: Fuel Structure, Fuel Dynamics and Fire Behaviour.’ (Ensis–CSIRO: Canberra, and Department of Environment and Conservation: Perth)

Matthews S (2006) A process-based model of fine fuel moisture. International Journal of Wildland Fire  15, 155–168.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McArthur AG (1967) Fire behaviour in Eucalypt forests. Department of National Development, Forestry and Timber Bureau Leaflet 107. (Canberra, ACT)

Monteith JL (1975) ‘Principles of Environmental Physics.’ (Edward Arnold Publishers: London)

Nelson RM (2000) Prediction of diurnal change in 10-h fuel stick moisture content. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  30, 1071–1087.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) ‘Numerical Recipes in C: the Art of Scientific Computing.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA)

R Development Core Team (2007) ‘R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna)

Saysel AK , Barlas Y (2006) Model simplification and validation with indirect structure validity tests. System Dynamics Review  22, 241–262.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sneeuwjagt RJ, Peet GB (1998) ‘Forest Fire Behaviour Tables for Western Australia.’ (Department of Conservation and Land Management: Perth, WA)

Trevitt ACF (1991) Weather parameters and fuel moisture content: standards for fire model inputs. In ‘Proceedings of the Conference on Bushfire Modelling and Fire Danger Rating Systems’, 11–12 July 1988, Canberra, ACT. (Eds NP Cheney, AM Gill) (CSIRO Division of Forestry: Yarralumla, Australia)

Van Wagner CE (1987) Development and structure of the Canadian forest fire weather index system. Canadian Forestry Service, Forestry Technical Report 35. (Chalk River, ON)

Viney NR (1991) A review of fine fuel moisture modelling. International Journal of Wildland Fire  1, 215–234.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Viney NR , Hatton TJ (1990) Modelling the effect of condensation on the moisture content of forest litter. Agricultural Meteorology  51, 51–62.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weise DR, Fujioka FM , Nelson RM (2005) A comparison of three models of 1-h time lag fuel moisture in Hawaii. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology  133, 28–39.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wittich K-P (2005) A single-layer litter-moisture model for estimating forest-fire danger. Meteorologische Zeitschrift  14, 157–164.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |





Appendix.  List of fuel moisture values and basic weather observations
Click to zoom