Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WF > WF07121
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 19(2)

Experimental measurements during combustion of moist individual foliage samplesA

Brent M. Pickett A , Carl Isackson A , Rebecca Wunder A , Thomas H. Fletcher A D , Bret W. Butler B and David R. Weise C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Chemical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.

B USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT 59808, USA.

C USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Fire Laboratory, Riverside, CA 92507, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: tom_fletcher@byu.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(2) 153-162 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07121
Submitted: 2 August 2007  Accepted: 22 January 2009   Published: 31 March 2010

Abstract

Individual samples of high moisture fuels from the western and southern United States and humidified aspen excelsior were burned over a flat-flame burner at 987° ± 12°C and 10 ± 0.5 mol% O2. Time-dependent mass and temperature profiles of these samples were obtained and analysed. It was observed that significant amounts of moisture remained in the individual samples after ignition occurred. Temperature histories showed a plateau at 200°–300°C at the leaf perimeter rather than at 100°C, with a plateau of 140°C for the leaf interior. Implications are that classical combustion models should be altered to reflect the behaviour of moisture in high moisture (live) samples. Mass release rates were determined at ignition and maximum flame height; these appeared to vary due to surface area and perimeter, but no significant correlation was found for all species.


Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the USDA/USDI National Fire Plan administered through a Research Joint Venture Agreement (No. 06-JV-11272166–060) with collaboration with the Forest Fire Laboratory, Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Riverside, CA and the Forest Fire Laboratory, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Missoula, MT. Special thanks to Joey Chong from the Riverside Forest Fire Laboratory and to Kenneth Outcalt from the Southern Research Station, who helped with the collection of chaparral and Florida samples respectively.


References


Albini FA (1976) Estimating wildfire behavior and effects. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Report INT-30. (Ogden, UT)

Albini FA (1980) Thermochemical properties of flame gases from fine wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Report INT-243. (Ogden, UT)

Andrews PL (1986) BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system. BURN Subsystem, Part 1. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Report INT-194. (Ogden, UT)

Butler BW, Cohen J, Latham DJ, Schuette RD, Sopko P, Shannon KS, Jimenez D , Bradshaw LS (2004a) Measurements of radiant emissive power and temperatures in crown fires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  34, 1577–1587.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Byram GM (1959) Combustion of forest fuels. In ‘Forest Fire: Control and Use’. (Ed. KP Davis) pp. 61–89. (Maple Press Company: York, PA)

Coleman JR , Sullivan AL (1996) A real-time computer application for the prediction of fire spread across the Australian landscape. Simulation  67, 230–240.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Deeming JE, Lancaster JW, Fosberg MA, Furman RW, Schroeder MJ (1972) National fire-danger rating system. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper RM-84. (Fort Collins, CO)

Dimitrakopoulos AP , Papaioannou KK (2001) Flammability assessment of Mediterranean forest fuels. Fire Technology  37, 143–152.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Drysdale D (1999) ‘An Introduction to Fire Dynamics.’ (Wiley: Chichester, UK)

Engstrom JD, Butler JK, Smith SG, Baxter LL, Fletcher TH , Weise DR (2004) Ignition behavior of live California chaparral leaves. Combustion Science and Technology  176, 1577–1591.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-Model Development and Evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Report RMRS-RP-4. (Missoula, MT)

Fletcher TH, Pickett BM, Smith SG, Spittle GS, Woodhouse MM, Haake E , Weise DR (2007) Effects of moisture on ignition behavior of moist California chaparral and Utah leaves. Combustion Science and Technology  179, 1183–1203.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Fosberg MA, Deeming JE (1971) Derivation of the 1- and 10-hour timelag fuel moisture calculations for fire danger rating. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Note RM-207. (Fort Collins, CO)

Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction System. Forestry Canada, Information Report ST-X-3. (Ottawa, ON)

McArthur AG (1966) Weather and grassland fire behaviour. Australian Forestry and Timber Bureau, Leaflet 100. (Canberra)

McArthur AG (1967) Fire behaviour in eucalypt forest. Australian Forestry and Timber Bureau, Leaflet 107. (Canberra)

Pickett BM (2008) Effects of moisture on combustion of live wildland forest fuels. PhD thesis, Brigham Young University, USA.

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Report INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Sadava D, Heller HC, Orians GH, Purves WK, Hillis DM (2008) ‘Life: The Science of Biology.’ 8th edn. (Sinauer Associates, Inc. and W.H. Freeman and Company: Sunderland, MD, USA)

Simpson W, TenWolde A (1999) Physical properties and moisture relationships of wood. In ‘Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material’. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, FPL-GTR-113. (Madison, WI)

Smith SG (2005) Effects of moisture on combustion characteristics of live California chaparral and Utah foliage. MSc thesis, Brigham Young University, USA.

Sun L, Zhou X, Mahalingam S , Weise DR (2006) Comparison of burning characteristics of live and dead chaparral fuels. Combustion and Flame  144, 349–359.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |

Van Wagner CE (1973) Height of crown scorch in forest fires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  3, 373–378.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weise DR, White RH, Beall FC , Etlinger M (2005a) Use of the cone calorimeter to detect seasonal differences in selected combustion characteristics of ornamental vegetation. International Journal of Wildland Fire  14, 321–338.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weise DR, Zhou X, Sun L , Mahalingam S (2005b) Fire spread in chaparral – ‘go or no-go’? International Journal of Wildland Fire  14, 99–106.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhou X, Mahalingam S , Weise D (2005) Modeling of marginal burning state of fire spread in live chaparral shrub fuel bed. Combustion and Flame  143, 183–198.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |




A Part of this manuscript was prepared by US Government employees on official time and with funding and is therefore in the public domain and not subject to copyright laws in the US.

B The source for the botanical names is the USDA PLANTS database (http://plants.usda.gov, accessed 3 December 2009).

C Trade names are not an endorsement by the USDA.