Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WF > WF06087
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 16(4)

Stand-specific litter moisture content calibrations for the Canadian Fine Fuel Moisture Code

B. Mike Wotton A C and Jennifer L. Beverly B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, 33 Willcocks Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3B3, Canada.

B Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 122nd Street, Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5, Canada.

C Corresponding author. Email: mike.wotton@utoronto.ca

International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(4) 463-472 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06087
Submitted: 16 May 2006  Accepted: 23 March 2007   Published: 20 August 2007

Abstract

A large dataset of litter moisture measurements collected at several sites across Canada by the Canadian Forest Service over the period from 1939 to 1961 is analysed. The stands in which sampling was carried out were described by three main variables: forest type (pine, spruce, Douglas fir, mixedwood and deciduous), season (spring, summer and fall), and stand density (light, moderate and dense). All three variables were found to have a significant influence on the relationship between the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System’s Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC) and surface litter moisture. Moisture in the upper duff layer was also found to have a significant influence on the relationship between FFMC and litter moisture content, with a wetter duff layer leading to moister surface conditions than would be indicated by the FFMC value. A model for litter moisture is developed, which provides a method of adjusting the standard FFMC value for the influences of forest type, stand density, season and duff moisture content.

Additional keywords: Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System, duff moisture.


References


Andrews PL (1986) BEHAVE: fire behaviour prediction and fuel modelling system – BURN subsystem Part 1. USDA Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-194. (Ogden, UT)

de Groot WJ, Wardati  , Wang Y (2005) Calibrating the Fine Fuel Moisture Code for grass ignition potential in Sumatra, Indonesia. International Journal of Wildland Fire  14, 161–168.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian forest fire behaviour prediction system. Forestry Canada, Science and Sustainable Development Directorate, Report ST-X-3. (Ottawa, ON)

Lawson BD , Dalrymple GN (1996) Ground-truthing the Drought Code: field verification of over-winter recharge of forest floor moisture. Canada–British Columbia Partnership agreement on Forest Resource Development: FRDA II. Report 268. (Canadian Forest Service: Victoria, BC) Available at http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/docs/Frr/Frr268.htm [Verified 2 March 2007]

Lawson BD , Armitage OB , Hoskins WD (1996) Diurnal variation in the Fine Fuel Moisture Code: tables and computer source code. Canada–British Columbia Partnership agreement on Forest Resource Development: FRDA II. FRDA report #245. (Canadian Forest Service: Victoria, BC) Available at http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/Docs/Frr/Frr245.htm [Verified 2 March 2007]

Lawson BD , Dalrymple GN , Hawkes BC (1997) Predicting forest floor moisture from duff moisture code values. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Forest Research Applications Technology Transfer Note #6. (Victoria, BC) Available at http://fire.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/Downloads/CFFDRS/4859.pdf [Verified 2 March 2007]

Martell DL, Bevilacqua E , Stocks BJ (1989) Modelling seasonal variation in daily people-caused forest fire occurrence Canadian Journal of Forest Research  19, 1555–1563.
Paul PM (1969) Field Practices in forest fire danger rating. Canadian Forest Service, Forest Fire Research Institute, Information Report FF-X-20. (Ottawa, ON)

Poulin-Costello M (1993) People-caused forest fire prediction using Poisson and logistic regression. MSc Thesis, University of Victoria, BC, Canada.

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper INT-115, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. (Ogden, UT)

Simard AJ (1970) Reference manual and summary of test fire, fuel moisture and weather observations made by forest fire researchers between 1931 and 1961. Canadian Forest Service, Forest Fire Research Institute. Information Report FF-X-25. (Ottawa, ON)

Van Wagner CE (1972) A table of diurnal variation in the Fine Fuel Moisture Code. Canadian Forest Service, Petawawa Forest Experiment Station. Information Report PS-X-38. (Chalk River, ON)

Van Wagner CE (1977) A method of computing fine fuel moisture content throughout the diurnal cycle. Canadian Forest Service, Petawawa Forest Experiment Station. Information Report PS-X-69. (Chalk River, ON)

Van Wagner CE , (1987) The development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System. Canadian Forest Service, Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Forestry Technical Report 35. (Chalk River, ON)

Vega-Garcia C, Woodard PM, Titus SJ, Adamowicz WL , Lee BS (1995) A logit model for predicting the daily occurrence of human-caused forest fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire  5, 101–112.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wilmore B (2001) Duff moisture dynamics in black spruce feather moss stands and their relation to the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System. MSc Thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks. Available at http://depts.washington.edu/nwfire/publication/Wilmore_2001.pdf [Verified 2 March 2007]

Wotton BM , Martell DM (2005) A lightning fire occurrence model for Ontario. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  35, 1389–1401.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wotton BM, Martell DM , Logan KA (2003) Climate change and people-caused forest fire occurrence in Ontario. Climatic Change  60, 275–295.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |




1 A more detailed report describing the test fire procedures and experimental sites is being prepared: J. L. Beverly and B. M. Wotton: The Canadian small-scale test database: historical overview and data documentation. Canadian Forest Service Northern Forestry Centre, Information Report.

2 Data (unpublished) from fire tower observations (1999–2004) of leaf flush indicate that leaf flush in aspen occurs very close to the end of May in this area on average. Although this is of course an approximation, we do not feel it has influenced the results greatly.



Appendix 1


Table A1: Models of actual litter moisture content based on Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC), forest type, season, stand density and Duff Moisture Code (DMC)
Click to zoom