Traditional and ecological fires and effects of bushfire laws in north Australian savannas
Noel PreeceSchool for Environmental Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin NT 0909, Australia, and EcOz Environmental Services, GPO Box 381, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia. Email: noel.preece@cdu.edu.au
International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(4) 378-389 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF05079
Submitted: 30 August 2005 Accepted: 11 January 2007 Published: 20 August 2007
Abstract
Landscape fires are common and frequent across the north Australian savannas, and are arguably an essential component of regional ecosystem dynamics. Seasonal biases in fire regimes and the high frequency of late dry season fires in a large proportion of the region have been presented as an impediment to appropriate land management. Legislation regulating the lighting of fires applies to the whole of the savannas. The legislation seeks to control the lighting of fires, provides for permit systems to operate in each jurisdiction, and is supported by policies and guidance manuals. The present paper argues that the legislation fails to address prescribed burning, the biophysical and social realities of contemporary regimes, and management needs. The policies and legislation are in need of some fundamental changes, including recognition of the concept of prescribed burning, mechanisms to promote regional fire management strategies and plans, and recognition of indigenous traditional practices.
Additional keywords: Aboriginal land, biodiversity, fire policy, habitat loss, indigenous practice, land management, land rights, legislation, native title.
Acknowledgements
Camilla Hughes provided the first critical analysis of bushfire legislation in the Northern Territory, and some thoughtful discussion on the present paper. Sandy Boulter kindly provided a conference paper on fire law in WA, and Wayne Bergmann provided some ideas. Prof. David Bowman (CDU) and Dr Gabriel Crowley critically reviewed the paper and made some very valuable suggestions, and Penny van Oosterzee provided her ever-valuable critical comments. I am also indebted to Profs Greg Hill (USC), Nancy Williams (UQ) and Marcia Langton (Uni. Melb.) for their early reviews of this article. The paper was prepared while undertaking PhD studies at Charles Darwin University. Andrew Edwards kindly supplied the fire history maps. Interviews were held with several permanent bushfire officers in each state and the Territory. My thanks are extended to each for their frankness and information. I also thank the three anonymous reviewers who provided valuable and salutary comments on an earlier draft. The opinions expressed in the present paper are my own.
Bowman DMJS (1998) Tansley review No. 101. The impact of Aboriginal landscape burning on the Australian biota. The New Phytologist 140, 385–410.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crowley GM , Garnett ST (1998) Vegetation change in the grasslands and grassy woodlands of east-central Cape York Peninsula, Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 4, 132–148.
Fensham R (1997) Aboriginal fire regimes in Queensland, Australia: analysis of the explorers’ record. Journal of Biogeography 24, 11–22.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Franklin DC (1999) Evidence of disarray amongst granivorous bird assemblages in the savannas of northern Australia, a region of sparse human settlement. Biological Conservation 90, 53–68.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hughes C (1995) One land, two laws: Aboriginal fire management. Environmental and Planning Law 12, 37–49.
Preece ND (2002) Aboriginal fires in monsoonal Australia from historical accounts. Journal of Biogeography 29, 321–336.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Price O , Bowman DMJS (1994) Fire-stick forestry: a matrix model in support of skilful fire management of Callitris intratropica by north Australian Aborigines. Journal of Biogeography 21, 573–580.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rigsby B (1981) Aboriginal people, land rights and wilderness on Cape York Peninsula. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland 92, 1–10.
Russell-Smith J , Bowman DJMS (1992) Conservation of monsoon rainforest isolates in the Northern Territory, Australia. Biological Conservation 59, 51–63.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomson DF (1939) The seasonal factor in human culture, illustrated from the life of a contemporary nomadic group. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 5, 209–221.
Yibarbuk D, Whitehead PJ, Russell-Smith J, Jackson D, Fisher A, Cooke P, Choquenot D , Bowman DJMS (2001) Fire ecology and Aboriginal land management in central Arnhem Land, northern Australia: a tradition of ecosystem management. Journal of Biogeography 28, 325–343.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Appendix 1
Queensland Fire Wardens and Fire Manuals
In Qld, fire permits are issued by fire wardens who are appointed by the Rural Fire Service (RFS). Most wardens are volunteers. The Rural Fire Service website defines the functions of fire wardens to include:
– responsibility for safe rural fire management;
– control of the use of fire through the issue of Permits to Light Fire;
– dictating the conditions for permits;
– undertaking a community awareness role, including the need for hazard reduction; and
– exercising considerable powers authorised under the Act. (Source: http://www.ruralfire.qld.gov.au/fw_permits/fw_p.htm, accessed 2 March 2006).
Manuals and guides for fire wardens were published to assist in the achievement of the RFS’s goals through administration of the ‘Permit to Light Fire’ system, and to enhance best practice in the use of fire as a land management tool (Queensland 2000, p. 7-3; Queensland 2003). Although happiness is not defined, the manual advised that a permit should be issued only when:
the …Warden is entirely happy to issue one (Queensland 2000, emphasis added).
The manual and guides use the term ‘prescribed burns’ (Queensland 2000, p. 7-3; Queensland 2003), even though this is not mentioned in the legislation, and actively promote fire as a tool. Section 2.3.5 of the manual advises fire wardens when issuing permits to consider fire suppression resources, prevailing fire conditions, alternatives to lighting fire, property protection, and the use of fire to enhance natural production (Queensland 2000, p. 2-4).
Clearly, the intention of the RFS is to promote the use of fire as a management tool rather than simply fire prevention and suppression, even though the legislation does not address this.
Cooperative fire management examples
Some examples of cooperative fire management practices that could serve as models for improvements to regional planning include the Gulf Savanna fire project, the Arnhem Land Fire Abatement Project, FIREPLAN, and the Kimberley Regional Fire Management Project (see the Tropical Savannas Cooperative Research Centre site http://savanna.cdu.edu.au/research/projects/fireplan.html/, accessed 30 May 2007). These projects were the result of cooperative efforts between many landholders, including the indigenous landholders, pastoralists, researchers and the bushfires authorities. Although they did not focus specifically on legislation, the lessons learnt from them provide guidance on how amendments to the legislation and policies could be most effective.