Trust, acceptance, and citizen–agency interactions after large fires: influences on planning processes
Christine S. Olsen A B and Bruce A. Shindler A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
B Corresponding author. Email: christine.olsen@oregonstate.edu
International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(1) 137-147 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08168
Submitted: 30 September 2008 Accepted: 3 June 2009 Published: 5 February 2010
Abstract
Wildfires have increased in number and size in recent years, making post-fire forest management an increasingly important topic. Citizen–agency interactions, citizen trust, and citizen acceptance of management strategies are central to successful planning and decision-making in these settings. In this study, citizen opinions from the attentive public are evaluated in two locations near recent fires in Oregon: the 2003 Bear and Booth Complex Fires and the 2002 Biscuit Fire. Results suggest an agency’s commitment to long-term interactions with citizens influences citizen trust in the agencies and acceptance of post-fire management strategies. There is broad acceptance for several post-fire management strategies (i.e. erosion control, replanting, reseeding). However, acceptance is highly dependent on trustworthy relations. Further, results suggest it is not enough to simply offer opportunities for public engagement; citizens need to feel that these activities were meaningful opportunities to participate. Although results differed between locations, overall the majority of respondents did not agree with how the local Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management handled forest planning after recent fires. Findings from this research indicate that positive citizen–agency relations need to be long-term and developed well before a fire occurs if post-fire actions are to be supported by communities.
Additional keywords: Bear & Booth (B&B) Fires, Biscuit Fire, decision-making, post-fire decision-making, restoration, salvage.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the USDI Joint Fire Science Program and the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest and Northern Research Stations.
References
Barber B (1984) ‘Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age.’ (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA)
Brunson M , Shindler B
(2004) Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the Western United States. Society & Natural Resources 17(8), 661–678.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burns MR, Taylor JG, Hogan JT (2008) Integrative healing: the importance of community collaboration in postfire recovery and prefire planning. In ‘Wildfire Risk: Human Perceptions and Management Implications’. (Eds WE Martin, C Raish, B Kent) pp. 81–97. (Resources for the Future: Washington, DC)
Campbell L (2004) On Biscuit plan, once burned, twice shy. The Oregonian (5 August).
Carroll MS, Findley AJ, Blatner KA, Mendes SR, Daniels SE, Walker GB (2000) Social assessment for the Wenatchee National Forest wildfires of 1994: targeted analysis for the Leavenworth, Entiat, and Chelan Ranger Districts. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-479. (Portland, OR)
Conroy S
(2007) Trust was a casualty of the Biscuit Fire. The Oregonian (14 May),
Cvetkovich GT, Winter PL (2008) The experience of community residents in a fire-prone ecosystem; a case study of the San Bernardino National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Research Paper PSW-RP-257. (Albany, CA)
Davenport MA, Leahy JE, Anderson DH , Jakes PJ
(2007) Building trust in natural resource management within local communities: a case study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Environmental Management 39(3), 353–368.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Dillman DA (2007) ‘Mail and Internet Surveys: the Tailored Design Method.’ (Wiley: Hoboken, NJ)
Donato DC, Fontaine J, Campbell J, Robinson W, Kauffman JB , Law B
(2006) Post-wildfire logging hinders regeneration and increases fire risk. Science 311, 352.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Duncan S (2002) Post-fire logging: is it beneficial to forests? USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Science Findings 47. (Portland, OR)
Durbin K
(2003) In fire’s aftermath, salvage logging makes a comeback. High Country News (1 September),
Firey W (1960) ‘Man, Mind, and Land; a Theory of Resource Use.’ (The Free Press: Glencoe, IL)
Frewer LJ, Scholderer J , Bredahl L
(2003) Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: the mediating role of trust. Risk Analysis 23(6), 1117–1133.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Fukuyama F (1995) ‘Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity.’ (The Free Press: New York)
Hull RB, Robertson DP (2000) The language of nature matters: we need a more public ecology. In ‘Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities’. (Eds PH Gobster, RB Hull) pp. 97–118. (Island Press: Washington, DC)
Johnson BB
(1999) Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust. Journal of Risk Research 2(4), 325–354.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kent B, Gebert K, McCaffrey S, Martin W, Calkin D, Schuster E, Martin I, Bender HW, Alward G, Kumagai Y, Cohn PJ, Carroll M, Williams D, Ekarius C (2003) Social and economic issues of the Hayman Fire. In ‘Hayman Fire Case Study’. (Ed. RT Graham) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-114, pp. 315–396. (Ogden, UT)
Kneeshaw K, Vaske JJ, Bright AD, Absher JD (2004) Acceptability norms toward fire management in three national forests. Environment and Behavior 36(4), 592–612. [Erratum printed in Environment and Behavior 36(6), 868–871] doi:10.1177/0013916503259510
Knopp TB , Caldbeck ES
(1990) The role of participatory democracy in forest management. Journal of Forestry 88(5), 13–18.
Knotek K, Watson AE (2006) Organizational characteristics that contribute to success in engaging the public to accomplish fuels management at the wilderness/non-wilderness interface. In ‘Fuels Management – How to Measure Success’. (Eds P Andrews, BW Butler) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-41, pp. 703–713. (Fort Collins, CO)
Lehman DR (1989) ‘Market Research and Analysis.’ (Irwin: Boston, MA)
Liljeblad A , Borrie WT
(2006) Trust in wildland fire and fuel management decisions. International Journal of Wilderness 12(1), 39–43.
Liljeblad A, Borrie WT, Watson AE (2005) Monitoring trust as an evaluation of the success of collaborative planning in a landscape-level fuel reduction treatment project in the Bitterroot Valley, Montana. Final report to the Joint Fire Science Program, University of Montana. (Missoula, MT)
Liljeblad A, Borrie WT , Watson AE
(2009) Determinants of trust for public lands: fire and fuels management on the Bitterroot National Forest. Environmental Management 43(4), 571–584.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Lunch WM (1987) ‘The Nationalization of American Politics.’ (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA)
Mascia M, Brosius J, Dobson T, Forbes B, Horowitz L, McKean M , Turner N
(2003) Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology 17, 649–650.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCool SF, Burchfield J, Freimund W (2000) Social science and the Bitterroot National Forest: a synthesis. In ‘The Bitterroot Ecosystem Management Research Project: What We Have Learned – Symposium Proceedings’, 18–20 May 1999, Missoula, MT. (Ed. HY Smith) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-17, pp. 77–79. (Ogden, UT)
McCool SF, Burchfield J, Williams DR , Carroll M
(2006) An event-based approach for examining the effects of wildland fire decisions on communities. Environmental Management 37(4), 437–450.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Mowrer T (2004) Post-fire restoration, rehabilitation, and salvage logging in the West. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Internal Agency Report. (Fort Collins, CO)
National Interagency Fire Center (2007) Wildland fire statistics. Available at http://www.nifc.gov/fire_info/fires_acres.htm [Verified 10 July 2008]
Olsen CS, Shindler BA (2007) Citizen–agency interactions in planning and decision-making after large fires. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-715. (Portland, OR)
Parkinson TM, Force JE , Smith JK
(2003) Hands-on learning: its effectiveness in teaching the public about wildland fire. Journal of Forestry 101(7), 21–26.
Preusch M (2004) Amid a forest’s ashes, a debate over logging profits in burning. New York Times (April 15), Late Edition, A-18.
Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS , Camerer C
(1998) Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review 23(3), 393–404.
Ryan R, Hamin E (2006) Engaging communities in post-fire restoration: forest treatments and community–agency relations after the Cerro Grande Fire. In ‘The Public and Wildland Fire Management: Social Science Findings for Managers’. (Ed. S McCaffrey) USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-1, pp. 87–96. (Newtown Square, PA)
Sessions J, Bettinger P, Buckman R, Newton M , Hamann J
(2004) Hastening the return of complex forest following fire. Journal of Forestry 102(3), 38–45.
Shindler BA (2003) An evaluation of AMAs in the Pacific Northwest. In ‘Two Paths toward Sustainable Forests: Public Values in Canada and the United States’. (Eds BA Shindler, TM Beckley, MC Finley) pp. 210–225. (Oregon State University Press: Corvallis, OR)
Shindler BA, Gordon R (2005) ‘A Practical Guide to Citizen–Agency Partnerships: Public Outreach Strategies for Fire and Fuel Management.’ (Oregon State University: Corvallis, OR)
Shindler BA , Neburka J
(1997) Public participation in forest planning: eight attributes of success. Journal of Forestry 95(1), 17–19.
Shindler BA, Brunson M, Stankey GH (2002) Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: a problem analysis. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-537. (Portland, OR)
Smith PD , McDonough MH
(2001) Beyond public participation: fairness in natural resource decision-making. Society & Natural Resources 14(3), 239–249.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stankey GH, Shindler B (1997) Adaptive management areas: achieving the promise, avoiding the peril. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-394. (Portland, OR)
Stankey GH , Shindler B
(2006) Formation of social acceptability judgments and their implications for management of rare and little-known species. Conservation Biology 20(1), 28–37.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Taylor JG, Gillette SC, Hodgson RW, Downing JL (2005) Communicating with wildland interface communities during wildfire. USDI Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2005–1061. (Reston, VA)
Thompson JR, Spies TA , Ganio LM
(2007) Reburn severity in managed and unmanaged vegetation in a large wildfire. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(25), 10 743–10 748.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Toman EL, Shindler B, Olsen CS (2008b) Communication strategies for post-fire planning: lessons learned from forest communities. In ‘Fire Social Science Research from the Pacific Southwest Station: Studies Supported by National Fire Plan Funds’. (Eds DJ Chavez, JD Absher, DL Winter) USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, General Technical Report PSW-GTR-209, pp. 165–179. (Albany, CA)
USDA Forest Service (2004) Biscuit Fire recovery final environmental impact statement. Abstract. USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/rogue-siskiyou/biscuit-fire/feis.shtml [Verified 9 July 2008]
USDA Forest Service (2005) B&B Fire recovery project. final environmental impact statement. Abstract. USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/projects/units/sisters/b-b-fire/bb-final-eis.shtml [Verified 9 July 2008]
USDI National Park Service (2003) Fire management: interpreting fire on the landscape. Glacier National Park. Available at http://www.nps.gov/fire/download/pub_fir03_glac_tours.pdf [Verified 10 July 2008]
Vaske JJ (2008) ‘Survey Research and Analysis: Applications in Parks, Recreation, and Human Dimensions.’ (Venture Publishing: State College, PA)
Winter GJ, Vogt CA , Fried JS
(2002) Fuel treatments at the wildland–urban interface: common concerns in diverse regions. Journal of Forestry 100(1), 15–21.
Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) ‘Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC)
