Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Separating combustion from pyrolysis in HIGRAD/FIRETEC

Jonah J. Colman A B and Rodman R. Linn A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.

B Corresponding author. Email: jonah@lanl.gov

International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(4) 493-502 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06074
Submitted: 16 May 2006  Accepted: 4 May 2007   Published: 20 August 2007

Abstract

HIGRAD/FIRETEC is a coupled atmosphere/wildfire behavior model based on conservation of mass, momentum, species, and energy. It combines a three-dimensional transport model that uses a compressible-gas fluid dynamics formulation with a physics-based wildfire model, to represent the coupled behavior of the local atmosphere and wildfire. In its current formulation, combustion and pyrolysis are treated as a single process, which depends on the local densities of wood and oxygen, the levels of turbulent mixing, and a probability distribution function (PDF) for temperature in the solid. The PDF is employed to estimate the volume fraction that is hot enough to burn. This burning model is now being extended to deal with pyrolysis and combustion as separate processes. Some fire behaviors, such as flash events, crowning, and fire ‘whirls’, may depend on the ability of combustion to take place in a separate spatial location from the pyrolysis. We refer to this burning model as ‘non-local’. In the non-local burning model, pyrolysis is dealt with in roughly the same way as formerly, but now as an endothermic process. Instead of producing solely inert gasses, it now produces a mixture of inert and combustible gasses. Combustion is handled as a separate gas–gas reaction, which is highly exothermic. The basic premise of the HIGRAD/FIRETEC burning model is retained, i.e. that the rate of a reaction is limited by the rate at which the reactants can be brought together (mixing limited). In the non-local burning model, the reactants for pyrolysis can be thought of as heat and wood, for combustion: the reactive gas and oxygen. A few simple test cases that used idealised geometries were simulated with both burning models, and the results were compared. The non-local burning model was found to give results comparable to the local burning model in terms of the fire-line shape and the spread rate for these simple test cases.

Additional keywords: fire propagation, HIGRAD, simulation.


References


Anderson HE (1982) Predicting wind-driven wild land fire size and shape. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Research Paper INT-305. (Ogden, UT)

Andrews PL (1986) BEHAVE: Fire Behavior Prediction and Burning modeling System-BURN Subsystem, Part 1. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-194. (Ogden, UT)

Bossert JE, Linn RR, Reisner JM, Winterkamp JL, Dennison P, Roberts D (2000) Coupled atmosphere-fire behavior model sensitivity to spatial fuel characterization. In ‘Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, January 2000. p. 21. (American Meteorological Society: Long Beach, CA)

Cheney NP, Gould JS , Catchpole WR (1998) Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire  8, 1–13.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Drysdale D (1998) ‘An Introduction to Fire Dynamics.’ 2nd edn. (John Wiley: Hoboken, NJ)

Dupuy J-L , Larini M (1999) Fire spread through a porous forest fuel bed: A radiative and convective model including fire-induced flow effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire  9, 155–172.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-Model Development and Evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT)

Fogarty LG , Alexander ME (1999) A field guide for predicting grassland fire potential: derivation and use. Fire Technology Transfer Note  20, 1–10.
Linn RR (1997) Transport model for Prediction of Wildfire Behavior. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Scientific Report LA13334-T. (Los Alamos, NM)

Linn RR, Reisner J, Colman JJ , Winterkamp J (2002) Studying wildfire behavior using FIRETEC. International Journal of Wildland Fire  11, 233–246.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Sero-Guillaume O , Margerit J (2002) Modelling forest fires. Part I: a complete set of equations derived by extended irreversible thermodynamics. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer  45, 1705–1722.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Warnatz J, Maas U, Dibble RW (1996) ‘Combustion.’ (Springer: Berlin)